Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Friday, 5th December 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

School buildings improving – but Labour urges faster progress



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 October 2008
THE state of Scotland's schools is improving, with fewer buildings in a "poor" state than a year ago, according to a Scottish Government report.
This year's survey of the schools estate looked at 2,704 buildings across Scotland and found 15 per cent were given a good rating, compared with 14 per cent last year.

The number rated "poor" fell from 31 per cent last year to 26 per cent, but the
proportion remaining in a "bad" condition stayed at 5 per cent.

The figures have been slowly improving since a survey in 2004, which found just under half of schools were in a state of disrepair.

However, opposition parties claimed no new buildings had been initiated since the SNP came to power.

Rhona Brankin, Labour's education spokeswoman, said only projects planned by the previous Labour-Lib Dem administration had been put into action.

She demanded the Scottish Government act more swiftly to improve the crumbling school estate. She said: "All of these new schools were initiated under the previous government. It's evidence there needs to be more work and more schools getting on the list for being rebuilt.

"They still haven't come up with their detailed plans for the Scottish Futures Trust," she said. "They are now saying a not-for-profit distribution model will be the basis – but that's a PPP (public private partnership] model."

However, the Scottish Government was adamant it had invested in new schools.

Fiona Hyslop, the education secretary, said 115 school building projects were completed in the last financial year.

She said 35,000 more children across Scotland would be getting lessons in modern, state-of-the-art classrooms already. She added: "Today's figures show we are well on track to meeting our commitment of lifting over 100,000 school pupils out of poor-quality school buildings and classrooms by 2011."

Ms Hyslop said the SNP administration was matching its predecessor's school building programme "brick for brick". She added: "Currently, there is more than £2 billion of committed investment in Scotland's schools.

"Since May last year, this government has signed off funding for seven major local-authority projects, with a further four projects in the pipeline, which will take the total to over 50 schools."

The Scottish Government expects 250 new schools to be built, funded or under construction by the end of this parliament.

The statistics also showed that £101 million was spent last year on PPP payments.





The full article contains 413 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 September 2008 10:36 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Labour Party
 
1

Guga II,

Rockall 01/10/2008 00:17:18
Typical of the New Labour Sleaze and Corruption Party (North British Branch), they blame the SNP for the state of schools which they, i.e. the Sleaze and Corruption Party, didn't bother about during their 50 years of misrule in Scotland.
2

Niknaks,

01/10/2008 01:02:20
I can;t believe I'm reading this c**p. It's been said many times before, but the Labour party in Scotland has run our schools, hospitals etc. into the ground over the last 60 odd years of rule.

How can you expect any new government undo the Labour wrong doings over an 18 month period? Would Tory, Lib/Dems be able to? How long did it take Labour to undo the Tory shambles?

And while I'm here - Hing up yer coat Broon and move on.

As for Rhona Brankin - shut the f**k up

3

james 1st,

hamilton nz 01/10/2008 02:02:26
just a thought but has the snp been in power for around a year?
schools have been run down by labour/tory governments for many many years me thinks labour should shut up
4

Anne,

Eaglesham 01/10/2008 06:15:29
It's not the building that makes or breaks a school - it's what is taught inside it.

I can make a fair guess that many of those contributing to these discussions attended what might be described as "run down" or " deprived" primary schools (I certainly did), but the quality of the teachers more than compensated for the inadequacies.
5

Finnzz,

Offshore 01/10/2008 06:18:19
Just more confirmation that the SNP government is working for the good of Scotland and actually improving the quality and conditions of schools.
Its interesting to note that the schools were left to deteriorate under the previous Labour led administration.
I would advise Ms Brankin to examine her own party's peformance before spouting off. It does her no credit and makes her look ignorant.
6

Duncan in Edinburgh,

01/10/2008 08:21:14
Bizarre but typical comments from #1-#3 and #5 here - the evidence clearly shows that it is the previous government's actions which have led to this improvement, since not a single one of the schools mentioned was the result of SNP work.

And note the dreadful spinning of figures here.

Hyslop says that 115 building projects were completed in the last year. ALL of them were initiated under the PREVIOUS government, but she is happy to take the credit.

Meanwhile the government "expects 250 new schools to be built, funded or under construction" by 2012. So the previous government were completing them at the rate of 115 a year, the SNP are happy that barely 50 a year would be *started* on their watch - never mind completed.

And yet the SNP drones in #1-#3 and #5 see none of this duplicity, and just harangue the last government - which actually built more schools in their last term than any government had for a generation!

It's this sort of completely blind support for the SNP that gets my goat. They are CUTTING education spending, and yet you sit and cheer them on.
7

Marian,

01/10/2008 09:20:31
New Labour's lies and deception regarding our children has no bounds as evidenced by a BBC report that "Millions of children in the UK are living in, or on the brink of, poverty", see http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7641734.stm
8

Duncan in Edinburgh,

01/10/2008 09:49:14
#8 And yet the fact remains that Labour reduced child poverty since 1997; despite recent reversals of that trend the overall change is still significantly positive. But all their opponents want to do is point at misleading statistics such as these.

If you actually *read* that BBC story, rather than just the headline, you'll see that the report authors stress that the numbers are not reliable indicators of the amount of poverty - they are merely used as indicators to show the geographic spread of poverty.

Yet people like yourself determinedly press on and abuse these stats because they suit the political axe you want to grind.

And what about *this* story? What about the shameless misrepresentation of schools buildings success and planned work by the SNP? Have you no comment on that, merely diversionary tactics?
9

capy,

embra 01/10/2008 10:15:53
While i agree that the SNP have not done enough, has the School estate just started to " crumble" in the past year? Rhona its over to you.
10

Boy Wonder,

01/10/2008 11:35:32
They say Scots swear too much. But with the politicians we've got ... can we be blamed??
11

Finnzz,

Offshore 01/10/2008 14:47:26
#7 Read the article.

There has been an improvement in the last year. Remember the SNP did this not Labour.

Instead of spouting off, decrying this U-turn, ask yourself the question of how the schools were reduced to this dilapidated state in the first place.








12

Duncan in Edinburgh,

01/10/2008 15:17:37
#12 Absolutely false. The Labour/Lib Dem coalition did this, not the SNP. How could the SNP take credit for building schemes that were planned three or four years ago? Apart from anything else, a good proportion of these are PFI funded - which makes it impossible that they could be SNP projects since they have refused to generate any further PFI projects!

That's some brass neck you have claiming the achievements of the last lot for your own.
13

Number 6,

Germany 01/10/2008 15:34:15
Pathetic stuff yet again from Liebour and their apologists. Any kind of success or progress is like a punch in the stomach to them.

What next, objecting to the fact that crime is falling in Scotland under the SNP?.

If Labour had not let our schools crumble into such a state of decay, then maybe the SNP would not be able to claim the Kudos for these huge improvements. The fact these projects were planned years ago, does not mean for one minute, they would ever have happened .

One nod from their london masters could have scuppered the whole deal. Breath a sigh of relief Scottish Parents, at least you don't have to rely on the party of "Education Education Education"
14

Duncan in Edinburgh,

01/10/2008 16:22:23
#14 Sorry, what? The fact that these projects were planned years ago is not stopping you from telling us that they are SNP achievements? Madness.
15

frank mcbride,

lusitania 01/10/2008 16:46:36
# Duncan, many posts.

Your defence of NuLabour is admirable, Duncan.

However, you are being disengenious.

NuLabour has been presiding over, for 11yrs, the most spendthrift government in the past century, but Scotland's schools are in quite a pitiful state.

If you take the last 11yrs Westminster Govt, 8yrs Holyrood Govt and 60yrs of (Nu)Labour domination in LAs, is the ordinary man/woman in the street wrong to blame (Nu)Labour for the unacceptable condition of our schools' estate.

As I said, your defence of (Nu)Labour's record is admirable, but sadly misplace.
16

Finnzz,

Offshore 01/10/2008 17:27:58
You see Duncan, the trick is to actually do things.

Its all very well planning something and saying you'll do it. Its very different actually getting it done.

Here we have a report stating conditions improving under the SNP's watch and you obviously cannot hack it. Typical labour angst
17

scottishcoffindodgerno1,

Tram City 02/10/2008 09:08:59
You see Duncan,all these wonderful schools built libliar will still have to be paid for.The ones built by the SNP Gov.are being paid for as they are built.The difference is that future generations will NOT still be paying for schools under SNP,but will still be paying for those under LIBLIAR
18

scottishcoffindodgerno1,

Tram City 02/10/2008 09:10:54
does that clear up your problem now Duncan.Hope so,hate to see you going through live totally deluded
19

livilion,

livingston 02/10/2008 12:25:47
Rhona Brankin says
"They still haven't come up with their detailed plans for the Scottish Futures Trust," she said. "They are now saying a not-for-profit distribution model will be the basis – but that's a PPP (public private partnership] model."

She misses the point: it is not so much companies making a profit which is at issue, building firms are not public charities, it is government sponsored profiteering that is the real bugbear.
Under Labour, companies were given blank chequeus and allowed to write their own pre-signed contracts which provide communities with inferior buildings at inflated prices which will probably require to be replaced before the payments are completed.

Profiteering is what Labour have sanctioned as the price to take civic projects out of government spending figures to make their books appear better balanced.

Profits necessary to run business, profiteering just not acceptable especially funded by taxpayers' money.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.