Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 16th October 2008 Change Date

London from only £11.50 plus, over 50 Other Discounted National Express Train Routes

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

£3bn blueprint for three new towns to boost local population by 30,000



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 December 2007
THREE new towns would be created in one of Scotland's population-growth hotspots under a £3 billion plan unveiled yesterday.
The proposal includes infrastructure costing £325 million and the creation of 20,000 jobs.

About 16,500 new homes will also be built over four decades on a 16-mile stretch between Inverness and Nairn in the Highlands, with around 30,000 people expected to move into the A96 corridor.

Inverness has already doubled in size over the past 30 years and the new developments would see the population rise from 65,000 to around 75,000.

Similarly, Nairn, which doubled in size at the height of the oil boom to around 10,000 people, would gain 9,000 residents.

Officials say the blueprint, published by Highland Council, will avoid piecemeal development of the type which has earned criticism in the past.

They say the new developments would help retain the area's young people and encourage migration from other parts of the UK and beyond.

However, the work depends on major road improvements, including upgrading the A96 and a Nairn bypass. It would also need eight new primary schools, three secondaries and more health facilities.

The blueprint includes:

• Housing for more than 7,000 at east Inverness, and a new campus for the proposed Highlands and Islands university.

• A new community of 550 homes outside Nairn.

• A development at Delnies to include a tourism and heritage centre, five-star hotel, championship golf course, equestrian centre, ecological centre, community woodland and housing.

• A 3,000-strong resort at Whiteness on the site of the former McDermott oil platform construction site near Ardersier. It will include 1,950 homes, a marina, hotel, shops and school. Work is due to start next year and be completed by 2020.

• A new town at Tornagrain with 4,500 houses for up to 10,000 people . A planning application from Moray Estates is expected in the new year.

• Moray Estates is also involved in a golf and hotel complex at Castle Stuart and the development of an Inverness Airport business park.

Consultants have estimated the infrastructure will cost around £326 million, with £151 million from the public purse and the rest from private funds.

However, the council says 90 per cent of the A96 corridor will remain undeveloped and a green framework has been drawn up for a range of measures to protect the environment and provide recreation and leisure facilities.

Sandy Park, the council convener and a Nairn councillor, said: "In the past the planning department has been criticised for allowing ad hoc development. This document gives us a vision to go forward."

FROM FARMS AND FORESTS TO URBAN COMMUNITY

TORNAGRAIN is due to become one of the largest towns in the Highlands.

An area largely made up of farmland and forestry is set to be transformed into a community of 10,000 people.

The plan is being overseen by John Stuart, Lord Doune, son of the 20th Earl of Moray.

For the design of Tornagrain, Lord Doune commissioned architect Andres Duany. He is a founder of the Congress for New Urbanism – which promotes traditional, pedestrian-friendly cities.

However, one local councillor, Roddy Balfour, has predicted Tornagrain will be a "disaster, economically, socially and geographically".

The full article contains 559 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 December 2007 9:53 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Scythia,

Glasgow 20/12/2007 01:23:59
Just a pity it won't be Scots living in them.
2

Bothwell,

Edinburgh 20/12/2007 02:37:34
#1Scythia

Something tells me that the vast majority of the people moving to this area will be "Scots" even under you're apparently narrow-minded definition.

If people want to settle in Scotland,live, work here and contribute to our civic society - they are Scots, and probably better and more welcoming Scots than you'll ever be.

3

W Smith,

Middle East 20/12/2007 05:05:58
A golf course eh?

How long before this area is suddenly designated a place of Special Scientific Interest?

(No doubt is has rare snails and weeds not found anywhere in the world, blah, blah, blah, blah... this developement can't go ahead... we must save the planet blah, blah, blah,... tell the americans and the English and the rich they're not welcome!... what about the 'poor Scots' who won't be able to afford to stay in this developement... golf is a poofs game... blah, blah, blah,....)

This sounds like progress and no doubt it will be opposed. This is a good time to make the upgrading of the A9 a priority - and it shouldn't be done on the cheap!

4

az,

20/12/2007 06:10:48
What happened to the Global warming argument that would cause sea levels to rise and therefore obliterate these new developments ????
5

calum,

Banchory 20/12/2007 06:25:53
What? Houses? A Championmship Golf Course? Ecological Centre? Community Woodland? Now where have I hear this before?
Might need some help on this from Dianne and all her pixie chums.
6

calum,

Banchory 20/12/2007 06:27:54
Beth Boyle!! Beth Boyle!! Where are you to save us from this calamity? This is awful news, it mightg bring in tourists, it might encourage people to stay in te region, it might give jobs and hope for the future and you know how opposed you are to that. Please help us.
7

Mr Mud,

offshore Norway 20/12/2007 06:58:30
Several mentions of "green" issues in this piece. Lots of road building - that's hardly "green"! Should the planners not be seriously getting their act together and building around new railway stations on a double track into Inverness with a 15 minute service?
8

A Better Way,

20/12/2007 07:49:31
This is excactly the type of development Scotland has needed. Its time for us to retake the Highlands and Islands which were decimated during the clearances and forced continous lack of development. I certainly hope that some of the more interesting projects like reinstating original forestry using seedlings that now only exist in certain islands. The creation of a sustainable forest industry can only be good for us Scots and our countryside. It could be an answer to the need for sustainable industry to provide employment to those who are crofters and their young folk. Its getting better all the time now for the Scottish People. Thats in spite of the criminal Nicol Stevens and his crooked allies in the London Labour Party. Get them out now, never to darken our doors again. Scottish Traitors.
9

Wait a minute,

Town 20/12/2007 08:11:20
The Highlands have desperately needed this type of vision for decades now.
10

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 20/12/2007 08:17:30
Someone is making a lot of money by the reclassification of farm land to building land. Since the community allows this change it should be the community that takes the profit. Bet that won't happen!
11

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 20/12/2007 08:35:06
-- Should the planners not be seriously getting their act together?

That'll be the day in Prodigality House on Glenurquart Road. At best we'll get a new bus station where the boarded up supermarket is.
12

ex katman 2,

x sudan 20/12/2007 10:33:24
14.000 new homes but no mention of affordability,no mention of an aiport upgrade,but the now obligatory golf course.Just saw pigs fly past my house,but they don't make bonny birds.
13

Alfie Bett,

20/12/2007 10:43:56
test
14

Alfie Bett,

20/12/2007 10:46:22
is there any danger of this crap site accepting my psts?
15

Jimmy Connely,

black isle 20/12/2007 11:07:58
Golf course and luxury homes?
Donald Trump ring a bell?

16

Ard Righ,

The Rock Of Edinburgh 20/12/2007 11:44:11
Fundamentally errored concept.

Livingstone and Cumbernauld is what happens when these idiots do such projects.

Free up the land for natives who wish to re-build the ancient settlements thus retaining the character and homely feel of villages. Gradual progression is retained.

Simple.
17

Saoghal Beag,

20/12/2007 12:45:30
14 High King, you've a point. lvingston, cumbernauld and glenrothes show us how not to do things in so many ways. will the learn?

will this place intigrate with the exisintg communities or will it be another cardronna?
18

Why can't I use my usual name?,

Glasgow 20/12/2007 12:49:39
The scale of the vision and ambition is welcome but the detail provided here looks like it's just going to be small-town suburbia writ large... why can't Inverness be a proper city with city institutions and infrastructure? A real university, decent public transport, interesting architecture, retail and cultural facilities, and a more diverse (Poles excepted) population.

This looks a bit too much like Life is for... What's it Called...?
19

Why can't I use my usual name?,

Glasgow 20/12/2007 12:51:23
#14, eh, whit? "Free up the land for natives who wish to re-build the ancient settlements thus retaining the character and homely feel of villages"?

That'll be lots of English kit bungalows dotted about the place then? And the young people will still leave in droves.
20

Unimpressed one,

20/12/2007 13:44:43
#4,how right you are. But just wait for the greenatics to announce that the 'carbon footprint' will be objectionable!
21

Murdoch,

Fort William 20/12/2007 13:45:34
This has nothing to do with "The Highlands" and everything to do with Inverness. All it will do is hasten the demise of places like Lochaber and Caithness which are already suffering population decline as more and more is relocated to the "city".
22

Saoghal Beag,

20/12/2007 14:20:31
Unimpressed one, this development will fall under the 10 or 20% renewables obligation which attempts to mitigate the carbon emissions associated with the buildings. Personally i think this policy is a bit misguided as it forces the adoption of technology as an answer, rather than design. The biggest barrier to decent low carbon design housing are the planners.
23

Saoghal Beag,

20/12/2007 14:20:38
Unimpressed one, this development will fall under the 10 or 20% renewables obligation which attempts to mitigate the carbon emissions associated with the buildings. Personally i think this policy is a bit misguided as it forces the adoption of technology as an answer, rather than design. The biggest barrier to decent low carbon design housing are the planners.
24

Why can't I use my usual name?,

Glasgow 20/12/2007 14:53:33
#21, so what do they want to do about it? What's their vision? Inverness mightn't be everyone's cup of tea but they're being positive...
25

Martyk,

sussex 20/12/2007 19:17:19
Livingstone. Cumbernauld. Irvine. Glenrothes. East Kilbride. Hardly a glowing advertisement for centralised planning as proposed here. Two multi-billion projects announced in a couple of days. The Celtic Lion must have arrived then. How else are they going to be paid for?
26

Dr. James Wilkie,

Vienna 20/12/2007 22:34:13
Inverness was once my ideal spot for relocation when I finally retire. No longer. The whole character of the place has been destroyed by tescoisation and messy, characterless sprawl. I agree with a number of posters on the "new town" approach to planning and its inappropriateness in this locality. Planned communities like Grantown, Ullapool, Kirkcudbright and others were successful because of their modest scale, their traditional nature, and their integration into their surroundings. Such communities need large areas of rural open space between them in order to retain their own characteristics. The border towns are still a good example. I don't know the details of the present plan, but I know the region well, and I am just a bit apprehensive about future developments in the direction of one vast built-up area between Inverness and Aberdeen.

27

Lord_S,

Edinburgh 21/12/2007 09:23:52
Great! When they say "THREE new towns" they really mean three groupings of dark, depressing, featureless rows of crap eastern european style houses without any greenery or amenities (typical of Scotland). If these are to go ahead please make them liveable and don't repeat the depressing planning mistakes of the past.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.