Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Friday, 5th December 2008 Change Date

The Scotsman Digital Archive - Special Christmas Offer

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Bank of England to pump £40bn into markets as Chancellor vows to support banks



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 October 2008
Chancellor Alistair Darling pledged again today to do "whatever is needed" to maintain financial stability as he disclosed that depositor protection for savers may rise again from the planned £50,000 limit.
In a statement to MPs returning after the summer recess, Mr Darling insisted: "All practical options must remain open to us."

Flanked by the Prime Minister, he told a hushed House that the Bank of England would tomorrow inject a further £40 billion into the financial system to help ease the credit crunch.

And in an implicit criticism of Germany, which has appeared to act unilaterally to safeguard all private savings accounts, he stressed the need for countries to act together to tackle the crisis.

Mr Darling said the FSA had announced an increase from tomorrow to the compensation limit for retail deposits to £50,000, covering 98% of all accounts.

The FSA was consulting on whether to increase the limit further – to "ensure that arrangements here continue to be comparable with international best practice".

Germany's action on depositor compensation appeared to take the Government by surprise with the Prime Minister's spokesman saying earlier today that ministers had been seeking clarification about Germany's position.

Mr Darling told the Commons: "I've always been clear that each country needs to do whatever is needed to deal with its own particularly circumstances.

"However, I also believe that wherever it is possible to do so, countries should work and act together to maintain stability."

In the last hour all 27 European Union member states had reaffirmed the need to take whatever measures were necessary to maintain stability.

"But in the light of what's happened over the weekend it is especially important that EU member states work far more closely together.

"So, tomorrow I will meet European finance ministers in Luxembourg to further discuss how we bring stability to the system and to protect depositors."

He said the Bank of England will continue to do "whatever it takes" to make cash available for banks to lend.

The Banking Bill will be introduced to Parliament tomorrow – giving the Bank of England a statutory role to maintain financial stability.

Mr Darling acknowledged that financial disruption had "intensified" over recent weeks and spread to all parts of the world.

The Government had made available more than £100 billion of long-term lending and was willing to make further resources available as necessary.

"Our aim is to reduce uncertainty and improve confidence in financial markets by increasing the openness of financial institutions' exposures."

The "process of change" would take time to work through and would require action not just at national level but internationally too.

"It would be irresponsible to speculate on the specifics of future responses," he cautioned. "Providing a running commentary could add to uncertainty in already febrile market conditions.

"But all practical options must remain open to us."

He added: "These are exceptional times and I'm in no doubt as to the size of the task facing us, and governments across the world, in bringing order to the financial system.

"I've made it very clear that the Government is ready, with the resources and the commitment, to do whatever is necessary."

Shadow chancellor George Osborne reaffirmed the Tories' commitment to work with the Government to get banking reforms onto the statute books.

He said: "If the banking system fails it's not just the banks that go bust: businesses fail, families can't get mortgages, people lose their jobs, not just in the banks but across the wider economy.

"The Prime Minister said that we would never see a return to 15% interest rates. Well this week one of our High Street banks has written to many of its small business customers increasing their interest rates to 15.8%.

"All of us need to work together to stop Britain sliding from a banking crisis into a deep recession."

Mr Osborne accused the Irish, German, Danish and Greek authorities of each acting unilaterally to guarantee savings.

"It is not helpful for European leaders to call for international co-operation at summits and then hours later act unilaterally."

Their actions were "adding to market anxiety," he said.

The reliance of banks on overnight lending from the money markets was creating a "hair trigger" which left institutions exposed to events, Mr Osborne said as he backed the latest cash injection by the Bank of England.

But, he added: "Let's be clear about what is happening here: the Bank of England is becoming not just a lender of last resort but the lender of only resort."

Mr Osborne said the crisis was caused by an economy built on a "debt-fuelled bubble" but "the bubble has now burst and debt is being called in".

The Tories called for an end to the "mark to market" accounting rules and a process of recapitalisation, possibly including the use of public funds.

"Would it not be irresponsible to not even at least consider more dramatic measures to help our banks, including support from creditors and government injection of capital."

To jeers from Labour benches he added: "Of course there would have to be very strict conditions to protect taxpayers and ensure that they benefit first from any gains.

"We couldn't contemplate taxpayers' money being used to prop up the kind of salaries and bonuses we have seen in recent years."

The Chancellor's announcement came as London's FTSE 100 Index was on course for its biggest one-day fall in more than 20 years today on another day of turmoil for global stock markets.

The Footsie was down almost 9% at one stage – representing the biggest decline since the aftermath of Black Monday in October 1987.

There was a similar freefall on the other side of the Atlantic. In the first hour of trading, the Dow Jones industrial average fell 336.43, or 3.26%, to 9,988.95, dropping below 10,000 for the first time since October 29, 2004.

A host of the UK's biggest banks were rocked by turmoil across the European banking sector, with Royal Bank of Scotland nursing a 22% fall.

The full article contains 1026 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 06 October 2008 4:57 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Credit Crunch
 
1

Nevsky,

Moscow 06/10/2008 16:32:52
Where is all the money coming from? Britain has a £600 billion debt and next year borrowing is expected to match GDP!

Britain is heading for bankruptcy and dragging Scotland with it; everything relatively stable in Noray still though as far as i know...they still have £186 billion to cushion the blow..Scotland £0!
2

Nevsky,

Moscow 06/10/2008 16:38:17
In fact no panic in Norway at all:

'OSLO, Oct 6 (Reuters) - Norway's commercial lenders have plenty of unused collateral with which they can obtain more liquidity loans from the central bank if needed, a senior Norges Bank official told Reuters on Monday'

Must be scratching their heads at the jocks who have given their oil away!

3

Mcsnagpile,

06/10/2008 17:17:14
My laundry knows where to invest--they wash all the underwear.
4

Mcsnagpile,

06/10/2008 17:35:27
Common number 4 everybody knows we gave it away to the multinationals even the Arabs didn't do that.
5

Mcsnagpile,

06/10/2008 17:55:32
A common trait of the Southern English is to get stuck on the first word and show their hinter.
6

Western Gael,

06/10/2008 17:59:43
Regardless of the Chancellor’s brave pronouncements, each government will react by doing the same two things. First, they will review a number of options that may bring stability to their national financial systems. Second, they will chose the one that causes them the least political damage and might be described as “European” in focus. I wish Mr. Darling well in his Luxembourg discussions but he would be well advised to remember that, even in view of the current turmoil in the financial community, talk remains quite cheap.
7

Ugly George,

Edinburgh 06/10/2008 18:03:40
1 Nevski
Please give it a rest. You have talked about Norway's oil fund ad nauseam for weeks but, while doing so you never answer the point I have made to you which is :

Yes, Norway has an oil fund but it has VAT at 24% (UK 17.5%)including VAT ay 12% on food (UK 0%) and income tax starting at 28% (UK 20%). It therefore funds its public services with these high levels of taxation leaving the oil revenues free to go into the oil fund.
Are you advocating the same levels of taxation here. If so please tell us. If not, please stop going on endlessly about Norway's oil fund. You can't have it both ways.
8

karinxxx,

06/10/2008 18:13:14
9 yeah and their welfare state is second to none and the united nations ranks it as the best place in the world to live.............

just now we have the price of everything going through the roof and next we will have to pay the increased taxes to pay for labours bail out of the bankers mess.
9

Nevsky,

Moscow 06/10/2008 18:13:56
9 George#

Here is the answer for you! Norway can afford to charge the levels of tax you quote because Norwegian wages are almost twice those earned in Scotland.

You will also notice that Norwegian higher taxes leads to better public services in just about every area compared to Scotland.

You choose to concentrate on the tax level of Norway in an economy that is much stronger than that of Scotland.

Here is a question for you (much more important than tax).

Are you willing to see another 30 years of Scottish oil production wasted in the UK while Norway's oil fund reaches an estimated £500 billion by 2020?

We have the choice, more poverty and lack of investment in Scotland with oil flowing into Westmimster or investing what is left and trying to do something with it for the future of the country?

You seem to prefer a poor Scotland in the UK than a rich independent country (see Norway for an example).

Sorry to keep going on about it but just shows what a massive mistake we made, if you dont realise it then why even bother discussing what tax system you prefer?
10

Ugly George,

Edinburgh 06/10/2008 18:32:58
11 Nevski
"Here is the answer for you! Norway can afford to charge the levels of tax you quote because Norwegian wages are almost twice those earned in Scotland"

Really. Please tell me what the average teacher earns in Norway. According to the most recent bulletin from international recruitment agency "Simply Hire" it is $39,000 which is roughly £22,000. Are you telling me that the average teacher in Scotland earns only £11,000 per year. This would be rather strange considering that the satrting salary is now in the region of £20,000.

Please telme what the average nurse, doctor etc. earns in Norway so that we can compare the salaries.
11

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

06/10/2008 18:39:02
Government's are losing control of it. This is slipping away from them. There's a quadrillion of derivatives out there and adding up the GDP of every country on Earth doesn't get you a tenth of that.

The simple fact is that they can't bail out the whole system and they'll be lucky to even hold up a small fraction of it.

As for:

"The Tories called for an end to the "mark to market" accounting rules"

Yeah, Let's stick our fingers in our ears and pretend the debts aren't there. That'll fix it. Weren't these guys supposed to be trying to be a serious possibility for government?

12

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

06/10/2008 18:42:04
Darling says:

"Our aim is to reduce uncertainty and improve confidence in financial markets by increasing the openness of financial institutions' exposures."

Yet the government itself has hidden from publication just how much of taxpayers money each bank has taken in the Bank of England's cash-for-your-dodgy-mortgages scheme.

Perhaps these hypocrites could start by showing some "openness" themselves.
13

Nevsky,

Moscow 06/10/2008 18:45:27
12 George#


mmmm..before googling 'average wage norway' i suggest you put some thought into wealth disribution first and what % of the population earn what %'age of the weath! It's not the UK!

MIMUMIM wage in Norway is almost 3 times that of the UK so that should give you some idea!
14

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

06/10/2008 18:45:42
Nevsky wants to know:

"Where is all the money coming from?"

Future taxation. They've already committed over 6000 quid from each taxpayer.
15

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

06/10/2008 18:52:06
Each and every time there's been a risk of a recession during the bubble, governments have enacted concerted cuts in interest rates to avert the possibility. Recessions however are a natural part of the business cycle. What's happeneed as they cut rates is that consumers and businesses (especially banks) have entered into more and more debt.

In turn that means that each threatened recession would be worse than the last one, and hence even more determination to cut interest rates to prevent it. Thus the rate cuts in 1998 during the Russian/LTCM crisis, 200 during the NASDAQ bust, 2001 during the 9/11 atrocity and 2003 during the deflation scare.

This tactic can only end when eventually the pressures to recession are so great that not even cuts in interest rates will serve to avert it. That would be when lending is no longer easy or possible and borrowers anyway don't want to borrow. Something like now in fact.

Well have our recession now, only with businesses, governments and individuals hlding vastly more debt.

Greenspan and Bernanke, Brown and Darling will go down in history as the men who saved a recession at the cost of a depression.
16

Alan B,

06/10/2008 18:52:31
#Ugly George

They may more tax but they get better public services.

They could cut their level of public services and have a lower tax rates we have (although as i pointed out before they do not have substantially higher taxes). They would still have their oil fund.

As such you are confusing 2 issues. Higher taxes to pay for better services. And having an oil fund by saving the monies from it, rather than spending it all up front (and many would say squandering it).

You are trying to attribute their higher taxes to saving an oil fund when in fact it is becuase of their better public services.

The biggest problem for scotland was that oil was squandered paying for a thatcherite monetary experiment that transformed the south east of the uk and left the rest high and dry.
17

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 06/10/2008 18:53:28
And Britain act unilaterally to up the ante to £50,000 per savings.

Geez, man, get real.
18

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

06/10/2008 18:53:46
Still though, good odds that before the end of this week, all the central banks will together announce interest rate cuts. The parrot is deceased, but they will indeed put 9000 volts through it.
19

Ugly George,

Edinburgh 06/10/2008 18:57:16
15 nevski
Please also tell me how you would explain to manufacturers in Scotland how they will be able to compete with the rest of the EU if they have to double the wages of their employees.

Please also tell me how money would be available for an oil fund when the SNP's own most rercent figures show a deficit on the Budget in Scotland of £2.7bn even if a "geographical share" of oil revenues is allocated to Scotland.

Please also tell us (since you dismissed my last example) what an average doctor, nurse etc earns in Norway so that we can compare salaries and see if your assertion of double (or now it would appear triple) earnings is valid.
20

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 06/10/2008 18:58:35
Where are all these posters who were on threads like this last week? Were they they not saying that Ireland could guarantee all savings because Ireland is a wee country and Britain could not because it was a big country with big banks?

Germany wee? Wee banks? Woodwork got to you, back into, then?
21

Ugly George,

Edinburgh 06/10/2008 19:06:07
15 Nevski
"MIMUMIM wage in Norway is almost 3 times that of the UK so that should give you some idea!"

Which minimum wage is this? Is there a universal minimum wage or a minimum wage for skilled workers in certain industries.

The reason I ask is that, according to the official website of Norway's mission to the EU :

"Norway has no statutes on minimum wage"

can you please verify and elaborate on your informATION.
22

The Strategist,

06/10/2008 19:07:32
I don't remember agreeing that Alistair - I don't believe in economic patriotism - Darling could use even one penny of my taxes to keep either Fred Goodwin or the boy Hornby in a job.
23

Ugly George,

edinburgh 06/10/2008 19:13:26
Alan B
But that is the essence of the debate and the point that I am trying to put across. It is universally recognised that Scotland spends considerably more per capita on public services (health, education etc. ) than the UK average. Whether the services are any better is a different argument.

The point is that so many people seem to be assuming that Scotland can have it all. We can have lots spent on public services, we can lots of money for an oil fund, we have lots of money cut taxes etc etc etc. Quite simply it does not all add up and some sense of realism has to come into play.
24

Scotish Exile,

06/10/2008 20:35:14
funny how the government can find the money "to do whatever is needed" to bail out greedy, incompetent bankers, but can't find the money for other more deserving causes.
Bailing out the banks now is sending the wrong signal, they will simply take even greater risks in the knowledge that the government will bail them out. They should be left to go to the wall, after all is that now what a free market is all about, the good profitable businesses thrive and the poor unprofitable ones disappear??
25

,

06/10/2008 21:41:10
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
26

The Federalist (the poster formerly know as NAUON),

06/10/2008 23:50:30
Some real nonensense from Nevsky reagrds Norway.

Norway's oil fund is losing money day after day because of poor investments in blue chip US funds:

http://www.scandoil.com/moxie-bm2/news/spot_news/norway-oil-fund-feels-34b-crunch.shtml

$34billion dollars lost in matter of days.

Then there is the issue of the Norwegian government pumping in £15billion to keep their banks going.

This mythe that any nation is somehow immune from global capitalism needs to be smashed once and for all. No country , be it Ireland, germany, the Uk or Norway can tackle this problem alone. It needs concetred action to deal with the problem - instead of teh backstabbing "I'm alright Jack" (for now) economics that is taking place right now.
27

Nevsky,

Moscow 07/10/2008 06:02:04
28 Fed#

Noray has an oil fund to lose money with, we don't. I have not ststed that any country is immune to the fluctuations of world markets, they can't be. But Norway is in a substantially stronger position than the UK; now in recession according to the radio this morning!

The difference is that Norway is not a country with any defecit..UK currently £600 billion, neither will Norway borrow money next year that matches it's GDP which the UK will.

None of the above is a myth, it's all cold, hard fact and mostly due to a small independent country investing it's resources for the long trm benefit of it's citizens..Scotland has invested (thanks to Westminster) nothing!
28

jj veritas,

07/10/2008 07:29:16
The jokers in charge of this are lost. Just chancers. So why give the almost £4 million in a pension pot to the single man at the top?

No one in public office should earn over £100K p/a. And the pension should be more normal too..

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Features

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.