Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Chancellor and City watchdog are blamed for Northern Rock fiasco

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 January 2008
THE City's financial watchdog failed to spot Northern Rock's "reckless" business plan, a damning report by MPs said yesterday.
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) committed a "systematic failure of duty", the Treasury Select Committee report concluded.

It also blamed Alastair Darling, the chancellor, and the Bank of England for not acting quickly enough to stop the run on the bank by panicked customers last September.

The committee has now demanded a radical overhaul of the FSA, which will make uncomfortable reading for Gordon Brown, the Prime Minister, who as chancellor was the architect of the regulatory framework.

Last night George Osborne, the shadow chancellor, said the report left Mr Darling's credibility "in shreds" after "yet more evidence of damaging dithering".

And Vince Cable, the Liberal Democrats' Treasury spokesman said: "Northern Rock's managers behaved like a bunch of cowboys and the FSA did nothing to rein them in, or even appear to see there was a problem."

Northern Rock, based in Newcastle, owes the Bank of England about £24 billion after soaring borrowing costs forced it to seek a funding bail-out. The leaking of that news on 13 September triggered a rash of withdrawals, with savers queuing outside branches for their cash.

The 183-page select committee report concluded that a four-day delay before an announcement from the Chancellor guaranteeing customer deposits "prolonged" the run on the bank. This was "more damaging to the health of the company than might otherwise have been the case", the MPs said.

The committee said the Treasury, the Bank of England and the FSA decided to announce funding for the bank two weeks after it had been agreed in principle by the Chancellor and a week after emergency funding was deemed necessary. The loan should have been announced within hours of the Chancellor's decision, the committee said.



The FSA did not act until the credit crunch had gripped money markets in early August and Northern Rock's "stress-testing" of its business model – relying on wholesale lending rather than deposits to fuel its business – was inadequate, the MPs said.

John McFall, the committee's chairman, said: "The failure of Northern Rock, while primarily a failure of its directors, was also a failure of its regulator.

"The FSA appears to have systematically failed in its duty and this failure contributed significantly to the difficulties and risks to the public purse that have followed."

He added: "The FSA did not supervise Northern Rock properly. Its procedures were inadequate to supervise a bank whose business grew so rapidly."

The MPs called for better communications to prevent panic and a beefed-up role of Bank of England deputy governor and head of financial stability – backed by staff from the Treasury and the FSA – to act as the main adviser to the Chancellor on potential crises.

The report said the holder of the role "should have credibility in the financial markets". This will be seen as a blow to the current deputy governor, Sir John Gieve, a career civil servant, who was condemned by the committee for being "asleep in the back shop" last year.

Mervyn King, the governor of the Bank of England, also drew criticism from MPs for failing to act in August while the European Central Bank shifted funding forward in an attempt to unfreeze credit markets.

But the report said the principal authors of the difficulties were the Northern Rock directors, who have since quit.

MAIN PLAYERS IN BANK CONTROVERSY

ALISTAIR DARLING

THE CHANCELLOR'S delay in announcing the guarantee for Northern Rock savers was blamed for fuelling the first run on a UK bank since Victorian times. The delay "prolonged" the run and made it more damaging.

SIR JOHN GIEVE

THE Deputy Governor of the Bank of England has been criticised for not spotting and anticipating the potential problems that were likely to befall the bank due to the credit crunch in money markets.

CALLUM McCARTHY

THE FSA chairman has also been implicated, as the Treasury Committee said there had been a "systematic failure" by the regulator. The FSA did not supervise the bank properly, or provide sufficient resources to monitor it.

The full article contains 696 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 January 2008 9:20 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Economic indicators
 
1

BIG EYE,

Celiatown 26/01/2008 00:13:43
Dithering Darling, whose indecision can only be matched by Bungling Brown have cost me and every other taxpayer in Scotland around £2000 each.

The only surprise is that they have not asked for my contribution in cheques for £995 every six months delivered to Wendy Alexander!
2

A Better Way,

Edinburgh 26/01/2008 01:07:09


Meanwhile at Number 10 the team swings into action...

Well Alistair what are we going to do about Northern Rock?....

I dunno what do you wanna do?....

I dunno what do you wanna do?....

But you wrote the safeguards Gordon...

Aye but your in the seat now.....

Can you come out from under that desk Gordon?..

Only if you come out from under yours first Alistair....

But I dont want to,its too scary and I want my mammy...

I want my mammy to....

Where is the Chancellor and the Prime Minister, I have very important matters of State to discuss with both of them. We need to call a meeting of the Cabinet asap...

But you know they all wont fit under the Cabinet Table at the same time....

3

the_figures_are _fudged,

Galashiels 26/01/2008 02:51:47
Anyone else think that the problem here is not really down to the FSA but the incompetents that set it up so badly in the first place, and then utterly failed to check if it was functioning properly ?

This is the NU Labour disease, form a comittee or a quango out of public funds and then try to blame the committee when something goes wrong instead of taking responsibility themselves.

4

Very Rev Ian Paisley,

26/01/2008 04:15:34
Dear Prudence,

An apology please and get rid of your Darling, he is clearly not up to the job
5

James,

Dundee 26/01/2008 05:44:59
Optical illusion shows Alisair Darling in front of bars.
6

Samcafe,

Glasgow 26/01/2008 05:50:17
I wonder what the very highly paid directors of Northern Rock were there for? Was it to assess the risk to its shareholders of its fairytale funding mechanisms or was it to find ways of hiding its fairytale funding mechanisms from the FSA
7

Mary Bell,

The Colonies 26/01/2008 07:21:49
"Soaring borrowing costs"... Hummm, ...Ok, so it's 'Standard fare', but is that acceptable?

It's time to look behind-the-veil, gleen from history, and apply clear logic, with a good measure of compassion.
8

Jimmy the Pie,

26/01/2008 07:47:26
Can we not spin it around and blame Alex Salmond and the Cybernats?
9

ziz,

Manchester 26/01/2008 07:57:47
June 30th - End of first half year of NR
July 26th - Interim results published wich show ;

1. Profits rise by 1%
2. Divvy raised by 33% as the Directors take opportunity to distribute more cash allowed by Basle II (alleged) improved Bank regulation.
3. Weekend Aug 8/9 as revealed on BBC4 by Mervyn King the NR Directors are having a chat with BOE / FSA about a need for £30 Bn.

...er .. when did our guard dogs leap into action to protect, depositors, shareholders, mortgagees, the banking system ?..well about September 13th when Andrew darling said NR was "solvent".

The only people who can declare a company solvent (or otherwise" are the Directors. If insolvent they must act according to law and go into liquidation / administration.

There are 2 tests of liquidity for a LImited Company ;

1. Can the company meet it's debts as they fall due ?
2. Does the company have a surplus of assets over liabilities?

It is evident that it was evident to the Directors of NR that the company was insolvent by the first days of August, hence the approach to BOE / FSA.

Many would argue (as I do) the company was hopelessly insolvent long before by overstating assets on the Balance Sheet.
10

Jimmy the Pie,

26/01/2008 07:59:49
Broon and his sleazy cohorts are fairly getting a kicking these days. Lets really start giving them a doing.
11

mike3,

Midlands 26/01/2008 08:51:02
Unfortunately, this is all of a pattern. Wherever you look there seems to have been systemic failure in government over many years. What a bunch.
12

Colin G,

Edinburgh 26/01/2008 09:07:05
What is the point in blaming Alastair Darling.

He doesn't make any decisions! He has spent his political life toadying for Gordon Brown. Brown is still the Chancellor.

It will be good to see both fall in the next year or so.
13

Alberto.,

26/01/2008 09:47:12
It is way past time that the whole caboodle of New (fumbling) Labour was got rid of - and now!

With such highly paid salaries and golden pensions at the end of their rainbow (no matter how faded it is!), they are not likely to 'go' of their own accord! After all, it seems, actually Governing the Country resonsibly is beyond their abilities and counts for nothing in their tactics of ' Get as much out of the system as we can, before it crumbles!'

Getting voted in is the 'be all - end all' of their very crafty little game - so, what's the odd lie here and there if you end up winning (New Labour strategy), and playing their pretendy Government game whilst having such power, simply makes the aspect of personal financial gain that much easier!

And thei situation is from 'allegedly' people who we have placed great trust in rby relying on their Truthfulness, Honesty and above all their promised Loyalty!

YES! We have been well and truly 'Polically Conned and taken for the biggest financial ride we could never have imagined!

New Labours legal Political financial theft would seem more appropriate than the title of Governemnt!
14

Jimmy the Pie,

26/01/2008 09:51:40
http://www.labour-watch.com/sleaze.htm Check out this website. Utterly shocking. It'll soon be payback time!!
15

HEN BROON 5,

26/01/2008 10:05:30
EXAMPLE:

Chancellor and City watchdog are blamed for Northern Rock fiasco
16

HEN BROON 5,

26/01/2008 10:12:33
SORRY #15 WRONG THREAD
17

HEN BROON 5,

26/01/2008 10:13:49
#14. JIMMY THANKS THAT TRULY IS BREATHTAKING STUFF. There has been so much we have forgotten about it all.
18

Jay Kay,

Burntisland 26/01/2008 10:36:28
#14 Jimmy, just added that to my list of favourite websites.

Incredible that these b*stards still have the nerve to stay in power they should be dumped out on their huge criminal ar*es.
19

OscarMacApfel,

Dumfries 26/01/2008 10:44:11
From the Labour sleaze site.

Sort of dwarfs Souters contribution, wouldn't you say?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/03/21/nloans21.xml
20

Damy Ruby,

Edinburgh 26/01/2008 11:04:43
What urine's me off is Brown going around the world telling other countries and organisations what they are doing wrong whilst he oversees the biggest shambles in government since Harold Wilson. He wants to educate every kid in Africa whilst schools standard's are dropping here year in and year out. He refuses to follow the pay review for the police. Can you imagine if a Union did that, the press would lambast them from pillar to pillar. He and the other self seeking parasites in Westminster have accepted a 1.9% pay rise which in real terms gives him another thirty five thousand pounds a year and his darling chancellor an extra twenty five thousand per year. They say this setting an example. He is incompetent, he is egotistic and he has to go and take his poodle Darling with him.
21

treacleswamp,

26/01/2008 11:40:14
I am surprised that no-one is blaming the BBC for the way they reported this story. The news that treasury had given 100% guarantee should have come as a relief to investors, but with the phrase 'cap in hand' lead to the panic.
22

JG,

Fife 26/01/2008 12:17:38
I appreciate that government ministers have a squad of advisors behind them but what really qualifies Darling for being Chancellor? HE'S A BL%DY SOLICITOR!
23

whitegold,

Shire 26/01/2008 12:20:22
#21 wrote:
"is responsible for this - not one person, political party or country. "

Incorrect.

I'm afraid Brown must take the share of the blame for this fiasco.

"The Treasury Select Committee said the framework for handling a financial crisis – put in place by Mr Brown when he made the Bank of England independent in 1997 – is fundamentally flawed"

Brown, who has been quite incompetent as a chancellor, put in place a system designed to stop precisely this, and was 'fundamentally flawed'. As one commentator wrote: 'It is as if he built a bridge, and then as soon as someone walked on it, it collasped.' That is the degree of ineptitude that Brown is responsible for.

The failure to do anything about the Rock's dodgy business model was due to incompetence from the FSA, and incompetence from Brown in setting up his flawed system in the first place.

24

Queen D,

Glasgow 26/01/2008 12:56:52
Darling has his mortgage with NR
Scotland gets less money than NR???
25

Jimmy the Pie,

26/01/2008 13:01:49
I can't wait for the General Election. New Labour Sleaze and Corruption Party are going to get a right kicking. There are some English council elections coming soon (May I think). I can hear the excuses already - 'mid term blues - it affects every government' 'it was the Tories legacy'. I watched some good You Tube vids yesterday. Ponsonby and Wee Joke were excellent. Its easy to see how NLSC Party got gobbed.
Happy days will soon be here
26

 Ayrshire Scot™,

26/01/2008 13:38:12
22. It was the dithering, indecision, delay, failure to take early private action as urged by the BoE and taking later public action that exacerbated the crisis that they are being criticised for.
27

Scotch man,

Other 26/01/2008 13:48:37
Gordon Brown will hold the assembly soon.
28

Cabbage Patch Troll,

26/01/2008 13:59:00
'And Vince Cable, the Liberal Democrats' Treasury spokesman said: "Northern Rock's managers behaved like a bunch of cowboys and the FSA did nothing to rein them in, or even appear to see there was a problem." '

Spot on, and no secret to anyone who has worked in financial services over the last 10 to 15 years.

Northern Rock is not alone. Cowboys occupy senior positions in every bank in the UK and they are far smarter than the regulators and the Government.
29

Evan Owen,

Snowdonia 26/01/2008 14:08:40
Let us hope and pray that they invite those who know a little bit more than them to 'consult' on the complete overhaul of regulation in the UK, we can't keep changing the coat of those carreer regulators who mislead the government because it just comes back to haunt us when the 'gaps' appear. In other words the people pay, not those who pretend they are on guard, who guards the guards?

As Thomas Sowell said:

"It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong."

Well, quite...
30

Il Penseroso,

Inverurie 26/01/2008 14:25:08
When the inadequacies of Westminster appear (regularly of late) on the radar, AM2 seems to be hiding or quoting "no big deal"!
31

,

26/01/2008 14:31:50
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
32

whitegold,

Shire 26/01/2008 14:35:04
#31 clarry:

"The FSA was not set up by Gordon Brown."

I never said it was. The "tripartite" system was set up by Brown. It was responsible for regulation, and part of its design was precisely to stop runs on banks and dodgy practices. It was, as the MPs found, "fundamentally flawed" and couldn't communicate with itself properly. Brown set this shambles up.

#31 clarry:
"I would agree there should have been stronger regulation put in place, but no political party would have introduced regulation"

There was sufficient regulation in place. A free market does not imply the wild west! The problem was not regulation per se, but that there was failure to act properly on regulation already in place.

The whole problem here was not 'evil capitalism or evil free markets', but that a body set up to regulate dodginess completely failed.

Incidently the same instability & dodginess inherent in NRock, is the same in our own economy. A high debt fuelled economy with no leeway.
33

Richard Taylor,

Aberdeen 26/01/2008 14:37:11
FSA are as much use as a chocolate teapot - I should know, working in an industry "goverened" by FSA guidelines.

And chocolate teapot could apply to Nu-Sleaze Labour.

I long for better days, when politicians listen to a represent THE PEOPLE. Fat chance of that.
34

Mack1,

Carlisle 26/01/2008 14:54:26
Don't blame capitalism or the organ-grinder's monkey aka the Chancellor. This fiasco is classic Gordon Brown: he alone was responsible for restructuring the roles of the Bank of England and the FSA; something, I recall, he never failed to remind us of when the going was good.

Clearly the FSA failed miserably to monitor Northern Rock but, should we be surprised when we find that the man responsible, Sir John Gieve, was the former chief civil servant at the Home Office? This is the same character who, in the words of John Reid, left an organisation that "was not fit for purpose". Just goes to show, though, in the world of New Labour you just can't keep a good bloke down.

Perhaps the PM should appoint him as his Chief of Staff, after all he couldn't make matters worse than they already are; he may also prove to be a useful scapegoat in the future.
35

Carneades,

26/01/2008 15:06:17
Curious.

This story hasn't made it into the antipodean media tycoon's grotesquely infected organs - The Scottish Scum and the (Clapped-out) Thunderer.

The online editions of both papers are strangely silent on the Treasury Select Committee's report.

Over on digital TV, Fly News is leading with the two-day-old story of the SocGen fraudster (£3.5bn of French money). The report by the TSC gets second spot (£55bn of British taxpayers' money).

Whatever can it all mean?
36

Roberta Burns,

26/01/2008 16:42:40
14 Jimmy the Pie - Great link, thanks.

It's high time shareholders were treated in the same way as other gamblers - some you win, some you lose. Why should taxpayers compensate them when their each-way treble fails?

If the French 'fraudster's' gamble had paid off, he would be a hero, not a criminal!
37

jamie fleeman,

ootside 26/01/2008 16:58:44
18 Jay Kay,Burntisland

Broon and Darling only have one between them. They're the "twa cheeks o' the same erse".

With apologies to George Galloway for paraphrasing his comment.
38

jamie fleeman,

ootside 26/01/2008 17:03:02
18 Jay Kay,Burntisland

Broon and Darling only have one between them. They're the "twa cheeks o' the same erse".

With apologies to George Galloway for paraphrasing his comment mad e about Brown and Blair.
39

Trade-wind,

USA 26/01/2008 18:11:22
The directors were making money hand over fist and in that state of euphoria they couldn't see the forest for the trees. Why would they quetion something that was making them richer by the day. No its congratulations all round and and a pat on the back and a wink and a nod. Who got hurt? well after all is said and done it probably won't be the directors, they took their money and resigned. The average Joe/Jill will take the loss and the directors and MPs shadow or not will still eat better, dress better and live better. If you did your jobs like that they would have you fired never to work again.
40

Toots - Sheila,

Canada 26/01/2008 20:44:48
The FSA has been in court "approving" the transfer of all endowment policyholders funds to "third parties" under a so-called business restructuring of the Scottish mutual investment societes to "share companies". This is NOT greed this is CRIME. The BBa'a own definition of FRAUD substantiates this!
Can anybody tell me just WHO is actually looking after the interest of the "consumers" here as we have been fleeced - that is endowment policyholders whose savings / investments have ALL ended up in the pockets of the moguls or "occupational pensions". And are these "occupational pensions" the employees pension fund. IF so then ALL of us with endowments are paying for the managers / staff to get a "decent standard of living" in their retirement by paying off debt on our homes for life!!!!!
Definitely NOT greed - this is CRIME not "business".
41

subrosa,

26/01/2008 21:20:33
Does anyone think if we did away with the Human Rights Act that this country would become a better place?
42

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta, CA..captured from Mexico 1845 26/01/2008 22:20:10
The decision of Darling and Brown was correct .

They bailed out a Scottish Bank whose business plan failed .

Not to bail out this mismanaged Scottish bank, may have triggered a financial crisis in other UK Banks .

The RBS is not looking so hot these Days. DOH !!

And to all U SNP squawkers (all talk no action) .

U constantly attack Westminster .

But who bailed out your failing Scottish Bank .

Definitely not the SNP .

One guess Dudes.

The very institution u attack daily and from whom u want to split

Westminster bailed you out .

You dudes act alike a bunch of ungreatful clowns most of the time.

GC

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.