Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Council in cutbacks row gives provost £2,000 a year for clothes

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 November 2008
A CASH-STRAPPED council has come under fire after it emerged its civic leader receives a £2,000-a-year clothing allowance.
East Lothian Council has admitted handing £2,000 a year for provost Sheena Richardson to spend on new outfits.

Campaign groups have accused the local authority of having a "bizarre set of priorities" for allowing the provost to use the allowance at the same time as its education department has been forced to embark on a major savings drive.

Schools have been ordered to slash their budgets by up to £150,000 each while 11 teachers in East Lothian are facing the axe.

Officials last night insisted spending on clothes was "an accepted part" of the council's budget.

Independent councillor John Caldwell said: "I was aware of a fund for the provost, but I thought it was for entertainment.

"I'm sure this will raise a few eyebrows. I will have to go and look into this."

A spokesman for the campaign group Taxpayers' Alliance said: "This demonstrates a bizarre set of priorities.

"No council can justify spending thousands of pounds on clothes while taxpayers struggle to make ends meet and teachers are being laid off."

An insider at the council said: "I certainly wasn't aware that the provost had this allowance and I don't imagine many people in the council do, or I'm sure it'd be a real bone of contention in the context of all these cuts.

"It looks terrible that a clothing allowance can be preserved while everyone else has to make efficiency savings on essential services like education.

"I think as a gesture of solidarity the council and the provost should agree to waive something."

Earlier this year, East Lothian Council announced it was to cut 11 staff across the county, claiming the cuts were based on falling school rolls despite teachers complaining that they were struggling with large class sizes.

It was revealed in September that teenagers studying for vital exams in East Lothian had been ordered to use computers to work from online guides because there were too few teachers to take their classes.

A spokesman for East Lothian Council said: "The provost attends a lot of events and for that reason a lot is spent on clothing. This is an accepted part of the council's budget."

Neither Glasgow nor Edinburgh city councils were able to say whether their lord provosts had an annual clothing allowance.

However, Aberdeen City Council, which is trying to find £25 million of budget cuts over the next year, has admitted its lord provost has a £4,000 a year clothing allowance.

A furious row erupted in Edinburgh last year over plans to revive the wearing of ceremonial robes for councillors.

The move was instigated by lord provost George Grubb but was recently shelved over concerns it would give the wrong impression at a time of economic downturn.

The full article contains 492 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 November 2008 9:50 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Fifi la Bonbon,

28/11/2008 00:07:36
"A spokesman for the campaign group Taxpayers' Alliance said this demonstrates a bizarre set of priorities."

NO HE DIDN'T!

What will have happened is that a lazy reporter phoned up the office of that organisation, briefly set out the details and the quote he intended to report, and the person at the other said "fair emough."

Lazy, lazy journalism.
2

Tris,

28/11/2008 01:01:28

What nonsense. I've no idea what political party this woman belongs to and I don't care.

Buy your own clothes. The rest of us have to. And some people are struggling to do that.

3

The real dracula,

28/11/2008 01:31:35
#2 totally agree.
Pensioners cant heat their homes yet the powers that be seem to think a £2k clothing allowance is necessary.......I dont think so !!!!!
4

Guga II,

Rockall 28/11/2008 03:48:00
Pigs at the trough; everywhere, pigs at the trough.
5

donald,

glasgow 28/11/2008 05:22:53
Nothing new in this. Cooncils have always given a clothing and hospitality allowance to Provosts.

Emperors jist huv nae claes, that's all.
6

tooch,

Edinburgh 28/11/2008 06:14:03
It may seem strange to many but I have to buy all the clothes that i wear to my work. And if I go out to a special occasion i have to buy them for that too.
7

R Davis,

Vienna, Austria 28/11/2008 07:45:41
She should shop in Primark, she could be fitted out for £100.
8

carrottop,

Dumfries 28/11/2008 08:01:38
If the alternative is to see her naked then let her have the money.
9

paulr,

edinburgh 28/11/2008 08:12:34
Row in Edinburgh last year over plans to revive the wearing of ceremonial robes for councillors instigated by lord provost George Grubb-------------
Closet crosdresser maybe?
10

paulr,

edinburgh 28/11/2008 08:13:52
#8
naked councilors at official engagements----------

it would be a laugh at least
11

jdships,

Edinburgh 28/11/2008 08:50:47
DEFENDING THE INDEFENSIBLE SURELY ?
nOTHING TO DO WITH POITICS - JUST REALITY
THE LADY SHOULD HAVE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION THE "COST OF THE JOB" BEFORE SHE STOOD FOR OFFICE.
THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE WHO WORK LONG HOURS WHO DON'T GET A CLOTHING HANDOUT.
12

ukslice,

Edinburgh 28/11/2008 09:00:29
I have to work too, I think my employer should reimburse me for wearing out the backside of my trousers. Sometimes they make me stand up and work and I get a bit sweaty and you know what those stains can do to a shirt. Its a diabolical liberty..
13

Alan B,

28/11/2008 09:19:09
Good to see where the endless council tax rises have been going.
14

,

28/11/2008 10:19:58
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

Simso,

Inveresk 28/11/2008 10:32:50
I think if she looks smart for business then it creates a professional and trustworthy impression. Pity she is obviously screwing the council and taxpayers in that case!
16

Tarchin,

Midlothian 28/11/2008 11:04:33
The sum of £2.000 is petty cash in the overall budget of East Lothian Council. There must be at least 20.000 council tax payers in East Lothian so the annual cost to each taxpayer is 10 pence, less than half the cost of a second class postage stamp.

#17 Tell me please , as someone with a 70% hearing loss. What does a deaf person look like?
17

Few Against Many,

28/11/2008 11:09:48
19. Sheena Richardson
18

Tarchin,

Midlothian 28/11/2008 11:23:43
# 20 What a perceptive person you are (not).
19

,

28/11/2008 11:57:57
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
20

B Elter,

28/11/2008 12:09:00
Did she not run the wee shop in Take the High Road ?
21

Luke Skywalker,

28/11/2008 12:28:18
"Neither Glasgow nor Edinburgh....were able" If the Scotsman is reporting accurately then this is an outrage that any major council is unable to comfirm or deny an item of spending. However, I suspect that the Scotsman has got it completely wrong in its reporting. The word "able" should be "willing". Come on Scotsman, start to report the facts please.
22

Tris,

28/11/2008 12:36:45
If she needs clothes for functions, and she can't afford them, she should be allowed to borrow the money for one dark suit which she can wear to wherever she goes. I have to buy out of Primark, why shouldn't she?

And yes, it is small beer to a council that size, but when you are sitting in the house with 4 layers of clothing and a hat and scarf on to keep warm, it is pretty sickening to hear onf ANY public money being spent on clothes for people to go to functions.

Are pensioners going to get more money for all the clothes they have to wear to try to keep warm?
23

Few Against Many,

28/11/2008 12:44:08
21, what was that? I couldn't hear you.
24

Highland Mist,

28/11/2008 12:58:18
#1, Fifi, if the person on the other end didn't agree with the journalist's statement they should have said so.

Second point - if the clothing allowance is for Council engagements then the clothes should be kept at the council for her to change into when necessary and not to wear when she goes to Asda or her neice's wedding etc etc.

Third - the money would have been better spent on a decent hairdo!
25

Highland Mist,

28/11/2008 13:03:29
Wonder where she got the clothes? It would be interesting to find out how the allowance was disbursed - did she go into Jenners and shop and submit her account or did she have an account set up somewhere? Oh I do think Brian Ferguson should dig deeper with this one. No difference between this and the Bank staff having freebies while the rest of us can't get a mortgage.

What p's me right off is that over 80% of what we pay in Council Tax and Business rates already goes to over inlfated Council employees salaries and pensions but for it also to go towards An Incredibly Grumpy Looking Old Lady's Clothing Allowance REALLY sinks my boat!!!!! Ugh!
26

Few Against Many,

28/11/2008 13:10:21
It feels like the further you climb up the tree the less the rules apply. No doubt she would frown upon benefit or disability allowance theft but ultimately what is the difference?
27

Highland Mist,

28/11/2008 13:13:09
I see that this is listed on her Register of Interests:

Mayor of Aubigny, Exchange Visit: Local Foods in a Pottery Bowl (est. value £20), 3 Nights in Local Bed & Breakfast for Provost and Granddaughter, Lunch and Visit to Winery. 14 July 2007
28

Honest facts,

East Lothian 28/11/2008 13:22:59
Ok - you've all had your thoughts - now for some facts. Brian Ferguson did not research or write this story but rather it originated from an Edinburgh-based news agency which did not check the facts or contact the council. Check out the same drivel in today's Daily Record, Express and Sun. East Lothian Council, in common with all other councils, provide an allowance for Provost's expenses. The limit decided by East Lothian is £2k BUT the amount claimed has actually been less than £100.
29

Few Against Many,

28/11/2008 13:25:00
32. Sheena, welcome to the scotsman boards. We love debate on here. Seriously though hen with 2k a year for clothes why did you no invst some of it in a haircut?
30

Highland Mist,

28/11/2008 13:56:28
#32, HF, Whatever she spent her £100 allowance on would DEFINITELY have been better spent on a decent hairstyle.

Bet she bought some thermal knickers with it.
31

Highland Mist,

28/11/2008 13:59:27
Jeez come to think of it, is she so skint she HAD to claim £100 for clothes? What the heck DID she get for that? New tights she caught on the Cooncil's desk? Honestly, these Council officials take the biscuit.
32

Few Against Many,

28/11/2008 14:01:47
34 It looks like its the one coo's lick that controls them all!
33

Mallory,

Edinburgh 28/11/2008 16:08:50
Why couldn't she go to the charity shops on Morningside like everyone else llking for a cheap 'designer dress'?
34

tartan army 2222,

28/11/2008 16:45:01
As much as I hate to defend a Lib Dem (fence-sitting, abstaining, pointless party) here's a question for the journalist - how much of the £2,000 did she actually spend?

Also, would it not have been worthwhile getting figures from several councils, seeing what was actually spent by each and then comparing. East Lothian might have the lowest allowance in Scotland - or would that have been too much work?
35

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 28/11/2008 21:08:47
Why does the Scotsman have to refer everything back to Edinburgh and Glasgow?
36

Dogandgoldfish,

28/11/2008 21:08:49
High time coucils were scapped along with all the fat cats that run them, they are just a dreadful drain on our reresorces, Just how long are people going to put up with all the misappropriation of funds, or is it OK because they (the councils) say it is. They seem answerable to no one
37

Fergle,

28/11/2008 23:14:27
My opinion is why has David Berry not gone shopping with Sheena to Morningside ? The second hand shops are second to none although hamburger supper could have been to the ready with his bitter but ever present services to measure the pair of them up for the cheap oh so stylish range at tescos 'florence and fred'. I think we shoul be pleased that Sheena has joined us and not taken offence at the wardrobe discussion. When are we going to start the debate on the xmas nghts out and how many vodkas she has attax payers expense? need vodka to socialise with the likes of david Berry and Peter Mackenzie.
38

Koshka,

East of Edinburgh 03/12/2008 23:22:54
A sindicated story tht the Scotman should have steered clear of.

The Provost has claimed a maximum of £85 since her election and designation as Provost in May 2007.....

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.