Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


EU set to force sale of Lloyds' Scottish branches

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 October 2009
CONSUMERS could soon have the choice of a major new bank on Scotland's high streets after it emerged that European regulators are close to agreeing a deal that would force Lloyds to sell 185 branches north of the Border.
The EU competition watchdog has been scrutinising Lloyds' business to ensure the bank, which was bailed out by the UK government last year, has not gained an unfair advantage over its competitors.

And now Brussels is nearing an agreement that would mean the group selling its substantial Lloyds TSB branch network in Scotland, while retaining about 300 HBOS branches.

It is also likely Lloyds will have to sell its Cheltenham & Gloucester branches, as well as internet bank Intelligent Finance.

The combined network of branches would make a "credible package" for a new entrant into the banking market, analysts said last night.

Read Bill Jamieson's analysis of this story here

Potential purchasers include Sir Richard Branson's Virgin Money, which has applied to the City watchdog for a banking licence, or Tesco Bank, which is creating 800 jobs in Glasgow at a new service centre. Spanish bank BBVA is also said to be interested.

Virgin Money said it was "working to make its bank ambition a reality" but would not comment specifically on whether it would bid for Lloyds' Scottish branch network.

The potential sale of Lloyds Banking Group's branches comes after the UK government gave the company £17 billion to keep it running at the height of the banking crisis last year. Prime Minister Gordon Brown and Chancellor Alistair Darling had waived competition rules to allow Lloyds to rescue HBOS.

Since then, however, EU competition commissioner Neelie Kroes has forced a number of European banks that received state aid to break up or sell off parts of their business.

Both Lloyds and the European Commission confirmed yesterday they were in "advanced discussions".

Ms Kroes said reports about the bank having to sell its Scottish branches was "premature speculation", while Lloyds declined to comment.

Jim Spowart – who founded the Bank of Scotland's online division, Intelligent Finance, and who campaigned against the takeover of HBOS by Lloyds – said a sale would be "a good thing for consumers and a good thing for employees as well".

But he added that the pressure on Lloyds to sell its assets was "needless".

"If they had kept the Bank of Scotland and Lloyds separate in the first place, they wouldn't have had to do this," Mr Spowart said. "It is a pity they didn't think about this at the time."

Martyn Evans, director of Consumer Focus Scotland, which campaigns for customers' rights, called for Lloyds to clarify the situation. "At the time of the banking crisis, consumers wanted stability and reassurance," he said.

"Now this has been achieved, there is the issue of effective competition in the retail banking sector.

"Consumers will want to know if any change in the ownership of Lloyds TSB branches in Scotland will help to deliver this."

Labour's shadow finance secretary Andy Kerr gave a conditional welcome to the potential for increased competition.

"There has been an expectation from those watching the market and the trade unions that steps would have to be taken along these lines," he said.

"In the first instance, I would hope that the workforce interest would be protected over the course of any change and, secondly, that whoever takes over these branches will provide good services to local communities, giving access to banking services as well as providing choice for consumers."

Lloyds TSB Scotland has 187 branches. The network was formed after Lloyds bought the Scottish Trustee Savings Bank in a £6bn deal in 1999. Together with its HBOS outlets, Lloyds has 500 Scottish branches in total.

The bank crisis – particularly after the takeover of HBOS – meant Scots had fewer banks to choose from. Up to 70 per cent of Scottish high street banks are now owned either by Lloyds or RBS, and Mr Darling has said he wants increased competition in the UK banking sector.

Analysts representing bank shareholders said the most important part of the Lloyds group was the 1,000 Halifax branches – and that it could sell its other branches or even its insurance arm, including Scottish Widows.

"As long as they keep Halifax. That is the most profitable part of the operation," said Jaap Meijer, of Evolution Securities.

The potential sell-off comes as Lloyds is due to announce plans to raise £20bn to try to boost its balance sheet and avoid the government's expensive insurance scheme for toxic assets. A rights issue would need to be approved by the Treasury and the EC.

Yesterday the bank confirmed reports that it was considering an appeal to investors to raise the funds, as well as selling off some of its assets to raise the money.

It also said it was "confident that the final terms of its restructuring plan, including any required divestments of assets, will not have a material impact on the group". After this assurance, its share price rose 7.5 per cent.

The bank hopes a sale of branches will raise funds that will allow it to avoid the government's asset protection scheme (GAPS), which, on terms agreed last spring at the height of the banking crisis, would cost Lloyds £15.6bn and insure £260bn of its toxic assets.

Experts said Lloyds' investors would be interested in putting more money into the bank if it could avoid the scheme. Paul Mumford, senior fund manager at Cavendish Asset Management, said: "Investors are likely to take a gamble on the long-term story for avoiding the GAPS, and would welcome the potential reversal to the dilution they currently face."

Page 1 of 1

 
1

Group Captain Lionel Mandrake,

29/10/2009 22:25:23

I predicted, a long time ago, that selling off TSB Scotland, C&G and one of Scottish Widows or Clerical Medical would be enough to settle the regulatory issues.

As usual, I was correct.
2

Justin Timbercake,

29/10/2009 23:36:40
#1 and Alex Salmond claimed that he could bail out the Dunfermline Building Society for £25 million when the real figure was £1.6 billion.

As usual, Salmond was wrong.
3

,

30/10/2009 00:08:14
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 30/10/2009 00:08:40

Now I want my £1.00 from every reader, comment 10,....


http://news.scotsman.com/latestnews/Overseas-bank-lines-up-to.4651216.jp
5

JaF,

30/10/2009 00:12:52
#2 Timberfake: As usual it thinks it is correct.
6

,

30/10/2009 00:14:06
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 30/10/2009 00:16:01

It will be one of refreshment to have the choice of a major new bank on Scotland's high streets, now we will have choice to ditch those with grotesque Banking Charges, and save our money taken from us for grotesque Bankers Bonuses.



8

Traquìr,

Alba 30/10/2009 00:16:39
"CONSUMERS could soon have the choice of a major new bank on Scotland's high streets "

Perhaps they could call it the Bank of Scotland :)

Will be good to see another independent bank in Scotland. Also I see that two other ones are also being formed one driven by Tesco and another by the Richard Branson. Kind of strange when the Brit Nats cry out that business will flee with a nationalist Government.

"Tesco Personal Finance has committed to establishing and building its bank from Edinburgh. Around 250 members of staff have already relocated from the South Gyle, while the business expects to recruit an additional 200 over the next 12 months."

http://mediacentre.tescofinance.com/savings/press-release/2009-06-10

"Scotland is expecting a large boost to its financial services sector with Sir Richard Branson planning a new Virgin Bank in Edinburgh. "

http://feeds.bignewsnetwork.com/?sid=507709

9

Brianwci,

30/10/2009 00:17:46
Oh what fun, a new NON Scottish Bank....in Scotland.

What a superb Union Dividend that will turn out to be for some English concern, a fire sale of Scottish Bank Branches, even if they were already acquired on the cheap by another English concern i.e. Lloyds.

Can't wait for the public rape of RBS. Do you think Wm Hill the Bookie will give odds on which ENGLISH concern will benefit from the RBS fire sale when it comes????
10

,

30/10/2009 00:24:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

Justin Timbercake,

30/10/2009 00:25:26
11 Atom Johnsen

Why the name change from Ford Transit?
12

The Answer,

Glasgow 30/10/2009 00:32:15
" "As long as they keep Halifax. That is the most profitable part of the operation," said Jaap Meijer, of Evolution Securities."

Ohhh the snp and nat's wont like that, wasnt the scotch BOS supposed to of been brought down by the English Halifax?
13

The Baker,

30/10/2009 01:16:30
wOW what an opportunity for Bank of Romanov lol
14

,

30/10/2009 01:18:56
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 30/10/2009 01:20:20
A1 and Lloyds? It certainly isn't!
16

,

30/10/2009 01:31:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

,

30/10/2009 01:33:10
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
18

,

30/10/2009 01:36:13
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
19

Navvy,

30/10/2009 01:36:32
This is the direct result of the actions or inactions of a very bad Chancellor and an even more bad Prime Minister

Away with Brown - now!
20

Letters From Muscat,

edinburgh 30/10/2009 05:17:55
The banking crisis, an ongoing story at a branch near you....HBOS, RBS, Tescos, or Virgin, what choice folks.WHERE WILL i MOVE THE OVERDRAFT TO NOW? and how much will those thievin' sods charge me now? Question Time for the politicians and bankers. Who started the credit crunch? Who's going to end it more bloomin' likely. The Euro gravy train steps in or rolls into the sidings, oops nearly hit the buffers there. Jobs for redundant Prime Ministers HMMM we'll have to ponder that awhile, now take a decko at his CV. that should suffice.
21

Dr. James Wilkie,

30/10/2009 05:29:30
How about returning TSB Scotland to Trustee Savings Bank status?
22

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 30/10/2009 06:14:31
I second Dr. Wilkie's motion.
23

,

30/10/2009 07:15:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
24

Ewan Randall,

30/10/2009 08:20:55
(#4) – (Charles Linskaill) –Would you not have to produce some evidence that Spain’s largest bank were ready to take over those assets which belonged to HBoS that your comments talked about?

Do you have such evidence to say that Spain’s largest bank is ready to take over those assets?
25

Oldhabits,

Bristol 30/10/2009 08:22:17
Do you really want to go back to the 'piggy' bank TSB?
Better to return to the Bank of Scotland, as it was before Halifax took over.
In advertising terms alone, the Scottish identity would get far more support.
26

Ewan Randall,

30/10/2009 08:33:19
(#8) – (Traquìr) –Do you think that Tesco or Sir Richard Branson would commit to such a thing if they believed that the economy in the UK was unsustainable?
27

Ewan Randall,

30/10/2009 08:52:21
(#9) – (Brianwci) –How do you know that these assets will become a new non Scottish bank?

Do you not think that with all the interest that could be generated over these assets that there could be a coming together of Scottish money to create a new Scottish financial institution?
28

Ewan Randall,

30/10/2009 09:08:32
(#19) – (Big Jack Spratt) – Is it not the case that it is Europe and not Westminster on this occasion that is pushing through this sale?
29

Buspass,

Edinburgh 30/10/2009 09:09:00
Do they ever think where the TSB came from in the first place? #24 has it right.
30

reincarnated,

Edinburgh 30/10/2009 09:30:43
People seem to be suggesting that banks should not charge customers who go into overdraft. Why not?

31

rpb,

30/10/2009 10:11:29
number 28 - your memory is poor. BoS attempted to takeover Natwest and failed. Losing out to the other bidder,RBS. Panicing about being subject to a hostile bid itself after a failed takeover bid, BoS CHOSE to 'merge' with Halifax and so created HBOS - like RBS another riproaring success.
To all the SNP deluded - it was your inspirational leader Salmond who announced last year that HBOS' failure was down to 'city spivs'( i.e the english...) When in fact its was down to insane lending by BoS Corporate.

Why cannot any of you xenophobic blinkered english hating SNP lot not accept that the banking failure in the UK was heavily contributed to by incompetence in Scotland? And was bailed out with nasty evil Union sterling???

No doubt, once your achieve your indepedence you will rewrite history and blame the English/ rest of the world. Or blaming the' wrong sort of scot.' I believe Hitler first used this model when blaming the jews for Germany's downfall.
32

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 30/10/2009 10:24:18
Tell me again why we are listening to an unelected EU quango ????????

Shouldn't it be the British competition watchdog that decides these matters on British soil ? Who gave the EU carte blanche to meddle in British affairs ?

The EU is so self serving and has never been given a democratic mandate in this country - time we had a referendum on our membership of the EU .... if they want to run our affairs for us then at least let the people decide whether that is right or wrong ....

Something stinks when unelected quangos have power over your own elected representatives ....

EUSSR springs to mind ..... do we really want that ?
33

Nevsky;,

St Petersburg 30/10/2009 10:26:25
34 rpb*

Calm down, nothing wrong with being English, why the massive chip on your shoulder and the inferiority complex?

Scottish independence has nothing to do with hatred of the English...where do you get all your ideal the Daily Express?
34

jock in the box,

edinburgh 30/10/2009 10:32:09
14 The Answer ? Must have been a pretty dumb question!

", wasnt the scotch BOS supposed to of been brought down by the English Halifax?"
First of all the word is Scottish and should read "have been brought down "!

The Bank of Scotland was a bank. The Halifax Building society was a Building Society.DOH!
The Bank of Scotland wanted a larger share of the Mortgage cake and presumably Halifax wanted expansion into banking also,and HBOS was created.
The problems were basically mortgage related,with many mortgages given out in England which cannot be repaid as I understand this, plus the combined HBOS had most of its customer base in (ten times bigger than Scotland) ENGLAND .
It is therefore impossible for it to have been anything else than a primarily south of the border problem when 90% of HBOS accounts are there !
"Ohhh the snp and nat's wont like that" I thought the SNP were the Nats ,and there is no ' required since there is no omission.There should be one at wasn't though!

You would be much more impressive if you had even basic literacy skills.
35

ecosseman,

FACTS NOT PROPAGANDA 30/10/2009 10:58:00
A NEW SCOTTISH BANK,SOUNDS GREAT!

ROLL ON THE ELECTION!
36

3rd wise man,

30/10/2009 11:12:35
#37 You are a moron, BOS coroporate was creating vast losses lending disproportionatly to Scottish businesses.

90% of the losses was not made south of the boarder, if anything it was decisions made north of the boarder that related to more than 90% of the loses.

Show me some figures saying the Halifax is a gravy train and that BOS corporate was a magnificant lending department leading to flourishing scottish businesses. I don't think you'll find any.
37

jock in the box,

edinburgh 30/10/2009 11:36:01
39 Your English is of an even lesser standard than his (but you could be one of the same of course).
The Halifax was a much bigger financial institution than Bank Of Scotland was , and the majority of its business was in England where the majority of the UK polulation,and therefore its customers, are. The decisions may well have been made in an Edinburgh office, but the account holders are people predominately south of the border, since they cannot be anywhere else.I agree Halifax Bank of Scotland management were irresponsible, but I don't need to see accounts to know that the majority of its customers are where the majority live !
Bank of Scotland was around in 1695 and survived two world wars.Its only when they paired up with Halifax that problems started to appear and whilst the problems are rightly considered to be those of HBOS which is the combined two,there is no escaping the customer base which is predominantly over the border (and they also are in Wales and Northern Ireland no doubt).The problem could be argued as being British,but its certainly not Scottish only.
38

jock in the box,

edinburgh 30/10/2009 11:42:33
and I should have corrected "population" and "predominantly" of course,and I acknowledge my own error here.
39

Ranald Newal,

30/10/2009 11:48:40
This is superb and positive news.
A new bank wasn’t what those being negative over intervention even contemplated.
Maybe these developments will change one or two people’s minds.
I think it would be even better if the new bank had a positive name like Scottish Independent.
40

jock in the box,

edinburgh 30/10/2009 11:58:54
42 This is news ,but whilst I would welcome the re establishment of a"Scottish" bank whose corporate headquarters were here ,I would wait and see what emerges before labelling this Good News for Scotland.

You may be correct of course. I do not rule out this possibility.

John McLean once said that he would not show favour to any organisation operating in SCOTLAND whilst headquartered outwith her. He was correct then , and he still is!
41

DeanConinPeteFSteed,

30/10/2009 12:04:42
A Scottish consortium is what this situation is crying out for. Something even the inept Scottish government with the clown Swinney must be able to put together. Watch this space for the act of credibility.
42

Brianwci,

30/10/2009 13:44:32
#30 Ewan Randall:

I would love the new bank to be Scottish but It looks as if the English are already primed to swoop on some easy pickings.

I would love to be proved wrong though. There are too many conduits already for Scottish money to run all the way to London Banks.
43

Fitba Krazy,

30/10/2009 14:09:37

It's all a load of garbage.

Banks are only in it for the money.

Shiny buildings, shiny people full of mince trying to sell you something you don't need or change it to their "superior" package with no mention of hidden transfer costs etc.

I personally would re-open a few shipyards and get those shiny clowns wi shiny backsides into doing a bit of deburring propellers wi a haun file or banging in rivets wi their thick heids.

Chanty rastlers the lot of them if you ask me.

How much debt is the country in now?

Experts anyone?

Didn't think so. You bunch of shiny ersed eejits.
44

,

30/10/2009 14:26:52
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
45

,

30/10/2009 14:54:17
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
46

,

30/10/2009 15:17:16
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
47

,

30/10/2009 15:26:04
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
48

Oldhabits,

Bristol 30/10/2009 15:47:07
#34

I take a couple of hours off to gather up leaves and this is the garbage I have to clean up when I get back.

At my age I may not be the sharpest pencil in the box, but to be blunt, it would appear there are one or two supposedly sharp 'pin pricks' or 'clever dicks' that this column could do well without.

I have posted before that when the so-called merger took place between the Bank of Scotland and the Halifax, my BOS current account was immediately transferred to the Halifax without even the courtesy of asking my permission.

There is no such thing as a merger,one partner or other becoming the top dog. Since my memory is said to be poor, please correct me if my recollection is wrong in that Halifax directors were given the top posts in the combined outfit? If that is true, then policy direction was dictated by the Halifax.

I trust that in future my advanced years and aging brain will not be seen as barriers to my having my say?

As to the second half of your 'diatripe' you have got your vitriol mixed up with your marmite.
49

Hector the Red,

30/10/2009 15:47:45
Another dividend of the great Union!
50

The Strategist,

30/10/2009 15:53:32
This can all be traced back to the clunking fist Gordon Brown. Labour supporters should be ashamed of themselves.
51

freedom not subservience,

still here 30/10/2009 16:21:08
l.iebour supporters have no shame - they do not even have respect for our country
52

,

30/10/2009 16:53:16
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
53

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 30/10/2009 17:24:01
Why are Lloyds about to be told to sell off the Lloyds TSB branches in Scotland? Surely the competition would be the same if the EU ruled that the HBOS takeover was against the rules.
54

Ggordon,

30/10/2009 17:39:53

Nationalise it

HBOS against the competion rules. So selling off Lloyds TSB branches breaks up the monopoly. Separates them.

Halifax based in England had the biggest mortgage book in UK. That is why the HBOS debt held, was not all Scottish debt. The majority of the debt was incurred in England. ie English mortgages. BOS took over this debt when it took over the Halifax. So HBOS in being left south, where the debt is based.

Just easier solution. Simpler
55

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 30/10/2009 18:08:54
57, Ggordon. Or deliberate.
56

Ggordon,

30/10/2009 18:27:32
58 Jock T

Just a question of names. Another company (foreign) often controls even if the name suggest otherwise.

Gordon Brown should not have encouraged the anti-competition take over. Trying to clear up his mess.

Clydesdale Bank is owned by Australian corporation.

Becomes an international market place. Is possible BOS name could return depends on the marketing.
57

Ggordon,

30/10/2009 18:29:31

34 Rpb

Grow up
58

Ranald Newal,

30/10/2009 19:28:15
Big Jack Spratt@47,14:26:52
---------------------------
I will take your comments into consideration.
We now see an opportunity to make a difference.
Things can change for the better.
59

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 30/10/2009 19:35:24
59, Ggordon. Yeah, suppose you are right. After all a by-pass is just a road by any other name.
60

Group Captain Lionel Mandrake,

30/10/2009 19:39:22
57

Ggordon proves to be a Mmoron once again.

The bulk of HBOS's bad debts were down to -->Bank of Scotland Corporate<--, not "Halifax mortgages".

Got it?
61

Ggordon,

30/10/2009 20:19:53

GCLM

Proves to be wong again Got it
62

Ggordon,

30/10/2009 20:26:15

62 JT

A bypass is just a road that by passes

Just get a red pen and write Bank of Scotland on your pass book. Same effect. Just different uniform. Relative same shareholders. Thanks to the UK gov in hock to the Bank of China
63

Ggordon,

30/10/2009 21:18:07


even relatively

JT

I used to like you. I think

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.