Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Farewell to the dashing white Sergeant

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 November 2008
HE WAS not the Lord of the Dance, but its beloved jester. Week after week the public switched on in their millions to watch John Sergeant tangle up the tango and, well, not so much pass the paso doble as fail on the polished dance floor.

If dancing is poetry in motion, then the former ITN political editor was lumpen prose. Watching him drag Kristina Rihanoff, his Russian partner, across the floor made coalmen wince with recognition. If Strictly Come Dancing usually creates stars, Sergeant was its first black hole, a talent so tiny but with a presence so powerful that he sucked in votes and appeared unstoppable.

Yesterday, however, Sergeant, fearing his continued presence was destroying the show, decided to self-destruct, pulling out of a competition he had an increasing chance of winning, despite resembling, as one critic said, "a dancing pig in Cuban heels".

Yet he was the nation's pirouetting porker, a figure increasingly beloved for his shambling moves and beatific grin. He was Eddie the Eagle in sequins.

As markets crashed, Sergeant soared, buoyed by the public's well wishes, before being brought down to earth by jealous judges and growing ill-will. Despite being voted the "worst dancer" on four occasions and, at one point, racking up just 12 points out of 40, the lowest score in the show's five series, he was persistently saved from the final dance-off, which each week results in one couple's swift exit, by the public's vote.

The imbalance between Sergeant's lack of ability and his persistent achievement to hang in while far better dancers fell by the wayside, riled the judges who were anxious to pass sentence. Len Goodman, the head judge, said his success "made a nonsense of the show". Sergeant responded: "It is funny how judges both in real life and on Strictly Come Dancing lose touch with the views of ordinary people."

The views of ordinary people were quite clear: John Sergeant, 64, portly – despite allegedly losing two stone during the past three months of training – was an urban hero, an everyman who, as one blogger explained, "represented every dad at a wedding".

Dance competitions have, historically, proved popular during an economic crisis. During the Great Depression in America, thousands would turn out to watch contestants dance till they dropped in "marathon dance competitions" that lasted as long as 24 hours.

Today's entertainment is a little more humane, but still more than nine million viewers switched on each week to forget rising unemployment and hang their hopes on a chubby failure capable of turning the cha-cha into, as one judge said, the "ha-ha".

When the show began, the former political correspondent provided a little comic relief as he manhandled the sumptuous Ms Rihanoff, a Russian champion, like a clumsy butcher with an ungainly side of beef.

The judges, to begin with, were patronisingly positive, describing his waltz as "warm" and "understated". Yet, while his fellow contestants sweated over their moves in the hope of surviving one more week, Sergeant, a correspondent in Vietnam, the Middle East and Northern Ireland, preferred to relax and read the broadsheets.

On a number of occasions, Ms Rihanoff issued posts on her blog, denying stories in the tabloids that she had had shouting matches with her partner.

"I never have, nor would I ever, 'roundly curse' John or any of my students – in English or in Russian! To say that I did during our cha-cha training last week is ridiculous and hurtful."

The contestant's ungainly swagger and relaxed attitude to training was quickly picked up and celebrated by the public. While Ms Rihanoff began selling "Team Sergeant" T-shirts on her website, thousands were signing up to more than 20 Facebook groups.

Over the next few weeks he became such a draw that William Hill was offering "Sergeant Specials": odds of 6-1 that he scores no points; 3-1 that he scores the lowest points tally in the history of the programme; 10-1 that he made it into the final and 33-1 that he wins.

The tension came to a head on Sunday night when Cherie Lunghi, the actress, and Lisa Snowdon, a former model, found themselves facing a dance-off, despite both being favourites to win in terms of their ability.

Goodman said: "This is terrible… neither should be going."

When Lunghi was eventually voted off, her partner made a public plea against those persistently voting to keep Sergeant in: "This is supposed to be a dance contest. Please, please, people at home, vote for the dancing."

In an ironic twist, one Sergeant might have managed, the actual "twist" being slightly beyond his ability, the dance he and his partner were due to rehearse was to be called "Murder on the Dance Floor", a sequence that was to end with him "machine-gunning the critics". He would not have been convicted.

Yet last night Sergeant insisted he had not been bullied out of the show, but said instead that the time to leave a party was before the fighting began.

Yet, with the public on his side, it was a fight he may well have won.

Sergeant sets out Strictly retreat

JOHN Sergeant yesterday said fear of victory after a "bloody battle" on the dance floor was the reason he dramatically quit Strictly Come Dancing.

The former political editor, whose clod-hopping style has made him an unlikely national hero, also declared that the joke had worn thin.

However, Sergeant, 64, brushed off suggestions he had been bullied to quit and said there was a real danger he might have won.

Speaking at a press conference at BBC Television Centre in London, he said: "That is a frightening thought, it is a terrifying thought. I didn't want that to happen because it would have been a very bittersweet victory."

Falling back on his years of election reporting, he added: "The problem was there was no viable Stop Sergeant candidate."

Sergeant, who has come under fire from judges for his clumsy footwork, said: "I decide to choose my own battles. What I did not want was a bloody battle." But he added he was very grateful to everyone who had voted for him over the past few weeks.

Viewers' fondness for Sergeant has kept him in the popular BBC1 show – despite him coming bottom of the judge's scoring table three weeks in a row with dance partner Kristina Rihanoff.

The BBC's website has been flooded with comments from "strictly incensed" viewers angry at his departure. Jay Hunt, the BBC1 controller, said anyone who had voted for Sergeant and wanted reimbursed would be.

Lord Mandelson, the Business Secretary, has added his voice of support. He said: "John Sergeant should not bow out. He has become the people's John Travolta and he should be a fighter, not a quitter."

Sergeant will end his dancing career with a last waltz on Saturday. After that, he said: "I shall return to my rather quiet life."

In front of a glitzy backdrop yesterday, Sergeant defended his move to quit the show. He said: "The reasons for leaving – well, it is like when do you leave a party? You leave before the fighting starts and I think that is what has happened on this occasion.

"We had fun dancing and dancing is a wonderfully enjoyable thing, but if the joke wears thin, if people begin to take things very seriously and if people are getting so wound up that it is very difficult to carry on the joke, then it is time to go."

Sergeant had planned a routine to Sophie Ellis-Bextor's Murder On The Dance Floor.

"It ended up with me firing imaginary bullets at the judges," he said. "It would have amused me, and maybe lots of people in the audience, but some people would say: 'Here we go – not more John Sergeant ruining a marvellous dancing competition.'

"The idea that we would carry on doing this week after week – irritating and annoying people and causing controversy – that is not what I'm about and that is not why I wanted to join the show."

From 'cute and cuddly' to 'stinking' – how John's ballroom blitz went sour

DURING his nine weeks on Strictly Come Dancing, John Sergeant has perfected the technique of dragging his partner around the ballroom.

But it started rather well when in week one his waltz was popular with the judges, despite him being the top tip to leave the show first.

Judge Bruno Tonioli described Sergeant as "so cute and cuddly".

"It was like watching Winnie the Pooh," he added.

"I found it a very endearing performance."

Sergeant's next performance, of the tango to Tony Bennett's Boulevard of Broken Dreams, was also popular, giving him scores above other dancers such as Jodie Kidd, who would have been expected to flourish.

Such dances earned him praise for his "warm" and "understated" performances.

But the kind words about his dancing did not last long.

In one of his most cringe-worthy – yet entertaining – performances, Sergeant pulled a seemingly unconscious Kristina Rihanoff along the floor while puffing out his chest like a proud peacock.

During the same performance of the paso doble, the political journalist marched along much to the enjoyment of viewers – but sadly not the judges.

Sergeant's unique version of the cha-cha-cha to Twist and Shout saw another classic performance – but his lowest score – just 12 out of 40.

Head judge Len Goodman said: "That was more ha ha ha than cha-cha-cha. If somebody deserving gets knocked out because the public like you, it makes a nonsense of the show."

Tonioli begged him to quit, saying: "Your charming personality is undeniable, but you must admit your dancing stinks."

The dragging technique reappeared again in his last performance, of the American smooth. During the dance, Sergeant trotted backwards, dragging Miss Rihanoff along the floor as she did the splits.

Judge Arlene Phillips said she found his performance "endearing".

But she added: "You did get that Hollywood feel, although it was more Mickey Rooney than Fred Astaire."


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 November 2008 9:30 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Rufus T. Firefly,

19/11/2008 22:53:29
This headline has been lifted from one of my posts 2 days ago!
2

Conan the Librarian™,

20/11/2008 00:22:09
Wee touch of megalomania, Rufus?
3

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 20/11/2008 03:17:11

Big Mistake!!, John Sergeant, should have kept it going!

Better this than some 'silly cruse'!




4

M.T.,

20/11/2008 05:24:03
"Sergeant had planned a routine to Sophie Ellis-Bextor Murder On The Dance Floor."

Would really have liked to watch that.

What is the point of a dancing programme which pleads for the public to vote then complains when they do?
5

,

20/11/2008 06:18:59
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

SouthernSkye,

20/11/2008 07:36:23
blah blah blah. Even radio 4 news (which usually sticks to real news) had this sh0iters on this morning.
C'mon people. It's television for the masses, it's TV dinner material, it's mindless drivel !!
7

Douglas,

Bathgate 20/11/2008 08:21:02
In general, some might say it was a major dose of corporal punishment (in private of course).
8

The Glasgow Ranger,

Edinburgh. 20/11/2008 08:34:03
Can`t we vote for the odious and irritating Arlene Phillips to be removed?
9

DannyG,

20/11/2008 08:51:26
#6 is right it is just tv for the masses... whatever the judges and competitors think they are there simply to entertain us on a Saturday night... it is a 'competition' in name only. John S was clearly entertaining, so the public voted to keep him in for that reason (and don't forget also paid for the privilege of doing so... double whammy really as they have also paid their licence fee for this 'programme') but clearly the judges and critics know better than the public about what is Saturday night entertainment... John should have seen it through and given the public what they have paid for in licence fees and votes
10

Couperman,

London 20/11/2008 09:09:29
Ah well - he's seen fit to go before the sequins got stuck in the back of his throat. His dancing was cringe-making in the extreme but very very funny.

Is he Jo Brand's twin brother separated at birth????
11

AJ Fife,

20/11/2008 09:17:30
Never heard of it!
12

molu kikes,

basel 20/11/2008 09:24:58
hurrah seeing thekicking off from the community bee hive society of the well come strict dancing was avery big blow ,. the flaaboyant ,. acrobatic ,.and the oldest gigs of the strict florr dancing lost his portfolio ,. as the well known judge like bruno and others termed him as acore and the hardest player in the dancing ,. seeing his career as tantalizing with benevolent ,. with very frency preening stylitc device in playing the fun of the of the joke ,.,., sad to say u bye ,.,. but well come again is permitted in the coming year
13

molu kikes,

basel 20/11/2008 09:28:58
well observing his days when he used to hood people mind like all the observing judge ,. and being praised with lavishing remarks from sarah eastenders ,,. but today seasrgent no more had those remaks ,. just wavng smart to go to the guest house as hs aged cling against strictly come dancing
14

JG,

Fife 20/11/2008 09:33:28
OK, he couldn't dance and he's overweight but he was incredibly entertaining. And, unlike the majority of the judges, he's a gentleman. I don't see a problem with him staying on. After all, the only contestant in the X Factor who could actually sing (Laura) was voted off and we're left with a selection of mediocrity there!
15

Beergut,

Embra 20/11/2008 09:59:56
One report I read described Ms Lunghi as a "trained dancer". That's a bit like going on to "Who wants to be a Millionaire?" with a list of all the answers! This show was obviously never intended to be a level playing field so why all the fuss when Mr Sergeant captures the public imagination? I can't say I was a fan of the programme, being a stranger to dancing, but this would have been one reason to watch it. Who knows I might even have broken the habit of a lifetime and voted.
16

Dick Lynas,

Glasgow 20/11/2008 10:19:35
Programmes like Strictly and X Factor seem increasingly to be more about the public judging the judges and less about judging the talent on display. This is probably not so important on Strictly given that it does not really matter who wins as the winner will still be a rank amateur who is unlikely ever to want to make a living from their dancng skills.
X Factor seems to me to be a much more serious matter. It is wonderful to think what the public have done to promote the career of Leona Lewis for example. Still I would like to think that in both cases the public would ultimately vote seriously. Even the amateurs on Strictly - with the exception of John Sergeant - were knocking their pans in during rehearsals) I think John Sergeant was absolutely correct to do what he did. The joke was wearing very thin and he was becoming a caricature of himself. But audience reaction now will be interesting. Will folk stop watching Strictly - or will they just start voting for whoever is the new poorest performer in the judges' opinion?
17

,

20/11/2008 10:40:39
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
18

,

20/11/2008 10:41:03
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
19

Dick Lynas,

Glasgow 20/11/2008 10:49:59
It is a bit of escapism Hugh - and therefore very much about getting a life. When you say that X Factor is a con, what exactly do you mean? If it turns out that voting is rigged, for example, then ITV will be in serious s***
20

Cassandra,

20/11/2008 10:52:05
Can't see what the fuss is about. Julian Clary nearly made it to the last two, and his paso as his alter ego Carlos the Gaucho was funnier than John Sergeant. And Darren Gough beat Zoe Ball and Colin Jackson to win the trophy, so bad taste in voting is obviously de rigeur for both judges and public.
21

Athiest,

swansea 20/11/2008 11:09:15
It was so good to see dancers enjoying the dance.

Unlike all the others prancing around the floor
like Zombies
22

Skip McClendon,

20/11/2008 11:11:26
Bring back Cheri! Quality older totty.

Sargeant should have stayed though. Watching him find new ways to annoy the judges each week was quality entertainment.
23

Dr Blockbuster aka Vince,

Strictly Come Dancing Green Room 20/11/2008 11:24:23
JOHN SERGEANT was MAJOR ENTERTAINMENT!

Dr Blockbuster says the judges, Len et al, need to remember which BUSINESS they are working in when they are on the panel of Strictly Come Dancing. It is NOT a dancing competition it is an ENTERTAINMENT show ... and John Sergeant was Major Entertainment! :wink:

9,000,000 viewers have been tuning in for Entertainment and certainly we've been having that. It is sad that John Sergeant felt forced to withdraw ... I'm sure SIR (to be) Bruce Forsyth will have some kind words for him.

Personally, Dr Blockbuster would give John Sergeant 10 for his courage.

It was nice to see you (John), to see you ..... !


Dr Blockbuster
Networks & Forums
(running the online campaign for SIR Bruce Forsyth)
24

,

20/11/2008 12:02:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
25

G,

dndy 20/11/2008 12:40:26
Come one - let's mobilise a huge vote for Sergeant in the Sports Personality of the YEAR!!!!
26

Joe Macdelta.,

20/11/2008 14:19:00
#25 Err, wots a wireless?
27

cataibh,

Over the Struie 20/11/2008 14:29:33
The judges were fast becoming the most hated people on the show so was John pushed to save the BBC from another disaster? I voted (first time ever on a TV show) for John as I could identify myself with his struggle to improve on his dancing. At my age and on my limited ability to dance he represented ME.
28

Skip McClendon,

20/11/2008 14:57:45
#29

Whereas I voted for Cherie since, despite being not too much younger than John, she is a) good at dancing and b) fit. In all senses of the word!
29

Athiest,

swansea 20/11/2008 15:51:10
Wherever did the BBC dig up those "Judges"?

You would have thought they could have found some real peoplen now wouldn't you?
30

,

20/11/2008 15:56:07
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
31

,

20/11/2008 15:57:15
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
32

,

20/11/2008 17:06:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
33

Pocket Dictionary,

20/11/2008 17:36:28

What's more shocking is the judges hypocrisy on Sargeant quitting after all the scathing criticism they directed at him. Reminds me of a 'Not the Nine o'clock News sketch', where two politicians were fiercely arguing, one dies and the remaining one heaps praise on the deceased.

Sargeant was the only reason my partner watched the show. If it was meant to be a serious dance competition all the contestants should have been professional dancers and not B or C List chancers.

I would hazard a guess this Saturday's show will produce the highest ratings because of Sargeant's 'Last Waltz' and then plummet significantly in the remaining weeks. Turkeys voting for Christmas comes to mind here.
34

Ike,

Glasgow 20/11/2008 17:46:37
Ahem:
Johnston Press plc distinguished publishers of The Scotsman:
Share price Jan 08 = 275p
Share price today = 6p
Let's all just work for the government and spy on each other!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.