Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Friday, 5th December 2008 Change Date

The Scotsman Digital Archive - Special Christmas Offer

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

'Hillary Clinton's a monster': Obama aide blurts out attack in Scotsman interview



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 March 2008
HILLARY Clinton has been branded a "monster" by one of Barack Obama's top advisers, as the gloves come off in the race to win the Democrat nomination.
In an unguarded moment during an interview with The Scotsman in London, Samantha Power, Mr Obama's key foreign policy aide, let slip the camp's true feelings about the former first lady.

Her comments came as Mr Obama, whose defeats in Texas and O
hio on Tuesday were largely attributed to a series of negative attacks on him, vowed to turn up the heat on Mrs Clinton over her claims to be the more experienced candidate.

Yesterday, the Obama camp went on the offensive, pointing out that Mrs Clinton has still not released her tax return and casting doubt on her experience.

In response, a Clinton adviser said the attack reminded him of the witch-hunt led by special prosecutor Kenneth Starr, which led to the impeachment of her husband, Bill, when he was president.

Earlier, clearly rattled by the Ohio defeat, Ms Power told The Scotsman Mrs Clinton was stopping at nothing to try to seize the lead from her candidate.

"We f***** up in Ohio," she admitted. "In Ohio, they are obsessed and Hillary is going to town on it, because she knows Ohio's the only place they can win.

"She is a monster, too – that is off the record – she is stooping to anything," Ms Power said, hastily trying to withdraw her remark.

Ms Power said of the Clinton campaign: "Here, it looks like desperation. I hope it looks like desperation there, too.

"You just look at her and think, 'Ergh'. But if you are poor and she is telling you some story about how Obama is going to take your job away, maybe it will be more effective. The amount of deceit she has put forward is really unattractive."

Ms Power's comments reveal how the inexperienced Obama campaign is coming under increasing pressure from a battle-hardened Clinton camp that saw Ohio as its last chance to save its candidate.

Before Tuesday's vote in Ohio, the press and the Clinton camp seized on remarks by Austan Goolsbee, Ms Power's colleague, on the North America Free Trade Agreement (Nafta). His comments are widely believed to have cost Mr Obama the Ohio Democratic presidential primary.

Mr Goolsbee, Mr Obama's top economic policy adviser, had told Canadian officials a public pledge to force a renegotiation of Nafta with tougher labour and environmental rules was "more about political positioning".

But the Clinton camp said Mr Obama could not tell the public of Ohio, where many manufacturing jobs have been lost, one thing and then tell a foreign government something else behind closed doors.

Yesterday, Mr Obama blamed fierce attacks by Mrs Clinton for his defeats in this week's big primaries, and quickly made good on a promise to sharpen his criticism of her, in what promises to become an all-out brawl in the race for the White House.

The Illinois senator took the offensive against Mrs Clinton, targeting her claims she is more experienced in handling foreign policy. "Was she negotiating treaties? Was she handling crises? The answer is no," he said. "She made a series of arguments on why she should be a superior candidate. It's important to examine that argument."

In recent days, the former first lady argued that Mr Obama was getting a free ride with the media and had hinted he was not ready to be commander-in-chief in a crisis.

Mrs Clinton, asked about her national security qualifications, highlighted a series of events in which she played a role, including peace talks in Northern Ireland, the Kosovo refugee crisis and standing up for women's rights in China.

Mr Obama's aides went on the offensive yesterday, holding a conference call to ask why Mrs Clinton had not released her tax returns. Her campaign team responded with a statement e-mailed to reporters while they were on the call that said the Clintons' returns since they left the White House would be made public around 15 April.

"There's no doubt Senator Clinton went very negative over the last week," Mr Obama said, adding that the Clinton campaign's attacks "had some impact" on the poll results, "particularly in the context where many of you in the press had been persuaded you had been too hard on her and too soft on me".

After this latest row, Howard Dean, head of the Democratic Party, warned that the tone of the campaign "may get nastier" and said discussions would take place to try to prevent that.

After Mr Obama's camp had raised the issue of Mrs Clinton's failure to release her tax returns, Howard Wolfson, a spokesman for Mrs Clinton, described the statement as being reminiscent of the attacks the Clintons endured during investigations by prosecutor Kenneth Starr in the 1990s, which many saw as politically motivated.

Mr Wolfson's introduction of Mr Starr's name again portrays Mrs Clinton as a victim, while her attacks on Mr Obama's "preparedness to be commander in chief and steward of the economy" continue.

Mr Wolfson said: "I, for one, do not believe imitating Ken Starr is the way to win a Democratic primary election for president."

The Clinton campaign has also attacked Mr Obama's inexperience on foreign matters, but Ms Power insisted he was not afraid to take tough decisions on this front.

She added: "Hillary Clinton always portrays his position on meeting with dictators as naive."

Ms Power also described working for Mr Obama as a pleasure, and said that people who knew him "adore him".

She added: "When we started this, we were all backing the guy who was supposed to lose.

"He was 25 points down going in to Iowa in January.

"If people were in this for the job or the political reward they would have gone somewhere else. They would not have gone to Barack."

Ms Power also said she believed Gordon Brown and Mr Obama would get on "like a house on fire".

Ms Power was in the UK to promote her book on Sergio Vieira de Mello, the extraordinary UN representative who died in a Baghdad bomb attack.

PUBLISH AND BE DAMNED

WHEN is off the record actually off the record? When the rules are established in advance.

Journalists are always looking for knowledge and want the information they receive to be available for publication.

But occasionally an interviewer will accept an exchange is "off the record" and that the conversation is not attributable. Remarks can be used as background to inform a journalist's article.

If a conversation is to be off the record, that agreement is usually thrashed out before the interview begins. Sometimes, public figures say something and then attempt to retract it by insisting it was "off the record" after the event.

But by then it is too late, particularly if it is in the public interest that the story be published.

In this instance, Samantha Power was promoting her book and it was established in advance that the interview was on the record.

A WOMAN OF POWER
SAMANTHA Power is the embodiment of the American immigrant dream.

Born in Dublin in 1970, she moved to the United States with her mother aged nine.

After being educated in state schools in Pittsburgh and Georgia, she gained entry to the prestigious Yale University, where she studied history. The self-deprecating Ms Power said this changed her life and opened many doors.

She worked as freelance journalist in Bosnia, after teaching herself the language in Croatia. Her only other journalism experience prior to that was covering the Yale women's volleyball team.

After graduating from Harvard Law School, she became an executive director and founder of the Carr Centre for Human Rights Policy at Harvard.

The 37-year-old already has one Pulitzer Prize behind her, for her book A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide and she is in the UK and Ireland to plug her new book, Chasing the Flame: Sergio Vieira de Mello and the Fight to Save the World.

Ms Power was head-hunted by Barack Obama to become his foreign-policy adviser in 2005 and combines this role with her job as a Time magazine columnist and professor of practice of global leadership and public policy at Harvard.





The full article contains 1398 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 March 2008 8:45 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Barack Obama , US elections
 
1

Boswall,

07/03/2008 00:31:37
If it gets the Clintons back in then I say go for it.

BO would be a a great VP and understudy to Hillary.
2

,

07/03/2008 00:54:14
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

,

07/03/2008 00:55:23
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

Jock MacSprog,

Embra 07/03/2008 00:56:28
They are both tax and spend socialists, whats the diff really ?
5

,

07/03/2008 00:56:53
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

IggyHorowitz,

behind the chicken coop 07/03/2008 00:57:01
Apparently, "that is off the record" means nothing to the press anymore. Other than that, yeah, she's a freakish nightmare.
7

,

07/03/2008 01:02:04
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

,

07/03/2008 01:04:33
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

,

07/03/2008 01:06:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

,

07/03/2008 01:15:53
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

,

07/03/2008 01:17:49
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

williamx,

canada 07/03/2008 01:21:06
Come on. If it takes $100 million to run a presidential campaign, $10 million for a Senate or Congress campaign then they are all bought before they arrive by the industrial/medical/military/drug company complex. All are bought regardless of party affiliation.
13

snakesup,

Georgia 07/03/2008 01:32:21
so, Obama calls her the hildabeast, too.........
14

indune1,

07/03/2008 01:37:12
1 - What an extraordinarily naiive person you appear to be.

"If it gets the Clintons back into power"?

The Clintons?? WTF? GTF?

Look, Slick Willie is perhaps one of the most morally warped individuals to have held office in the US.

Hillary is claiming experience in foreign policy, economic policy and - stupidly - health policy; all while she was the wife of the President of the USA. She was unelected and has ridden Billy-Bob's coattails since his initial election.

He lied and cheated on her and - more importantly to the nation - on at least three separate occasions. The woman has no shame - only blind, naked ambition.

You would trust her as your financial advisor - given such a track record?

Wake up.
15

Francene,

California 07/03/2008 01:44:45
I was under the impression when a person being interviewed states the qualifier "off the record" it means just that, off the record. The Scotsman may want to revisit that point. Journalistic integrity is in question here.
16

,

07/03/2008 01:54:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

indune1,

07/03/2008 02:00:07
15 - I make a living as a communications advisor. When preparing a client for a media interview, the first thing I tell them that is nothing, repeat nothing, is ever off the record and any journalist who makes such an offer should be instantly deemed as untrustworthy.

However, some supposedly savvy people do make such an agreement in the hope that it will be broken by the media and the resulting coverage have the desired. strategic effect for a mutual benefit.

Dealing with a journalist is like any other commercial transaction. If you haven't done your homework then you deserve the mark you will receive after the test is completed.
18

Fred C Dobbs,

Lafayette 07/03/2008 02:00:37
I think the Scotsman has truthfully reported the results of the contests for in Ohio and Texas. The Scotsman says Clinton won both. The fact is she got more delegates in Ohio than Obama, but less Texas. As a result, she did not win them both. [If the Scotsman thinks the popular vote was point of the election, it is wrong. The election objects were delegates to cast votes at the Democrats Convention in August.] In fact, she has to win every contest forward by more than 20% to secure a number of delegates that will bring her the nomination.
19

Duchess-Of- Drumnadrochit,

USA 07/03/2008 02:08:22
The Texas Delegates will be Annouced at the Democratic Convention In Denver this June. The caucuses in Texas were are Nightmare.

Hillary has Not won Texas yet, But as she told a National TV-NBC audience - I WILL Get the Nomination.
20

William - Cedarburg, WI USA,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lvrp1UWVimk 07/03/2008 02:11:02
It's all extreme this or that - negative platitudes signifying nothing.
You disagree with me and your must be a monster.

Just like this song - "I Am For Nuclear War"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lvrp1UWVimk
21

Ne'er Again,

Brandon, Ms 07/03/2008 02:12:41
Monster? That's not the half of it.
22

Duchess-Of- Drumnadrochit,

USA 07/03/2008 02:13:27
'I'm neither a Republican or a Democrat.'

Hillary has Not won Texas Delegates yet, Popular Vote yes.
Thanks to the 'Archie Bunker Mentality 'of the older Voters.
Now she wants to break the rules For Mich. and Florida.
But as she told a National TV-NBC audience - I WILL Get the Nomination. Go Figure!
23

,

07/03/2008 02:16:30
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
24

,

07/03/2008 02:18:40
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
25

LMKG,

Alaska 07/03/2008 02:24:49
Ms. Powers is merely saying aloud what millions of us are thinking.
26

Wilove,

Aberdeen 07/03/2008 02:26:04
I see some sort of positive media bias towards the Clinton campaign team here. The writer refers to it as relatively inexperienced; talk about a very experienced Clinton campaign team that has been through a lot of shake ups with some top staff resigning.
27

,

07/03/2008 02:32:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
28

,

07/03/2008 02:34:52
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
29

,

07/03/2008 02:37:46
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
30

,

07/03/2008 02:37:55
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
31

PortiaElizabeth,

New Hampshire, USA 07/03/2008 02:38:07
It's unfortunate that someone who represents herself as a spokesperson for Senator Obama is so obviously unprofessional. This seems to be a recurring characteristic of many in the Obama camp as they repeatedly make missteps worthy of a grade-school student council campaign, as evidenced by Obama's senior economic advisor Austan Goolsbee's documented meeting with the Canadian official on NAFTA. My fervent hope is that the good people of Scotland and England will take the time to examine the tactics of both the Clinton and Obama campaigns and then form conclusions as to which candidate is prepared to assume the Presidency of the United States.
32

,

07/03/2008 02:38:19
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
33

,

07/03/2008 02:43:05
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
34

,

07/03/2008 02:45:10
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
35

,

07/03/2008 02:48:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
36

,

07/03/2008 02:50:48
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
37

,

07/03/2008 02:54:49
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
38

Scott Hamilton,

Morgantown 07/03/2008 02:55:56
Good Scots,

Over the next few weeks you will probably witness the destruction of an American Political Party. They will be done in by a scheme to front load the primary to get the advantage over the opposition that backfired horribly.

Enjoy

... I certainly will!

I just wish that my Republican father had lived long enough to enjoy this with me. He would have had so much fun!
39

57Nomad,

california 07/03/2008 02:57:44
It doesn't make any difference who the Dems nominate. Europeans who are sure that Americans think like thay do abour Iraq and Afghanistan and are anxious to bring a Dem to the White House are sadly mistaken. Both Hillary and Barak have bad mouthed the effort while American troops are in the field and under fire. That is not well received and it will show in the general election. The Dems will not carry more than ten states no matter who they nominate. Get ready for President McCain.
40

,

07/03/2008 02:58:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
41

nene,

New Jersey 07/03/2008 03:06:15
It disturbs me that Obama, as chairman of the Foreign Policy Subcommittee on Europe and NATO, did not visit NATO headquarters or any other European country. You would think he would have jumped at the chance to really learn something important. To me, it looks like he thought he already knew everything, so why wait to run for president? Not exactly confidence inspiring.

So what will he do? Surround himself with experts, as George W. Bush did? What do we know about the type of people he would surround himself with, except that some of them will be Republicans, the very people who rubber-stamped Bush's every order.

I want to know now, before the nomination.

42

,

07/03/2008 03:06:22
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
43

,

07/03/2008 03:06:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
44

,

07/03/2008 03:07:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
45

,

07/03/2008 03:08:55
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
46

,

07/03/2008 03:12:27
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
47

,

07/03/2008 03:13:14
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
48

,

07/03/2008 03:14:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
49

indune1,

07/03/2008 03:14:44
46 - Yes, and your dear Hillary supported the invasion.
50

Stuart 2,

U.S.A. 07/03/2008 03:19:38
If Clinton gets in it will be one giant for socialism and one world government. As for health care, the governments meddleing is what is wrong with it. She wants to take it over.

I never had any respect for Bill Clinton and have less for Hillary. If that is what the democrat party stands for why don't they just nominate a marxist that has enough character to say that he/she is one.

Europe and the world better be on their toes if hillary wins because the only help you will get is appeasement and just maybe a bombing of an asprin factory.
51

Not my Country. Not another Clinton. Ever...,

Denver, Colorado 07/03/2008 03:19:55
That's just it...

It's

DEMOCRAT Hillary (BAD, BAD, BAD)

versus

DEMOCRAT Omaba (Good, Good, Good)

Coming from a state that carried Republicans for the past 16 years, everyone wants to see OBAMA win. McCain and the entire Republican party is an afterthought, in fact, no one I've met has said they are going to vote for McCain, but

Hillary is pushing her "Victim" Mentality!

She's all style and no substance!
52

Gantry,

Long Island 07/03/2008 03:21:59
indune1, McCain can only carry on the corruption of the Bush debacle, the sinking of America's greatness into the rubble of a ruined economy. The American home, the symbol of achievement and pride in USA, today means nothing. Because of Bush ineptitude, ignorance, arrogance and people-be-damned, people are walking away from their homes. Home equity is at the lowest point since 1950. Bankruptcy is at an all time high. Do you in your feeble mind think the American people will elect another Bush?? What planet are you visiting?? Or do you live there permanent??
53

indune1,

07/03/2008 03:22:27

51 - McCain and the entire Republican party is an afterthought, in fact, no one I've met has said they are going to vote for McCain.

Perhaps you are mingling in the wrong circles or need to get more.
54

grandbrother,

Los Angeles 07/03/2008 03:25:14
Gantry....Rezko is Obama's "mentor"? Are you kidding? The guy was one of many contributors to Obama, and upon learning what was going on, Obama forwarded Rezko's $11,500 of contibutions to charity. If that's all you've got on him, then you're reaching.

And DirOfTheObv...that "wink wink" stuff regarding Canada and NAFTA is nothing more than Hillary Clinton rhetorical talking points. The Obama camp and the Canadian government have both made clear that the dialogue they had was mischaracterized in that report, and have clarified the situation quite clearly.

It's extremely telling that in order to create controvery about Obama, Hillary's campaign is having to invent and lie about it. It's just too bad that so many uninformed voters out there fall for it.

And compare these invented controversies to the incontrovertible failures of Hillary in years past. She says she'll reform health care when she's already failed miserably at doing it back in the '90's....and it was largely because she was so kniving in her methods that she alienated not only Republicans and moderates, but also her own Democratic allies!

And National Security? She claims to have a handle on that when she actually played a part in getting us into a war in Iraq that's cost thousands upon thousands of lives, and trillions of dollars!

But by all means, let's get mad at Obama for simply knowing a person who broke the law. Yeah....that's REAL logical.
55

,

07/03/2008 03:26:55
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
56

,

07/03/2008 03:28:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
57

Another Long Islander,

Ny 07/03/2008 03:29:29
Funny thing is a nut like Gantry knocks McCain and McCain is essentially a democrat disguised as a republican so in essence he or she is knocking their own lol lol ironic isnt it.
58

Not my Country. Not another Clinton. Ever...,

Denver, Colorado 07/03/2008 03:29:53
Gantry,

Did you not see the headlines last year that Hillary was having "Secret Meetings" with Bush?

She's going to tow the line. NO MORE OF THE SAME TWO FAMILIES IN THE WHITEHOUSE.

59

,

07/03/2008 03:31:56
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
60

,

07/03/2008 03:32:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
61

Another Long Islander,

NY 07/03/2008 03:34:48
#59 gantry, its ironic you knock obama yet hilliary had file gate, vince foster, travel gate, white water, et al. Hypocrisy is alive and well in the gantry world I am a republican but I gotta say, if electing obama gets rid of the clintons I say GO OBAMA. PS remember obama has hinted he is going to give republcans key spots in his cabinet. He cant be that bad of a guy now can he. lol
62

Creepmaster ,

USA 07/03/2008 03:36:42
A good picture of Hillary is here- www.creepyvision.com - Hillary wants to force her agenda on us that will make bush seem like a dream come true. Remember - the president doesn't have all the power -we do - The federal goverment cannot watch our kids at home, make them do thier homework, teach them manners, respect, ethics or responsibility - Parents do. It all starts with individuals and we must remember that our founding fathers wanted us as citizens to have FREEDOM amoung the formost right as a human. We cannot be Free if we are endentured servents to the US Federal Government - Be it the bias tax system, federal and corporate welfare systems, to the arts and education departments - we are a bloated governement and unfortunately none of the canidates will be addressing these issues - it will be status quo for a while.
63

Another Long Islander,

NY 07/03/2008 03:36:47
funny, gantry is a racist to boot. Mrs Black?????? Thats not very democratic now is it? And how did he raise that money? By people liking him thats how. And he has been groomed since the convention of 2004. go back to the tapes to jog your small mind. duh.
64

indune1,

07/03/2008 03:36:52

Oh my, dear Gantry, you are indeed getting carried away. Get a paper bag and breathe in and out of it for at least 2 mins.

Yes, Bush is an idiot. Jimmy Carter was a hopeless wimp. Clinton was a lying, cheating, man of the worst type but a brilliant orator ( oral being the operative).

So what? Your fellow Americans voted Bush in twice as they did the fatally flawed Clintons.

A more dispassionate, experienced observer would conclude that Hillary Clinton has only a slim chance of getting to and winning the convention.

Piece of advice: Start the Prozac program. After November, triple the dosage, immigrate (God knows where) or become a "Obamma Jamma" for 2012. DO you have a medicare plan that will cover the Prozac costs for such a long period?

I really do hope so, if only for the sake of your fellow Long Island rodents.
65

Another Long Islander,

ny 07/03/2008 03:37:43
creepmaster you make too much sense. The fanatics on here wont listen to you. sadly.
66

,

07/03/2008 03:37:55
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
67

mogalmike,

Philadelphia, PA 07/03/2008 03:39:43
Hillary is awful. . . What more do you need to know? However, the "old Guard" will not go "quietly into that good night." Hopefully PA will do the right thing and put her finally put her away.
68

Dan Weinkauf,

Los Angeles, CA 07/03/2008 03:45:54
"They are both tax and spend socialists, whats the diff really ?"

I'll take that over spend incredulously, then force someone else to tax later once interest has accrued, as has been the staple of Reaganomics. What about GW Sr.? Remember, "Read my lips, no new taxes!" Then reality hit... Why don't you take a moment to examine the quality of life in nations like Norway and Sweden, in tangent with their tax rates.
69

indune1,

07/03/2008 03:47:17

Official Psycho Warning!!!

Poster known as Gantry is to be ignored. Responding to his postings will only cause him/her to have inflated view of self-value and relevance.

Desist from responding or referring to his/her psotings. This is asked only in the better interest of America's and the world's mental health.

70

abehn,

San Jose, CA, US 07/03/2008 03:47:53
And these breathless and babbling remarks come from someone who acts as Sen. Obama's "key foreign policy aide"? Oh, great--having amateur hour in the WH is going to be such fun after the trainwreck American foreign policy has been for the last seven years.

Her implication that Ohioans are a bunch of poor deluded fools simply because they didn't vote for her candidate is insulting to the voters. But when things don't go well for the Obama campaign, rather like petulant teenagers, they blame everyone but themselves.
71

FLGirl,

Florida, USA 07/03/2008 03:48:53
all my 18 year old students in the communications program know that "off the record" does not exist when dealing w/the media...that this woman, an advisor to a presidential candidate, is unaware of this fact proves that he is surrounded by idiots...add the one that said today he is not ready to answer a 3am call and neither is clinton - smart, very smart...keep giving the reps more ammunition...obama and his camp are so not ready for "prime time"...go back to school, all of you & come back in 8 years--unless rezko makes your political career go "puff"...
72

,

07/03/2008 03:49:22
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
73

indune1,

07/03/2008 03:49:30
68 - Das Dumkoff - Huh?
74

Bonnie B,

USA 07/03/2008 03:51:57
You might want to update your news regarding the secret meeting with Canada on NAFTA

"OTTAWA (AFP) - US presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton's campaign, while rapping rival Barack Obama for telling US voters he is anti-NAFTA and saying otherwise to Canada, tried to reassure Canada too, local media said Thursday."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080306/pl_afp/canadausdemocratsvotediplomacy
75

,

07/03/2008 03:54:08
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
76

indune1,

07/03/2008 03:55:33

74 - Well done. It is has been conveniently ignored that Clinton advisors also reassured Canadian officals that her strident - and somewhat puzzling opposition to NAFTA, considering that her husband signed the agreement ( where was she then?) - was only political posturing and pandering to the Ohio masses.
77

Bonnie B,

07/03/2008 03:56:24
Ah there really IS hope! Hope that we could have some honesty in the White House. Hillary really is a monster!
78

,

07/03/2008 03:58:14
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
79

,

07/03/2008 03:58:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
80

svsolis,

Chicago 07/03/2008 04:00:08
I think that Ms. Powers is more than a little arrogant. I guess she must believe that if you are poor you cannot think things out. What exactly did Hillary stoop to. Is it because she dared to question Obama's capability? Is that why she is a monster? I think Obama not knowing what his economic advisor had been doing and saying, indicates that he lacks some capability. I'm sure she is upset that a professor was embarresed, because of course, professors should not be exposed when they make mistakes. Know that working class people are intelligent, and they know what they like and believe. Obama is not being forthright, he has been caught not being truthful about many things. How dare Ms. Powers call Hillary names. What would the reaction be if Obama was called names by one of his advisors.
81

ceemonster,

california, usa 07/03/2008 04:02:01
er....what "Ms. Powers' comments reveal"....is that she, and the Obama strategists, are no less ugly, low and dirty than the camp of any other contender in the current presidential race, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton included. that has been plain to see to anyone who has been watching, but this woman is a sow with a mouth on her like that of the delightful Ann Coulter, and these quotes say a lot about the cynicism and hypocrisy of Senator Obama's "we're above dirty pool" pose.
82

indune1,

07/03/2008 04:05:56
81- And the Republicans must be just sh**ting themselves laughing at this most public of trainwrecks.

The Clinton team has now set the standard. Be absolutely squeaky clean in every regard. Only problem being is when it is proven that you are not it is the equivalent of a political freefall without a parachute.
83

divapatriot7,

Detroit 07/03/2008 04:19:54
Gantry: it is time to crawl back under your rock, and take your personal dogs with you. Only a facist islamic fundamentalist thinks that dogs are bad. You must be one. Say "Hi" to achma-I-am-a-nut-job for us when you see him.
Let him know we are comin' for his rear end, too.
Love from Detroit.
84

joeysky,

usa 07/03/2008 04:21:45
if i'm with Obama campaign, i'm more concern with her calling OH voters obsessed to vote for Clinton. I'm sure every OH voters cast their votes with conscious and concern of their future. Obama can kiss OH goodbye for GE. He will have little chance to win the state.

To dismiss voters like that after you lost their voters is not a good move.
85

Devs,

Washingtron, D.C. 07/03/2008 04:22:02
To most of us getting negative emails from Obama's campaign this comes as NO surprise. The candidate of hope and change who is above it all is one of the lowest snakes ever in any race. The proof will come out. He has attacked everyone from the get go. He is incompetent and shouldn't even be in the U.S. Senate. Does this constitute Affirmative Action or just white guilt? Oh and if you don't vote for his sorry butt you're a racist.

If he wins or not there will be riots must worse than when O.J. won and someone ....ummm some exuberant youth gave me a black eye and nearly broke my cheek...but it was just happiness. Imagine anger?
86

,

07/03/2008 04:23:07
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
87

grandbrother,

Los Angeles 07/03/2008 04:29:34
Gantry:

The full relationship of Obama to Rezko is as follows.

Obama bought a house that had a separate strip of land next to it which was bought by Rezko. This strip of land was later sold to Obama, totally legally.

Next, Rezko helped legally raise campaign contributions for Obama's campaign, as he had done with many politicians over the years. He also donated $11,500 of his own money. Upon news of the impending Rezko trial reaching the Obama campaign, the $11,500 Rezko had contributed was forwarded to charity.

Lastly, Rezko wrote a letter of recommendation for an intern that ended up working with Obama for a few weeks.

That's it. If there's more, then you must be the keeper of that secret knowledge. Otherwise, there is absolutely nothing worrying about this connection. I think it's safe to say we all KNOW someone who's done something illegal or immoral at some point, but simply KNOWING them doesn't make us guilty by association.

Incidentally, this reply is really meant for people who may not know the whole story, not for you. It's clear that your mind is set regardless of things like facts.
88

,

07/03/2008 04:32:16
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
89

,

07/03/2008 04:32:38
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
90

grandbrother,

Los Angeles 07/03/2008 04:37:03
Your poem makes it clear now Gantry. You appear to be a bigot.

Way to rhyme "man" with "man" by the way. Very inventive.
91

Devs,

Obama's brand of Foreign Policy...we in trouble no 07/03/2008 04:41:07
http://www.whackynation.com/2008/02/15/senator-barack-obama-proves-he-is-a-dangerous-man/

even more telling, and this isn't some republican spin, but actual facts about the man. The Press is going to investigate this and you can be sure the Republicans will.

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/02/obama-islam-the.html

92

,

07/03/2008 04:44:13
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
93

jim de,

07/03/2008 04:48:03
there is a paper that hillary wrote in college about a
radical named alinsky , he wrote a "rules for radicals"

here are the first six

Rule 1: Power is not only what you have, but what an opponent thinks you have. If your organization is small, hide your numbers in the dark and raise a din
that will make everyone think you have many more people than you do.

Rule 2: Never go outside the experience of your people.
The result is confusion, fear, and retreat.

Rule 3: Whenever possible, go outside the experience of an opponent. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.

Rule 4: Make opponents live up to their own book of rules. “You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.”

Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.

Rule 6: A good tactic is one your people enjoy. “If your people aren’t having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.”

" Rules for Radicals is written for the Have-Nots on how to take it away, the organizer must begin the task of agitating: rubbing resentments, fanning hostilities, and searching out controversy ".

kind of interesting
94

indune1,

07/03/2008 04:49:50
Sorry - but I do remind all new posters to read and heed posting # 69.
95

,

07/03/2008 04:50:00
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
96

,

07/03/2008 04:55:12
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
97

,

07/03/2008 04:58:18
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
98

,

07/03/2008 05:00:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
99

,

07/03/2008 05:01:31
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
100

,

07/03/2008 05:01:57
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
101

,

07/03/2008 05:04:59
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
102

,

07/03/2008 05:12:51
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
103

,

07/03/2008 05:14:13
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
104

jim de,

07/03/2008 05:15:29
hey, does anybody know how much hillary made on those cattle futures?
she and bill have a lot in common with all of us , what with all those fees bill has been getting from foreigners i think those tax returns will show a little more than 35 million usd
i wonder if they know how much a gallon of milk costs
105

Grant10,

California 07/03/2008 05:24:47
HillBillie would make a great understudy to Karl Rove. She has the experience as a union bashing attorney at Walmart. Years of accepting lies from her husband. She has done pretty well at Karl Rove style politics in weak attemps to stop her opponent. By the way Barack won Texas Delagate count! Nice that she claimed victory before Caucus was finished!

There is a clear choice for the US. Obama/Edwards 08.

We dont need Bill Clintons Middle East money or the big drug companies influnce over our healthcare in the US. Any wonder why these two crooks wont reveal their ta returns?
106

Dahveed,

USA 07/03/2008 05:32:33
As their shenanigans surface Americans are quickly going to grow tired and frustrated from yet another round of "Clinton Fatigue Syndrome." We had our belly full back in the 90's. Hillary and Bill will be defeated by their own unscrupulous behavior and dishonesty.
107

PresidentHillary ,

Oregon 07/03/2008 05:38:37
I have never seen so many immature comments in one location. This website wins that prize big time. What a bunch of whiny, poor losers. So Illusionist Obama got his private parts in wringers over the past week. Get used to it. I knew that he wouldn't hold up to scrutiny. He is not seasoned. His pouty foreign policy aide Samantha Powers isn't either. If she were she would be able to come up with a description more worthy of a Pulitzer Prize winner than "monster!" "That's off the record." Pathetic wimpish amateur.
108

CaliforniaBhoy,

07/03/2008 05:43:41
#12 It might take a ton of money to run for president and if you look at where the money comes from, then you have a good idea who will be getting favors from the next administration.

Hillary has taken more money from big business interests than ALL the other candidates, Republican or Democrat, combined.

Barak Obama has refused all big business and PAC money and has raised huge amounts, much from very modest donations, from the American people.

He knows who he owes when he wins because the only favors he owes is to us!
109

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta, CA........captured from Mexico 1845 07/03/2008 05:53:51
Barack Hussein Obama (his full name)

In my opinion is a
"Smoke and Mirror" dude.

He will not, and can not, change a dam thing inside the Beltway in Washington DC

GC
110

CaliforniaBhoy,

07/03/2008 06:17:47
109 GC Is there a point behind your "(his full name)" comment?

We know that hillary won't change anything inside the beltway. She's taken a lot of special interest money.

We know that McCain won't either! He has over 80 lobbyists working on his campaign, including his campaign manager.

Obama will at least try to change te status quo-he doesn't owe the beltway establishment anything!

He who pays the piper calls the tune!
111

,

07/03/2008 06:22:35
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
112

DestinyBender,

The Colonies 07/03/2008 06:24:27
The complete review of Samantha Power's book "A Problem from Hell", says, "one hopes that Power's book will cause more widespread unease about America's sideline-role in (these) horrific genocidal events. Former president Clinton is vilified for engaging in sexual acts with an intern, but hardly anyone damns him for his callous disinterest and inaction during the Rwandan atrocities. A strange sort of moral relativism indeed. (It's a wonder Clinton can sleep at night: there are few blacker marks on any former president than Rwanda on him.) Obviously, this is not the first Clinton that Power thinks ill of. It also reveals how much of a 'Blame America Firster' this International Policy Advisor to The Dali Bhama, really is.
113

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 07/03/2008 06:25:30
Only 'monsters' take part in frontline politics nowadays.

Decent folk refuse to sink so low, which is why politicians (in general) are s