Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Lockerbie bombing: Appeal could go ahead even if he's dead

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 October 2008
THE Lockerbie bomber's appeal could still go ahead after his death, at the request of the families of the victims.

The Scotsman has learned that British relatives of the 270 victims from the 1988 bombing could be prepared to seek permission to continue the appeal in their name, should Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi lose his battle against prostate cancer bef
ore the challenge takes place.

The Libyan government or Megrahi's family could also apply to the Scottish courts to allow the appeal to go ahead without the convicted bomber. The appeal is currently expected to be heard late next year.

Professor Robert Black is an Edinburgh law expert who helped devise the unique trial of Megrahi at a specially constructed court at Kamp van Zeist, in the Netherlands.

He said that when a convicted person dies before their appeal is heard, judges can grant permission to anyone "with a legitimate interest" in the case to continue the proceedings.

"It might be a family member or, in this case, even the Lockerbie families who have an interest in whether this man is properly convicted or not."

Such cases are extremely rare. In 2001, a mother won a battle to posthumously clear her son's name of child abuse. Malcolm Cowan, from Lochgelly in Fife, took his own life after being convicted of an indecency offence involving three girls.

Dr Jim Swire, whose daughter Flora died in the bombing, said the possibility of the families of Lockerbie victims continuing with the appeal had yet to be discussed.

But he indicated it was something which many relatives would be keen to press ahead with in the interests of justice – as they face the alternative that the "truth" will simply wither away.

"There are many people who want to see this sorted," said Dr Swire. "The death of the accused, without a further appeal, would not be right and would be bad for the Scottish legal system. I feel confident that members of our group would wish the appeal to continue no matter what."

But Mr Swire also said he wants to see the appeal brought forward, given Megrahi's rapidly declining health. "If his prognosis is bad then I hope that the Scottish authorities would look for a way of speeding up the next appeal without compromising the fairness of it. It would be an act of great humanity."

His views were echoed by former Labour MP Tam Dalyell. "My view is there is a moral obligation to speed up the (appeal] process," he said.

Alex Neil, a Nationalist MSP for Central Scotland, said: "In light of Megrahi's illness, I am calling on the Crown Office to bring forward his appeal and not to cause any further delays. It is in the interests of natural justice that a timeous appeal takes place."

The Scottish Court Service said: "It will be for Mr Megrahi and his solicitors to apply to the court, to be heard on any issue regarding his appeal."

No application has been received by the court service, it is understood.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 October 2008 1:12 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Lockerbie
 
1

Edwin & Mahnaz Bollier, Mebo Ltd,

Zurich 22/10/2008 02:12:23

The rehablitation Libya's and its Official Mr.Abdelbaset Ali Al-Megrahi.
Please bring back, Mr. Al Megrahi, to its family immediately. Mr Al Megrahi, have nothing to do with the "Lockerbie-Tragedy"!

The political hostage and "Lockerbie victim 271"
Abdelbaset Al Megrahi, suffering since April 6th, 1999 until now
324,698,942 painful seconds, innocent in scottish prisons...

There are more and more accumulations of demonstrable evidence of proof falsifications that the Scottish Justice suppresses. How comes that the Scottish Justice does not resist the justified reproaches of Edwin Bollier (MEBO Ltd.) and ex-engineer Ulrich Lumpert (in his affidavit) in this crucial affair?
Reason: Because their allegations were developed on fundamental evidence (hardware) and the responsible persons behind the falsifications of this crucial evidence would be exposed!

More information on our webpage: www. lockerbie.ch
2

Guga II,

Rockall 22/10/2008 06:50:07
Al-Megrahi's conviction was a total stitch-up as a result of pressure being brought to bear by the Americans.

As he is dying of cancer, he should be freed immediately so that he can be with his family for what remains of his life.

I also think that his appeal should continue, even if he dies, so that, at last, the Scottish legal system can attempt to salvage what is left of it's reputation.
3

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 22/10/2008 09:29:27
2 - How do you know he is innocent? Who is guilty ? - Genuine questions - I am interested - othe wise I'd say he could rot in prison without the aid of painkillers but if he's not the man then I agree with you.

The scottish legal system - like most legal systems - has lost sight of good judgement a myriad of legislation and legal crusades to uphold the 'reasonable' have ensured that the vast a majority of our laws can no longer be reconciled with right and wrong - which is a tad concerning .... It almost needs to be scrapped and started again from new ...
4

Curious Yellow,

Edinburgh 22/10/2008 10:12:46
#2 - 1 - rubbish; 2- rubbish; 3- rubbish

Why should we fund a continuing appeal that will have absolutely no end effect?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.