Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 14th May 2008 Change Date

Free A to Z of Scotland's Munros

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Lost luggage, delays, stress and tears… welcome to Terminal 5



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 March 2008
WHEN it became clear I would be among the first passengers to arrive at Heathrow's £4.3 billion new Terminal 5, I uneasily laughed off a joke from a colleague: "I bet they lose your bags."
He won the bet.

It was already going to be a very difficult day. I was flying to London to attend a funeral. I had booked an early flight with British Airways to give myself plenty of time to get there.

When I landed in London, already half
an hour late, there was no sign of my or anyone else's bags. Passengers on the first inbound flight, from Hong Kong, received their luggage in less than 15 minutes – along with a personal handshake from Willie Walsh, BA's chairman. But the baggage system soon appeared to collapse completely.

Dozens of agitated customers were standing next to empty conveyor belts, while on the information screens every arrival was "awaiting bags".

It soon became clear that some passengers had been waiting more than two hours for their bags. Dozens of irate passengers became hundreds as more planes landed. Staff hurried by – either on the phone or on radios, but no-one stopped to provide any information.

As my onward bus to Woking came and went, there was still no bag or announcement. We were told the Tannoy system had broken down.

I joined a queue at a customer service desk, where just two people were attempting to deal with hundreds of frustrated customers. It took several minutes to log each person's details and none of the staff seemed to know what the problem was or whether our bags had reached Heathrow.

By that time, a queue of more than 100 people snaked back from the cancelled flights desk as passengers tried to get on to other flights or receive refunds.

Snaking queues were meant to be a thing of the past for BA passengers at Heathrow, yet they were the most noticeable feature at Terminal 5 yesterday – all within sight of giant signs proclaiming: "Welcome to our new home."

Passengers on a BA flight from Los Angeles that landed at 9:30am only emerged from the arrivals hall four hours later, while others waited longer for their bags than they had spent in the air.

Hertz Merkel, a German businessman flying to Düsseldorf, said: "This is real British organisation for you. I've only got hand baggage but I still have to stand in the same queue. It doesn't look like I'll be getting home today."

Eventually, a woman arrived and started handing out forms. She couldn't offer any answers as to what had gone wrong, where our luggage was or how long it would take to sort out.

My tearful pleas for help were met with exasperation and shrugged shoulders.

In the end, I had to abandon my bag. In its place, I accepted a "mishandled baggage" form with a reference number scribbled in Biro. I didn't even get an apology.

I made it to the funeral service in time – after sprinting to catch a later bus.

A call to the "centralised baggage tracing centre" later was less than reassuring. It seems my bag made it to Terminal 5, but where it is now is anyone's guess. "If" it turns up, I was told, British Airways will "call me".

I have the misfortune of returning to Edinburgh with BA tomorrow – still in the suit I wore to the funeral, no doubt.

It will be the last time I fly with BA.

COUNTDOWN TO CHAOS
4:42am: The first flight from Hong Kong arrives eight minutes early, to be welcomed by British Airways' chief executive Willie Walsh.

He said: "This is a historic day for BA and for UK aviation. Everyone involved in the project should be extremely proud of their achievements in creating this fantastic facility."

6:20am: The first departing flight to Paris leaves on time. However, arriving passengers encounter major problems with baggage reclaim, with some having to wait more than two hours for their bags.

Noon: The knock-on effects of the baggage problems force BA to cancel 20 flights.

1:30pm: Passengers arriving from Los Angeles collect their luggage four hours after arriving.

2pm: Flight cancellations increase to 34.

5pm: BA suspends all baggage check-in, forcing passengers to travel with hand luggage only.



The full article contains 732 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 March 2008 9:19 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Jock MacSprog,

28/03/2008 02:04:51
lets face it we are just the world's worst at service businesses in the UK. Also, I would wager that bitter trade unionist baggage handlers, "working slow" are behind this debacle.
2

jed,

London 28/03/2008 04:29:15
What do you expect. Thousands of militant baggage handlers, many of whom can barely speak English, and that's just the English ones, let alone the foreigners. It's the same in hotels, in restaurants, in shops, in bus and railway stations. The service industries are manned by millions of lazy people who are semi-literate, bad-mannered and ill-tempered. The best of the English have moved abroad, and are being joined by 200,000 more every year.
English - you have become lazy, slow-witted, unimaginative, inflexible, dishonest, but what is really the worst thing - you are also becoming completely dependant on your government run by control freaks to tell you what to do in every aspect of your lives.
3

Agent 99,

28/03/2008 05:38:18
"WHEN it became clear I would be among the first passengers..."

Says it all really. Another non-thinking person who gets hastily turned into a victim.

You have a choice, Andrea. No one forced you to fly BA and, as what appears to be a literate person you have presumably been keeping up with the [bad] press that BA and heathrow in particular have been receiving of late.

As regards choice, I made mine years ago, mainly as a result of one too many mishaps in the so-called flight connections [not] centre. I fly frequently, but haven't been through heathrow for more than 5 years.
4

Nell,

The Preservation Hall 28/03/2008 07:35:42
No. 2 Jed:- Are you racist by any chance?
5

Bob Christie,

28/03/2008 07:38:57
#3 Absolutely!

Thankfully from Scotland we have the choice of using the hub airports of Schipol, Frankfurt and Copenhagen.
Only the masochists would use London!
6

Liam,

28/03/2008 07:39:56
Thank God that Scots have plenty of flight options now which don't involve having to pass through this nightmare of a London airport. I'd transit through Paris, Amsterdam or Frankfurt any day, rather than subject myself to the hell of Heathrow. And if I'm going to the States there's always Newark and JFK direct from Edinburgh. Perfect!
7

Kate,

Zurich 28/03/2008 07:53:57
#5 and #6 unfortunately, we don't have the best choices coming from Switzerland to Scotland. Whatever I do, I have to change aeroplanes; although British Midland does attempt to fly direct, the one time I did book with them they changed the days of my flights, I ended up transferring at Frankfurt and my luggage came 3 days later...

All it needs is for BA to re-introduce the very easy transfers at Manchester, Birmingham, Bristol, Newcastle and so on; they were a doddle compared to the disasters at the London airports
8

Upandunder,

28/03/2008 08:22:25
No.4 (Nell) are you a typical person of the left who just labels people who views different to yours with throwaway words like "racist"?

Could you perhaps argue your reasons for begging to differ?
9

Conan,

Chile 28/03/2008 08:32:01
#1 & #2 - absolutely right on the money. While I still love by Scotland and have a passing residual occasional liking for the UK, it is such a relief to get out of the UK for a while each year as the quality of most services these days has reached an all time low. But, for Gawd's sake, don't ever say so - or offer observations on the obvious reasons why - or you'll have a nitwit like #4 shrieking racist ..... likely the only word in English they can pronounce or spell. Cheers!
10

Duncan in Edinburgh,

Edinburgh 28/03/2008 09:06:15
#8 Are you the sort of person who finds himself constantly trying to justify racist views as something other?

Did you notice that #4 was a question?
11

Keithie Boy,

St Albans 28/03/2008 09:25:46
The problems faced at T5 should come as a surprise to nobody. New building, lots of technology. Hmmmm. These things, despite testing, never work first time out. And, whilst, it's fun to slag off the truly awful BAA, it's worth pointing out that the new Hong Kong (now rated the world's best airport for passengers!)had exactly the same types of problems. As did the new "Peking" airport. So, it's not just the Brits who do this. It's quite sad how we beat folk up on this. When St Pancras opened without a hitch nobody said anything. Some people are just never happy.
12

James, Edinburgh,

28/03/2008 09:27:05
Kate, #7. We don't find it any problem to travel between Edinburgh and Zurich via Amsterdam by KLM. In fact, we quite enjoy the transfer point, where we can get a decent meal, a leg stretch and make purchases at the plentiful shops. If we want to go to Geneva, there are direct flights. It's a pity that Swissair went down the tubes, as they ran a Crossair flight twice a week (with good food and drinks thrown in. Forbye, you can get good deals with KLM
13

donald,

glasgow 28/03/2008 09:29:14
This a result of London's over centralisation and sheer greed.

Time for home based direct flighta.
14

The Genuine Mario Antoinette,

28/03/2008 09:38:43
I'd take this as a more or less made up schadenfreude (can you fly there direct? is it near Zurich) piece about the new terminal.

As others have pointed out no-one in their right mind would fly to Heathrow from Scotland. Lutons easy and cheap , so is Stansted.

Also, if she's going for such a short trip why take hold luggage at all ?

Leave Heathrow to the londoners and those who absolutely have to use it.

Schipol and Frankfurt are wonderful Hub airports (as much as an airport can be wonderful) , or even Brussels Zaventem.


15

The Genuine Mario Antoinette,

28/03/2008 09:39:04
Ryanair fly to Schadenfreude.
16

Kate,

Zurich 28/03/2008 10:03:26
#12 James in Edinburgh, I agree, or at least would have if Schiphol had not lost luggage on each of the 5 last occasions I or my mother transferred there...It is a great airport if you are not in a hurry!
17

The Genuine Mario Antoinette,

28/03/2008 11:03:07
She works for News of The World and NEWSFLASH scotland eg, its Guff.
18

MyricaGale,

Dundee 28/03/2008 11:32:43
I agree on flying via Schipol and KLM. I haven't flown via Heathrow for years nor using BA. So far (quite a few flights) KLM has not lost luggage and even tight connections have been fine (even if involving a bit of running through Schipol).

The chaos at Terminal 5 should never have happened, it should not have been opened until both BA and BAA were 100% confident in their operating process and their staff were fully up to speed. The final responsibility for the mess lies with the Managing Directors of both companies - not the ground staff. The fact that the opening was rushed, staff not trained etc. says a great deal about the the "competency" or otherwise of the respective company boards of directors.
19

truthsleuth,

28/03/2008 12:08:06
I wonder did the duty free shops etc work ok
However I think baggga haulage and passenger flight should be charged separately ie those who take the most pay the most.
20

truthsleuth,

28/03/2008 12:08:58
Don't talk to me about KML
21

The Genuine Mario Antoinette,

28/03/2008 12:24:36
KML is a file format used to display geographic data in an Earth browser such as Google Earth.
22

Xena - Warrior Princess,

28/03/2008 13:32:55
I wonder if it is not the case that they just do not have enough staff?
23

bogmon,

28/03/2008 15:03:21
A question: What are the pros and cons of living in the UK?

I can't think of any pros at the moment, but I'm working on it...
24

John Blackley,

Florida 28/03/2008 17:46:29
Nineteen years in the planning. Air traffic and ground traffic control don't work. Baggage handling doesn't work. Customer services don't work. The flight status board didn't work. The elevators and escalators didn't work. The tannoy system doesn't work. The transport to the car parks doesn't work.

Apart from that, triumph!
25

mocasy,

matsudo Japan 03/04/2008 16:19:46
I'm sorry for the long comment but i am so angry right now.

This is indeed the worst thing that has happened to me it comes to travel. My two bags are problaby lying around among those 15 000 bags at heathrow and who knows when and if i'll get it back.

I travelled from my home stockholm to tokyo while passing london heathrow. When reaching tokyo airport Narita, roughly speaking;about 10 bags had accomponied the flight. So practically no one on my flight got their luggage.

Andf there were no excuses, no talking about compensation. You just gave them your temp adress in tokyo, and they gave you a piece of paper that started with the phrase "I'm sorry to inform you that your luggage was no travelling on the same flight as you today", and that was it. Just waiting. For days not nowing anything.

I'm here in tokyo for studies and i will be studying for 6 months. I had a very strict economy already when i landed in japan. That economy has litterly been smashed to pieces of this little misfortune. I've been forced to buy all these basic things from clothes to bedsheets. My travel insurance dosent kick in until after 30 days of lost luggage. Until then its up to the BA they told me in an email. BA though, can't even spell compensation.

This is the worst journey i've ever made. It ruined my first experience of studying abroad.

//still waiting and hoping.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.