Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 9th May 2008 Change Date

Evening News / Sony Centre Reverse Auction

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Heathrow Terminal 5 misery: British Airways admits 'We got things wrong'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 March 2008
PASSENGERS endured another day of travel misery at Heathrow's new £4.3 billion Terminal 5 (T5) as British Airways axed flights for the second day running.
Admitting his airline had "got things wrong" after yesterday's disastrous opening day at the new facility, British Airways chief executive Willie Walsh warned of further flight cancellations tomorrow.

Adding that he would not be resigning, Mr Walsh said that the planned move of more of BA's Heathrow operations to the new terminal at the end of April was "under review".

Arguments broke out among passengers in long, early-morning queues today as BA struggled to recover from the chaos of Thursday, which had seen the airline cancel 34 return flights and suspend checked-in luggage operations.

BA had to axe 36 return flights today – all of them short-haul – but at least passengers on flights that did leave were able to check in hold luggage.

There were also further problems today with staff having difficulties getting through security.

The Conservatives called for an inquiry into the "chaos and confusion", while the British Chambers of Commerce said T5 was a "PR disaster for London and the UK".

The GMB union asked the public not to take out their frustrations on BA staff who were "doing their best to cope with what looks like technical difficulties".

Vanderlande Industries that has helped design and supply the baggage system at T5 would make no comment today, and merely referred callers to British Airways or Heathrow operator BAA.

Alstec, the company operating the bag-handling systems, would also not comment.

The worst of the disruption came early today with some passengers missing flights after claiming there were not enough desks open, or that they were given wrong directions to the departure hall.

Tony Pascoe, 35, from Witney, Oxfordshire, arrived just after 4am today with his mother Ann for a holiday to Vienna – her first flight.

He said: "None of the desks were open and we were told to stand in a queue. After standing there for God knows how long they opened one, and people who had just walked into the terminal began jumping in. It was chaotic.

"Everyone who had been queuing were annoyed and a lot of jostling and arguing started. Then the desk just crashed so everyone was stood there. Our flight was due to leave at 6.45am so I stood in one queue and my mum in another. Eventually they told us we weren't going to get on."

Having praised the operation at the new terminal in its opening hours yesterday, Mr Walsh was forced to conduct a series of damage-limitation interviews at T5 today.

He said: "I am not pointing the finger at BAA. Both British Airways and BAA made mistakes, but I am taking responsibility for the mistakes we made. If people want someone to point the finger at then they can point it at me. I didn't get any pleasure out of what happened yesterday."

When asked about whether he would resign his post Mr Walsh said: "I am going nowhere – I am going to make this work."

Mr Walsh said he was determined to "make this great building work", that lessons would be learnt from the opening and that the opening-day difficulties had resulted from "a combination of problems".

He went on: "Yesterday was definitely not British Airways' finest hour. We disappointed many people and I apologise sincerely. I take responsibility for what happened. The buck stops with me.

"Our performance was not good enough. We did not deliver for our customers and we should have. I would expect some disruption tomorrow, but I think it will get better every day as we become accustomed to the building and the quirks of the systems."

The full article contains 637 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 March 2008 4:57 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: British Airways
 
1

thebroons,

dunblane 28/03/2008 10:19:42
Does not bode well for the 2013 Olympics!
2

Highland Mighty,

28/03/2008 10:31:42
There's one in 2013 too?

Same old problem with rushing such major projects into operation; lack of preperation of staff.

Give it a week or two and all will be sorted. The media blitz on this is a little bit of an overreaction!
3

Daft Old Git,

28/03/2008 10:31:54
BA and Heathrow make a horrible combination
4

Toast,

28/03/2008 10:39:29
BA & BAA must be the two most customer unfriendly companies in Britain,they just couldn't care less as long as they get their pound of flesh
5

Optimus Prime,

Cybertron 28/03/2008 10:42:58
You have to laugh you really do. That pompous lot BA being turned into an International embarrassment.
6

Indie Rep Kid,

28/03/2008 10:59:51
#2 Over-reaction?

Call me old-fashioned but I would expect that something costing £4.3bn would work - and work well.

Or is it just another case of style over content?
7

Luke Skywalker,

28/03/2008 11:02:40
I suggest Tony Pascoe, 35, from Witney, Oxfordshire takes the train from St Pancras etc. It is fast, comfortable and above all reliable.
8

Jock MacSprog,

28/03/2008 11:51:29
Some staff, who refused to do overtime, said they would call in sick during the next few days until the glitches were ironed out. Others questioned BAA and BA for failing to heed union warnings over the sudden change in working practice among a large and notoriously testy workforce

Disappointing to see that the some staff would rather pull a sicky than get in there and help out for the overall good of their company and it's customers.

My prediction is that when this is all over the culprits will be the militant baggage handlers trade union, the same reason it has taking a hour to get your bags at heathrow for the past 5 years.
9

Upandunder,

28/03/2008 11:57:58
If we called in a German logistics consultancy firm to organise the opening of T5 we wouldn't be in this mess.

But then again us Britons are too proud, arenn't we?

10

Calum Crubag,

28/03/2008 12:40:55
Aye, Highland Mig. It's all the media's fault. Give New Labour a week or two and this won't have happened at all. Actually, such fiascos are good for us! In the same way as the SNP arne't really doing well in Scotland...
11

JT,

28/03/2008 12:43:44
Im glad I dont fly to/from Heathrow. Its not much better at Gatwick, last summer we waited over 30 mins for our bags after flying from Edinburgh.
Typical of BA/BAA teething problems. I would fire their quality assurance and testing people.
12

John south of Soutra,

28/03/2008 12:52:41
I'm surprised that H&M isn't blaming Salmond for this, have to agree with #6, with amount spent on it it is only reasonable to expect it to work from day 1
13

thebroons,

dunblane 28/03/2008 12:59:19
#2
Sorry Olympics now on in 2014; my mistake, unforseen problem with revised 2013 forecast, you didn't get the joke!
14

Arrow,

edinburgh 28/03/2008 13:32:48
i thnk that you will find that the lost luggage will turn up at the usual auction of unclaimed (lost)baggage. funnily enough many of the people who turn up at the auctions bear a striking resemblance to the people who are involved in the baggage handling and other parts of the admin of Thiefrow.
15

Jock Smith,

Waukesha 28/03/2008 13:56:09
I have just returned from a group visit to the UK. For the second time in 2 years my luggage was " DELAYED " for 2 and a half days. The last time 3 days, 4 of my group this year had luggage delayed and one has still to be found.I received 2 bags at my hotel, one of which was for some poor person in Yuma Arizona, and was still at the hotel when we left 10 days later because the courier company refused to uplift it when they delivered other bags.
Good old BA.
16

Agent 99,

28/03/2008 14:41:20
[9] A good point.

BA is clearly one to develop everything themselves, and at an enormous cost in prestige.

They are just one of the large club of UK-based NIH afficionados. Just this week there was an article in the Times about how there would be a "massive opportunity" to bring a new generation of nuclear reactors into use across the world, as a lot of existing plant was nearing end-of-life This spokesman in the article appeared to think this could be masterminded from the UK, heralding a new dawn for British industry. This type of deluded thinking is exactly what got BA into this mess today.

o Failure to procure tried and tested solutions.
o Test exposure kept to a minimum.
o Total management failure to bring on board the most significant resources: the people that run the thing.
o ...

No one would tolerate this with a new operating theatre, or for that matter a new aircraft type, so why do BA think they can just muddle through with such a critical and potentially prestigous development? To call them idiots would be generous.
17

Jwil,

28/03/2008 15:54:20
No mention here about the number of Scottish flights cancelled or that Scottish business is not very happy about the cancellations. A very sanitised article.
18

Mcsnagpile,

28/03/2008 17:47:03
I am glad they have cancelled the finger printing idea. Looking at there organisational ability every one and his dog would have a copy in a short space of time; possibly available on eBay.
After many years away from a certain country, when I returned they said my fingerprints would verify my security and identity. The computer did find me only it decided I should be 15 years younger—thank you-jolly good, at least the computer had decided I was not a terrorist-perhaps next time, who knows.
19

Shionnach,

28/03/2008 20:22:45
Anyone daft enough to travel by British Airways deserves all they get!
20

JayDeeTee,

28/03/2008 20:35:09
#17. Beacause 'British Airways' treat domestic customers like sh*t, especially those flying on the Scotland to England routes. Time to take stock and fly with somebody else. BA always gives me the impression of an 'elitist' airline who seems to cater for the well heeled as a priority.
21

Kenny A,

28/03/2008 21:49:52
Wait for terminal 6, serious gridlock, what a bunch of (fahgfeocks) British Airways are.
22

Kitti Kat,

PA 28/03/2008 23:19:42
I've heard a similar story before. The same thing happened when the new terminal in Denver opened a few years ago. It was several months before the mess was straightened out. Hope that Terminal 5 is on track faster than Denver. My last trip from Heathrow in December 2006 was one of the worst I've had in 20 years of flying BA. We arrived at terminal 4 three hours early and got no further than the over crowded check in area. We stood there for three hours when the flight to Philadelphia was called. No time to buy a newspaper or the goodies promised to friends and family who love the sweets from the UK. We have no idea why this happened but it was not good. It was also my cousin's first fligh t to London and after that fiasco, she swears she won't return. Too bad as the UK has so much to offer.
23

DaveSubsea,

28/03/2008 23:21:08
English Airways are doomed, see Open Skys policy Easy Brit on the cards
24

Shionnach,

29/03/2008 00:04:34
#22 Kitti Kat
You were very luck, compared to what many people go through, it sounds as though you had a very pleasant and relaxing trip through Heathrow!
In a couple of months time the holiday season will start, at which point the staff at Heathrow will be having their annual strike. When these occur only the very fortunate are allowed to queue inside, the vast majority are left outside in the rain.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Features

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.