Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008 Change Date

The Scotsman Digital Archive - Special Christmas Offer

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Stem cell research may not find wonder cures



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 April 2008
STEM cell research, we have long been told, should pave the way for revolutionary new treatments to help millions of patients around the world.
Yet despite the years of study and debate about the potential, therapies have been slow to materialise.

Even the head of the UK National Stem Cell Network has now conceded that stem cell research may never deliver new treatments.

Given the ethi
cal controversy about the research – particularly the use of animal-human hybrid embryos – some have questioned whether it is worth pursuing the research any further without proof that it will actually benefit human health.

But researchers meeting in Edinburgh later this week for the first ever UK National Stem Cell Research Conference will very much be spreading the message that the science is producing results and experts must be allowed to continue to study stem cells in their many forms.

Lord Patel of Dunkeld, chairman of the UK National Stem Cell Network and chancellor of Dundee University, said the current signs were that research involving stem cells would lead to therapies for patients.

But he said there was also a chance such treatments could prove too risky for human use.

Speaking to The Scotsman, Lord Patel said it could be five to ten years before stem cell treatments were widely available, with trials starting shortly in the UK and US.

"But we have to be cautious," he said. "It may not deliver therapy for anything. We may find that stem therapy is quite a risky business.

"We had a lot of hype about gene therapy, and while we still use it in some cases it did not deliver the great promise we thought it would because of the side-effects. But the promise just now is great and we must continue with the stem cell science."

Stem cell research has risen up the agenda in the last month due to ethical concerns about the creation of so-called hybrid embryos.

The DNA is taken from animal eggs and replaced with genetic information from humans, making them more than 99.9 per cent human.

From these, scientists can create embryonic stem cells for research – those with the most potential because they have the ability to develop into many types of tissue. They argue that a shortage of human eggs for research means that such hybrid embryos are vital to speed up developments.

But the Scottish Catholic Church has condemned the research, with Cardinal Keith O'Brien saying such research was of "Frankenstein proportions" and was a "monstrous attack on human rights, human dignity and human life".

He urged MPs to vote against a Bill which would support scientists working with such embryos in the UK and several members of the Cabinet threatened to resign unless they were given a free vote when it comes before parliament in a few weeks.

Scientists pointed out that the research involved embryos no bigger than a few grains of sand, not allowed to grow for more than a few days.

But a spokesman for the Scottish Catholic Church said: "At one point, we were all just a small bundle of cells.

"At that stage, while not recognisably human, these cells are still human life." The Church also pointed out that, as yet, embryonic stem cell research had failed to produce any meaningful results.

Despite his own reservations that stem cell work may not live up to its hype, Lord Patel said he was hopeful of finding treatments for serious diseases such as diabetes, Parkinson's, motor neurone disease and even disorders such as Alzheimer's.

"Are there any signs that this could happen? Yes there are, particularly in animal experiments that suggest this might be possible," Lord Patel said.

"In terms of embryonic stem cell therapy, there is currently no such therapy that is available in a large number of patients.

"It is suggested that pretty soon in the US they may go to first phase clinical trials in humans using embryonic stem cells for repair of damage to the spinal cord.

"It is possible that the UK, within a year, might be able to go to first stage clinical trials using embryonic stem cells for age-related macular degeneration (an eye condition].

"If both of these which have shown early promise come to fruition we are talking about a serious number of patients being treated."

One area currently exciting scientists is research showing that adult stem cells can be genetically manipulated to take them backwards so they behave like embryonic stem cells.

Known as induced pluripotent stem cells (IPS cells), the creation of such cells means that researchers will be less dependent on embryos to harvest the most useful cells for study.

Dr Willy Lensch, from the Children's Hospital in Boston, is among those working with such cells and believes they do hold huge promise, despite concerns they could be more at risk of cancer.

He said the aim was now to reduce the number of genes used to create the IPS cells to reduce the risk of a cancer side-effect.

So far his team have taken adult cells and turned them into stem cells for diseases such as juvenile diabetes and Down Syndrome.

Dr Lensch, who will address the Edinburgh conference later this week, said he hoped to learn a lot more about disease from studying such stem cells.

"My own specialism is to understand the genetic basis of disease and I believe there are a cornucopia of opportunities to use this science to increase our understanding and eventually lead to new treatments."

Dr Lensch said he had confidence that stem cell research would eventually lead to new treatments for patients.

"I think there is a lot of evidence to suggest that it will get somewhere.

"I could not guarantee to anyone that this work will actually lead to improvements in disease as a definite.

"But there are precedents already set which suggest the potential of stem cell science."

And yesterday, scientists in the US revealed they have been able to use skin cells re-programmed to act like embryonic stem cells to ease the symptoms of Parkinson's disease in rats.

Lord Patel said it was vital that scientists had every method possible at their disposal to study stem cells – including hybrid embryos – to make sure the potential was not lost.

PROMISING PROJECTS

SCIENTISTS around the world are exploring potential uses for stem-cell therapy. Here are some that are showing promise:

• A team in the UK are attempting to restore vision in people with age-related macular degeneration – the leading cause of blindness – using cells from patients' own eyes. Larger trials are planned.

• Researchers in the US are hoping to start trials using embryonic stem cells to treat patients with spinal-cord injuries.

• Scientists at the University of Nottingham are experimenting with stem cells in the hope of developing heart cells to treat patients who have suffered a heart attack. A billion of these cells would be needed for treatment. Currently they are only to create the cells in their millions.

• Researchers in Edinburgh and several other places are trying to harness the potential of stem cells in treating degenerative diseases such as motor neurone disease.

• As well as eventually being used in therapies, researchers hope that tissue created from stem cells could be used to test new drugs without having to use patients as guinea pigs. This could help speed up new treatment development.

• Some research suggests stem cells could be directed to become eggs or sperm to help patients who are infertile.





The full article contains 1269 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Resolutions,

08/04/2008 00:29:41
This stem cell business seeems to have been blown up too much.

Why it was expected to provide a cure for all ills was distinctly unrealistic! Research is just not like that. Thousands of blind alleys with a 'maybe' somewhere in there, to help a wee bit here or a wee bit there, is more like it.
2

Right-on-the-Left-Coast,

08/04/2008 05:54:32
Check out Dr. Science grabbing for money...

http://www.geocities.com/Baja/Trails/7667/cartoons/drscience.html
3

conservative,

Fife 08/04/2008 07:57:59
Scientists are interested in science, not miracle cures. They wave the carrot of a 'cure' only as a way to get permission to carry out ever more disgusting experiments on human embryos. We can only hope that the embryology bill will be defeated but no doubt Brown will find some way to bring his jackboots down on any Labourites who step out of line.
4

Non!!,

East Britain 08/04/2008 08:03:59
I remember when biotechnology was the technology which would produce miracles. Some 30 years on there have been achievements but much less than was hyped. Then there was gene therapy which would "cure" haemophilia (and other disorders such as cystic fibrosis) at the flick of a switch.The end result has been disappointing. Stem cells are the next wonder. As the hype has been that they are (or may be) the cure for so many diseases that affect man, the result is likely to be disappointment here too. However, like biotechnology,(some)start up companies specialising in stem cell technology will make vast sums of money for their founders and for their investors without actually doing anything very meaningful. Cynical? Certainly so. But,sadly,based on the accumulated expeience of a lifetime spent in research.
5

fife runner,

08/04/2008 08:48:40
it is scientists pushing the boundaries in the pretext of helping people.
6

Duncan in Edinburgh,

08/04/2008 09:01:24
Name me a single scientist who has claimed that they are certain that stem cell research will result in cures!

No credible scientist has ever made such a claim, therefore by refuting it they are refuting a straw man.
7

voltaire's janny,

08/04/2008 09:08:33
Keep going brave pioneers at the frontier of knowledge.

With luck you may find a cure for religion and save us from mankind's greatest mental illness and source of misery.
8

Alan B,

08/04/2008 09:13:12
Stem cell research will produce results. But it is still in its infancy. Part of the crititism is that it has not produced results yet. That is just being silly. It may well be over 20yrs before results really come through. The article mentions 10yrs as like many things, it normally takes longer than initially anticipated.

Also with governments have restricted this science eg the US and the current discussion of allowing experiments to go ahead in the uk, how do we really expect to have results now.
9

Buspass,

Edinburgh 08/04/2008 10:30:14
Don't knock research. Without it, no stents, no Beta Blockers, no progress in cancer treatment. So just be grateful for the one success in a 1000 blind alleys.
10

Gdgy,

dundee 08/04/2008 10:59:57
No, this research might not finds cures but it might.
Doing nothing certainly won't!
11

AtheT,

North of Kelso 08/04/2008 11:58:56
Many of the medical treatments used today were railed against by the clergy, claiming Satan was running amok. Now if they need a new heart they are first in line. Hypocrits all. Let them do the research. Good always comes out of it eventualy.
12

Resolutions,

08/04/2008 12:57:40
#9 #10
No research = no progress, but the reality is there are many more totally blind alleys than those which take a step forward in knowledge.
looking at it another way, every blind alley is a step in knowledge as it limits the alleys to be pursued.
Am not saying research is useless - quite the contrary - but please no unrealistic expectations of miracles!
13

Regret,

08/04/2008 14:48:09
Excellent article. Let's put it in a 25 year time capsule and in the year 2032 see where we've gone. Regular medicine is great, but anything derived from another human, I want no part. The odds are it was taken forcefully away from that person.
14

voltaire's janny,

08/04/2008 16:01:10
13 Regret

So blood transfusion, bone marrow, cornea, kidney from living donor (sibling say), anti-D if you are female Rh- with +ve partner and pregnant (again) etc etc etc you would refuse?

Your right of course. What about "regular" medicine? No LD-50 (vivisection) == no license.

Happy with that?

Maybe you're a Jehova's Witness?

Sure you're gonna live until 2032?

Good luck dude.
15

annaleslie,

California 08/04/2008 17:09:23
Instead of spending a fortune on stem cell research for Alzheimer's, MS, diabetes, fathering babies before one is 34 would go a long way to prevent these and other disorders in the first place. I wonder how much money health alerts about the paternal age effect would cost?
16

steve green,

preston,lancashire. 08/04/2008 21:04:47
At least the scientists are trying and I,for one, am grateful.
17

Trade-wind,

USA 08/04/2008 22:23:49
This and all experimental things are feared. With good reason, I expect they do cause problems we know nothing about. Why do we have cancer that is going uncontroled and advancing in human kind. I have long thought it was probably from some chemical wonder devised in an experiment in some lab a long time ago. We do things to ourselves and the environment that we have no idea we are doing. Yet we all clamor for more things made of plastic because it is cheap and strong and makes having things we otherwise would not have. Aluminum has been known for a long time to be the agent or at least one of the agents that are responcible for Alzheimer's disease. It occures naturally in the body as a growth agent. However, we have been cooking with it and drinking out of it and packaging food in it for well over half a century. Think what would happen if it were suddenly removed from the market in these forms. What would we use to take its place. So many of these experiments to creat something, lead to the creation of unwanted side things. We don't know if cell phones cause or will cause brain cancer but look at all the people with them stuck in their ear. We don't really care until someone we know get affected by it or we get affected by it then we care. They will continue to do research. We will support it in enough numbers that it will continue. They will creat something that will help or hinder at some point. So all of this jawing about it is I guess, useless.
18

Resolutions,

08/04/2008 23:48:10
#15
One comment - ageism
19

voltaire's janny,

09/04/2008 09:06:58
17

Did you know that most Americans mis-spell AluminIum because of an error in commercial flyer? It's author uses "ium" in all his patents, so it isn't a preference for a givem version - it's just a mistake.

Other discovered elements, polonium, lithium, francium, strontium, caesium, cadmium (you getting it yet?) show the way.

Once the American Chemical Society decided to use "um" instead of "ium", in absolutely typical fashion the ignorance spread and now this uniquely American version is made "world champion" and the more correct "ium" dismissed as a Brit variant.

So what you doin' on a Jock site Trade Wind?

20

voltaire's janny,

09/04/2008 09:08:50
It has been suggested that aluminium is a cause of Alzheimer's disease, as some brain plaques have been found to contain the metal. Research in this area has been inconclusive; aluminium accumulation may be a consequence of the Alzheimer's damage, not the cause. In any event, if there is any toxicity of aluminium it must be via a very specific mechanism, since total human exposure to the element in the form of naturally occurring clay in soil and dust is enormously large over a lifetime.
21

JohnN,

USA 09/04/2008 15:28:13
Billions have been spent world wide on human embryo-killing embryonic stem cell research for ten years and it has not produced one cure, one treatment or even one clinical trial.


Late in 2007, scientists discovered a new way to produce embryonic stem cells from skin cells as an alternative to cloning embryos (human beings) and then killing them to experiment on their stem cells. Ian Wilmut, who cloned Dolly the Sheep in 1997, stopped cloning research, saying the new procedure is "100 times more interesting".

Dr. Yamanaka, who is credited with the discovery, was motivated by moral concerns over human life: "When I saw the embryo, I suddenly realized there was such a small difference between it and my daughters. I thought, we can't keep destroying embryos for our research. There must be another way."

Wisconsin University's Dr. James Thomson, who discovered embryonic stem cells in 1998 and who duplicated Dr. Yamanaka's breakthrough, said after the discovery, "If human embryonic stem cell research does not make you at least a little uncomfortable, you have not thought about it enough."
'
Dr. Thomson said all thinking people, including researchers, are uncomfortable with embryonic stem cell research. That is because God has instilled in our hearts that we should always respect and protect His magnificent gift of human life.

Embryos are the very beginning of life. As fellow human beings, we cannot view embryos simply as a commodity for our convenience or benefit. God alone has the right to determine who lives, who dies and the life span of each person. We are stewards, not masters of human life.

But there is plenty of research to do using adult stem cells which are already bringing cures to many and the new reprogrammed stem cells. Stop the embryo-killing embryonic research and put the money where it will benefit people - put patients first.
22

Dr.Phil McCrevas,

USA 09/04/2008 20:59:59
Janny, for a people that pronounce Lieutenant...Left-tenent ya dinna have a wee bit o' ground to criticize our destruction of Aluminium er, Aluminum...LOL
23

diha,

Ontario 21/10/2008 05:10:30
Responding to Post no.21 by JohnN.

Thanks for your posting. This article is especially frustrating because it is filled with contradiction and circular argument. I.e. we may find some potential benefit, but it may be risky but the promise is great and therefore we must continue. I have read this over and over.. the maybe potential might prove itself possibly someday in the far future..... and so it goes.. therefore even though it is proving itself risky and we can't try it in humans, but if we do, watch out for possible side effects... but we must continue to pursue this.. etc etc. I think through all things something good can come, and if the IPS cell research can bring us to the conclusion that embryonic research hoped it could, we shouldn't need any more confusion and rhetoric about doing embryonic research. However, I have a feeling something dishonest lies beneath the quest for embryo research, that we think in some way we can control our destiny - find the secret of secrets etc. I highly doubt it, but some of mankind seems to have a propensity for trying.

I liked your comments John. With all the research that I have done into the hype and hope of this embryonic stem cell research, I have to say I agree with your posting.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Features

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.