Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 26th July 2008 Change Date

Free tickets to Impressionism and Scotland

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

The Apprentice factor 'causes firms to fail'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 May 2008
BUDDING entrepreneurs possessed with unshakeable self-confidence often see their business ventures flounder because of their arrogance, according to a new study.

Psychologists believe cocksure tycoons, such as those featured in television shows like The Apprentice, are most likely to wade into markets that cannot support newcomers.

The study comes as Sara Dhada, a Leicester barrister, became the latest
candidate to be fired on the hit BBC1 show. The 26-year-old was sacked by Sir Alan Sugar for failing to defend herself.

Researchers at the University of Leicester believe that over-confidence – a quality common in The Apprentice contestants – explains why many new businesses fail within their first few years. Those most at risk, it has been suggested, are companies helmed by individuals with "absolute" confidence – people who rush in, head first, with scant regard for their competition, or the size of the market.

The study, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council, was conducted by Dr Briony Pulford and Professor Andrew Colman, in collaboration with Dr Fergus Bolger, formerly of the University of Durham.

The study, published in the journal Experimental Psychology, set up a "game" that simulated market conditions where participants stood to gain capital, or make a loss, based on decisions they made in different market scenarios.

Players had to choose whether or not to open restaurants given different market scenarios, using a combination of skill and luck in order to perform.

Whenever market capacity was exceeded, winning or losing depended on skill in half the rounds and on chance in the others. Players' confidence was manipulated by giving them easy or difficult quizzes about business matters.

Dr Pulford, who led the study at the university's school of psychology, urged entrepreneurs to be wary if they have every confidence in their future success.

She said: "Our results showed that, when success depended on skill, over-confidence tended to cause excess entry into a market place.

"Market-entry decisions tend to be over-optimistic, with the inevitable result that new business start-ups tend to exceed market capacity, and many new businesses fail within a few years.

"Taking the housing market as an example; people have obviously over-entered that market. People are confident they can make a profit and don't compare themselves to other people who may be entering the market.

"This is why a lot of businesses fail, because people don't consider that there are plenty of people out there who are similarly confident."

However, the Federation of Small Businesses dismissed the study, pointing out that excessive regulation and high fuel and energy costs are more likely to cost young businesses.

Andy Willox, the FSB's Scottish policy convener, said: "A 'game' that simulates market decisions, no matter how complex or accurate, doesn't replicate the hard work, determination and grit that so many small-business owners put in."





The full article contains 480 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 May 2008 9:55 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

truthsleuth,

15/05/2008 01:14:08
The 'Bigger' they are the harder they fall.
But one or two will make it, the world aint a fair place.
2

Fanling,

Switzerland 15/05/2008 02:53:43
I've seen videos of most of that series to date. The supreme arrogance of the majority of candidates is only equalled by a naivety and/or a diminished intellect that is almost staggering. A lack of everyday common sense also seems to be a shared factor among that collection of bullies in the making. It makes you wonder about the thousands who failed to make final selection for entry to Sugar's Ego-land.

The "good Jewish boy" candidate is a typical case. And Edinburgh University got the blame for him by one of Sugar's sidekicks in spite of the fact that he brought with him to the capital a supreme ignorance of his own background from England. Nice one, Margaret. You're fired.

3

,

15/05/2008 07:50:08
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

Lillig,

15/05/2008 11:34:39
The kind of cheap arrogance and nasty-rude boss behaviour seen on The Apprentice has no place in most businesses. I would not employ a service company, for example, peopled by apprentice-style candidates. You have to put your money where your mouth is.

The Federation of Small Businesses is right. Small businesses are vulnerable. They are over-taxed, over regulated by ever-mounting bureaucracy from the nanny state which leaves employees better off than the business owner. With few concessions to help entrepreneurs develop their business idea.

If you add to that, some over-confident twit, who has little understanding of the market - disaster.

But, you must believe that you can succeed when you start a business - or why do it?
5

Vincent-W,

15/05/2008 12:31:04
From the programmes I've seen these arrogant over confident twerps have no concept of team work. I certainly wouldn't let them anywhere near my factory.

Sadly, the chances are that they will all go on to be highly 'successful', 'leaders'.

Their ridiculous bhaviour should not be rewarded. Let's see some really successful people on our screens.
6

Farmernot,

15/05/2008 14:04:28
Very good article and sums up the utter arrogance of a number of graduates who think they are the real deal.
The current programme must be the worst bunch yet and I bet they were all hand picked for their cringe material on the box
7

SteveSC,

West Lothian 15/05/2008 18:36:13
The apprentice perpetuates the myth that business is all about marketing.

A good business is based on knowledge and expertise. Does any of Alan Sugar’s companies actually make anything?
8

Vincent-W,

15/05/2008 18:40:41
I'd really like to see them trying to work in a real life situation. Like trying to analyze why a system isn't working, coming up with a solution and bringing a team with them to solve it.

My prediction would be that they would p!ss off so many people that the obstacles would get ever bigger and they would fail.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.