Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Trump unveils fresh plans for Menie course

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 17 July 2009
DONALD Trump has unveiled fresh plans for his £1 billion golf course development in Aberdeenshire.
The Trump Organisation's "zoning masterplan" sets out an architect's vision of where various parts of the project will sit within the site – including the two golf courses, a 450-bedroom hotel and housing.

The tycoon's organisation has sent lette
rs to the owners of five properties on about 100 acres of land next to the Menie Estate, near Balmedie, Aberdeenshire, with offers to buy them out.

These properties are marked with red dashes on the masterplan. The owners, who include Michael Forbes, the campaigning opponent of the plans, fear the approach is the first step towards a bid by the Trump empire to seek the council's support in seizing their land through compulsory purchase orders.

David Milne, who owns Hermit Cottage, a former Coastguard station, previously described the bid as a "bullying tactic" and pledged to ignore the offer.

Yesterday, he said he had had no further contact with Trump International and had not been shown the plans.

George Sorial, Mr Trump's managing director for the Menie project, told The Scotsman he was confident "mutually beneficial" deals to buy their land could be struck in the near future.

"We have had very meaningful discussions with four of the landowners and I am optimistic that over the next month or two we will agree mutually beneficial deals.

"Obviously, no-one is excluded from this process and we are optimistic about reaching satisfactory conclusions with all of them." He said the door was always open for Mr Milne and Mr Forbes to discuss an offer.

The latest plans have been published two months after the Trump Organisation was accused of dragging its feet by failing to submit any detailed proposals for the project.

Mr Trump's plans to build "the best golf course in the world" at Menie have been mired in controversy since being announced in April 2007.

The plan, for two golf courses with nearly 1,500 housing units, was rejected by Aberdeenshire Council, which cited issues regarding wildlife, before being called in and approved by the Scottish Government.

Conservationists were outraged that ministers allow the project to encroach on the Foveran links, naturally shifting sand dunes designated a site of special scientific interest by the European Union.





The full article contains 388 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 July 2009 9:25 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Donald Trump
 
1

donald,

glasgow 17/07/2009 01:37:07
Onionist Cooncillors would rather see Scotland a Desert than Free.
2

Barney Thomson,

Reading 17/07/2009 02:29:27
Do I recall this story being published a few months ago when the plans for the development were made available to the public?
3

Scotaway,

Wanchai 17/07/2009 04:52:00
Funding this development will be difficult and Mr Trump is not renowned for using his own financial resources in high risk ventures. Don't book a tee time yet......
4

TheDisplacedGlaswegian,

Edinburgh 17/07/2009 10:10:58
"The plan, for two golf courses with nearly 1,500 housing units, was rejected by Aberdeenshire Council, which cited issues regarding wildlife, before being called in and approved by the Scottish Government"

Lies. The vast majority of Aberdeenshire councillors welcomed the plans. A lib dem influenced infrastructure sub committee, led by a man who was later booted on the orders of his own party, decided to scupper the initial application attempting party political gain.

If only the Scotsman would stop publishing lies about how the peopel of Aberdeenshire don't want this - the majority do.
5

Scottish Girl,

edinburgh 17/07/2009 10:33:49
~4 - it's not a lie. That is a strong word and poorly used. Those are the facts.

As it stood the committee was in fact split 50:50 on the vote and the chairman had the swing vote - he chose to vote against, as was his right.

PRIOR to this, the entire committee had already voted on another aspect of the development which would have resulted in it being rejected whatever the final vote.

Voter apathy results in minority voters electing their candidates. If Labour/SNP/Tory voters had voted for local elections then the Lib-Dems would not have had such a hold on Aberdeenshire Council.

Be less gleeful and scathing about a shocking precedent set within Scottish local and national government whereby a legally elected official, carrying out his duties within the law was hounded out simply because he voted with his moral belief as opposed to his monetary want.

Whether this course proceeds or not, the Trump organisation is riding rough-shod across our legislative systems. If enforced land seizures proceed it is a HUGE inforngement on the rights of Aberdeenshire residents and once again will set a dangerous precedent that one day may come back and bite any of Scotland's residents on the butt.

And as previously mentioned - Trump doesn't use his own money. Who do you think will pay for the sewars and electricity and the rest of the utilities installations? Roads, street lighting etc.

A golf course employs a select few specialised staff for hospitality and management, the rest will be poorly paid service staff, made up of women, foreign labour and students in the summer season.

Trump is not a White Knight come to replace oil and fishing. Like with all promises of wealth and fortune, there is a price to pay.

6

mobocaster,

Aberdeen 17/07/2009 12:22:52
#4 Rubbish. #5 lays it out well enough.

Also, the vast majority of Aberdeenshire councillors have expressed no such opinion. In fact the only vote that might have been interpreted as any sort of opinion on the scheme saw a majority of abstentions, with those who did vote largely following party lines.
7

overton,

aberdeen 17/07/2009 12:36:24
4 TheDisplacedGlaswegian,Edinburgh

You are quite correct.

Unfortunately the councillor who landed with the casting vote made a very ill-considered decision which was out of tune with both the majority of people and councillors in Aberdeenshire.
8

Richard Taylor,

Aberdeen 18/07/2009 17:09:08
Not been following this recently, but my understanding was that the initial local committee voted 7-4 for, the Infrastructure Committee was 7-7, leaving Chairman Ford the casting vote...except that he should have voted for the status quo (ie. FOR) as voted by the local committee. I think the rule was that the casting vote should have been to accept how the local committee had voted, which was to allow the application.
9

Beardy,

Menie 22/07/2009 21:01:37
It is amazing just how much ill informed rubbish there is here.

8 The status quo was the legal situation that existed at that time. i.e. no permission existed so the refusal was the correct decision - as evidenced by the recent failing of the budget bill in Holyrood.

7 Overton is well known locally as a supporter who often fails to hear what is aid. The majority of local people do not want this damaging and destructive housing development for that is what it is, the golf course is merely a distraction

4 I dont where you get your information but if I was you I'd be asking for my money back because it is complete rubbish.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.