Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008 Change Date

The Scotsman Digital Archive - Special Christmas Offer

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Union anger as Government cools on fuel cash handouts



View Video
Download Video

Video

Adam Scorer of Energywatch on fuel poverty
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 September 2008
THE decision to rule out cash handouts for households struggling with soaring fuel bills was blasted by unions as a "downright disgrace".
Ministers were expected to unveil plans to give each household up to £100 following in-depth discussions with power companies.

But Whitehall sources confirmed last night that the Government would instead focus on long-term proposals including support for energy efficiency measures.

The Unite union said "greedy" fuel companies had won out over struggling consumers and people needed an "immediate respite" from rising energy costs.

Left-leaning pressure group Compass said the real disappointment would be felt by the "fuel poor who will go cold this winter".

In a speech to the Scottish CBI in Glasgow last night, Gordon Brown insisted there would be no "short-term gimmicks or giveaways".

Ministers will now announce an assistance package for those affected by rising energy bills next week, following the £1 billion package of support for the housing market announced on Tuesday.

A spokeswoman for the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) said ministers had been "working hard" with energy companies to find "long-term" solutions.

She said: "We are committed to responding to the concerns that hard-pressed families are currently facing."

The scrapping of proposed one-off payments is likely to upset more than 70 Labour backbenchers, who last month signed a petition calling for the introduction of a windfall tax on energy companies to help hard-pressed families.

Tony Woodley, joint leader of Unite, said: "At this moment in time people need immediate respite from the struggle to pay their gas and electricity bills.

"There must be a rethink and cash assistance for every needy household in the land. It cannot be right that big business is allowed to bank their obscene profits while ordinary people will shiver this winter."

Neal Lawson, chairman of Compass, said: "It is not a short-term gimmick to heat the homes of the poor and vulnerable.

"What people want is the warm glow of knowing the Government is on their side, they are not getting it. Just like the 10p tax issue – this decision can and must be turned round."

Labour MP Fabian Hamilton said the consequences for Labour ministers could be "very serious indeed".

He told BBC 2's Newsnight: "They could further lose support from those people that look to the Government for the help that they need right now.

"And I think that people like me – who are strong supporters of Gordon Brown and the current government as it's constituted – I think that our support might fade away considerably if we don't see the very people that we are trying to help supported by Labour."

The full article contains 457 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 September 2008 1:05 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Labour Party
 
1

Between the lines,

Scotland 05/09/2008 13:42:42
Rather than hand-outs, the government should be encouraging people to assess their energy usage and to make small changes to their behaviour in order to conserve energy (and therefore reduce fuel costs). Alongside this there should be enhanced tax breaks or grants to insulate homes too.

I am totally opposed to the idea of a £100 hand-out to all households as this will do nothing to encourage people to be more responsible about their energy usage and it will send out the message again that the state (i.e. tax-payers like myself) will bail out the masses when they encounter the slightest inconvenience in life -it's time people in the UK learned to deal with problems in a mature and responsible manner rather than running to the nanny-state every time that they have issues with their finances.
2

Buckpool Loon,

Cheshire 05/09/2008 13:52:33
"there will be no short term gimmicks or give-aways" Once again Brown gives precedence to the body corporate to that of the people; irrespective of the bodies created by that precedence.
3

Matt there,

somewhere 05/09/2008 13:52:39
Gordon and his Band of Performing Idiots.

Well done!
4

lulach mac gille coemgain,

05/09/2008 14:13:04
Ahh the Slavour party ehh ?
5

Aearnur,

Glasgow 05/09/2008 15:06:50
Gorgon just can't get the hang of this, can he? You would think after the 10% tax debacle he might have learnt something, but no. Where are his instincts? Hidden deep within the flabby political flesh he keeps mechanically waving around? Surely Labour MUST keep this guy, for the sake of the SNP and (less enthusiastically I'll admit) the Tories?
6

Aearnur,

Glasgow 05/09/2008 15:09:06
Between the lines: I am totally opposed to the idea of a £100 hand-out to all households...

I don't believe that was the proposal here. It was to provide financial help to those who were quite likely going to be in a 'heat or eat' situation this winter, such as pensioners.
7

Gtj,

05/09/2008 15:35:28
Another broken promise, U-turn by Gordon Bull and his Liebour party.

How long has he got.

Not to worry , the Tories will win the next election and Davy will not steal Scotlands £400 milion and the show will go on.
8

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 05/09/2008 15:58:32
#1 Between the Lines -

In complete agreement. This is a U-turn by Brown but probably because he is unable to exert pressure on fuel companies to reduce bills to the "underprivileged". But I think we've heard enough about this sector which expects everything and does little enough for it. E.g. stamp duty freeze, help for people who took on loans they know they shouldn't have etc. Who pays at the end of the day - ye the taxpayer again. And if not immediately then I'm sure Broon would love to go borrowing more money but he's backed into a corner on that one as well. His whole slimy world is caving in on him and not before time. I wish I could vote in Glenrothes!
9

MacGillicuddy,

05/09/2008 16:22:00
With Broon and Liebour toadying up to the CBI just when are the unions (aka Liebour's paymasters) going to realise that the Liebour Party has totally abandoned ordinary working folks?
10

danbob,

05/09/2008 16:24:42
Let me get this straight. The government trys to pressure power companys to give handouts to 6 million people. Naturaly the power companys refuse. Well why dosn't the government stop wasting money and give these people the money in the form of tax cuts or a benefit payout. Why is Brown expecting everybody else to bale him out of a mess of his own doing.
11

The Strategist,

05/09/2008 16:42:25
Ah well... I'm not surprised. This Govt has been aware that energy prices would go up for at least the last ten years but it hasn't done anything about it. Now the Govt is in blind panic but it's too late.
12

MoragtheToerag,

05/09/2008 16:52:29
Sorry, but telling us to put on another jumper and freeze in the dark whilst shareholder profits have seen a 19% rise in the past year is hardly akin to promoting more responsible behaviour in people, no. 1.

How are so many of us supposed to insulate our homes if we're private renters?

I'm sure my landlord is going to jump at the chance to decrease the yield he is getting from rents.

And it's going to be awfully hard to insulate so much of the ancient, stone housing stock.

Yes, it's so inconvenient, going without heat at all because you can't afford it.

Give me a break!

As if the UK isn't already about 10 years behind teh standard of living in most Western countries.

Same old, same old from Gordon Clown's goverment, slap the masses with a stick and give the ever-fattening carrot to the few.
13

Brian M,

Edinburgh 05/09/2008 16:59:09
Broon has not promised anything to Scotland at all, he is just trying to pull the wool over our eyes, after all he is a Britishman
14

guenevere,

05/09/2008 19:23:28
13. He had planned to build a 50 million sports stadium until salmond scuppered it!
15

notanactivist,

The Borders 05/09/2008 21:17:52
What's the bet that tomorrow our quadruple-chinned First Minister will get on another bandwagon and say that his magical bagpipes will eliminate fuel poverty in an independent Scotland?

And #12 if you think we're behind you clearly haven't seen the worst places in continental Europe. Our run-down areas are bad but compared to the French banlieues they are an absolute paradise.
16

,

05/09/2008 22:02:15
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

,

05/09/2008 22:26:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
18

tartan army 2222,

05/09/2008 23:12:08
And yet they keep subsidising the Labour Party!
19

Jwil,

05/09/2008 23:28:28
No assistance on fuel costs!

This translates directly into a greater number of deaths of vulnerable people this winter, followed by many Labour MPs and MSPs getting kicked out of office.

Insulation is not a short term solution and anyhow this should have been done years ago it has been in the Scandinavian countries. The UK is always at the a*se of any progress.





20

i a n,

Edinburgh 06/09/2008 09:35:59
According to today's Guardian newspaper:

"Rising energy prices are on course to net the government a windfall of over £1bn thanks to a little-known scheme designed to promote the development of renewable energy."

What is that money being used for?
21

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 06/09/2008 12:53:07
#20 i a n

Take your pick - 10p tax debacle, stamp duty "holiday", help for the feckless on mortgages, more immigrants...more votes...

Won't matter too much about grannies freezing to death - that's one more expense they can avoid to feather their own nests - scum.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Features

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.