Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 21st July 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Flawed logic



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

William Ballantine (Letters, 12 May) claims that, because the SNP received a vote of approximately one third of the electorate on a 50 per cent turnout (ie, 16.5 per cent of eligible voters), the Scottish Government has no democratic accountability. Using his own figures, only 33 per cent of those eligible to vote supported the unionist position; therefore, 51 per cent don't care or are unpersuaded in either direction.
Applying this logic, no government in modern times, at Westminster or Holyrood, has been democratically accountable. This logic would mean that the introduction of the NHS was undemocratic, ditto the introduction of "right to buy" by the Conservatives.

If you win a majority of seats, by whatever electoral system is in place at any given time, and whatever the turnout may be from time to time, then you have a democratic mandate.

By all means let's inform the debate and encourage everyone, whatever their view, of the importance of voting. The SNP's "national conversation" is hoping to achieve this, as is the alternative Calman review. But let's not pretend the SNP is particularly lacking a democratic mandate any more than Labour or any other party has at any time they have been in power locally, at Holyrood or at Westminster.

If you engage people in intelligent, informed debate rather than slagging each other off, more people would vote.

MARK MILLER

Leith Links

Edinburgh






The full article contains 235 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 May 2008 8:09 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Alastair the First,

14/05/2008 09:03:33
Difficult to have an intelligent debate with Labour. In a battle of wits, there's no fun in taking on an unarmed opponent.
2

jj veritas,

14/05/2008 10:53:52
Nationwide Labour also have a built in advantage where boundary changes haven't kept up with population movement thereby protecting many of their historically 'safe' seats.
3

Duncan in Edinburgh,

14/05/2008 11:56:22
"If you win a majority of seats, by whatever electoral system is in place at any given time, and whatever the turnout may be from time to time, then you have a democratic mandate."

This is entirely true. What the letter writer appears to be unaware of, is that the SNP completely failed to win anything approaching a majority of seats. They won 47 out of 129.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.