Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Opinion off-track

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 November 2009
YOUR leader (Opinion, 3 November) demonstrates the pitfalls of an Edinburgh-centric view of Scottish affairs. It's dismissal of the economic case for the Waverley line may misinform your readers.
First, the economic case is based on far more than a prospective boost to house building in the Borders. It is also predicated on wider economic activity, including labour market benefits from efficient movement of people in to and out of the Scottis
h Borders, and potential economic growth in terms of inward investment, tourism expenditure, commercial property and other infrastructure development.

Second, you completely misunderstand the purpose of the single-track line with passing loops, which is most suited to the half-hourly service without over-engineering the line and will not necessarily "limit capacity" as you put it.

Finally, as anyone who travels the tortuous A7 between Galashiels and Gorebridge can see, the trackbed is there ready and waiting on this section and the engineering solutions to take the train through Galashiels are in place with a new road layout and bridge completed last year.

Scotland is not Edinburgh and your myopia leads you to assume passengers will only travel into Edinburgh. Here in the Borders we have paid our taxes for 40 years to help subsidise rail services in every other part of the UK. It is surely not asking too much for us, finally, to be reconnected to the rest of Scotland and beyond.

VICKY DAVIDSON
Executive member for economic development Scottish Borders Council






Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 November 2009 9:23 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

gus1940,

Edinburgh 09/11/2009 09:19:00
In case usage of the reinstated Waverley Line exceeds expectation I hope that the track will not be laid down the middle of the trackbed and that any new bridges and other civil engineering works will be constructed to allow for any future requirement for double track working.

Naturally it is only to be expected that such allowances will not be made.

It was interesting to be reminded in saturday's paper that The Canadian Pacific Railway (all 3000+ miles of it) only took four and a half years to build in an age when little or no mechanical aids existed.

This compares favourably with the years of huffing and puffing re The Waverley Line and makes the crazy Edinburgh Vanity Tram Project look even more ridiculous.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.