Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Time for co-operation

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 November 2008
I have just returned from a week with a parliamentary delegation to China during which we were shown the site being prepared in Shanghai for Expo 2010. These major global exhibitions take place every four years. This one is important not just for the Chinese market but for the 70 million visitors expected in total from all over the world during its six months of existence from May to October.
The design of the British pavilion has excited much positive coverage, and Prime Minister Gordon Brown, in launching it, secured a prominent site on the river bank. I was therefore appalled to learn from our consul-general in Shanghai (herself a Scot
) that Alex Salmond's Scottish Government has overturned the decision of its predecessor to contribute £500,000 for a Scottish component in the pavilion.

I quite accept that there are occasions (such as next year's excellent Homecoming) when independent initiatives to promote Scotland internationally are appropriate; but there are also occasions when co-operation at a UK level is vital for the same purpose. Some 30,000 Chinese come to UK universities and here is a chance to attract more to Scotland. China has massive spending power for our consumer goods, and its companies are on the constant lookout for attractive sites (they love golf) within the European Union to set up branches.

I appeal to MSPs of all parties – including the sensible ones in the SNP – to get this extraordinary decision rescinded. This is a golden opportunity to showcase modern Scotland at a prestigious world event, and failure to do so smacks of cutting off our nose to spite our face.

DAVID STEEL
House of Lords
London




The full article contains 283 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 November 2008 9:15 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Seannair,

04/11/2008 00:17:15
How dare Lord Steel suggest that there are sensible SNP MSPs!
Does he not know there is a by election pending?
We Unionists must stand together in such circmstances even if we can get a week off fo a "jolly" in China.
2

,

04/11/2008 00:51:46
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Alastair the First,

04/11/2008 11:04:55
David Steel is being disingenuous here. Scotland already pays her share of this exhibition through our UK taxes. Why should we be expected to pay twice over? It should be the case that Scotland is already represented by the UK exhibition, but of course that probably won't be the case (probably some kitsch corner with tartan and shortbread rather than proper representation I suspect). I don't hear any calls for Wales to donate, or Cornwall or anywhere else. The truth is that a UK exhibition will be largely London-centred, and we in Scotland as usual will be expected to contribute to that. OK, Lord Steal, sorry, Steel, give us our money back and we'll handle the whole thing ourselves,but don't ask us to pay twice over.
4

G,

dundy 04/11/2008 12:41:38
Salmond can't see further than his own belly.....he wants the UK to pay Scotland's share and then he'll complain about that as well....as usual.
5

,

04/11/2008 19:36:51
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

neil robertson,

Dundee, Scotland 04/11/2008 21:57:56
Is the problem here perhaps that although the pavilion is great, the UK 'content' is being programmed by The
British Council which has been closing libraries all over the world and operates a visa monopoly racket in
collaboration with their 'Education UK' commercial subsidiary whose activities are anti-competitive to
put it mildly? David Steel should look at Hansard:
http://dblackie.blogs.com/the_language_business/2008/10/truth-threatening-to-triumph.html

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.