Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Lib Dems reveal plan to ease mortgage problems



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 August 2008
THE Liberal Democrats yesterday unveiled proposals to help families who are unable to pay their mortgages.
Vince Cable, the Lib Dem Treasury spokesman, said change was needed urgently to stop the "downward spiral" of Britain's housing market.

Proposals include a mortgage rescue scheme, which would allow families struggling with repayments to sell all
or part of their house to a housing association or private firm and then stay in the property as tenants.

The government should also allow councils and housing associations to borrow money to buy up land and empty new homes "to help replenish Britain's much- depleted stock of social housing", the Lib Dems suggest.

Mr Cable urged Jack Straw, the Justice Secretary, to give guidelines to the courts so that homes could only be repossessed in extreme circumstances.

He said: "The government seems obsessed with fighting a losing battle to artificially prop up the housing market, rather than finding ways to deal with its worst effects."

The plans could be financed using funds already committed to social housing but currently unspent due to the collapse of new building.

The Lib Dems' call came as Taylor Wimpey, the UK's biggest housebuilder, racked up half-year losses of £1.54 billion after market turmoil forced the firm to slash the value of its land bank.





The full article contains 224 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

JayDeeTee,

28/08/2008 12:44:23
"Proposals include a mortgage rescue scheme, which would allow families struggling with repayments to sell all or part of their house to a housing association or private firm and then stay in the property as tenants.~

This sounds familiar. Can you not already do this? There are firms advertising this. Not exactly a new plan is it?
2

Active Sassenach,

Luton, England 02/09/2008 08:02:35
Vince Cable is sound. He has distinguished himself as LibDem interim leader and treasury shadow. But he is on a high wire with no safety net here and he should not delude himself that he can walk on water.

Vince Cable should remember when interest rates hit 15%. Mortgages cost 10-12% for a long time afterwards. So people took mortgages on 75% of the property and left the remaining equity with the bank in lieu of interest. This was a gamble for the bank on an eventual property recovery. In 1991, that looked precarious and presaged nothing like the prices of 2000 - 2007. Which is why bank customers snapped up the offer.

Property prices rocketed during the currency of those mortgage deeds as Vince Cable will remember. People could not move because they had to pay 25% of house sale proceeds to the bank. There was "much binding" (and whingeing) "in the marsh" portraying banks as loan sharks. All they were doing was being rewarded for their risk - and a risk customers had also happily taken even when it was explained to them.

Under the malicious pressure banks refunded money out of their rightful return on risk. As it was "shareholders' money", nobody cared. It was seen as a victimless crime, which it was not. It ripped off the banks' depositors, who got lower interest because of the costs, and the pension funds who held the shares, which were marked down because of the risk, and then because of the return of capital to customers.

If the taxpayer takes 25% of the equity in lieu of interest, the taxpayer loses either way. If property prices fall or do not rise, the taxpayer gets the loss. If property prices rise, the taxpayer will be the loan shark who has to refund money. That is not a victimless crime. It means taxes taken from low earners will be returned to high earners. This is not what LibDems stand for.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.