Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Stamp duty holiday announced to tackle housing slump



View Video
Download Video

Video

Helen Williams of the National Housing Federation discusses the stamp duty 'holiday'
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 September 2008
HOMES worth £175,000 or less are to be exempted from stamp duty for 12 months as part of a package to revive the housing market, the Chancellor announced today.
The change, which comes into effect tomorrow, raises the threshold on which 1% stamp duty is paid from its current level of £125,000.

The move will save eligible home-buyers up to £1,750 when they purchase a property, and relates only to buildings entirely for residential use.

In a statement, the Treasury said: "The Chancellor of the Exchequer has today announced that stamp duty land tax will not apply to purchases of residential property of £175,000 or less.

"This will provide an exemption from stamp duty land tax for land transactions consisting entirely of residential property where the chargeable consideration is not more than £175,000.

"This relief will apply to transactions with an effective date on or after 3rd September and before 3rd September 2009."

The Treasury estimates that the one-year stamp duty freeze will cost the Government £600 million – suggesting that it expects about half a million home-buyers to benefit from the change.

Around half of the 90,000 home purchases completed each month are on properties worth £175,000 or less, but deals below £125,000 are already exempt from stamp duty.

The average price of a home in the UK was just under £165,000 in August, according to the Nationwide Monthly House Price Index.

The plan for a stamp duty freeze first emerged last month but was met by official silence – leading to claims that the housing market had been paralysed by dithering between the Treasury and Downing Street.

Today's announcement came as Communities Secretary Hazel Blears unveiled a further package of measures to revive the housing market, including help for first-time home-buyers and people at risk of repossession.

A mortgage rescue scheme will allow those facing repossession to sell their home to a registered social landlord (RSL), who will clear the mortgage and then rent it back to them at a level they can afford. In some cases, the RSL could buy a share in the property, or provide an equity loan to help reduce the homeowner's mortgage repayments.

Under the new HomeBuy Direct scheme, first-time buyers with a household income under £60,000 will be able to buy newly-built properties with a free-of-charge equity loan of up to 30% of the property's value, co-funded by the Government and the developer.

The Government is also planning to bring forward funding for social housing from existing budgets to deliver more properties sooner, with local authorities which manage their own housing stock able to apply for a grant to build social housing alongside RSLs.

Ms Blears said the measures, which apply only in England, were not aimed at people who had been reckless in their borrowing but at "decent" families who might find themselves in difficulties.

"We are looking at about £200 million over the next couple of years for families who are struggling with mortgages, there will also be £100 million to help with mortgage interest payments to keep people in their homes," she told BBC Breakfast.

"I think that is a very good use of money because otherwise you do end up spending a fortune... it is not just bricks and mortar when you get repossessed, it can destroy whole families."

Ms Blears said the measures were not going to "transform the world" but they were going to "make a big difference to those people that are struggling".

Referring to first-time buyers, Ms Blears told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: "We can't run people's lives but we can try and help. What we're saying is... we will help you get the deposit so you can get the mortgage and you can get into the housing market."

Ms Blears said the housing plans would be paid for with money that the Government had "scheduled to spend in the next couple of years or so".

She said: "I think it is sensible Government policy to say let's bring forward that money so that people who are struggling can be helped, first-time buyers can be helped and we get more rented housing."

The initiative is part of a wider series of announcements which will be made in due course to help alleviate the pressure on consumers and the industry.

Ministers hope they will help shift some of the focus away from what has been a dreadful summer for Labour, with talk of a threatened coup against the Prime Minister and accusations of "dithering" over issues such as stamp duty and a windfall tax on the energy companies.

Yesterday Mr Darling was accused of "talking the economy down" as the pound slumped against the euro and dollar in the wake of his claim that Britain was facing the worst economic crisis for 60 years.

Recent figures show that the number of homes being repossessed hit their highest level for 12 years during the first half of the year, with 18,900 properties taken back by lenders, 48% more than during the same period of 2007.

The full article contains 870 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Brian Ferrari,

02/09/2008 09:20:13
Over to you ccc...
2

Vivas,

Edinburgh 02/09/2008 09:25:26
Why would Joe or Jean Bloggs (who were looking for a 175K rabbit hutch last week but were only deterred by the stamp duty LOL...) bite on this tiny morsel of bait .... when they've jusy been told by the chancellor that this is the worst economic outlook in 60 years and that the outlook is awful ?

Go figure how any of this makes sense (it doesn't) and what impact it will have (miniscule).
3

James.com,

02/09/2008 09:30:24
More National Debt. for an Independent Scotland to share!
4

Fairfax,

02/09/2008 09:35:40
James.com (3): "More National Debt. for an Independent Scotland to share!"

More National Debt for an independent England, caused by 11 years of management by Scots. Perhaps we should demand reparations on Scottish succession, together with the Darien subsidy, suitably index-linked . . .
5

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 02/09/2008 09:38:09
Why just for 12 months? Why not permanent?
6

Active Sassenach,

Luton, England 02/09/2008 10:04:51
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/so/newsletter16-3.htm

So is the devil going to be in the detail or what? This is an interlude with avoidance at the margins, and razor sharp transaction pricing, while fees burn up defining "substantial performance" of a contract to purchase land and "fixture and fittings" sold separately. If you really did complete last week, you have to find a way of pretending you didn't.

Any port in a storm for this stale mob that have run out of ideas. £175,000 for my fine property in a superb location, kitchen and bathroom extra. Yes we have been here before and we are tired, very tired. We are also beginning to get bored.
7

Fairfax,

02/09/2008 10:07:39
Dave (7): "As long as Westminster takes into account the 60 years worth of national debt we had to pay to America for the War."

Of course, indexing both by GDP. Obviously we shall also be asking reparations for inflicting the Stuarts on us. Perhaps a suitable settlement would be for Edinburgh and the eastern Borders to become English, based on the percentage of GDP funded by Darien; we could rebuild the Antonine Wall. You can keep Glasgow, Aberdeen and the Western Isles. We're not going to pay for Edinburgh's trams though.
8

Alan B,

02/09/2008 10:09:12
Another uturn by Brown.
9

Venachar,

02/09/2008 10:09:49
This is pure window dressing.
The real problem is that the banks are not lending money. Interbank lending is down 70% in the last quarter and mortgage approval are down dramatically from last year. If banks are not approving mortgages then the temporary removal of stamp duty will be for the lucky few.
10

Voice of reason,

EDINBURGH 02/09/2008 10:15:47
Does GB think all this will buy him a few more months in office ? Does he think we are all idiots ??
What about our pensions which he has decimated ?
11

DanishBird,

Fife 02/09/2008 10:26:26
'Ms Blears said the measures, which apply only in England..' Why not in Scotland?
12

Venachar,

02/09/2008 10:34:23
DanishBird don't you know that when ignorant people talk about England they really mean Great Britain.
It is a well known fact that all the Welsh, Irish and Scots soldiers that fought and died in WW2 did it for England and not anywhere else, at least that is according to many of Churchill's speaches.
13

Ugly George,

Edinburgh 02/09/2008 10:35:15
5 Fairfax
Interesting point about the Darien scheme. The investors in the scheme were given £398,000 to cover their losses. They were offered the opportunity to invest this with an annual return of 5%.
£398,000 with 5% p.a. over 301 years comes to £950 billion. Where has it all gone?
14

Fairfax,

02/09/2008 10:55:58
DanishBird (12): "'Ms Blears said the measures, which apply only in England..' Why not in Scotland?"

Why should the two be treated identically? The SNP has already accepted that there should be distinctions: "Stewart Maxwell said he would "encourage" any moves by mortgage lenders to take into account the fact Scotland's housing market has not been hit as hard by the credit crunch as England." -- see here

http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/scotland/Give-Scots-families-better-mortgage.4439148.jp

If Scotland's property market is less affected then, following the SNP's own suggestion, it is right for stamp duty relief to be given in England, but not necessarily in Scotland.

15

Active Sassenach,

Luton, England 02/09/2008 10:56:53
"....first-time buyers with a household income under £60,000...."
So 2-up @ 40 hrs a week each, £14.00 per hour approx is the new level of "housing poverty" is it? Where is weary Bleary getting her sums and her definition of "hard up"? The National Minimum Wage is under £6.00 per hour, the EU official definition of poverty. The single adult rate of unemployment benefit is £60 per week.

£300 million is not a worthwhile price to pay, out of taxes levied on people whose joint income is well below £60,000, to foster the continued illusion of home ownership wealth.

The article para beginning "A mortgage rescue scheme..." is fanciful rubbish and exactly why people are fed up with the Government as Alistair Darling realises. At what price will the RSL buy the property and with what mortgage attached? Eg, property value now £175,000, mortgage cleared £200,000 (on property value 18 months ago). Immediate cash loss, £25,000.

After 10 years, property value £250,000? To whom sold? Another RSL to recoup the loss, or Nicholas "all tenants are scum - no self respect" Van Hoogstraten? Or will the loss not be recouped? Or will it be re-financed in mortgage-backed securities in the financial markets? AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN.

Stale mob of wise monkeys, they see nothing, they hear nothing, they say nothing but above all, they LEARN nothing.
16

,

02/09/2008 10:56:54
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

Angus Ogg,

02/09/2008 11:36:00
Is it just me, or might the good voters of Glenrothes be a little angered at Dithering Brown & Darling the Bungler, that Fifers and all fellow Scots have been denied the £175,000 Stamp Duty holiday when it comes time to maek the X on the Ballot Paper in the next few weeks time ?

18

ccc,

02/09/2008 12:12:08
Dithering nonsense. Not much more to be added.

The Government cannot beat the market, they never have and never will. You are wanting to buy a house at 175k. Today you will pay £1700 in stamp duty. Next week you will pay £0 in stamp duty. According to latest Nationwide and Halifax figures house prices are falling at about 2% PER MONTH.

That means you are saving £1700 about every 2 WEEKS - never mind stamp duty....

Yeah I think I'll go and buy that overpriced flat afterall....

The more meddling they do the worse it will be.

As has been said this is really just tinkering around the edges. I actually think the Government know they can't do anything about this and are just wanting to be 'seen' to be helping.

It would be laughable if it were not so sad. Pound is tanking = inflation (in the short term) will soar even higher due to our reliance on imports = interest rates will probably go up = more mortgage interest payments.

Nothing they can do about this. It really is out of Broons hands now.
19

Fairfax,

02/09/2008 12:13:03
Angus Ogg (19): "might the good voters of Glenrothes be a little angered at Dithering Brown & Darling the Bungler, that Fifers and all fellow Scots have been denied the £175,000 Stamp Duty holiday"

The £175,000 stamp duty holiday is also mostly irrelevant to London and the South-East, where almost all prices are above this level despite property-price falls. This holiday will overwhelmingly benefit low-price areas such as Northern England -- Labour heartlands, by some strange coincidence.
20

Bottoms Up,

Blackhall 02/09/2008 12:14:00
19#

Don't worry Angus - the £175,000 stamp duty holiday applies to all of the UK.

The other measure (30% loans to FTB's on new builds) only applles in England.

21

Bottoms Up,

Blackhall 02/09/2008 12:19:29
20#

There has been a lot of talk over the pound/dollar rate falling in the last week.

The rate was high for UK tourists when they took their holidays in July and August this year - that's all that matters.

Better still - anyone returning with unspent dollars can sell them back for more than they paid
22

Brian Ferrari,

02/09/2008 12:19:44
Don't think this will have any noticeable effect other than to be a nice surprise for anyone who is buying and their purchase has yet to go through.
23

ccc,

02/09/2008 13:28:04
#23

"The rate was high for UK tourists when they took their holidays in July and August this year - that's all that matters.

Better still - anyone returning with unspent dollars can sell them back for more than they paid"

I take it you are being sarcastic ?!!

Exchange rates affect virtually everything we buy in this country.
24

Fairfax,

02/09/2008 13:36:58
Dave (25): "We will seek reparations for the Feudal system."

For that you'll have to deal with your own aristocracy. No new feudal elements were adduced during Union. In fact, given that the Commons provided better representation than Scotland's pre-Union Estates, the Union reduced the remnants of feudalism in Scotland. England, on the other hand, will be able to cite James VI/I, Charles I, Charles II, and the entire Hanoverian line (being descended from Elizabeth, the so-called Winter-Queen). And that's before we even ask for index-linked Darien returns, together with compensation for our marvellous Scottish Chancellors since 1997 . . .
25

danielrober,

02/09/2008 13:37:52
# 14

Very disrespectfull to some brave people. Can we not leave the war vetrens alone. I think they have earned their rest.
26

Fairfax,

02/09/2008 13:39:45
ccc (26): "Exchange rates affect virtually everything we buy in this country."

They do, but they also affect virtually everything we sell. The decrease to $1.80 is probably much better for the British economy than $2: a strong currency is a mixed blessing.
27

The Federalist (the poster formerly know as NAUON),

02/09/2008 13:53:38
#20 "According to latest Nationwide and Halifax figures house prices are falling at about 2% PER MONTH."

The figures are actually quite patchy - some parts of the country are seeing larger falls whilst some areas - especially in parts of Scotland are still experiencing house price rises. Moreover looking at a single month is misleading - average falls have been as high as -2.5% per month dropping to -0.9% the next month.

Three monthly figures probably give a better indication od the state of affairs. Latest average monthly figures for the last 3 months are:

Scotland -0.07% per month
Yorkshire & Humberside -1.25% per month
West Midlands -1.25% per month
Wales -1.84% per month
South West -0.34% per month
Outer South East -1.08% per month
Outer Metropolitan -0.73% per month
Northern Ireland -2.27% per month
North West -0.86% per month
North -0.67% per month
Greater London -1.26%
East Midlands -1.23%
East Anglia -1.43%

As one can see Scotland seems to be weathering the storm better than other areas.

One should also remember that many property owners will have made substantial gains in their property values in the previous years. Those most at risk of negative equity will be any who got the last of the 125% mortgages. Someone buying a house in Scotland would only have seen a rise of less than 1% in the last year. Go back to 2005 and the rise is 27.88% - a cushion for potential devaluations in property prices.

For those who see their property as being a long-term investment there is hope. It is likely that house prices will rise back up due to the fall in the housing supply through a lack of new builds.
28

ccc,

02/09/2008 14:59:16
#29

"a strong currency is a mixed blessing."

Indeed. However we import a massive amount more than we export a weak currency at this precise moment is no good thing. I do agree it is a mixed blesing though.


#30

"For those who see their property as being a long-term investment there is hope. It is likely that house prices will rise back up due to the fall in the housing supply through a lack of new builds."

People should not see their property as an 'investment' - that is what has caused these problems in the first place. And as for the housing 'supply' argument that has been well and truly demolished in the last few months. All it took was the 'property developers' to skip out of the market and what do we see - all of a sudden a huge oversupply!!

I see no lack of houses for sale or to rent in this country.

Prices will fall by at least 30-50% in real terms.

According to a regular commenter - FOFP - prices will fall more like 70%+. And that guy knows his stuff !!

29

Fairfax,

02/09/2008 15:17:59
ccc (31): "However we import a massive amount more than we export a weak currency at this precise moment is no good thing."

It will be difficult initially, certainly, but this import/export imbalance is partly caused by an over-valued currency. I'm guardedly optimistic.
30

The Federalist (the poster formerly know as NAUON),

02/09/2008 15:26:38
#31 That's some jump from an average fall in Scotland of 0.07% - are you seriously trying to say that there is going to be a 100-fold decrease in house prices?

By the way the increase in some houses entering the market has been ably assisted by muppets in the media overstating falls in house prices - the usual Corporal Jones mentality of some means that the "don't panic (but we will cap'n)" brigade are trying to get rid of houses at the worst time. Anyone with half a brain knows that now is a stupid time to sell. Better to hold on to what you have - prices will recover in the long run.

Also to deny that proprty is a not investment is ludicrous indeed - many individuals will see it as a very long-term investment - something that they will gain from come retirement through either equity release or downsizing. Property is still the best long-term investment compared to the ridiculously low returns from much riskier investments.
31

techpunk,

02/09/2008 15:41:53
#31 #34

Good God man!

never, EVER question CCC's opinion. Did you not know that he is the UKs leading brain in all things property related?

That's right. He has been proving the likes of lawyers, estate agents, government bodies and ministers, think tanks, economists, surveyors etc etc WRONG, WRONG, WRONG! for months now.

Prices to fall 70%+...rmember where you heard that first!
32

ccc,

02/09/2008 16:02:24
#34.

The falls in Scotland have probably been about 10-15% so far. The upper end is simply skewing the figures. Even estage agents are admitting this now. Funny that prices have fallen only 0.07% and yet ALMOST EVERYONE selling a house today in Scotland will get markedly less than they would have last year....

These figures are seriously lagged. Just look at England for that proof. Excatly teh same thign happened to them. Initially massive drop in sales with a slight increase in prices. We are following behind perfectly.

#35.

Just my opinion yes. Anyway my prediction was for 30-40% falls. Many people that know a lot more than me however are going for 50%+ easy. I have no reason to doubt their knowledge on the subject.

As for property being the best long term investment I think you will find that is somewhat of an urban myth. Ask someone who bought an 'investment' in London in 1989. Most had to wait until 1998 just to break even. And that was after paying for the upkeep fo the depreciating asset for almost a decade. Yes of course3 if you buy at exactly the right time and sell at exactly the right time I am sure it can be a great investment. Howeve that geos for anything. The sheer hassle and effort of looking after a property takes away a massive amount of the gains.
33

Andrew Allan,

02/09/2008 17:41:55
Fairfax, Fairfax, Fairfax, what a joker you are, William Paterson setup the company of Scotland with permission of the British royals with knowledge of using Darien. After that time English merchants made an agreement with the Spanish. With that our royals didn't back our claim anymore, allowing the Darien project to be smashed. To make things worse the royals then put acts of parliament in place to stop us making the money that would save our country.
34

Phil1,

Edinburgh 02/09/2008 17:45:07
38 Hawkeye the Noo,02/09/2008 16:59:24

Hawkeye the Noo

Just remind us all where are the these most famous and successful Picts now then?
35

subrosa,

02/09/2008 18:01:15
# 40

One here.
36

Fairfax,

02/09/2008 18:09:02
ndrew Allan (39): "William Paterson setup the company of Scotland with permission of the British royals with knowledge of using Darien."

There were no British royals in any formal sense before 1707: the King of England merely happened to be the King of Scots.

"With that our royals didn't back our claim anymore, allowing the Darien project to be smashed."

William III was a constitutional monarch in England, and you're quite correct that England did not want Darien to succeed; hence William could not support Darien as King of England. For that reason no help was provided by English ships in the area. After all, why should England provide assistance to foreign venturers whose silly plan would, at best, harm English trade?

"To make things worse the royals then put acts of parliament in place to stop us making the money that would save our country."

Are you referring to acts of the English Parliament or the Scottish Parliament?
37

James.com,

02/09/2008 18:30:09
*36 You are right,very few are selling and of those that are many don't need Mortgages ie. mainly more expensive- which skews the stats.
38

Joanna,

02/09/2008 20:10:15
"But, who had actually been out to see this Promised Land, this remote spot where Scots could settle? Well not Paterson apparently!"

http://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/Scotland-History/DarienScheme.htm

Andrew Allan

You really should do your research - Darien was a half-baked scheme set up by someone who had not even bothered to check out the type of place he was asking people to invest their money and lives in.

It also conflicted with England's interests and the East India Company monopoly. You could hardly expect a foreign government such as the English one to put Scottish interests above its own. Why on earth should it have? Would the French or the Dutch have done so, would the Scots come to that? No of course not.
39

Calummac,

02/09/2008 20:36:08
where is the logic (economic or moral) in this?

Morally, it is wrong to try and persuade people to buy into a market that is clearly overpriced relative to earnings and savings. Economically, this is merely an attempt to distort a market (i.e. to fight a falling market). Did we not learn in 1992 that this is not possible?

How does maintaining the price of a house make it easier for a first time buyer to enter the market?

40

Vote UKIP,

02/09/2008 22:08:27
Gordon Brown is a pointless splattering of runny cr @ p.
41

Richard Lionheart,

02/09/2008 22:14:08
So just what is the average price of a house in Glenrothes?

£175,000 per chance.

Voters in Glenrothes please don’t be fooled.

Vote SNP.
42

Bien E. Bien,

02/09/2008 22:55:41
There is a very telling comment about this topic on the BBC website:

"I was buying a house anyway, and now the taxpayer is paying my stamp duty so I'm very happy. I'm not sure it will get the government re-elected, though."

Where is the economic prudence in handing something to those who were about to buy anyway?
43

Fairfax,

02/09/2008 23:20:45
Calummac (45): "How does maintaining the price of a house make it easier for a first time buyer to enter the market?"

It doesn't. The measures will have little effect on South-East England in any case, so its net effect on the economy will be small. It will, however, provide an illusion of support for Labour heartland voters in Northern England.

However, the better course would be to do nothing: let the market reach a new equilibrium. Some will suffer, but the vast majority will benefit enormously from the end of our house price bubble.
44

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 02/09/2008 23:30:17
It may be hard for some of them but even labour supporters can see that this gesture is a vote-catching effort and will have no tangible effect on house purchase difficulties or the housing market.

In any event the Labour help for people in difficulties with mortgage repayments only applies to England. The Stamp Duty limit being raised applies to the UK as a whole. So the whole thing is fraught with being potentially misunderstood geographically, as usual. Is this the right thing to do for the long-term health of the housing market and the economy? Err, no. It will demand 600M comes from somewhere in the already beleaguered public spending pot or will have to be something else to borrow. And since Brown knows he is on the slippery slope to doom he's hardly going to affected by wondering whether this measure will have real impact; more like he's counting the number of votes it will buy.

It is "his turn" you see and he is always right.
45

Fairfax,

03/09/2008 09:51:16
The Former Mr. Angry (50): "In any event the Labour help for people in difficulties with mortgage repayments only applies to England."

Presumably this is because the extra help lies in areas that are considered to be devolved, in which case the Scottish Government can provide its own measures, should it so wish to waste money. However, it would be inconsistent for the SNP to complain at different treatment for England and Scotland: their own housing minister was, after all, suggesting that mortgage providers should treat England and Scotland differently.
46

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 03/09/2008 10:48:26
#51 Fairfax

Yes, I mentioned that not from the viewpoint of SNP support but just in case anyone runs away with the idea that this announcement is a truly UK one (it is for Stamp Duty, but not the oher forms of help)and it was down to Brown and co. when there are other devolved measures in progress from the Scottish government. Whatever happens tinkering with the housing market at this point is utterly fruitless and will not reverse its fortunes until market forces have prevailed and house prices have dropped to a realistic affordable level.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.