Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 6th September 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Motherwell declare Reynolds not for sale at any price



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 June 2008
RANGERS have failed in a bid for Motherwell defender Mark Reynolds, reported to have been between £750,000 and £1million, with the Fir Park club insisting that the Scotland Under-21 international is not for sale at any price.
Manager Mark McGhee last week rejected an offer to manage Hearts to stay at Fir Park for the club's Uefa Cup push, and he has been assured by chairman John Boyle that none of his top players will be sold. McGhee said: "It was part of my discussions w
ith John and one of the reasons why I didn't go to Hearts. I was given guarantees that none of our top players would be sold this summer.

"Even if Rangers were to offer £5 million for Mark Reynolds it wouldn't matter to me because I would tell John that this time next season he could be worth £10 million. Our top players are not for sale and if they are sold then I will be going out the door with them."

Former Motherwell and Rangers defender Craig Paterson, meanwhile, has warned that 21-year-old Reynolds, who played every one of Motherwell's games last season, would have his career put on hold if he moved to Ibrox.

He said: "Mark's biggest problem will be breaking into the team. If David Weir and Carlos Cuellar stay at Rangers and play to the standards they have shown then Walter Smith will go with them.

"Although Mark would be picking up good money, first-team games could be few and far between for him. He played every minute of every game for Motherwell last season.

"And once you have played regularly in the first team then you want to play there all the time, you don't want to go back to playing for the reserves."

Paterson believes Motherwell are well within their rights to hold out for a bigger fee for the under-21 international if they are looking to cash in.

He said:

"Left-side central defenders are always at a premium. But if Hearts consider Christophe Berra to be a £2million player and there is talk that Lee Wallace – who hardly ever plays at Tynecastle – is also rated a £2 million player, then Motherwell might be looking at £3 million for a player who plays every game."





The full article contains 393 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 June 2008 10:37 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Motherwell FC
 
1

Backofthenet,

05/06/2008 00:07:07
Berra is a full international and has skippered Hearts, Wallace will never fetch £2m.

It's up to Motherwell. If they really won't sell Reynolds at any price then fair play to them. Rangers have moved on to other targets according to the BBC.
2

Richardinho,

05/06/2008 00:18:59
Rangers by all accounts have a lot of money to spend. Given Watties preference for Scottish players and the scarcity of these with genuine quality, it's a sellers market. McGhee is a smart cookie.
3

bring them on,

05/06/2008 00:58:38
Why would Rangers want to buy a defender?
4

,

05/06/2008 01:26:09
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

Richardinho,

05/06/2008 02:08:29
#3 I assume that's a joke. Rangers have some serious rebuilding to do over the summer-particularly in defence. Weir is likely leaving (and is too old in any case-ditto Dailly). Cuellar is supposedly going to leave for 10 billion pounds on a Boumsong, and Kirk Broadfoot is probably the worst player to play for either half of the old firm-ever!
Most of the top European players are out of Rangers league and Wattie seems to prefer the home grown players anyway. There aren't many of those, so those teams like Motherwell with such prized assets are right to guard them.
6

Fayneant,

NZ 05/06/2008 03:50:18
Rangers should be chasing 'unsettled' Richard Dunne at man City - he's a class act
7

Fayneant,

NZ 05/06/2008 03:58:15
5 - Broadfoot 'worst ever' player to play for the OF?

Surely plenty of donkeys more deserving of that accolade...!
8

Phil MaGlass,

Holland 05/06/2008 07:15:53
well done Motherwell,tell them where to go
9

Ian.M,

North Ayrshire 05/06/2008 07:27:48
While it's difficult to argue that the price quoted is fair enough, this attempted move does little to suggest Rangers have a 'staggering' £20,25,30M depending on which chip wrapper you read.

Earlier this year David Murray refused to reveal the extent of Rangers debt in their interim accounts. It is unlikely this was because he had it down to such a low level. One no holds barred Rangers supporting Sunday tabloid journalist recently suggested they could have as little as £3M to spend this summer. The names of Kenny Miller and Mark Reynolds do little to dispel that notion.
10

,

05/06/2008 07:52:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

Media 1,

cape town 05/06/2008 07:57:47
He wont sell him for any price! bwahahahaha
Not even 6 million?
McGhee is taking the p!ss. He himself would have left Motherwell if someone else had wanted him. But nobody was prepared to throw money at him so he is stranded at wee Motherwell, when ideally he would love to be manager at Hibs, Hearts, Aberdeen, Dundee United or of course one of the Old Firm. Sorry Marky boy but those jobs are for REAL managers.
12

,

05/06/2008 08:32:06
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

Johnny Jambo,

05/06/2008 08:39:46
It says a lot about Scottish football, it appears that more clubs are deciding not to sell to the OF.

I have a sneaky suspicion of course that this is because they are trying to increase the price, but fair play to them for that.
14

porters at 9,

05/06/2008 08:42:46
#12 unless she asked for it..

i'm sure the player won't be happy at McGee's comments - there's £2k a week at Well but i'm not going to let you earn a decent living

typical OF tho - moan constantly there's no challenge but they pilfer SPL players that WON'T win them the CL or UEFA but their happy just to race each other to the line..

buck
fast
15

,

05/06/2008 08:45:07
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

Pepper Pig,

05/06/2008 08:54:12
Media 1. Spot on about McGhee. he is a money-grabbing sod. Sodded off to Hamburg from Aberdeen as a player, and hacked off Reading to go to Leicester, then Leicester to take the Wolves job. Damn cheek of the man!
17

Lion-O "Lord Of The ThunderCats,

05/06/2008 09:06:25
If Rangers are prepared to bid £750k now (probably a Naismith offer of £100k now and the rest after 5 years or 100 Scotland caps) then like Naismith they will offer more at the end of August.

If Rangers are prepared to offer £750k (in easy repayment installments) then is this Wattie's way of trying to get Strachan to buy the player? That's what normally happens innit?

If Rangers will pay £750k then I'm sure that an English championship team can beat that fee easily and pay the lad more money and offer him first team football.

18

Jambo-ree,

05/06/2008 09:29:04
Why would Rangers want to sign another central defender when they went to such lengths to get Andy Webster?

#15 - Care to explain how the OF support the rest of Scottish football? Each club keeps its own gate money and we have shown we are capable of filling Tynecastle on a regular basis with or without the Weegie battalions.

Or are you talking about all the money you pay in transfer fees to weaken the rest of the league then moan (a) about the SPL not being competitive enough (b) about how many OF players are expected to play for Scotland while also killing the careers of promising young players by leaving them on the bench or in the stand. You can't have it both ways.
19

yeahyeahyeah,

05/06/2008 09:36:06
#19 - i guess you'd rather rangers filled their team with unknown lithuanian diddies than buy scottish?
20

&Larrsonfixestheradio,

05/06/2008 10:03:45
#18,

without Celtic their would be no TV deal. Cheaper SPL sponsorship. Less transfer fees ... etc.

I cant see too many companies rushing into put money into a nationally televised sporting event where a great leader and broker of piece like JP II minute of silence is roundly booed and abused.

Does this explain why the SC does not have a sponsor for next year? Rangers protection racket more interested in Rangers interests this year than the rest of us for next year? mmmh I wonder why :-)

We even paid a small fee for Caldwell and Riordhan when it wasn´t necessary. Scott Broon we probably overpaid. Time will tell. Hartley and Pressley were booted out the door by yourselves ... we took advantage and paid an acceptable fee for Hartley. Pressley (stop gap) I wish we had never signed. Also I have to say I dont see many Rangers players playing for Scotland these days

Its not as if Celtic do to Hibs what Rangers done to Hearts a la Ritchie and Webster. It sounds like Webster will have to fork out his compensation fee to Hearts from his own pocket if thats whats decided. That´s what his love of Rangers has cost him.

Being financially challenged is it a Lithianan or a Jamboe short coming

I would take #15´s comments further and say that Celtic is Scottish football. Without Celtic there would be nobody left to hate. We are grouped in more often with the Old Firm tag because it suits Rangers and most other clubs in Scotland. Celtic being guilty by association - ask Vladimir. The damage that us Scots done down in Manchester to our Scottish reputation is disastrous according to the Chief executive of the SFA.

4 in a row here we go


21

,

05/06/2008 10:12:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
22

Teary Ennui,

05/06/2008 10:33:06
"Its not as if Celtic do to Hibs what Rangers done to Hearts a la Ritchie" (#20)

Rangers offered Hearts £1m for Ritchie.
23

&Larrsonfixestheradio,

05/06/2008 10:37:15
#22

Ritchie went off to Wigan to help Dignity FC avoid having to pay anything to his employers as part of the JJB deal. Like Ritchie Dignity FC will leave Ritchie out to dry or are you telling me that Rangers will now pay that 1m or at least part of it to Hearts as compensation if Websters appeal fails ?
24

&Larrsonfixestheradio,

05/06/2008 10:38:15
above should read

Ritchie went off to Wigan to help Dignity FC avoid having to pay anything to his employers as part of the JJB deal. Like Ritchie Dignity FC will leave WEBSTER out to dry or are you telling me that Rangers will now pay that 1m or at least part of it to Hearts as compensation if Websters appeal fails ?
25

Teary Ennui,

05/06/2008 10:41:33
#24,

Ritchie never went to Wigan. Keep trying.
26

Jambo-ree,

05/06/2008 10:55:01
#19 Nope - I'd rather the OF put some commitment and energy into producing their own home-grown talent rather than in effect using the rest of the SPL as feeder clubs. The OF do have significant financial clout (for all the wrong reasons) but my point still stands - either change your recruitment policy or stop whingeing on about lack of competition and the number games that your players have to play.

You'll have noticed that Hartley (for whom we got good a fee IMO) and Elvis (past his best) we haven't fed anyone to the OF for a while now (I don't count Judas Webster who manipulated his own arrival in Ibrox).

#21 We did mount a serious challenge a couple of seasons ago, or have you selective amnesia? Unfortunately our Dear Leader managed to screw that up for his own reasons. Incidentally we did reach the quarter finals of the UEFA Cup losing on aggregate to Bayern Munich after beating them at home.
27

Teary Ennui,

05/06/2008 10:59:25
"I'd rather the OF put some commitment and energy into producing their own home-grown talent rather than in effect using the rest of the SPL as feeder clubs" (#26)

Quite a few home-grown players in the Rangers and Celtic squads. Also quite a few products of the Old Firm youth programmes who do a good job for other Scottish clubs (the aforementioned Presssley did, for example).
28

It's me!,

05/06/2008 11:06:10
Why do they need Reynolds when they have that other guy as back up? What's his name again? Web... Webster. That's it! Andy Webster! And what a fine ploy that was, eh Andy and your devious agent? Not!!! You could have played many more games for Hearts with Romanov picking the team than you have for Rangers. Saw you on the pitch after the cup final. Not during the cup final. After the cup final!
29

&Larrsonfixestheradio,

05/06/2008 11:14:17
#25 Thanks

Webster went off to Wigan to help Dignity FC avoid having to pay anything to his employers as part of the JJB deal. Like Ritchie Dignity FC will leave WEBSTER out to dry or are you telling me that Rangers will now pay that 1m or at least part of it to Hearts as compensation if Websters appeal fails ?

#25

Now will you answer the question ?
30

Teary Ennui,

05/06/2008 11:17:52
#29,

Will Rangers pay the £1m they offered years ago for Ritchie for another player (Webster)? No, of course not. Why should they? One deal has nothing to do with the other (despite whatever daft conspiracy theories you believe in).
31

&Larrsonfixestheradio,

05/06/2008 11:24:48
#30,

Pedantic or just are acting stupid ?

Will Dignity FC help Webster pay compensation as they engineered the whole deal so that Webster could shaft the club that made him a professional player to pursue his first love of ingratiating himself with Dignity FC in the first place ?
32

,

05/06/2008 11:26:15
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
33

Teary Ennui,

05/06/2008 11:28:35
"Will Dignity FC help Webster pay compensation as they engineered the whole deal" (#31)

Now what did I say about daft conspiracy theories?
34

&Larrsonfixestheradio,

05/06/2008 11:41:00
#33
I cat remember. I´ll take a guess

That you will use them througout your whole life to allow you to remain in the gutter and in denial.

Close ?
35

,

05/06/2008 12:48:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
36

Jambo-ree,

05/06/2008 13:07:26
#35 Well, if you're all that good then why is there the need to raid other clubs for their best talent? Could it be just to shaft them and suppress any meaningful competition to the cosy OF duopoly?

#31 I acknowledged in my post that our beloved owner blew it that season but firmly believe (even without mentioning Takis Fyssas/Sean Maloney) that the challenge would have been maintained had he not meddled. Still the only time the OF have been split in the league and we also won the Cup that season which just makes us regret what might have been. Don't think it was us that put you out the Cup that year - who was it again?
37

&Larrsonfixestheradio,

05/06/2008 13:12:46
Even Terry Butcher is urging Reynolds not to join Rangers.
38

The Equaliser,

05/06/2008 13:22:09
Jamboree

The SPL has been and is well populated with ex Rangers developed players. just look at Motherwell with Hughes, Malcolm, McCormick, Mclean and Smith while Aberdeen with Nicholson show that plenty goes back
39

,

05/06/2008 13:22:52
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
40

Jambo-ree,

05/06/2008 13:53:34
#38 So you're quite happy to offload those that don't come to scratch and pillage the best back in return, even if it means them rarely kicking a ball in anger. Anyway, discussion was not about what happens but the whingeing that goes on about the blame for lack of Euro success being apportioned to lack of a competitive SPL. The fact it is not is to a large extent down to the OF and their chums.
41

Backofthenet,

05/06/2008 14:04:25
#40,

Big teams in any country sign players from the smaller teams. It's just a fact of football life.

As for Webster, don't forget Hearts took him from Arbroath in the first place!
42

mac1888,

05/06/2008 14:33:05
http://thelightblues.blogspot.com/2008/06/sir-david-murray-deliberately-lowering_05.html

Interesting article from the light blues website that will no doubt depress the majority of Rangers fans :)
43

mac1888,

05/06/2008 14:46:00
http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/sport/display.var.2320258.0.0.php

and another!
44

Bemused and above it all,

05/06/2008 15:12:56
#36
So youd rather the OF produced their own players rather than buy up any talent for the reserves?

Rangers - Fleck, Shinnie, Furman, Burke, Adam, Smith, McGregor, Hutton, Ferguson, Kinsborough et al

Celtic - Caddis, McGeady (sure theres more but i'm more interested in my own team)

We ARE producing talent, and lets face it how many of the players who 'emerge' at diddy teams like Hearts have been punted from our respective set ups?
45

Richardinho,

05/06/2008 18:10:23
It's absolutely pathetic the way the Scottish media talks up every Rangers dudd into being a world beater, and hyping up the transfer fee. We've seen it with Ferguson, Boumsong and Hutton. The first two flopped in England and Hutton hasn't looked anything spectacular either.
Now we're hearing it with Cuellar. In the Scottish cup final he gave the ball away several times under pressure, and there's the small matter of the two cheap goals Rangers gave away. But this still didn't stop the commentator showering him with gushing praise and speculating how a 'big club down south' will be in for him.
46

Rosscobhoy,

Glasgow 05/06/2008 20:16:30
A left sided centre half who is good in the air, composed on the ball and has a bit of pace. If i was Gordon Strachan i'd have a bid in for him already. Easily one of the best prospects in Scotland from what i have seen of him(admittedly thats not very much, but he has impressed me with the exception of 1 game i can think of). £2m is not that big a risk, or maybe we could swap him for Bobo and Graveson......
47

jerrymanders,

05/06/2008 20:19:08
#45

Not to mention McGregor! Has hardly played for them, never played in Euro or WC and has a packed defence in front of him. How many caps?
48

Teary Ennui,

05/06/2008 21:34:25
When there's transfer speculation about Celtic players, you lot think it's a conspiracy against Celtic.

But when there's transfer speculation about Rangers players, you lot think it's a conspiracy in favour of Rangers.
49

Bleeding Heart...,

05/06/2008 22:25:17
The reality here is that once again, an OF club shows its disrespect for the other Scottish clubs by offering a derisory amount for a player.

Contrary to public utterances, the OF does NOT want a more competitive league. They consistently undermine the efforts of clubs like Motherwell by raiding them for their best players.

Rangers, in particular, have in the past made something of an art form of buying players and then barely giving them a run-out.

These two quotes - from both sides of the OF - are classic examples of this contemptuous mentality...

#12 "..I'm sick of the diddy teams selling their best players then having to listen to their whinging fans..."

#15 "It's time the diddy teams realised that and shut up and get on with it. Reynolds is average so we offered average money."

Curious how both these eejits choose to use the word "diddy" in respect of the rest of us, isn't it? Or his it?

Perhaps it proves how obsessed they are with each other, and how ignorant they are of football matters outside their incestuous relationship.

Reynolds an "average" player? If so, why are Rangers interested? Is Waldo losing it?

But no - perhaps it's an offer founded on that same altruistic streak that prompted Rangers to so kindly offer to take Webster off Wigan's hands.

Who's Webster? You remember him. Left Hearts as a Scotland international player but amazingly, he wasn't apparently good enough to play for relegation-threatened Wigan FC. Curious, eh?

But, as we know, big-hearted Rangers stepped in and helped out. Great guys, eh?






50

Teary Ennui,

05/06/2008 22:38:44
Russell Anderson left Aberdeen as a Scotland international and didn't get many games for mighty Sunderland who chucked him out on loan. Curious?
51

Marky Bhoy,

Dunfermline 05/06/2008 23:08:14

Reynolds seemingly got 5 o grades but I dont think Rangers would be so keen to sign him when they find out what school he achieved them at .

Hence no end my Motherwell hell headlines have appeared yet

Give him another year at well and he might well replace Caldwell
52

Bleeding Heart...,

06/06/2008 20:27:35
#50 - Perhaps.

Care to enlighten us as to the point (if any) you are making..?
53

Bleeding Heart...,

06/06/2008 20:40:18
#51 - Congratulations on living up to the stereotype, Marky.

I make a series of points/observations and all you can do is "inform" us that Reynolds attended a Catholic school.

Well, thanks for that Marky, I'm sure we'll all sleep better tonight in that knowledge.

And, you don't think Rangers would sign a Catholic player?

Really? Didn't you know the Mighty 'Gers have understood for some time that it would be commercial suicide to pursue a discriminatory policy that might incur sanctions from the European football authorities..?

You're from Dunfermline (apparently) - why do you support Celtic? Is it because (a) you hold pseudo-religious/political views, (b) you're a glory-seeker (c) it's all your dad's fault (d) all of the above..?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.