Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Supertanker 'was damaged by explosion or submarine'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 July 2010
A JAPANESE supertanker which sustained serious hull damage while sailing through the hyper-sensitive Straits of Hormuz was either hit by an explosion or in a collision with a submarine, officials in the United Arab Emirates said yesterday.


•The damage to the hull of the M Star is clear to see. Below, the tanker in open seas Pictures: AFP

When the M Star supertanker reported it had been hit by an "explosion" late on Wednesday, officials in the UAE played down the claim, citing seismic activity and saying the vessel had been hit by "a freak wave".

Yet yesterday, it was confirmed the crude carrier had been hit by an external force and a specialist on military attacks has been asked to help investigate damage to the 1,100-foot vessel laden with oil for Japan.

"What we know is some collision happened. We don't know what it was," said Captain Mousa Mourad, general manager at the UAE port of Fujairah.

"It's possible that it could be a submarine collision, or that it could be a sea mine."

The Straits of Hormuz are a strategically vital waterway; a narrow chokepoint between Iran and an enclave of Oman surrounded by Emirati territory through which 40 per cent of the world's shipped oil must transit.

Iran has frequently threatened to blockade them in the event of any military action against it, and the US maintains a constant naval presence in the area.

A spokesman for the US Fifth Fleet, based in Bahrain, said no American warships were in the area at the time the M Star reported the incident.

US nuclear submarines have been involved in two collisions in the busy sealane since 2007, one involving a Japanese supertanker and the other another US warship.

A photograph released by the Emirates state news agency WAM after the tanker arrived in Fujairah yesterday showed a large, square-shaped dent near the waterline on the rear starboard side of the ship's hull.

Wednesday's incident happened shortly after midnight as the ship entered the Strait of Hormuz, heading out of the Persian Gulf, Japanese shipping company Mitsui OSK. Lines said.

The incident briefly spooked oil markets particularly in Japan - a sign of the heightened focus on the Gulf after new sanctions were imposed on Iran at the beginning of the week.

"In international waters, it is always difficult to tell what happened," said Jonathan Wood, global issues analyst at Control Risks. "It could be an accident or it could be an attack.

It took weeks to raise the South Korean corvette Cheonan after it sank in March and for Seoul to blame North Korea. Investigating this could be easier - the ship is still afloat.

Attacks on land are hard enough to probe, but at sea independent witnesses may be scarce, radar and satellite coverage patchy and physical evidence at the bottom of the sea.



Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 29 July 2010 11:36 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Tom in DC,

Daly City, California 30/07/2010 00:40:45
A collision seems a better hypothesis. Commercial vessels are pretty thin-skinned against military explosives. Mines could sink battleships, which had waterline armor.
2

Johnny Ringo,

30/07/2010 04:08:30
Doesn't look like an explosion to me. Perhaps they hit a whale.
3

gus1940,

Edinburgh 30/07/2010 07:22:26
~1

Mines sank battleships by penetrating the hull below the armour belt - the same with torpedos.
4

Dave from Skye,

30/07/2010 07:51:07
Very odd looking damage.

Unlikely to be caused by a (distant) underwater mine/torpedo explosion, since the damage from a pressure-wave would be concentrated below the waterline - not above it. Actual contact with such a weapon would, of course, have blown a very large hole in the side of the ship.

It seems to have collided with a large, blunt, floating object. Possibly Moby Dick.
5

Douglas,

Bathgate 30/07/2010 07:57:37
Were there any reports of ladies trying to parallel park Nissan Micras in the area?
6

Auld-Yin,

Musselburgh 30/07/2010 09:29:14
Douglas #5

I was thinking along the same lines, but thought there might just have been a doris driving the tanker :)

(Ducks incoming anger from PC brigade)
7

All Politicians are the same,

Scotland 30/07/2010 10:21:45
#7

Would love to have a look below the water line. It actually looks like they have been crunched by the tug that helped them unberth at their last port.
8

Rob Royston,

30/07/2010 10:26:33
Aye, insurance job by the look of it. Probably sideswiped a rubber fendered mooring dolphin at his last port.
9

rgeg,

30/07/2010 12:32:07
#2 JR, I'm right beside you on this one, this tanker has been hit by a whale and no mistake!

And I suspect Barnum & Baileys circus are responsible for firing the whale from one of those huge cannons.

I thought we'd had enough animal cruelty stunts this month with the parasailing donkey in Russia...
10

Laird o' Glenrothes,

30/07/2010 12:50:19
Doesn't look like submarine damage to me. The buckled plate is above the waterline, and the plating is going back to normal form towards the waterline.

As for tug damage, these things have "tug points" which are thicker plate and transverse framing where the tug will push against.

Any explosion would have penetrated the hull plating before bending the frames.

Looks like it's been a large flat face that's caused the damage.
11

All Politicians are the same,

Scotland 30/07/2010 14:00:25
#10
They should indeed have tig points but can you see one marked in the picture? There should be one in the vicinity of the photo.
12

Ironaxe,

30/07/2010 15:51:41

I blame the Americans.
13

Douglas,

Bathgate 30/07/2010 18:22:24
Laird o' Glenrothes: "Looks like it's been a large flat face that's caused the damage."

Any reports of injury to Sophie Ellis-Bextor? :o)
14

Tobytoo,

Southington 30/07/2010 18:47:25
#12 Ironaxe
You always do.
15

Rob Royston,

30/07/2010 19:31:20
No, it's not been a "large flat face", You can tell by the damage to the transverse frames that the impact has been from a horizontal direction, just above the boot-topping line. Whatever impacted the hull was well fendered.

If it was a tug, it must have been damaged in bending the frames like that. Surely it would have been reported.

I think they drifted sideways into a mooring dolphin and they are putting up this story to save someones career. That's unless a large, well-fendered navy tug did it as a false-flag attack.
16

westview,

all at sea 30/07/2010 20:49:04
Did Tony Blair drop his wallet in this area? It would make this size of damage to shipping.
17

Baggy Troosers,

30/07/2010 21:37:06
It wiz Iain Gray's chin.
18

Ironaxe,

31/07/2010 21:39:22
#14.

Why not? They blame us for everything else.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.