Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Let's mark Kyoto anniversary by taking lead on climate change



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 February 2008
Scotland has the chance to be at the forefront of efforts to establish a low-carbon economy, writes DAN BARLOW
TOMORROW marks the third anniversary of the Kyoto Protocol – the world's first binding agreement on cutting climate emissions – coming into force. Despite a bumpy ride in the years running up to the protocol being ratified, not least with the United
States signing up to it under Clinton and then withdrawing from it under Bush, it is important to reflect on its significance.

Kyoto signalled a turning point in galvanising global commitments to tackle climate change, with more than 160 countries having translated aspirations into law and 35 industrialised countries (plus the European Union) agreeing absolute and binding commitments to reduce their emissions.

Of course, since those countries originally agreed to the principle of a global agreement in 1997, the scientific certainty of the causes and consequences has become even more apparent and the imperative for bolder action has become more acute. The latest report from the world's leading climate scientists highlights the scientific consensus that climate change is already upon us – and that human activities are the cause.

Here in the UK, a growing momentum for action has been triggered by a number of events, ranging from Sir David King, the UK government's chief scientific adviser, stating that climate change posed a bigger threat than international terrorism, to the findings and profile of the Stern review – the economic assessment of the impact of climate change commissioned by Gordon Brown.

The latter concluded that the scientific evidence was "overwhelming", the consequences "disastrous" and that action now would be much cheaper than action later. The report made it clear it is not a question of whether we can afford to act, but whether we can afford not to. If we tackle climate change now, the annual costs will be equivalent to approximately 1 per cent of global GDP; if we delay our response, the annual costs are likely to be between 5 per cent and 20 per cent of global GDP. Of course, we've also seen political leaders start installing renewable energy in their homes and cycling to work to demonstrate their commitment to the cause and barely a day goes by without reference to climate change in the press.

So where has this momentum taken us so far? In terms of action, we are just beginning. Having dragged our heels, used feeble arguments to delay progress and missed huge opportunities to achieve change, we have made the challenge that much greater now. Governments around the world are still failing to join up the rhetoric on tackling climate change with action on the ground, whether it be plans for major airport expansion, the failure to embrace fully energy efficiency or commitments to build new motorways. However, I believe we are reaching a turning point at last and, while too late to avoid some of the impacts of climate change, with swift and bold action we can avert the worst impacts, safeguarding the livelihoods of millions and the protection of thousands of species and their habitats.

Globally, governments are waking up to the threats and opportunities and the need to act now.

Scotland has an opportunity to shine and is well positioned to seize the opportunities presented by acting quickly and leading by example. We all have a moral imperative to take action, but Scotland also has the natural and human resources to be able to act confidently.

Since the early Kyoto discussions, the Scottish Parliament has been reinstated, giving us greater scope than ever to set a strong lead. In last year's election, many political parties set out their ambitions to help Scotland to tackle climate change. Significantly, the SNP manifesto committed to bringing forward climate legislation to cut Scotland's emissions by 80 per cent by 2050 through statutory annual cuts of 3 per cent each year. Proposals for a Scottish Climate Change Bill are under way, and this is a unique opportunity for the Scottish Government and parliament to ensure this legislation positions Scotland at the forefront of efforts to establish a low-carbon economy.

Today marks the start of WWF Scotland's climate campaign to secure widespread public support for a strong Scottish Climate Change Bill. For us, this means legislation that commits Scotland to reduce greenhouse gases by at least 80 per cent by 2050. In order to achieve this, we believe the legislation must require emission cuts each and every year of at least 3 per cent to ensure we are on the trajectory to an 80 per cent cut by 2050. In addition, emissions from our share of international aviation and shipping need to be included. Aviation is the fastest-growing emission sector and excluding this does not make sense. Without addressing emissions from aviation, they are set to dwarf those from other sectors and equate to our entire carbon budget.

As part of our climate campaign, we will be touring Scotland's cities to meet as many people as possible and secure their support for strong Scottish legislation to tackle climate change. Scotland's Climate Change Bill may be the most important piece of legislation in our lifetime. It could establish our nation as an international leader in tackling climate change, helping to secure the future for millions of people and giving hope for species and habitats under threat from climate change.

With a government consultation on proposals for a Scottish Climate Change Bill running until April, this is a unique opportunity to make your voice heard and add your support to ensure that, as a nation, Scotland leads the way in tackling climate change.

• Dr Dan Barlow is the acting director of WWF Scotland. For more information, visit www.wwfscotland.org.uk/climate





The full article contains 966 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 February 2008 9:31 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Climate change
 
1

Isonomia,

Lenzie 15/02/2008 06:38:53
When the kyoto protocol was signed the world had just seen half a century of rising temperatures which although there was no scientific evidence to link them with manmade CO2, the "precautionary approach" meant we should be preparing.

But since 2001 global temperatures have been declining, the evidence against a link between CO2 and temperature has declined with e.g. the evidence that CO2 lags temperature in the historical record suggesting CO2 changes ARE CAUSED by temperatures rather than the reverse.

So, lets mark Kyoto with a return to science, with policy based on the evidence and an end to this scare about manmade global warming!
2

Isonomia,

Lenzie 15/02/2008 07:48:51
The US ... late fore two world wars, now will they arrive at the global warming "consensus" just when its over!
3

Leifwiz,

Eatonville 15/02/2008 09:12:39
Well, we may have been late to join Europe's martial convulsions, but we came, we saw, we conquered and then were hated till this day. I don't know how seemingly intelligent people can buy into this global warming, now climate change crap. Simply viewing the Algore comedy of An Inconvenient Truth, should be enough to realize he is peddling Convenient Untruths. The whole world has fallen for a con artist and legions of scientists desparately searching for research funds and twisting facts to justify this theory du jour.
4

person who's right,

Edinburgh 15/02/2008 10:08:54
I agree with much of what the writer from WWF Scotland says. But he has to accept that this piece of legislation, in itself, will not change anything in terms of global warming. Scotland is responsible for about 0.16% of global emissions.

What we have to do is use the Scottish legislation as an international example. It's already having an impact at UK level (where the equivalent targets are not sufficiently ambitious - but where it looks like they may be 'shamed' by the Scottish bill into matching us).

If/when we do finalise a strong climate change bill, people like WWF should concentrate on 'exporting' this knowledge and expertise to other countries (both in terms of technical expertise in reducing carbon, AND in terms of shaming/encouraging other, bigger, countries to follow suit. THAT is the way in which the Scottish bill could have a genuine impact on global climate change.
5

Itchy,

15/02/2008 13:02:28
"Let's mark Kyoto anniversary by taking lead on climate change"

Let's flush this load of shyte down the toilet.
6

Unimpressed one,

15/02/2008 13:06:03
Look, WWF is a business, masquerading as a charity, that hypes and lies in order to get us poor suckers to pay their salaries. They lie about species extinction levels, they lie about sustainable development and they certainly lie about 'climate change'. Only gullible fools will support a Scottish climate change bill.
7

Neil,

Glasgow 15/02/2008 14:32:50
Wonder if the Scotsman would publish an article by me saying catastrophic warming is a total lie & that we can & should get rid of all the eco-fascist nonsense. You know just for balance.

No I don't either.
8

Dragonlord,

15/02/2008 18:54:34
Dan, Scotland is a world leader in low emmissions. The system of lumping Scotland with Englandshire ( to make their emmissions look good) should stop. Scotland leads the world in re-newable( Hydro) energy and doesn't need any more wind farms, or any other blot on the landscape Thank you very much.
9

Alan Reid,

NZ 16/02/2008 23:15:43
For all you head up the a@se brigade.
I've seen the Great golbal warming swindle and it's cr@p. Check out the following:
http://www.durangobill.com/Swindle_Swindle.html

10

Alan Reid,

NZ 16/02/2008 23:17:05
Unimpressed one,15/02/2008 13:06:03
"Look, WWF is a business, masquerading as a charity, that hypes and lies in order to get us poor suckers to pay their salaries. They lie about species extinction levels, they lie about sustainable development and they certainly lie about 'climate change'. Only gullible fools will support a Scottish climate change bill"
Prove it
11

Harbinger,

A cooling world 17/02/2008 15:19:39
How does WWF get a free publicity article like this?

They are essentially a pseudo-governmental organisation with strong government links via their trustees. There are also Royal Society and National Environmental Research Council linkages. (NERC directs the flow of reseach funds in environmental research). The chairman of the Met Office Board is the recent Chief Executive of WWF.

They distort and misrepresent data to promote their agenda to government, here is one example of many:

Chemical campaigns 'misleading' By Rebecca Morelle, Health reporter, BBC News http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6040146.stm

Leading toxicologists have warned green groups are "misleading" the public with chemical contamination campaigns. They said they are deliberately and unfairly scaring the public.
In particular, they criticised a WWF campaign that has highlighted the presence of certain chemicals in blood, food and in babies' umbilical cords.
The scientists said the minute levels detected did not warrant the group's focus on health dangers, but WWF has denied it was scare-mongering.
The message they are putting across is misleading, and
deliberately so said Professor David Coggon of Southampton University.

They make false claims about Polar Bears and Penguins and achieve instant Press coverage but the truth is hardly ever reported.
12

Paul A,

29/02/2008 14:05:59
"But since 2001 global temperatures have been declining, the evidence against a link between CO2 and temperature has declined with e.g. the evidence that CO2 lags temperature in the historical record suggesting CO2 changes ARE CAUSED by temperatures rather than the reverse.”

Global temperature peaked in the late 1990's because of the effect of El Nino. El Nino will return in future, and we will see global temperature records broken again.

Regarding the tired old glacial lag claim – yes, it is true that the evidence shows a lag of about 800 years between the warming at the end of a glacial period and an increase in CO2 levels. However, it took around 5000 years for the last glacial period to end, so you can’t conclude that an increase in CO2 and other greenhouse gases (GG) did not contribute to the warming - the warming lasted a further 4200 years!

Glacial periods are caused by variations in Earth’s orbit (Milankovitch cycles). A slight warming caused by orbital changes stimulates changes in GG levels, causing further warming, stimulating further increases in GGs, and so on. All the glacial lag proves is that GGs don’t trigger the end of a glacial period – but no-one ever claimed that they did (Milankovitch cycles)! Small changes in Earth's orbit are hugely amplified by changes in GGs. The glacial lag is actually evidence of the importance of GGs to our climate.

It was proven about 150 years ago that certain gases, including CO2, have a greater capacity for absorbing radiant heat. Increase the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere and it will effect climate - as proved by the mechanism by which glacial periods end.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.