Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 11th October 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Market forces are the best way to stop cruelty of seal clubbing


Platform

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 18 March 2008
DAVID MARTIN - Labour member of the European Parliament
THE sight of skinless dismembered seal carcases savagely strewn across the ice floes off Newfoundland will once again be on our TV screens as Canada's annual commercial seal hunt begins again. It is the largest commercial hunt of marine mammals in t
he world.

Last year over 224,000 harp and hooded seals (98.5 per cent of which were pups under three months old) were clubbed to death or shot for their fur and other products; an inhumane practice that continues to find support from the Canadian government. International calls to end this cruel and commercially questionable practice are heard annually and little has been done about it. The even more striking fact is that only a handful of EU states have fully outlawed the trade in seal products, and the UK is not one of them.

Using its market power is the most effective tool that the EU has at its disposal in ending the cull and Britain is in a prime position to make it happen.The European marketplace is a major economic force. Last year 19 per cent of all world trade was done with the EU alone. Indeed, if Europe was to no longer permit producers of seal products to trade within our borders, the effects would certainly be felt. In 2006, 32 per cent of Canadian seal fur exports went to the EU, mostly to Finland, Germany, Denmark and Greece.

With an EU ban, Canadian sealers would thus be forced financially to think twice about the heartless hunt.

At the European Parliament, action has been taken to try and encourage the council and the commission to introduce and enforce a Europe-wide ban. A written declaration signed by 450 MEPs was adopted and the commission's proposed animal welfare action plan received widespread approval. Political will at EU level is, therefore, not lacking.

However, despite resounding European political support for these measures, it is the choice of individual governments to introduce a ban. The Netherlands, Belgium and Slovenia have all implemented outright bans and other member states are contemplating similar action. The UK has said it would welcome EU action on the issue, yet very little seems to have been done to actively pursue this end and a domestic ban is not yet in place.

Much is made of Britain's status as one of the EU's "major players" and its influence could stimulate concerted European legislation in this area. The UK's ability to come out of every recent treaty negotiation with red lines in tact is testament to this power, not to mention the fact that the commissioner in charge of trade is Peter Mandelson. The British government has the opportunity and the ability to lead the EU in calling for union-wide engagement with the unethical trade in seal products.

By ending this trade across Europe, a clear signal would be sent outlining the union as a market place for ethically sound goods. Trade offers Europe a key tool to alter habits and put pressure on the fishermen and the Canadian government that recurrently participate in the seal cull. Britain should be actively calling for this tool to be used and has little excuse not to.





The full article contains 551 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 17 March 2008 11:36 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

W Smith,

Middle East 18/03/2008 04:01:52
Around 200,000 abortions are carried out every year in the UK and Mr David Martin isn't the least bit squeemish about that.

The point is that the sight of animal blood on an iceberg (red against white) upsets Mr Martin as it is an extremely visual reminder of the slaughter that has taken place.

Maybe if the seals were killed in a sound-proof clinic out of sight of TV cameras Mr Martin wouldn't be so uptight.
2

ghost chaser,

other side of the pond 18/03/2008 08:06:53
why do we as a public need for seal skins, minkie whales for " research " or shark fins for soup? WHAT IS THE POINT !!!!!! It doesn't matter, if every woman that has an abortion decided to keep their child, we as a species are going to destroy everything for all our children anyway. so really what are we going to leave as our legacy.
3

donald,

glasgow 18/03/2008 08:54:36
What else could a Labour numpty do but support market forces?
4

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

18/03/2008 10:07:10
These seal pups are bludgeoned in front of their distraught mothers... some of them are not dead when the skin is cut off of their wee bodies... and there are witnesses to this atrocity...

It is not humane... despite what the pro hunters will tell you... it is an appalling act of human barbarity...
5

Tweedmouth,

Coldstream 18/03/2008 10:16:31
It is not 'some' which are still alive when their skins are ripped from their bodies - it is a good many. These swine who carry out the cull are so mean that they will not spend 10 cents for a .22 cartridge per seal. They do it with a club with a metal spike in the end - and its not easy to hit a seal dead centre on the skull when it is trying to escape. It is appalling.
6

Dragonlord,

18/03/2008 11:00:20
If seal want to go out clubbing why stop them.
7

Nìall,

Edinburgh 18/03/2008 14:28:05
What is that man haverin about?

Government intervention is not "market forces" -- market forces is whether people choose to buy sealskin products or not. And the *are* choosing to buy sealsking

One of the reasons that the UK is such a big supporter of the Canadian trade is the sporran -- sealskin sporrans are "in" at the moment.

But don't blame me: I've got one made of cow and another made of rabbit.

So yes, market forces *could* end the trade, but market forces are currently *supporting* the trade.
8

Scotsperson,

Planet Earth 18/03/2008 16:46:36
How many chickens were slaughtered last year? How many cows? How many pigs? How many sheep?

How many fish suffocated to death?

Oops I forgot, they don't have big brown eyes and soft furry skin. And they are killed behind closed doors or away out on the sea. So that's different isn't it?

Onward with the hypocrisy....

PS he got the location wrong. The location is Gulf of St Lawrence, not "off Newfoundland". Still, what's a thousand kilometres or so? Heather and Paul couldn't get that one straight either.
9

Biker,

Ayr 18/03/2008 17:13:53
Scotsperson. The difference is that all chickens, pigs and cows are usually eaten with the pelt as a by product. Same for the fish.
Seal pups are killed purely for the pelt, and the reason they are clubbed is to preserve the pelt intact. Barbaric dos'nt begin to describe this cull.
10

Meta,

18/03/2008 22:26:34
Anyone wonder how brutality is perpetuated? Why Glasgow is the murder capital of Europe?

Here are the first 2 clues. They come from the Woman pullout section of the Daily Record, The Junior Cross[word], Tues 18 March 2007.

Across
1. To injure someone with malice (5)
6. Cut lenghtwise (4)

Ho ho, I rest my case.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.