Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 17th May 2008 Change Date

Free A to Z of Scotland's Munros

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

No room for originality



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

For the sake of my sanity, and the ability to continue working as a writer who has to live in Scotland, I gave up reading on issues around contemporary literature a while ago. The current one (your report, 5 May) drew my attention because my own publisher, one of Scotland and the UK's finest, is under attack. It does not surprise me. Originality and genuine creativity are not required in this country. It follows that those who support such things will not be assisted wholeheartedly
The kind of publishing grants that allow publishers the freedom to choose their projects will be curtailed. They will be deemed unreliable, untrustworthy, difficult, perverse, too individualistic and so on. One-off projects only will be funded. More
committees will be set up to audit and audition these projects which can then be "approved", as the politicians and bureaucrats say; the rest of us say controlled.

The bureaucrats in control of the funds may enjoy originality and creativity at a personal level but will have little interest in such art professionally, which is tricky to quantify and justify to those who supply the funds. It requires courage, especially because those who supply the funds are the bureaucrats' employers.

This is why their primary interest seems to be ensuring the conditions by which their salaries are secured. Usually that means strengthening the foundations of their own department, then increasing their departmental revenue. The actual funding of literary art and those who support it comes a poor third.

One thing that drew me to return to a Scottish publisher was the publishing list at Birlinn. Such a list could not exist without courage, commitment and a fundamental love of Scottish literature. It does not surprise me that the Scottish literary establishment are withdrawing the conditions that allow for that.

I always know I am back in this country when it dawns on me that I am being squeezed out of earning a living.

JAMES KELMAN

c/o Birlinn Publishing

Edinburgh






The full article contains 337 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 May 2008 7:36 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

KatieH,

Kinross 12/05/2008 10:14:48
It's a sad day when one of our greatest writers feels he has to write in to a newspaper about this issue. But it's even sadder when he feels he has to malign the whole arts community in Scotland. So, 'originality and genuine creativity are not required in this country'? Tell that to all the artists living here.

I'm reading his latest book at the moment and enjoying it but it's not published by the publisher he mentions: it's published in London - so what exactly does he mean when he says he is being "squeezed out of earning a living?" Writers earn a living by the sales of their books and in this case, he's having several previous books reprinted by Birlinn but publishing his new stuff with Hamish Hamilton in London. If they sell, he earns a living and he's certainly being published, so what is all this about? It is so easy to invoke the faceless bureaucrat argument as an enemy to take potshots at.

Third point: Mr Kelman says that 'those who support (orginality and creativity) will not be assisted wholeheartedly' - thing is, they have been. Almost every single literary novel published in Scotland has come with a grant. Birlinn have received around £300k from the taxpayer via the funding body.
2

A.T.,

Manhattan 12/05/2008 11:45:16
One has every sympathy with James Kelman's plight. Writers in Scotland have often been treated as second class citizens, and literature has indeed suffered from under investment, in comparison to other art forms.

But Mr Andrew of Birlinn is in danger of drawing our attention away from literature's pressing needs for more investment, with petty quibbling with figures for websites and the like. His figure of 120,000 for the Publishing Scotland website is deliberately misleading - it is substantially less than this. And as another poster pointed out on a previous thread, to compare this website to that of Birlinn's is not comparing like with like.

Other Scottish publishers such as Floris Books and Mainstream have a different view from Mr Andrew.

Mainstream
"Hugh Andrew's reaction doesn't surprise me but it slightly saddens me. Publishing Scotland does a lot to help the industry. I have my own reservations about exactly which direction it should be going in and who it is employing but I don't throw my rattles out of the pram to make a fairly shallow point."
Bill Campbell, joint managing director of Mainstream

And from Floris
"While any member is free to resign from the organisation, the reasons given by Hugh Andrew of Birlinn Publishing suggest a lapse of memory, as he has been a member for a great many years, taken part in many of its activities and has benefited from its services. His books are distributed by BookSource, a company set up by PS and majority-owned by PS."
Letters, The Herald, 9 May
http://www.theherald.co.uk/search/display.var.2258368.0.defending_publishers.php

Literature needs greater investment and cheap shots questioning the financial competence of people such as Publishing Scotland - whose staff have come from industry and are every bit as 'competent' as others - is diverting from the main issue.

Please Mr Andrew, we would expect a more professional attitude from you. The Scottish publishing industry needs more suppo

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.