I find myself agreeing with Anne-Marie Keenan (Letters, 29 August) that no debate should be silenced. However, in this instance I am curious to what it is we are debating. In her letter Ms Keenan raises a number of issues, but does not make clear what her overriding concern is.
She suggests the Scottish Islamic Foundation is in favour of oppressing women and makes other unsavoury accusations. We, along with the overwhelming majority of the Muslim community, are united in fighting against the oppression of women – whether on
a local, national or international level – including within Muslim countries.
I was surprised to hear negativity regarding the story on our website "Muslim wins Olympic sprint dressed head to toe in hijab". The sprinter in the story will be a role model for the many thousands of women who wear hijab in Scotland. Hijab, like any other form of dress, must not be forced on any women. However, those who do choose to wear it must not continually be labelled as oppressed. Surely fighting for our sisters means fighting for their right to choose.
In addition, most people I have spoken to have welcomed the idea of an al-Jazeera bureau opening in Scotland. During his short trip here, Wadah Khanfar, director-general of the Arab news channel, saw for himself the massive potential Scotland has to attract tourism and investment from the Middle East. How better to communicate this than through a media channel that goes out to more than 250 million people in that region?
The debate, when clearly defined, should be out in the open and is most welcome. In the heat of the moment I think it is important to keep our criticism constructive, I sincerely hope Ms Keenan has found mine to be of this effect.
HUMZA YOUSAF
Director of public affairs
Scottish Islamic Foundation
Royal Exchange Square
Glasgow
The full article contains 317 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.