Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Ross Lydall: A rabbit out of a hat, but some smell a rat

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 December 2008
AMID the splendour of a great State occasion, the Queen announced that the government's "overriding priority" was to ensure the stability of the British economy during the global economic downturn.
But, as she turned the pages of her "most gracious" speech, there was little immediately apparent in terms of providing help to hard-pressed families fearing for their jobs.

Several hours later, Gordon Brown, the Prime Minister, unveiled a three-
point plan in the Commons to protect people living with the threat of repossession. At first glance, it appeared to remove at a stroke the threat from most families of losing their homes over the next two years. But how many will it help? Nobody knows.

Help already exists for single-income households where the sole earner loses his or her job. Mr Brown's Homeowners Mortgage Support Scheme, announced yesterday, widen-ed this to cover families with mortgages up to £400,000.

Under the deal, which already has the backing of eight major lenders, no mortgage interest payments need be made for up to two years if one person is made unemployed.

The government is desperate to keep people in their homes, knowing how devast-ating a blow it is to be forced to hand back the keys to the building society.

What it won't do, though, is pay anyone's mortgage. Payments will simply be deferred, meaning monthly repayments will be potentially much larger once both earners are back in employment.

Mr Brown has essentially used his muscle with the banks to get them to accept a government IOU. In the event of people defaulting on their mortgages in the long run, they will be compensated for their loss. Until then, he is asking them to sit on their hands and be patient.

The banks will therefore receive less in mortgage repayments than they would expect. That seems the one weak point of the scheme. Few banks will want to see the amount of money flowing into their coffers being reduced in such fraught times.

But it will not be a free-for-all. People with £16,000 or more of savings will be expected to use these first before applying for a mortgage repayment "holiday".

Ministers want to keep the scheme at arm's length too. Negotiations will have to be conducted between borrower and lender, not by writing into Downing Street asking for a stay of execution.

Opposition parties believe they can smell a rat. Like many of Mr Brown's schemes – the compensation for the 10p tax shambles being an example – they tend to unravel when more detail emerges. They suggest he has drawn up the plan on the back of the proverbial envelope. But the National Association of Estate Agents was quick to give its approval.

With the banks and NAEA on his side, Mr Brown should have a package that works.





The full article contains 487 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 December 2008 10:26 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

,

04/12/2008 00:44:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Steve A.,

04/12/2008 01:59:02
1#
They like their liebour masters take the paying and voting public for fools .

They will be fooling themselves if they think all this started in the American housing market ,as their great leader crash Gordon does .

I just wish the media could grow a spine .
3

,

04/12/2008 02:35:16
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

TWC,

Ayrshire 04/12/2008 08:34:32
I suppose this tells you how really bad this recession is going to be, especially around London.

I think any colour of Government would have done the same given where we are but don't forget who took us to this debt ridden position and that the Interest underwritten here will add to our tax burden after the election.
Then there will be Inflation to consider.

On the Herald Lay offs, I think they have turned away supporters of free press, over the past 2 years and it continues today.
5

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 04/12/2008 08:58:59
Once again people astute enough to have savings are to be penalised under this "plan" which inevitably involves spraying taxpayers' money all over the problem. No savings? Couldn't care less? Bought a house at stupid money? That's OK, have yet another holiday from reality for 2 years.

You can imagine that if someone has been daft enough to get themselves into debt with a huge mortgage or has remortgaged to buy that flash car or superb holidays every year, that they'll be saving money and behaving themselves so they can get their mortgage account back to square one in 2 years? I think not and yet I among others who have been careful enough to stay in credit am once again penalised.

Plus - has Gordon Brown ever done anything that works? Answers on a postcard.
6

TWC,

04/12/2008 09:04:27
5 The Former Mr. Angry,
aye I managed to Stay safe but I have to move 2 investments in Jan & Feb and I'm not sure where to move to.
Any suggestions?
7

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 04/12/2008 09:51:28
#6 TWC

Yes - I had the unpleasant experience of being on holiday in Majorca when the Icelandic bank crisis hit and I had (probably foolishly) invested in Kaupthing Edge not that long ago! At least although I had a couple of sleepless nights, we were on holiday and could relax the next day. After a few weeks I managed to extricate myself from what was now ING Direct.

Not being an IFA I couldn't offer any specific advice but investing in a non-UK bank could be "interesting" if it goes under and is protected by a foreign rescue scheme such as ING (Dutch). I'm in the same position as you as regards moving an Egg deposit - which is covered under the UK scheme, but whose parent - Citi - are in deep trouble and needing further bailout from the US Gov. So far thoughts are a) under the mattress b) gold c) (maybe more realistic) something Santander-ish, HSBC or Barclays as these banks seem to have weathered the storm without too much intervention from the Brown account (i.e. you and me as taxpayers)and are less affected by dud investment vehicles. Some might argue the opposite that since Northern Crock are now 100% "guaranteed" deposits they are the safest. You can tell I'm still researching this.

Having seen a small amount of RBoS shares hit the deck I'm not too chuffed about further stock market investment at the moment, so it'll be steady as you go in that area unless of course you have a keen insight into share movements! Was admonished by my IFA "you're not thinking of day trading are you?". Clearly looking for more of my business!

8

Number 6,

Germany 04/12/2008 12:04:55
6/7 How about the Germans ?. Only one bank over here has accepted Goverment help.

The others baulk at the idea of needing a handout, they refuse to damage their financial reputation.

Throwing billions of borrowed money at a black hole is
not going to solve anything Brown. Nor is this shambles of a plan which once again will not force the
banks to help anyone unless they wish to do so. Yet another cowardly cop-out.
9

Jimmy Le Pie,

04/12/2008 12:07:08
I used to buy the Hootsmon and to a lesser extent the Herald, on a regular basis.

I've bought neither for 2 years and as long as they continue their New Labour Sleaze bias, I will never buy either again.

I don't want a paper unless it reports facts and leaves me to make my own mind up.

10

Astonished,

inverclyde 04/12/2008 13:41:51
Yet again Mr le pie hits the nail on the head !

I heard Dougie on the BBC talking about this story,he forgot that he had recently jumped ship.

Obviously an unquestioning labour comic is bad for everyone. I do hope this message is getting through.


HOW ABOUT A STORY ON MR MARSHALL AND HIS POSSIBLE MILLIONS - WAS IT EMBEZZLEMENT ? WHY NO POLICE ACTION ?


There are lots of stories out there - they just need reporting. A good story sells papers.
11

Sanny,

04/12/2008 22:23:10
10 Astonished

Your comment on Mr. Marshall is absolutely spot on!

Why is it Mr. Marshall can go off with upwards of half a million pounds and there is not cheap from the press nor the police, not even from his fellow parliamentarians. Yet, when an opposition member obtains information, that had been volunteered by a public servant with a conscience, that shows the cover-up of the incompetence of asenior minister and her department, uses this information to properly hold the government to account, then his office and home are raided by officers of the terrorist squad and the MP himself is arrested.

I ask whose offense is the greater; Mr. Green, who exposes ministerial incompetence in the proper execution of his role as a representative of the people; or Mr Marshall, who allegedly lines his pocket at the taxpayers’ expense?

I can assure the ‘Scotsman’ that a properly conducted inquiry into the events leading to Mr. Marshal having to retire because of stress, (brought about by what?). Would have the papers flying off the counters.

12

TWC,

04/12/2008 22:32:24
#9 & 10 I stopped the Herald reluctantly because I did like I Mcwhirter & Ian Bell, I would buy it again if they get more neutral and a bit more pro Scotland.

Thanks for the tips posters I'll take a look at German Banks
We may need a protest like moving all investments to Europe or not giving blood or stopping voluntary work to kick Brown up the Jacksy. He appears to be ignoring Scotland
13

DouglasT,

05/12/2008 02:22:42
'In the event of people defaulting on their mortgages in the long run, they will be compensated for their loss.'

I don't know where you get that from. Its not true.

This is another 10p-tax type fiasco. It will help a few with less than £16,000 saved, of course most of that will probably be needed at the end of the deferment period to pay off the deferred interest. Further, many people in this situation will have mortgages with sub-prime lenders who will either not agree to Brown's proposal or will be in like sharks as soon as the deferment period expires. If its the latter case the victims will have two more years of debt and no home.

If I was a cynic I'd say it was purely a political move in a pre-election time, if I was a christian I'd say it was less well thought out than his 10p con - another pre-election gimmick
14

DouglasT,

05/12/2008 02:26:05
6 TWC

I suggest you buy gold from Gordon Brown - he sells it cheap.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.