Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Salmond's giant U-turn on wind farms reveals falsity of pre-election rhetoric

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 July 2008
Back in January 2007, Alex Salmond was unequivocal: "There is a real difficulty with public acceptance of onshore wind." "There should be a cap on future developments." "We should concentrate the development of onshore wind into suitable areas."
He went to say that financial support for onshore wind farms should be looked at again as there was a danger onshore wind developers were getting too much financial support. Of course, all that was done to help the SNP get elected and gain votes in
areas where there was rising opposition to wind farms.

This week the First Minister said Scotland was on the brink of a renewables revolution as he gave the go-ahead for the largest wind farm in Europe. He told the World Renewable Energy Congress in Glasgow that his government had given the green light to a 152-turbine project in South Lanarkshire. The chairman of the congress hailed Mr Salmond as the "saint of renewable energy".

This volte face from Mr Salmond is not totally unexpected; he is, after all, a politician. But such is the courting of the Scottish Government by the renewables industry that even I'm staggered by the complete change in attitude. Does he not understand that wind turbines are inefficient and make little money for Scotland – other than for the landowners and the renewable companies, which are often foreign owned?

RICHARD HAVERS
Whitchester Lodge
By Duns, Berwickshire


Scotland has won the natural lottery, claims Alex Salmond describing our renewable energy resources (your report, 21 July). Yet will he come to regret his choice of words? The SNP policy which will make Scotland's energy supply dependent on unreliable wind farms may prove a reckless gamble with the odds heavily stacked against success. Wind energy has proven to be a liability in other countries, where wind-generated electricity is exported at a financial loss, and has failed to lessen dependence on fossil fuel.

In the UK, wind energy will cost £6 billion annually. This is equivalent to 40 National Lottery jackpots each and every week. Much of this cost will be passed on to the long-suffering electricity consumer. Consequently, it would have been more accurate for Mr Salmond to have stated that "energy firms have won the natural lottery".

BILL STARKEY
Innerdownie
Kinross


During the last UK general election, Alex Salmond told BBC Radio 4 listeners he did not want to see Scotland blanketed with wind farms. When subsequently campaigning for election to the Scottish Parliament, he assured me, as a constituent, that this remained SNP policy. He added that he was in favour of onshore wind farms only if they brought direct community benefit.

How is this to be reconciled with approving the largest wind farm in Europe, in total disregard of the affected local communities, as pointed out by Ralph Barker (Letters, 24 July)?

(DR) RHONA NEWMAN
Boganclogh Lodge
Huntly, Aberdeenshire


I ventured up the M9 last week, Wednesday, in fact, a windy day, and lo and behold as I crested the rise after the roundabout at Dunblane, not a windmill working.

Who is kidding who here? How often does it have to be said, the damn things only work when the wind blows at the right speed from the right direction. Can Saint Alex guarantee that 24/7, 365 days a year? I don't think so.

P PATERSON
Aitken Terrace
Camelon, Stirlingshire




Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 July 2008 8:34 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Richard Havers,

By Duns 25/07/2008 08:02:37
I guess space was at a premium with all the letters about Mr Salmond's change of heart. This is what was left off....

Here in the Lammermuir Hills we are still waiting for a decision on the Fallago Ridge wind farm that was the matter of a public enquiry in January and February this year. The longer it goes on without a decision the more likely it is to be approved and the greater the damage to these hills.

Some questions. Why if wind farms are so benign are they not being placed along the M8 corridor, close to where the majority of Scotland’s electricity is consumed and more convenient for export via the grid? Are there any windfarms in Mr. Salmond’s constituencies? In fact how many windfarms have been approved in SNP constituencies as opposed to opposition constituencies? It might make for interesting analysis.
2

Neil,

Glasgow 25/07/2008 11:08:56
Even with 3,000 windmills (enough to match Hunterson & Torness except on calm days) Scotland will have to hope that England builds enough nuclear capacity not only to keep their own lights on but to have spare for us.

Ironic that a party claiming to be uniquely Scottish nationalist is trying to make Scotland wholly dependent on England.
3

Gordon48,

Uphall Station 25/07/2008 11:58:25
I contacted my SNP MSP re my fear that Scotland would be covered in wind farms and her response 'all things in moderation' and she did not consider 'windfarms as more intrusive than power pylons'. I drive down to Lockerbie every weekend and am only out of site of a windfarm for less than half the journey 'currently seven windfarms'. There is also a windfarm proposed at the 'Devils Beef Tub' and the power company believes that it is only motorists who would be troubled by it. When are the media and our politicians going to take note of the growing anger a good percentage of Scots have about our country being covered in wind farms?
4

ARP,

Scotland 26/07/2008 10:24:14
Nothing will stop the march of these awful things. Big business, greedy land owners and spives dominate the scene. Politicians are putty in their hands - a couple of freebies and they will agree to anything. As to public opinion - most of the public are inward-looking townies who would not know a moor if they saw one - they don't know or care about efficiency or even cost, let alone preserving the landscape. Complacent and ignorant they have been brainwashed into acceptance of everything and anything that is presented by the spin doctors. Future generations will look at these monuments and wonder what they were for. If someone told them they were for generating electricity they would laugh their heads off.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.