Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Unsustainable pensions

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 July 2008
W Yule (Letters, 24 July) is quite right to condemn the Equitable Life directors for promising unsustainable guaranteed returns to their investors while effectively getting off scot-free themselves.
However,
our politicians, senior civil servants and many top businessmen have clearly learned nothing from this fiasco and blithely continue to give similar unsustainable promises with their own finalsalary defined-benefit pensions, guaranteed from
65 or even younger and for unknown but ever-increasing lifespans.

These are unsustainable and inequitable. They typically amount to three or four times the pension level available to money-purchase defined-contribution schemes for similar contribution rates.

Worse still, at least in the public sector (and in much of the private sector) they are unfunded by contributions made to date, unlike money-purchase schemes. So the estimated unfunded public-sector liabilities of an incredible £1 trillion as at today's date, just for today's MPs, MSPs, MEPs and public-sector employees, will have to be paid by our children and grandchildren; already it appears that the tax paid by the average private-sector employee, purely to pay public-sector pensions, is greater than his or her own pension contributions. And such unfunded liabilities are, of course, not reflected in the government accounts.

This is an utter disgrace which virtually no politician is addressing. The MPs' schemes should be terminated forthwith; and the other final-salary schemes, public and private, should be wound-up over a five year period, with accrued benefits to date secured for the employee but with no further compensation. As economist Maynard Keynes once said to a critic: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?"

JOHN BIRKETT
Horseleys Park
St Andrews, Fife




The full article contains 286 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 July 2008 7:25 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Dav,

Edinburgh 26/07/2008 10:53:49
A great post John It should be printed on the front page of every newspaper – but it won’t be.


The message is clear but the machine that inspired this farcical scenario is self preserving. The distortion is the application of final salary defined benefit pensions applied to the public sector. Whoever allowed this situation to develop can not be trusted to regulate any change.

A political mind shift of spectrum change magnitude either to the left or to the right could only offer such succour but this is difficult to foresee in the present climate.

2

StuartAD,

West Lothian 26/07/2008 11:01:37
Headlines proclaim that this was an error in judgement, I am looking at the otherside of the coin, that it ws a scam to fleece the public out of their money, so long time that it would never have come out until it is too late. Why are the culprits not in court?
3

Colin Wilson,

Aberdeen 26/07/2008 16:49:28
"other final-salary schemes, public and private, should be wound-up over a five year period"

Final-salary schemes in the private sector are the business of the two parties involved, the employer and the employee, and of no-one else.
4

john birkett,

st andrews 28/07/2008 12:08:44
Colin, I would normally agree with that principle, except (a) because of the tax relief involved, thereby making it each taxpayer's business; and (b) because company accounts have been distorted by not requiring the resulting liabilities to be fully reflected in their annual accounts (though this is under discussion), thereby misleading their shareholders, suppliers, clients, the stock market and the public as to their real financial strength - and also passing on these liabilities to future shareholders & directors, which could even impact on the company's ability to afford decent increases to future employees.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.