Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Wednesday, 3rd December 2008 Change Date

The Scotsman Digital Archive - Special Christmas Offer

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Why should Scotland pay the price of England's renewable-energy deficit?



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 19 February 2008
What other country has politicians so gullible that they end up making their electorate pay to produce energy needed in another country?
What other country would set a renewable-energy obligation that taxes its consumers to produce 18 per cent of electricity to compensate for the failure of England to reach its 10 per cent obligation?

The reduced cost of connecting to the UK nation
al grid for Scottish renewable energy producers should be welcomed because it ought to allow Scottish wind energy producers to export energy to England to be paid for by English consumers. The truth is that Scottish consumers are being obliged to pay for renewable energy to plug an English accounting gap: England may have a target that 10 per cent of electricity consumed comes from renewables, but the renewable production incentives fail to account for the fact that around one unit of renewable electricity in ten fails to reach the consumer.

This is effectively accounted for by the 8 per cent of Scottish electricity coming from large hydro, and while this does not need a subsidy from consumers, why is the renewable energy obligation for Scotland artificially set at a higher 18 per cent rather than the 10 per cent in England? If England needs Scottish wind to fulfil its renewable energy target, surely English consumers should pay Scottish wind energy producers. Indeed, because the target has been incremental, if proper account had been taken of our already high levels of renewables through hydro, then with a decent government looking after Scottish consumers not a penny would have been paid in higher bills.

When will the Scottish Government wake up and realise that the Scottish consumer is fed up of being asked to fund the English to achieve their renewable energy targets, and when will the government realise it is time to turn Scottish wind energy from a subsidy junkie into an export earner?

MIKE HASELER

Poplar Drive

Lenzie, Lanarkshire


You claim that when we "flick on the light switch" (Editorial, 14 February) we pay for the electricity used and the cost of delivering it . But in fact, the latter is included in the former; it is not a separate charge. However, considering the purpose of your editorial, it is odd that you omitted to mention that what consumers pay also includes a hefty subsidy to the generators of uneconomic electricity from renewables.

You also claimed that Scotland's economic future was dependent on the switch to renewable electricity generation. Insofar as the present Scottish Government's plan is to attempt to rely entirely on renewables, this is true; the likelihood is that Scotland's economy will collapse for lack of electricity.

STEUART CAMPBELL

Dovecot Loan

Edinburgh


It is sad to discover that a proportion of the population in Lewis appears to support the multinational company seeking to desecrate the north of the island with the construction of a host of wind turbines bigger than Big Ben.

One of the most commendable aspects of Gaelic culture is a sense of place, a love for their Hebrides and Highlands that has survived the hardships of many centuries and over countless generations. Now it would appear that this ancient affection has been eroded to the extent that some islanders are willing to permit the permanent transformation of their island.

So much for a Gaelic sense of place. "... but still the blood is strong, the heart is Highland, and we in dreams behold the Hebrides – complete with a multitude of giant wind turbines".

IAIN HALL

Georgina Place

Scone, Perthshire






The full article contains 598 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 February 2008 8:04 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 19/02/2008 06:12:05
The Scottish Goverment is right to pursue a policy of 100% renewable energy. The paradigm of Energy Prices is undergoing a shift that will lead to continued increases in the cost of energy. Even the US economy,the worlds largest engery consumer,falling into recession has not led to lower oil prices. There are 5 Billion people in the developing world who are demanding there share of the good life. That life will be built on the back of energy consumption. The worlds energy pie will not only be for the 1 Billion priveleged enough to be living in the developed world. Scotland is lucky. It has more renewable potential per capita than any other country in the world. We would be fools not to exploit it.
2

Greenheatman,

TAIN 19/02/2008 06:39:07
""Scotland is lucky. It has more renewable potential per capita than any other country in the world. We would be fools not to exploit it.""

Er, no it hasn't and we are being fools exploiting it in real time generation ie subject to the vagaries of the weather and tides.

100% renewables is impossible to achieve because you will still need thermal stations' backup. If nuclear, then why build more intermittent low carbon wind turbines to complement low carbon secure electrical output?

Are we going to build more coal fired stations instead to justify renewables?
3

EWB,

UK 19/02/2008 07:29:08
If Iain Hall wishes to add to his parody of "Canadian Boat Song", then why not include the line: "that some degenerate utiliy company may boast its wind turbines."

The 19th century poem refers to the Highlanders displaced in the Clearances by the anglicised "degenerate" lords who replaced them with sheep and, in Canada, they beheld their former lands in their dreams.

If this scheme goes ahead, then only in their memories will the inhabitants be able to behold the landscape that was.

What guarantee is there for those living in the Western Isles today that this grandiose scheme will prevent the loss of population and with it of the Gaelic-speaking culture and way of life?
4

Friend of Lewis,

19/02/2008 09:22:47
Scotland has been wooed by those with a vested interest in renewable energy. Al Gore visited Glasgow on 16 January 2007 where he addressed 700 “of the most influential people in Scotland’s business world” - quoted from the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) website http://www.sepa.org.uk/publications/sepaview/html/35/scottish_news.html - about climate change. The SEPA article goes on to mention that “following the success of Mr Gore’s documentary An Inconvenient Truth, and Bill Clinton’s visit to Scotland last year, interest in climate change has never been higher.” The SEPA article goes on to mention, quote: “Scottish businesses are tuning into the fact that while climate change is a major environmental threat, tackling it also presents major economic opportunities.”

Al Gore's company Generation Investment Management, investing in renewable/sustainable technologies, has moved into Crown Estate premises in Regent Street. Crown Estate has given its approval for the undersea cable to the Western Isles. The Crown Estate has also targeted large wind energy companies to build offshore wind farms from which they would lease the seabed, benefiting the Crown Estate.

Unfortunately, despite the flaws in Mr Gore's movie, the love of money blinds those who cannot see beyond it. I pray their eyes be opened before it is too late.
5

Isonomia,

Lenzie 19/02/2008 10:16:14
“Scottish businesses are tuning into the fact that while climate change is a major environmental threat, tackling it also presents major economic opportunities.”

Only in the same way as chopping down the Amazon provides huge economic opportunity for "investors" and major problems for the people who actually live in areas that have this "investment".

But it is worse than that. Scottish wind developers are not only "chopping down the amazon", in Scotland they are expected scottish consumers to pay them subsidies for destroying the environment.

We are footing the bill to enable English consumers to meet their own targets, at a time when those targets are looking increasingly suspect as global warming has stopped!
6

Amanda Huginkiss,

19/02/2008 10:18:33
So, Scots should export goods and services to the rest of the World except our fellow citizens in England.
Anti-Englishness, yet again.
7

Neil,

Glasgow 19/02/2008 10:58:29
Kampung Highlander thinks we would be "fools" not to spend tens of billions annually in Scotland subsidising intermittent power at, at least, twice the present cost when we could get unlimited, reliable, sustainable power from nuclear at, at maximum, half the current cost.

This must be some new definition of the term fool.
8

Hermitage,

Edinburgh 19/02/2008 11:04:47
Whinge, whinge, whinge............zzzzzzzzzzzz
9

bill-alba,

Fife 19/02/2008 11:52:27
#6 now dear...where did you read about exporting to the rest of the world but not england...read the post again and then please please stop your anti-Scottishness again..
10

fred bloggs,

Edinburgh 19/02/2008 12:57:56
Mike Haseler's letter makes no sense.

UK consumers have a free choice among many electricity suppliers.

Hence, consumers in Scotland may be paying an English, Scottish or foreign supplier.

However, the power coming down the line is the same regardless and there is no way the consumer can know where it was generated as this is changing from minute to minute.

All that the ROC system does is to reward generators of renewable power to incentivise the creation of more renewable sources.

There is no point in thus subsidising hydro as this is a mature technology in place for 50 years in Scotland and with little prospect of further expansion.
11

Homer,

19/02/2008 16:32:41
Insomnia, I see the letter writer from Lenzie shares your views.

The same fellow had a letter published last week and you berated him in the comments. Which is a curious thing to do. Because he's obviously you.
http://news.scotsman.com/letters?articleid=3781426

Mike/Insomnia/Sooty, I agree with Fred, and think you're wrong about the RO. I tried to explain why in comments on the thread below.
http://business.scotsman.com/alternativeenergysources/Objectors-win-the-day-in.3770604.jp

Can you tell me why you think I'm wrong?
12

Hugh V McLachlan,

Elderslie 19/02/2008 22:59:08
#11 Homer,

As long as people use aliases - including you - it is pointless to raise questions about the actual identity of the people lurking behind the assumed names.

One might say: perhaps you are Insomnia- but it is a silly game to play.
13

Homer,

20/02/2008 12:43:54
Hugh, in my view, aliases are fine but sock-puppets are not. Naturally, this is a matter of opinion, but I expect my view is shared by most contributors to this website.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_sock_puppet

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.