Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Wednesday, 3rd December 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Alexander in the clear over leadership bid donations



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 March 2008
WENDY Alexander, the Scottish Labour leader, will not be prosecuted for failing to register donations to her leadership campaign, it was announced yesterday.
A spokesman for the Crown Office, which is responsible for prosecutions in Scotland, said further action "would not be appropriate".

It was revealed last month that Dr Jim Dyer, the Scottish Parliament's standards watchdog, had sent a report to th
e procurator-fiscal in Lothian and Borders concerning Ms Alexander.

Ms Alexander last month disclosed the details of ten supporters who each gave just under £1,000 to her campaign to become Scottish Labour leader.

At that time she said she was disclosing the details after receiving advice from Dr Dyer, the Scottish parliamentary standards commissioner.

Clerks to Holyrood's standards committee told her in November she did not need to register the donations on the register of MSPs' interests.

But Labour said Dr Dyer later said this advice was "incorrect", and Ms Alexander therefore made a voluntary registration.

The Crown Office spokesman said: "Crown counsel has concluded that a prosecution would not be appropriate in the full circumstances of the case."

In addition, there was a "degree of uncertainty" regarding the interpretation of the provisions, and Ms Alexander made a voluntary disclosure to the Electoral Commission.

A spokesman for Ms Alexander said she welcomed the decision. He stated: "The Crown Office has found that not only would a prosecution not be in the public interest, but it would not be appropriate as Ms Alexander has made clear all along she took written advice from the standards clerk and made a voluntary disclosure to the Electoral Commission."

Roseanna Cunningham, the SNP MSP, said the decision would surprise no-one.





The full article contains 288 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 06 March 2008 11:12 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Political Funding
 
1

ptdoug,

07/03/2008 00:18:24
Roseanna is right.

I'm not surprised.

Anyone out there surprised?
2

Sanny,

07/03/2008 00:26:55
Disgusted yes Surprised no!
How can anyone believe in our justice system after this? How can anyone even consider voting for this corrupt Labour Party.
3

Boswall,

07/03/2008 00:34:05
For the sake of democracy will someone PLEASE put Goldie in charge of the opposition.
4

ptdoug,

07/03/2008 00:40:30
Meanwhile back at the ranch....

The Scotsman is obviously feeling the pinch of their shrinking circulation figures....

From the Herald...

Rory Mair, Cosla's chief executive, announced it is expanding its role beyond lobbying to provide shared services for councils, including workforce development, social care planning and online portals for online recruitment and public information. These are expected to shave at least £3m off newspaper advertising costs.

The managing director of The Scotsman publications, Michael Johnston, pleaded with councillors to stick with newspaper advertising, claiming their proposal is "undemocratic" and that journalists' jobs could be lost if revenue is cut.

5

2Right,

On Location 07/03/2008 02:10:32
Remember "Elish" was elected by Labour.
Payback eh ?
6

bill inch,

EDINBURGH 07/03/2008 02:17:28
Remember the idea to fine anyone who did not vote.Brought about by voter apathy.this is sure to increase turnout. i don't think
7

Murray in Canada,

Salt Spring Island 07/03/2008 02:42:02
Was there ever an attempt at a Freedom of Information request for full disclosure of the Electoral Commission's discussions?
8

Breezy,

Argyll 07/03/2008 06:50:28
Not only is this a cover up that a one eyed parrot with conjunctivitis could see through, Jackie Baillie blatantly lied on national television when she stated that the Alexander teams 'e' mails on this affair were in the public domain.
What is in the ' Public interest ', here is that democracy in Scotland is upheld and that this bunch of incompetents are never allowed to govern again.
9

Guga II,

Rockall 07/03/2008 07:21:12
Well we all have a good excuse if we are ever caught breaking the law. We just need to tell the Procurator Fiscal and the Sheriff that we "did not intentionally break the law".

Other than that, it comes as no surprise that the Mouth of the South, who openly admitted breaking the law, is not to be prosecuted. The New Labour Sleaze and Curruption Party (North British Branch) is obviously a pure as the driven slush, as far as our Labour appointed Lord Advocate is concerned.
10

Alberto.,

07/03/2008 07:49:40
What a wonderful World our Politicians have to work in, and classically displayed by this 'glaring show' of the 'Wendy Alexander' case, who did commit a crime and admit it but 'has got away with it!'

It does confirm what the electorate see, that Politicians can do just what the hell they want simply on the basis of 'if nobody notices I win' - if they do notice, 'Well, the Party do know a man, probably many a man 'allegedly' true and honest - no don't laugh, who has avery large spade to dig us out of any size hole and make it all look 'hunky-dory' and probably legal and 'Bob's yer uncle!'

Thinks! Thank goodness I chose the world of Politics as a 'Career!' - they don't seem to come any better, and if the buffoons in the electorate keep voting for me I've cracked it!

After all, in this day and age, particularly in the Political world - Corruption and Illegality, which seem to be entirely free of any stigma in the Party - and in any case they are, after all, especially to New labour, as we see and have now had confirmed - simply words and nothing more!

11

Foulkes Off the CyberNat,

Edinburgh 07/03/2008 07:52:25
"Ms Alexander last month disclosed the details of ten supporters who each gave just under £1,000 to her campaign to become Scottish Labour leader."

Why did they each give JUST UNDER £1000 if naebody was aware of the consequences of giving more?????

"The Crown Office has found that not only would a prosecution not be in the public interest"

How many times are we going to here this statement comming from the crown office? they obviously thought it was in the public interest to go after Tommy Sheridan and his wife though.
Who is running the crown office again????

12

Foulkes Off the CyberNat,

Edinburgh 07/03/2008 07:53:39
If anybody is considering committing a crime best to join the Labour party first in case you get caught
13

sam the god,

07/03/2008 08:18:43
I E-Mailed MacAaskill (justice minister) a few weeks ago about how many people asked any of the Scottish police forces to look into this situation.

I received a reply from one of his staff Unfortunately Mr MacAskill cannot respond to this query either in his role as a MSP or as Cabinet Secretary for Justice as the Scottish Government does not hold the information you are seeking.
We forwarded your information request to the clerk of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee at the Scottish Parliament
Further to that I got this reply The clerk of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee has confirmed that they do not hold the information you requested either.
They suggested that I contact the police force’s individually the question that has to be asked what do they do at the parliament you would think that in a high profile case like this they might at least have their fingers on the pulse.
14

Alberto.,

07/03/2008 08:31:03
Alexander 'cleared legally' but not morally, except perhaps in her own tiny mind!

But what about Charlie Gordon and all the other accessories to it all, in this seemingly never ending season of Political pantomime?

It seems that with so many saying they were given wrong information by people in authority and, presumably, should know, it appears that a 'right set' of nincompoops must be on the Holyrood and New labour Party payroll - probably with good cause!

I notice that Ms. Alexander has continually implied she was 'told'(implying a vocal response!) by such people of the procedure to adopt - but now, it is noted above, this has been promoted to 'written evidence' - a late entry, perhaps?

There seems to be a brilliant display, by all the activity and results so far, that Corruption in Scottish Politics - possibly in all parties (will we ever know?)and may be thriving and well, wherever it is lurking, and possibly totally involved in the whole Political 'carry on!'

I don't know if a target has been set in the 'game' between 'Westminster Wobblers and Ditherers' versus the whole caboodle of the 'Holyrood Meanderers and Clanger Droppers plc!', but if there is it certainly looks as though it will be a very 'tight finish!' -if it ever does!

It is said 'You can't win them all - but, my goodness, it will not be for want of trying, and with such good connections there seems to be a good chance of success - if they are not seriously watched with purposeful and meaningful eyes!

Hopefully, we may see truth and honesty being restored to Politics - but don't hold your breath on this point!


15

Roy,

07/03/2008 09:41:38
It disnae matter. The lassie's now damaged goods anyway.

I've asked before. Which charities benefited from this money since there was no contest?
16

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 07/03/2008 09:51:42
A lot of comments have been made about the sleazy and underhand dealings concerning matters on which MSPs and others in public life as well as ordinary mortals should be above reproach. This is all correct and is reprehensible.

However Ms Alexander, despite having "got away with it" on several occasions is in fact toast politically as pointed out by Murdo Fraser. And the best way to hammer this home is to vote for any party you fancy as long as it's not Labour, ever again.
17

alanh,

ek 07/03/2008 09:52:19
so remind me?

Dishonest Wendy asks for advice AFTER the time limit for registerring and says that she was told there was no need, I would love to see the paperwork involved in this, and this is the basis that " "The Crown Office has found that not only would a prosecution not be in the public interest, but it would not be appropriate as Ms Alexander has made clear all along she took written advice from the standards clerk and made a voluntary disclosure to the Electoral Commission."
And this paper uses this to say that dishonest Wendy was " in the clear over leadership bid donations " when its another case of not proceding with the case and NOT "clearing" her again
18

Jwil,

07/03/2008 10:12:12
#7 Murray in Canada,Salt Spring Island 07/03/2008 02:42:02
Was there ever an attempt at a Freedom of Information request for full disclosure of the Electoral Commission's discussions?


A poster on the Herald said that he had asked for documents to be released and he received a long letter from the EC quoting chapter and verse from the regulations. (The letter of reply was posted on the Herald web site if you want to see it). The bottom line was the EC invoked an exemption clause to avoid publishing the papers.

I am not sure if the information commisssioner could twist the EC's arm over this. He has done on other matters with other organizations where he thouhght it was in the public interest.
19

Auckland Arab2,

07/03/2008 10:28:24
That is great news as we can now all go back to supporting the Labour Party.
20

Alasdair,

07/03/2008 11:04:33
I see that oce again, the Hootsmon confuses "not being charged" with "in the clear".

Predictably poor journalism from a dying tabloid.
21

AJ Fife,

07/03/2008 11:18:49
Hoorah,

The Save Wendy Campaign came good!


I bet the FM is pleased, in fact he's very pleased, extremely pleased and p!shin' himself laughin' pleased!!
22

 Ayrshire Scot™,

07/03/2008 11:32:00
23. now if only we could get enough people together to roll Kimba back into the sea our two immediate priorities will be complete.
23

Nikostratos,

07/03/2008 12:03:21
Give up snp Drones the Wendy issue has run out of steam.....splut..splut..splut
24

 Ayrshire Scot™,

07/03/2008 12:22:24
25. I think the criminal investigation of other Labour cabinet ministers is continuing, is it not Niko? Haim, Harmen, Johnstone.

We have yet to hear about criminal investigation into Labour's illegal £600,000.

Much mileage left on Labour's long list of sleaze and corrutpion.

Wendy is tainted. And fairly inneffective. Long may she reign....
25

The Master,

07/03/2008 12:31:45
This has all been the proverbial storm in a teacup then? Don’t hold your breath for Wendy’s credibility with the public at large to be shot to pieces over this: it’s just not going to happen and I’ve only ever seen posters on this site predicting this in any case (although I have a policy of ignoring comments from deranged west coast types on the Herald!) She’s as effective a politician as any to emerge for the parliament and all your attempts to convince yourselves that she’s simply not up to the job just won’t wash. Same goes for all this clap trap which you Nats insist on posting about how the so called “union” is dead in the water etc etc: get real! You’re all living in Lalaland!
26

 Ayrshire Scot™,

07/03/2008 12:36:14
27 "Don’t hold your breath for Wendy’s credibility with the public at large to be shot to pieces over this"

Whar credibility is that? She is regarded as totally ineffective at FMQs, her own spin doctors have written scathing articles about her, her own MSPs are plotting against her, and her excuse for breaking the law "unintentional" "muddles" was hardly Socratic....
27

Banana Skin,

07/03/2008 12:42:54
27 The Master: whats the view on all this from Geordieland then? Can we have a “female” shell suited perspective from your other oft used moniker? For that matter, why have you stopped using the term “Tartan Taliban” whereas shes taken it up with glee?
28

The Master,

07/03/2008 12:53:55
#28 Ayrshire: Wendy’s performance at FMQs is a complete irrelevance as far as the wider voting public is concerned: I know that an interested chap such as yourself pays close attention, but your average man in the street doesn’t! I doubt if McConnell or McLeish were any more effective as politicians from the critical perspective of those in the know, and yet Labour was able to hold onto power from the inception of the parliament right up until the last election. Indeed, this very success was the undoing of the party: it’s a natural part of the political cycle for voters to turn to the principal opposition after a party has been in power for a number of years. You know as well as I do that, when SNP popularity eventually troughs, Labour will be back: it’s the way of things!
29

FLUB,

a rocky outcrop in eastern central Scotland 07/03/2008 12:56:14
Behold the power of the Labour Party, once and future leaders of our United Kingdom, and who shall be kings thereafter! SNP and other regional 'nationalist' movements are just a temporary aberration.

The real power, that which can arrange the intimidation and sissuasion of the prosecutorial authority in Scotland lies with the 'made men (and women)' of the Labour Party - Scotland's Cosa Nostra!!
30

FLUB,

a rocky outcrop in eastern central Scotland 07/03/2008 12:57:46
Sorry. That should have been 'dissuasion'

I'm so overcome with awe and wonder at their power, my shaking hands wouldn't work the keyboard!
31

Nikostratos,

07/03/2008 13:14:52
#26 Ayrshire Scot™

The topic hear is our 'Wendy' and she is innocent of any
intentional wrongdoing.............God bless her

remember ayrshire "wise man once say forgiveness is divine but never pay full price for late pizza"

A thing worth having is a thing worth cheating for.

WC Fields
32

The Master,

07/03/2008 13:51:17
#31 FLUB: the prosecutorial authority decides that there is “no case to answer” in many cases: it’s not a case of their having bowed to “intimidation and dissuasion” but rather a case of their not wanting to waste the time of the already overburdened court service. You Nats seem to have become arch conspiracy theorists!
33

JayTee,

Wemyss-by-the-sea 07/03/2008 14:04:32
So that's "in the clear" as in two jumps ahead of the SLP lynch mob. Keep it up, Wendy, you're worth every penny you've borrowed/stolen/skimmed (delete as appropriate).
34

Alasdair,

07/03/2008 14:05:19
The Master - so basically your argument is that Labour can rely on votes from folk that don't know much about politics?

How reassuring.
35

Joe M.,

Edinburgh 07/03/2008 14:22:14
The facts are that her campaign deliberately lined up donations just below the amount which would have to be declared which suggests they were trying to cover up the sources. I wonder why and what happened to the money when the campaign didn't happen?

The donations were in fact gifts which should have been declared anyway. One was from a non UK resident so should never have been allowed to donate yet Alexander wrote to him to thank him at his home address!

One of her aides tried to cover it up by pretending the donation was from a company. Charlie Gordon resigned but the ultimate responsibility for the campaign should have been hers.

So here we have someone who practiced deceit (by trying to cover up illegal donations) and then effectively got away with it by pretending ignorance of the law.

It's not an attractive advert for the country and I can't help but think that the establishment would have came down a lot harder on anyone else who had done this.

If she broke the law (and she clearly has) she should have been prosecuted. Any fine could have reflected the small sums involved but she should still have been done for it.
36

The Master,

07/03/2008 14:45:20
#36 Alasdair: ~”The Master - so basically your argument is that Labour can rely on votes from folk that don't know much about politics?”

I would say that’s a fair summation of my position: we have to live in the real world here and that’s the way things work. I know I spend my whole time disagreeing with everything Salmond stands for, but it’s interesting that politics have become so personality based that he’s able to command the support of many merely becaue he has proved extremely voter friendly to date. In this connection, I would draw a comparison with the rapport which Ken Livingsone has been able to establish with the people of London over many years (and please, let’s not get into a discussion about his kentroopers!)
37

FLUB,

a rocky outcrop in eastern central Scotland 07/03/2008 14:53:43
#34 The Master (?) Surname please!!

I'm not a Nat, quite the opposite in fact;

I find their insidious racism and the current toadying to minority interest groups somewhat off-putting, however, my reason for the ironic (as I thought) posts was my bewilderment.

What is it going to take for legal sanctions to be taken against one of these tarry fingered Labour politicians?
38

Queen D,

Glasgow 07/03/2008 15:11:04
Flub what is quite the opposite of a Nat when its at home??
Regarding your question ,the answer is a giant rat trap!
I am also surprised at the journalists lack of knowledge.
The words 'in the clear ' are not the same as 'no further action because it would not be in the public interest'.
39

The Master,

07/03/2008 15:17:53
#39 FLUB: I’m sorry if I insulted you by calling you a Nat! However, you seem to have as narrow an outlook as many Nats: you refer to “tarry fingered Labour politicians” but this is very British sleaze and hardly in the league of many other coutries in the world. For goodness sake, this is more about alleged procedural irregularities rather than the real corruption we see abroad.

As for my surname, I'm a Dr Who themed avatar and we timelords don't have them!
40

FLUB,

a rocky outcrop in eastern central Scotland 07/03/2008 16:34:07
#40 I don't know, actually - is it an internationalist, an 'Internat'?

#41 No offence taken, however, I don't agree on your concept of a scale. It's about more than procedural irregularities, it's about illegality, morality, propriety, honour and setting an example and the privileges and responsibilities of elected office.

Corruption is real, the amount is not in question. One of the damning factors about this is that the influence is being sold cheap.
41

Richard Lionheart,

07/03/2008 16:42:09
1. Law change to give rest of population same rights.

2. New anti corruption laws required to close loopholes.
42

bill-alba,

07/03/2008 18:47:51
Master...Narrow an outlook as a nat?? meethinks your being a bit narrow minded but as a unionist I would expect you to say that its ok to break the law a little bit and to say that we shouldnt be bothered with procedural irregularaties when the offender who may not have broken the law but asked for donations of less that £1000 to get round the law is very very small minded but then perhaps if we wait a wee while the corruption can get to the level of those abroad..
43

Richard Taylor,

Aberdeen 07/03/2008 20:24:53
Wendy aff the hook? That's what SHE thinks...
44

Amparo de Glasgow,

07/03/2008 20:36:05
Time we just shut down Uncle Tom's Cabin / Hollyrood

The whole thing has become Scotland's biggest ever running political joke.

Wee Eck and Nicol Stephen and dough-heid Goldie are just as bad as daft Wendy.

Shut it down.
It's pish.
45

Saoghal Beag,

07/03/2008 21:36:09
amparo, whit about gordie broon and hir brither and the man of questionable facial hair colour, wur chancelor. They leave bendy wendy standing when it comes to jokes.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.