Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Hain sorry (again) for 'forgotten' donation of £82,000

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 January 2008
PETER Hain, the Work and Pensions Secretary who is in charge of one of Whitehall's biggest budgets, has been forced to apologise for overlooking a £82,000 political donation.
Mr Hain, who late last year was twice forced to admit to accounting errors with his failed deputy-leadership campaign, yesterday said he deeply regretted the latest gaffe.

The Neath MP, who also juggles his portfolio with being Welsh Secretary, bl
amed "administrative failings", which he described as "deeply regrettable".

He will now make late declarations to the Electoral Commission by the middle of the month.

"It is no secret that there were organisational and administrative problems within my deputy-leadership campaign," he said.

On the late submission of the £82,000 donation, he said: "I reiterate that this is deeply regrettable and I sincerely apologise."

Mr Hain revealed at the end of November that he had failed to register a £5,000 donation from Jon Mendelsohn, Labour's chief fundraiser. Then, at the beginning of December, Mr Hain said other donations to his campaign "were not registered as they should have been", including a £1,300 campaign dinner.

The Prime Minister's official spokeswoman said No 10 had "full confidence" in every member of his Cabinet.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 January 2008 10:33 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Political Funding
 
1

,

09/01/2008 00:41:58
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

ex-labour,

09/01/2008 00:45:45
I overlooked my tv licence fee due to the c**p they spend it on, which I deeply regret. Do you think a wee 'sorry' would sort it for me?
3

Conan the Librarian™,

09/01/2008 00:57:22
3
Is your name Wendy?
4

williamx,

canada 09/01/2008 03:16:33
He seems to be incompetent enough to replace Brown.
5

Jimmy the Pie,

09/01/2008 06:08:23
I fear Wendy may have fled the country. Which countries do not have an extradition treaty with us??
6

Harris tweed and levi's 501,

Edinburgh 09/01/2008 07:41:23
I suppose in labourite terms £82,000 is a relatively easy sum to overlook.

After all, you could not even get a half decent spin doctor for that price.

Incidentally, does anyone know the name of the balloon who donated this sum towards Hain’s failed election attempt?
7

Jay Kay,

Burntisland 09/01/2008 08:46:39
Look if they dont want it I can give you my bank account numbers feel free to deposit it anytime.
8

Stephen101,

Useless plonker 09/01/2008 09:40:05
Sorry Peter the fact that there were administrative problems with your Dep Leadership campaign was a secret to me. In fact to most people. Because most people don't give a sod what you are up to as long as you didn't dip your nose in the trough too much. But YOU knew. You knew and did nothing. You plonker. You TOTAL plonker!

How can we trust idiots like this to run a country?

Talking of which.

I keep checking the obituary columns but Wendy never gets a mention. Is she one of these poor folk who die from hypothermia in their one room tenement flat over Hogmanay and the body isn't found for some time? If she has any friends left would then please pop round just to check that she is ok.

And if you want some fun, dress up in a policeman's uniform. I know she would enjoy the joke.
9

Farmernot,

oan ma traictor 09/01/2008 09:43:32
£82 grand to run a deputy leadership campaign...............Prescott must be in on the act helping himself surely and Jimmy the Pie.....Wendy will be helping herself again shortly you can be sure......any sightings of the poor wee soul ???
10

Mercutio,

FALKIRK 09/01/2008 10:48:57
This oleaginous oaf should be sacked now.
11

yolanda,

09/01/2008 10:59:49
Some of you are being unkind. How many of us have overlooked £82,000 lying around. Come on now, it's easily done.
12

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 09/01/2008 11:12:02
If someone gave me 82 grand, I'd know about it. This is just another load of lies to cover up malpractice.

As John Major said recently, when the Tories went through the mire in the mid-90's, it was about personal matters and nothing to do with government.

The "new labour" sleaze is all to do with personal matters AND to do with government. I remember the hard time that the Tories went through in the 90s. How come labour are getting away with it so lightly?

Not only are they not morally fit to govern, they are not competant to govern and have completely ruined this country in most respects during a period of only 10 years---undoing the Tories 18 years of building the country up and giving it stability.
13

 Ayrshire Scot™,

09/01/2008 11:26:42
I have overlooked several fines and income tax payments due to "administrative and organisational" problems. No problems though - a wee sorry and a box of Roses has been dispatched to the authorities concerned.

New Labour - tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime (only when sorry isn't good enough)
14

Allan(handofgod137),

09/01/2008 13:02:00
#14 That would be because so many journalists are closet lefties, if they reported all the labour sleaze and cover ups with the same zeal with which they hounded the tories then no labour party candidate would ever be elected again.
15

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 09/01/2008 13:39:42
#15:

The only "crime" labour are "tough" on is crime that they can make money out of---speed cameras come readily to mind here.

Other "crimes" have been invented by the labour party as an excuse to make money. For instance, owning a car, driving a car, parking a car, smoking tobacco, drinking alcohol, dying (death duties), owning a property (extortionate council tax), wanting to insure your property, traveling by air... The list is endless.

None of these were "crimes" under the Tories. Let's get them back into power before it's too late. I propose a vote of no confidence in the current government (north and south of the border).
16

JayJay,

Right here 09/01/2008 14:46:44
Since most politicians appear to be blessed with the brassiest of brass necks, yet appear unable to understand why the general public holds them in such low regard, could they not all sign up to a code of conduct? Something that unequivocally states that,should you do "x", or be caught unintentionally with money you shouldn't have, then you must resign.
My abiding memory of the latter days of the Tories was of successive ministers being caught with either their pants down or their fingers in the till or just simply telling giant whoppers. All stood defiantly (sometimes with a daft wife) saying all was well, and they were frightfully sorry. Meanwhile voters thought - these guys can go hang.
Is Broonie really so dumb to think that voters have not made a similar calculation. The likes of Hain, Harmann and our own dear Wendy, should she ever be found, must appreciate that, in saving their own skins, they are shunting the odious David Cameron ever closer to number 10. I hope they are pleased with themselves.
17

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 09/01/2008 17:00:22
#18:

"...they are shunting the odious David Cameron ever closer to number 10. I hope they are pleased with themselves."

Well? Are you pleased with the alternative? The alternative that has nurtured and implimented intrusive, restrictive, knee-jerk, discriminatory policies that have reached into everyones' lives like the tentacles of a poisonous sea creature and tainted them?

I'd rather have people in charge who show me the respect I deserve and leave me to live my life and make my own choices in peace.
18

tomfrom66,

Thornton Cleveleys 09/01/2008 17:33:11
According to today's Guardian, Hain received £5000 from a guy who denies that he runs a 'subprime' lending outfit.

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/funding/story/0,,2237948,00.html
19

Griffe,

09/01/2008 20:17:17
Has he got dementia? Perhaps he should by Minister of Health.
20

bully wee alba,

Edinburgh 09/01/2008 20:21:32
#17 writes:-

“I propose a vote of no confidence in the current government (north and south of the border).”


I have no problem with Tories such as yourself initiating a vote of no confidence in the Scottish Government.

If this results in a your preferred party being further kicked into the long grass, then Scotland will be well served.

As far as a vote of no confidence in the English Government is concerned, who gives a monkey’s whether your team emerges prevalent or otherwise?

Whether it be Tweedle Dee or Tweedle Dum in Westminster, our future will be determined by which party has the support of the electorate in Holyrood.

Westminster represents an unnecessary level of government.

Goodbye, you are the weakest link.
21

Paula,

West Lothian 09/01/2008 22:18:39
If someone would care to give me £82,000 I could happily overlook it. I'll even say sorry to whoever you want.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.