Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 6th September 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Martin under growing pressure as inquiry into wife's taxi bills begins



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 April 2008
PRESSURE is growing on Michael Martin, the Commons Speaker, after parliament's sleaze watchdog began an investigation last night into his wife's travel expenses.
A preliminary inquiry was launched by John Lyon, Westminster's standards commissioner, after he received a complaint about Mary Martin's £4,000 taxi bill for shopping trips.

Mr Lyon said the spending "may not have been in accordance with the Code
of Conduct for Members of Parliament".

Mr Lyon decided that further scrutiny was needed after receiving a complaint from a pressure group, the TaxPayers' Alliance, in February.

In a letter to the complainant, Mr Lyon said: "In essence, the part of your complaint I have accepted is that Mrs Martin's expenditure on taxis may not have been in accordance with the Code of Conduct for Members of Parliament and its associated rules.

"I am inviting Mr Speaker to let me have his comments on your complaint. Once I receive his response, I shall consider how to proceed."

The news heaped more pressure on Mr Martin, who is at the forefront of the fight to block publication of details of allowances granted to all MPs and their addresses.

He launched a High Court attempt to stop a breakdown of MPs' expenditure on their second homes being released. The release had been ordered by the Information Commissioner and by an information tribunal.

This weekend, it emerged that more than £1.7 million had been spent on refurbishing the Speaker's Westminster residence and garden.

Questions have also been raised over why he has claimed more than £75,000 in MPs' allowance for a second home, despite having no mortgage on the Glasgow property he was claiming for.

Last night the original complainants, the TaxPayers' Alliance, said it was now "completely inappropriate" for the Speaker to remain in charge of the Commons inquiry into MPs' expense arrangements, which is due to report in the coming months.

Mark Wallace, the campaign director of the group, said: "The Speaker is meant to oversee MPs' expenses and the propriety of their behaviour – an extremely important task at a time when the public are concerned at how their money is spent in parliament," he said.

"The controversial way Mr Martin has behaved by trying to keep MPs' expenses secret and running up questionable expenses bills has only added to that concern.

"Now the Speaker is being investigated over his household expenses it would be completely inappropriate for him to remain in charge of the parliamentary expenses system.

"He should hand over control of the review into MPs' expenses to someone independent and untainted by scandal."

The TaxPayers' Alliance has called for Westminster to follow the more transparent expenses system at Holyrood.

A spokeswoman for the Commons authorities insisted Mr Martin's role with the committee carrying out the expenses inquiry was not in question.

She insisted there would be no further comment until the Standards Commissioner's investigation had finished.

It is understood that Mr Martin has already provided material to the Commissioner concerning his wife's taxi bills.

The taxi row led to the resignation of Mike Granatt, the Speaker's spokesman, in May. He admitted inadvertently misleading journalists over Mrs Martin's trips to buy food for "entertaining official visitors". He said she was accompanied by a Commons official, but she was with her housekeeper.

Controversial Speaker bedevilled by questions

NICKNAMED Gorbals Mick, Michael Martin was a controversial choice when he replaced Betty Boothroyd as Speaker in 2000 and has been no stranger to questions over expenses.

Earlier this year, it emerged he had claimed £4,000 for taxi rides taken by his wife and had claimed £75,000 towards the running costs of his Glasgow home, even though it is mortgage-free and he lives in a grace-and-favour flat when in London.

His official residence in London has had more than £700,000 spent on it since he became Speaker.

This included more than £100,000 a year on items including furniture, art and air-conditioning for the Grade-1 listed apartments. Another £992,000 has been spent on the Speaker's garden, although most of the costs have gone on improving security since 9/11.

Last month, Mr Martin's committee made the last-minute decision to appeal at the High Court against MPs' expenses being published in full.





The full article contains 724 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 April 2008 9:32 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Politicians' expenses
 
1

Angus Ogg,

01/04/2008 22:59:36
Michael Martin is Derry Irvine without the good taste in wallpaper.

When is this sleeze going to end ? ? ?
2

Teofilio Cubillas,

02/04/2008 00:44:52
I'm sure that the facts will show that it is a muddle, not a fiddle......
3

subrosa,

02/04/2008 00:59:24
# 2

It's neither. It's theft. I didn't work all my life for his wife to take taxis to Sainsburys or wherever. I worked and paid my taxes to help my fellow countrymen in need and to help keep my country running.

Of course it will all be glossed over with spin.
4

urban poacher,

Edinburgh 02/04/2008 01:17:43
this man is a disgrace to Scotland. he should immediately resign. he is not fit for office.
5

Vivas,

Edinburgh 02/04/2008 01:40:15
#3 subrosa ... I'm afraid to say that it turns out that YOU - and I - and many many others in fact HAVE worked all their life for his wife to take taxis to Sainsburys or wherever....

He and his wife seem to have an inflated sense of their entitlement...of what this country "owes" them.

Typical Scots though eh ? Dodgy taxi fares ... such small thinkers ! When you think what other husband and wife teams have been able to achieve in the past...
Nicolae and Elena Ceausescu....Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos ... :-))



6

The Daleks,

Longmen 02/04/2008 03:34:10
I agree with Subrosa, it is theft.

Theft and hypocrisy.

When I think of all the hoops honest people have to jump through to get a few paltry state benefits when they fall on hard times, with the constant inference hanging over their heads that somehow they're scrounging or cheating etc, when they're warned that investigators will be watching them, and advertising campaigns encourage their neighbours to "shop" them, all for forty odd quid per week, the behaviour of our greedy, grasping, thieving, lying, politicians makes me sick.
7

Jeeemy,

St Andrews 02/04/2008 05:40:36
Spending


"When a man spends his own money to buy something for himself, he is
very careful about how much he spends and how he spends it. When a
man spends his own money to buy something for someone else, he is
still very careful about how much he spends, but somewhat less what
he spends it on. When a man spends someone else's money to buy
something for himself, he is very careful about what he buys, but
doesn't care at all how much he spends. And when a man spends someone
else's money on someone else, he doesn't care how much he spends or
what he spends it on. And that's government for you."
8

donald,

glasgow 02/04/2008 06:15:16
Rich Labour thickos live in a parallel universe in Westminster
9

Pilrig.,

Livingston 02/04/2008 06:22:39
The best club in London.
10

Pilrig.,

Livingston 02/04/2008 06:24:50
Rt Hon Martin...Lord Foulkes = working class heroes. Wendy's allies in the class struggle
11

scottish person,

paisley 02/04/2008 06:41:34
Vivas.
When are you getting the tumour removed from your anglophobic typical english brain
12

Guga II,

Rockall 02/04/2008 07:17:45
#5 Don't forget Mr. & Mrs. Copper-Balls.
13

M.T.,

02/04/2008 07:54:01
Her Majesties Revenue & Customs would not agree to taxis for the owners wife to go shopping in her husband's business accounts, why should it be agreed in her Majesties Government?
14

11+failed,

the pans 02/04/2008 08:04:30
"may not have been in accordance with the Code of Conduct for Members of Parliament".
That is parliamentary speak for theft
15

sam the god,

02/04/2008 08:06:12
Well they are not getting cash for honours now so they will have to take the money from elsewhere i.e us taxpayers but do not worry it will be the usual political whitewash nothing to answer for
16

McMillar,

London 02/04/2008 08:09:12
Good point #15. If this was legal we’d all be doing it in business and claiming excessive expenses. ‘You couldn’t expect the wide of a director to possibly get the bus…could you’. Blah blah blah. Not legal and is downright theft by people who barely see it as that due to having no idea that they are there to serve.
17

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 02/04/2008 08:47:19
Prescott's wife took limos to protect her hair, so Mrs Mick has her precedents. After all the £180k her man 'earns' barely keeps the wolf from her doors.
18

haggis 10,

02/04/2008 08:49:11
The Labour party has always slated the Tories for "hangers on". Now that Populist New Labour in power its Beluga and Chips at the local Whitehall Takeaway and lets take a Rolls Royce Taxi And in case there are any International Terrorists at the shop we better take extra Police armed with Uzi machine guns Total cost who Knows I'm in charge of Expenses aint I!!!!!!!!!! Besides I'm above suspicion Im very respectable Proletarian neighbourhood called the GORBALS.
19

haggis 10,

02/04/2008 08:50:19
Aint I !!!!!!!! ??????????
20

drew 33,

02/04/2008 08:57:05
The real problem here is that Martin and a some other MP's see nothing wrong. Even worse, in Martin's case, we have him in charge of an inquiry into something he considers to be perfectly satisfactory.
21

morris,

edinburgh 02/04/2008 09:15:14
Michael Martin is an MP and Mr Speaker. His wife is NOT.

Simple as that.

Either her taxis should not have been paid from the public purse,or the rules are even more ridiculous than we realised.Michael Martin should be removed and investigates by the POLICE.

The alternative is that its perfectly in order to pay taxi fares for friends relatives constituents and maybe even the odd prostitute.
My view is simple.If I am in the taxi I pay for it.
Otherwise NO.
If Mrs Martin is in the taxi .She Pays for it!

McLethchie resigned over taxi claims and he was at least Tory leader and going from Parliament to his office.If he is at fault, then Mrs Martin CANNOT be justifiable,she is not even elected!

LABOUR ARE ROTTEN TO THE CORE AND LIARS GALORE
22

Vivas,

Edinburgh 02/04/2008 09:22:33
#12 I am Scottish ...you dumpling...
23

Doh,

02/04/2008 09:28:20


Fill your lungs and sing -

The working class can kiss my ar$e
I've got the speaker's job at last
whilst opponents snear and taxpayers flinch
we'll keep our expenses flying high
24

glassbenmhor,

02/04/2008 09:46:24
Next stop the Lords,
bigger fiddles to play
and sooth ma piles on the wool sack
25

glassbenmhor,

02/04/2008 09:52:07
We are all new-labour--ites
and we don't mess with small hand--outs
Farmm ani-mals and two year old wains
We counldn't give a *uck just give us all your do--sh
26

glassbenmhor,

02/04/2008 09:54:06
Hey #24 ,
thats not VISAS I hope, we has very tight immigration laws, especially for those from Jersey!
27

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 02/04/2008 10:06:10
#25

Nice one!
28

AJ Fife,

02/04/2008 10:20:04
Goodness, what is it with the Labour Party? Is there a course Labour politicians attend, which teaches them how to fill their pockets and screw expenses to the limit?

No wonder there are so many benefit fraudsters out there, with the Labour Party setting such an example!
29

Robb,

02/04/2008 10:57:19
It's time to get their big fat greedy thieving snouts out of our trough. I hope there are criminal charges pressed over this latest case of theft. How much longer will these jumped up criminals get away with it?

Taxi for Martin.... destination jail.
30

James (1),

02/04/2008 11:11:13
What is this country coming to when we cannot let our betters fleece us without complaining?
Their rules ensure they get extremely well paid and they get perks on top of this.
It has always been this way and always will. Greed is a prerequisite of political life.
What you do is give the illusion you are for the people but the reality is you are for yourself.
Most of the public are too stupid to realise this so politicians bank balances grow as they claim their cat or dog needs to learn to speak and their wife, son or daughter is helping with this process and that makes it a legitimate expense claim.

What happened to the old value of service to the community?
31

Janis *,

london 02/04/2008 11:34:13

Taxis to Sainsburys Mrs Martin, why? They will deliver. I reckon those taxis went to John Lewis with the MPs' allowance list.
32

subrosa,

02/04/2008 11:40:06
# 33

You may not be that far wrong.
33

Number 6,

Germany. 02/04/2008 11:50:28
Just great, keep this labour sleaze story in the news as long as possible. This is what you get from the "party of the working man". Labour sleaze and sheer unadultarated greed. Nice one "Gorbals Mick".
34

Montford's Jaicket,

Hanging around 02/04/2008 12:39:11
Well, it's obvious there's been a simple little misunderstanding here. "Taking the Michael" Martin obviously thought that socialite and socialist were the same thing.

HMRC; where are you now that your country needs you?
35

Calum Crubag,

02/04/2008 12:41:58
Another Labour crook? Where is Highland Meally Mooth?
36

Rednose Harry,

Wallasey 02/04/2008 12:46:52
So that's why the country is in a mess?"Muddled"politicians running the place.Hain,Harman,Alexander and now Mr Speaker all mixed up!!!Given who is in charge of all this there's as much chance of the "facts" emerging as there is of Mugabe running free and fair elections.
37

Rednose Harry,

Wallasey 02/04/2008 12:48:01
Sorry ,response is to post #2.
38

Alberto.,

02/04/2008 14:19:02
From reports in the press - presumably true, and, I imagine, not difficult to prove, about the 'Nice Little Earner' the man Martin has got going for himself - and possibly others - in the Club, seems very much being treated by the authorities as 'of not much concern!'

It is little wonder that Martin wants to keep control over the whole thing - he seems to have much to hide and protect!

How anyone, with even average - or very low intellect, in an ‘alleged’ well run and honest 'Expenses Claims' office, can stand up and say that what Martin has 'pulled off' in his false Mortgage repayment claims over the past few years - as reported, is 'Within the rules', is absolutely preposterous and beyond comprehension, and must give rise to the nasty odour of 'Collusion' with many others - on a scale we as taxpayers are not yet ware of!

To get such ‘alleged’ payments re-imbursed, must clearly mean the receipts produced - if any, as evidence of payment must be false, and any documentation submitted and ‘authorised’ to confirm the a claim is in order - must also be false, and there must be a great portion of blame for this fiasco placed on the shoulders of those 'accepting the claim as in order’, and authorising payment accordingly!

It is not too difficult to imagine the whole caboodle of those involved in dealing with 'Expenses Claims' are all in collusion in an apparently well organised illegal 'Scam' - run by and for, the sole financial benefit of the Political participants, driven by their personal greed - which seems very much to be a natural habit of the breed!

Presumably, by the look of things, any investigation will be dragging its feet, playing for time and looking for some small technical 'get out' for these criminal elements of society - or perhaps just hoping it will be washed over and forgotten!

Presumably the Police and the CPS (the alleged Crimestoppers - we hope!?) - by rights, should by now, in view of the reports and the great possibility and ea
39

Lovepan,

North East England 02/04/2008 15:02:36
Unbelievable. £4000 on taxis? These people don't know the value of money!

My brother bought his first house in County Durham in 2001 for £10,000. A Labour heartland as well...
40

ExpatNI,

somewhereelse 02/04/2008 15:05:00
The whole Martin family is rotten to the core! My mum's late partner was Michael Martin's uncle and he was a dummy who tried to cheat her out of her home after his death!(It's a long story) He 'forgot' he had left his estate to his scumbag sons and they tried to force my mum from her home immediately after his death. He wouldn't have had a home in the first place if it hadn't been for her!. The older son, Alex works for McDonalds designing restaurants and the younger one Owen Jnr is a waster and failed salesman who got sacked for 'fiddling his expenses'. You can't trust a MARTIN as far as you can throw one! If either of them read this, you know who I am!
41

Doh,

02/04/2008 15:13:04
#29

thanks, I based it on the better known version

"the working class can kiss my ar$e
I've got the foremans job at last"

I think the sentiment is the same though.
42

Retah Esenihc,

Fife 02/04/2008 15:59:37
Bring back Betty .................. she is wonderful
43

westview,

Titanic Britain. 02/04/2008 16:49:41
Vote them out. Tell friends, neighbours, workmates, the wee wummin at the bus stop,(avoid taxi ranks, just in case), any one---VOTE THEM OUT. Even the Irish leader has the good grace to resign over his scandal today.
44

Alberto.,

02/04/2008 17:25:15
Principle involved - Resign - New Labour - as if!!!!

There doesn't seem to be an ounce of it amongst the lot of them - and probably never will!

It is even more surprising that Brown - allegedly a man of the Manse (should be trust and loyalty lurking somewhere but difficult to discover! would even associate with characters we see in 'his' Party nowadays, and yet he does not denounce them or the activities they are getting / got up to - must be an essential qualification to 'belong!'

When asked his opinion at the start of the Martin fiasco, he even praised the man for being good at his job - regardless! A habit he must have caught off his 'Chum!!!!!' Blair!

The mind boggles!

45

Allan(handofgod137),

02/04/2008 17:37:44
Same old labour, always stealing!
46

Griffe,

02/04/2008 17:45:32
He won't go until he has negotiated a safe haven in South Africa or The Bahamas with a financial settlement.
47

Paddi,

02/04/2008 19:20:36
The best one must be his £27,000 each and EVEY year he claims for a house in weegieland where there is no mortgage!! how the hell does that work???
48

Alberto.,

02/04/2008 21:45:25
#40 Cont'd....

Presumably the Police and the CPS (the alleged Crimestoppers - we hope!?) - by rights, should by now, in view of the reports and the great possibility and ease of proving wrongdoing - or not, by all concerned, be deeply and independently involved in their own investigation - so, as it appears, why aren’t they?

I understand someone, presumably a Politician' in amongst it all, has to request the Police to get involved before they can take any direct action - seemingly they don’t go looking for ‘fraud’, it must be presented to them by others? So no chance of real 'Right and Wrong' being involved in such matters, where Politicians are involved, as the Police are no doubt totally under orders, and directed from 'above'- to steer them to the 'Right' conclusions - as will obviously be required!
49

portonian,

falkirk 02/04/2008 22:11:11

WE SEEM TO HAVE MASTERED THE ART OF CATCHING THIEVES AND EXPENSE CRIMINALS BUT WE DO NOT APPEAR TO HAVE MASTERED THE ART OF PUNISHMENT MAYBE WE SHOULD THINK ALONG THE SAME LINES AS GAINS MADE FROM DRUGS
TAKE THE MONEY BACK AND GAOL THE OFFENDER AND ANYONE THAT BENEFITS IT IS COMMON THEFT
50

yoric,

02/04/2008 22:50:44
Micheal Mugabe Martin is not available to comment at the moment as he's ensuring fair play in the Zimbabwe elections.
His wife is in charge of food aid distribution, via Scotland, and one of her houses.
51

weeshooie1,

Wollongong 02/04/2008 23:28:47
And here's to all the cynics out there who didn't believe that 'Yes Minister' was based on fact :0)
52

Citylocal Fife,

Citylocal Fife News 03/04/2008 07:43:38
I wish we could focus on his appalling performance as speaker, it is costing the country far more than a few £k in taxi fares. He should be turfed out for that, and his pension paid over to a worthwhile cause.




Yours etc

Angus Whitton
53

Alberto.,

12/04/2008 11:53:25
How remarkably interesting is the remark made by Sir Christopher Kelly, top man in the 'Standards Committee' about this affair when he says 'Unfortunate' as it makes it appears they have something to hide - 'Get Away!'

It would seem that many more than the MP's have something to hide, in the way of total collusion for such a success to be made of having many of these apparently illegal claims paid out, especially when there seems to be overwhelming evidence they are false and faudulent, especially in the case of Michael Martin and his 'non-existent' mortgage claims which has been going on year after year!!

In view of the remarks by the CPS who consider there is too much mystery in the claims procedure for them to be successful in a prosecution (never will be if they don't attempt one!)and one can only assume Political endeavour has beenbrought onto them for such an hilarious and probably 'Politically directed' answer to come forth!

I feel sure the overwhelming opinion by the Public is that the 'Political Castle' aka 'The House of Corruption' in Westminster is overflowing with 'fraudulent activity' and this 'Expenses claims' nice little earner could well be the tip of the iceberg - otherwise why all the serious endeavour, to suppress it all, especially by the man Martin who seems as guilty, if not moreso than many others!
presum,ably the final outcome - from wherever, will be another 'New Labour' blockbuster of a 'Whitewash!' solely to protect the guilty regardless of right and wrong!!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.