Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 18th July 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Revealed: just a few of the bills top MPs charged to the taxpayer



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 April 2008
TAXPAYERS have picked up a cleaning bill of nearly £5,000 for Gordon Brown, and John Prescott, the former deputy prime minister, ate his way through £4,000 of groceries in one parliamentary calendar year.
The disclosures were laid bare yesterday by the Commons authorities who, after a two-year legal battle, released some of the expenses requested under Freedom of Information laws.

However, under the stewardship of Michael Martin, the Speaker, they
have vowed to press ahead with their High Court battle to stop the disclosure of every receipt and invoice, unlike the arrangement in the Scottish Parliament.

Other revelations included that Tony Blair, as prime minister, charged his £116 TV licence fee to taxpayers – along with a dishwasher. David Cameron, the Conservative leader, claimed nearly the maximum allowable for his mortgage interest payments, £21,293.86.

While Mr Prescott's food bill is arguably understandable, the trim Sir Menzies Campbell consumed nearly as much – £3,700 in food and refreshments. He also spent £1,765.33 on parking, taxis, laundry and TV licence.

There is no suggestion that the claims of any MPs mentioned were illegal, or that they broke any rules.

Nick Harvey, a Liberal Democrat MP representing the House of Commons commission, said Westminster would resist moves towards a Scottish Parliament system, where every invoice is available for scrutiny.

Mr Harvey said one Scottish politician had been labelled a skinflint for charging for his milk and a loaf of bread. "Had he had a full dinner, nobody would have batted an eyelid, so I don't think you can win."

He said the Scottish Parliament "have made a mistake in publishing every receipt", claiming that such a change in Westminster would lead to "no end to the mischief-making from political opponents".

Nevertheless, publishing all receipts may explain some of the mysteries. One is why Mr Brown's cleaning bill went from £2,380 in 2003-4 to £4,981.04 in 2005-6, at a time when EU enlargement should have brought even more competition in the market.

Meanwhile, taxpayers picked up a £7,675.82 bill for Mr Prescott for "repairs and maintenance", although he claimed nothing for mortgage interest repayments.

Matthew Elliott, the chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, which campaigns for lower taxes, said: "Why are ministers on generous salaries who live in free homes allowed to charge council tax and food bills to the taxpayer?

The spending on food, cleaning, TV licence and mortgage payments was all reimbursed under the controversial Additional Costs Allowance (ACA). Commons rules state that ACA is paid "to reimburse members for necessary costs incurred when staying overnight away from their main home for the purpose of performing parliamentary duties".

Most MPs use it to pay for the cost of a base near Westminster while away from their constituency homes. It cannot be claimed by those representing seats in central London.





The full article contains 494 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 April 2008 10:33 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Politicians' expenses
 
1

Senga Jean,

Scotland 05/04/2008 00:16:10
Between Brown and Prescott there is not much to choose. Champagne Socialists at our expense.
2

Huntly loon,

Aberdeenshire 05/04/2008 00:28:34
I wonder what HM Revenue & Customs would make of claiming, your TV licence, cleaning costs and groceries as allowable expenses on your self assessment form. I know what they would do. Treat them as disallowable and charge you the tax on them. That's if they didn't think you had deliberately committed a fraud. But it is OK for the Prime Minister, his Deputy and the Chancellor to take the p!ss and charge these ordinary living costs to the taxpayers.
Last week the Labour trolls were slagging Salmond for his expenses. They will be a lot quieter now.
3

walter,

05/04/2008 00:35:25
The sooner the people are made to pay their own way the better.
I worked for 2 years away from my home, I paid for accommodation, food and travel from my own pocket.
This argument they put forward that they represent us so we should pay is total rubbish, they came to us and asked if we would allow them to represent us.
We pay them a wage to represent us so why are we also paying their expenses as well.
They should pay for any expense incurred themselves as they asked to do the job in the first place.
Non of them are any better than the other they are all at it no matter what party they represent or who they are.
4

henrymanchester,

UK 05/04/2008 01:08:07
Not surprised about Prescott's food bill.

Looks like he enjoys a pork pie or three...
5

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 05/04/2008 03:33:44
There needs to be a radical change in how MP's are compensated. They should have their remuneration tied to performance as most in people in private sector have. They should be paid a salary that is linked to the average wage in the UK. Perhaps 3 times the average wage for MP's, 4 times for Cabinet Ministers and 5 times for Prime Ministers.

As far as expences go they should pick up their own tab.
6

Castaway,

05/04/2008 03:40:07
Tony Blair spent nearly £2,000 of taxpayers' money on cosmetics over six years.
7

Joseph Gibson,

Stevenston 05/04/2008 03:47:55
As the smart politicians know that people are not as they use to be; controllable and made to believe whatever their leaders said now know that these figures are high to the ordinary British citizen, but don't be fooled people. The figures are much higher, before Tony Bliar was PM he had nowhere near the amount of assets now. So come on idoitic Britain, wake up to the fact that we are robbed blind every day and we need a real government, in my books that would be retoring Her Majesty with full power once again, atleast we will see politicians heads in baskets.

Should we all campagin to learn of all MP's personal accounts to see why they want a pay rise from 61k to 100k a year? I think we should. And that would include offshore accounts which they probably don't include that they have.
8

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta;. .....a place in the Sun in California 05/04/2008 05:47:12
7
Castaway,
0
-

Dude ,
It must have been cheap cheap cosmetics for that paltry sum.

HHD

GC
9

Guga II,

Rockall 05/04/2008 05:55:42
They are a bunch of lying, theiving, crooked charlatans that are robbing the taxpayers blind. It's time this theivery was stopped.

Why should we pay for cosmetics, TV licences, groceries, taxis for their wives to go shopping etc. etc. They get paid a very good salary, especially when their other expenses are taken into account.

Why should we pay for a second home for them? Why doesn't the government buy some flats and ensconce them all there, and the flats remain the property of the taxpayer. Why are they allowed to profiteer at our expense.

Remember also, the New Labour Sleaze and Corruption Party have continually increased our taxes since they came to power, especially stealth taxes. They have even eliminated the 10% tax rate for the poorest people. Now we know why, to pay for them to live the life of Reilly at our expense.

Every halfpenny of expense claims should be listed in the public domain, and the this blatant theft for day to day living expenses, among other things, including groceries, should be stopped. Are there no honest MP's in Westminster?

This grand scale larceny must stop.
10

Castaway,

05/04/2008 06:48:44
Politicians are spending £2.2bn a year of taxpayers’ money on private management consultants.
11

Hermitage,

Edinburgh 05/04/2008 07:50:52
Easily seen just by looking at Prescott that he's had his snout in the trough for a very long time. Appear that we have to pay or the pigswill as well.

So Tony Bliar can't afford a TV licence? He should put aside £15.00 a month as I have to do.

No wonder the pigs are squealing about their 'expenses' being made public! Good...........lets have more 'transparency'.
12

DutchGirl,

05/04/2008 08:10:12
I think it is absolutely disgraceful for the taxpayers to pay for a tv licence, food!!, and mortgage payments for people that are far more wealthier than the average person!! Can't they pay their own way???
They expect all of us to pay our own way. I am sure that if we claimed that, the HM Revenue and Customs will be knocking at our door!! This is welfare for the rich!!!
13

FedUpTaxPayer,

Edinburgh 05/04/2008 08:11:08
The one that _really_ annoys me is the second home expense, and this is true for MSP's as well as MP's.

It's not unreasonable they have somewhere to stay near the parliament, but us paying them a huge profit to do this is just wrong.

To add insult to injury, we then pay for the next lot, and the next, etc. Surely it must be better for the parliament to own a selection of houses and flats, paid for just once, and MP's to get use of these.

On the rest of expenses, every MP's should be disclosed (I think its clear they can't be trusted), and everyone and anyone who has been unreasonable should be immediately deselected by their party.

Let's get MP's who want to represent the people, and are not in it to see how much they can get for themseleves.
14

The Fat Jannie,

Edinburgh 05/04/2008 08:20:43
O.P.M. folks, O.P.M.
Nothing changes.
15

Boy Wonder,

05/04/2008 08:30:04
Changes to how these lying, theiving, crooked charlatans are paid are surely necessary now? Why should the public pay for THEIR TV licences, food, dry cleaning etc ...

Receipts for everything please!!!
16

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 05/04/2008 08:52:24
#14 - That's pretty much the arrangement with 'grace and favour' residences (a company hoose) enjoyed by Blair, Broon, Fatty Prescott, not to mention that Disgraceful Oaf, Mick Martin - doesn't stop them milking the system for all it's worth. All they do is designate their hoose back home as their 'second' one and mallet the expenses for that. Even when - as in the case of Gorbals Mick - he doesn't even have a mortgage on it. It's about as close to Fraud as you can get.
17

DrDread,

Gulag Archipelago 05/04/2008 09:05:18
Let's not forget the generous salaries paid to their feckless offspring in addition to these unaccountable expenses. At the same time they are bitching about GPs being paid £100,000 for a soon-to-be 0800 to 2000 working day during the week plus Saturday mornings. GP pay is performance related and we don't get to claim any of these expenses, having already funded ourselves through medical school to the tune of £25,000. I wonder how much money MPs would get if their pay was performance related?
18

Tweedmouth,

Coldstream 05/04/2008 09:13:34
How can Blair and Brown claim for a mortgage on a second home - when both PM and Chancellor are provided with palatial homes in 10 and 11 Downing Street. Meanwhile 'Gorbals Mick' - an utter disgrace to the historic role of Speaker of the House - has launched a £100k legal action in the High Court to block moves to make MPs divulge all their expenses. Of course - its £100k of YOUR money being used to stop you knowing what your MP is spending your taxes on. In Martin's case his wife claimed £4,000 on taxi-fared to pick up 'groceries'. That from the wife of the Speaker - who has an entire catering department plus cook and housekeeper to prepare food for the Speaker and all visitors. Oh sure, I can just see Mrs Mick popping out to buy neeps and tatties. Pull the other one. These people are thieves, liars and trough-guzzlers - like the majority of politicians (with a few honourable exceptions).
19

WKKB,

05/04/2008 09:15:40
I'm sure they get a decent wage... let them use their pay cheque to pay their way in life just like the rest of us. I wish I had an expense account I could use for everything I didn't want to pay for myself. Geeze... and someone out there elected these guys!
20

Senga Jean,

05/04/2008 09:41:33
#19 Tweedmouth,Coldstream you were doing fine with your critical analysis until you said "Gorbals Mick" and you lost your Scottish audience. Such insulting patronising racist remarks only resonate in the Home Counties (sic) and you are no doubt in Coldstream for the shooting
21

it has always been allan,

05/04/2008 09:45:00
they like us to see them as they see themselves, but now we see them as they realy are.
22

Alberto.,

05/04/2008 09:45:31
This 'Fraudulent' use of the expenses 'rules' must be by many, in and outside of the 'Political' game, and totally in collusion with those in the ‘Claims Office’ - for it to happen at all, and especially for it to have gone on so long and run so smoothly for them all!

Obviously fraudulent conversion of taxpayers funds is the one thing they really do well!

I cannot believe that the 'fight' - presumably at our expense, being put up by the seemingly 'Chief Fraudster' of the lot - 'The Honorable (so it is said???)Michael Martin MP who is also the Speaker of the House, on the basis of protecting security holds any water.

As for the 'non-production' & non-display of receipts for claims made, itis just another load of eyewash to fool the taxpayer as, from all the waffling excuses emanating from the Politicos and those in the 'Claims office' in this respect, everything would seem to point to such documents possibly being non-existent - in many cases, or even on record, - and most payments are settled on a 'Nod and a Wink' basis, probably for no other reason to keep 'their' life simple! Also in an endeavour to ‘follow their leader’ and ‘great friend’ the ‘EU and its system - seemingly another great non-audited ‘organisation’ operating solely for the financial benefit of politicians!

No wonder the ‘Britain Hero’ Brown and his cronies didn’t want to hold a referendum - not a good investment financialwise for our ‘homegrown Politicians’ with their own Taxpayer ‘Piggy bank’ at their disposal!!




23

Jock MacTamson 2,

Highlands 05/04/2008 09:52:18
Robbing Bar Stewarts.

They get a massive salary, the most generous pension contributions, expenses, allowances for family members who are not there and then have the total cheek to claim for groceries.

It seems their salaries must go straight into their savings accounts as they do not use it to live off.

I understand business expenses are deductable but when was watching Effing TV a business activity.

I wonder how much of there expenses are relating to the Westminster Licenced Bars. There is no way John Prescott was buying fruit and vegtables.

It's at times like this I really do wish the 5th of November was a different type of celebration.
24

Jock MacTamson 2,

Highlands 05/04/2008 09:55:38
At least in the Scottish Parliment the Labour party have to accept illegal gifts because they cannot mis claim on expenses.

The inland revenue rules should apply to everyone. If I have to save every receipt for every business expenses then why should the people who made that rule be allowed to spend upto £250 per day without a receipt.
25

shivago8,

livingston 05/04/2008 10:20:15
BIZARRE AND INCREDIBLE,CHEATS AND HAVE THE HARD NECK TO TELL US TO BE GOOD CITIZENS.
SMARMY AND TWO FACED
26

Angus Ogg,

05/04/2008 11:25:43
HOW MP'S ARE DIFFERENT.....

One day a florist goes to a barber for a haircut. After the cut he asked about his bill and the barber replies, 'I cannot accept money from you. I'm doing community service this week.' The florist was pleased and left the shop. When the barber goes to open his shop the next morning there is a 'thank you' card and a dozen roses waiting for him at his door.

Later, a policeman comes in for a haircut, and when he tries to pay his bill, the barber again replies, 'I cannot accept money from you. I'm doing community service this week.' The cop is happy and leaves the shop. The next morning when the barber goes to open up there is a 'thank you' card and a dozen doughnuts waiting for him at his door.

Later that day, a university professor comes in for a haircut, and when he tries to pay his bill, the barber again replies, 'I cannot accept money from you I'm doing community service this week.' The professor is very happy and leaves the shop. The next morning when the barber opens his shop, there is a 'thank you' card and a dozen different books, with titles such as 'How to Improve Your Business' and 'Becoming More Successful.'

Then, an MP comes in for a haircut, and when he goes to pay his bill the barber again replies, 'I cannot accept money from you. I'm doing community service this week.' The MP is very happy and leaves the shop. The next morning when the barber goes to open up, there are a dozen MPs lined up waiting for a free haircut.
27

Angus Ogg,

05/04/2008 11:30:02
What is needed is a Martin Bell type person to stand in the next election on the promise to remove the gravy train of those MP's and MSP's who are greedy snout in the trough types.

A complete overhaul of the MP and MSP ripoff expense system needs to be made.

The only thing some of these thick skinned people understand is when some are shown the door, and the rest are threatened with either a P45 or the polis if they don't clean up their act.
28

boudica,

Glasgow 05/04/2008 12:33:08
Are we also to be given a rundown on how Wee Eck`s
£ 130.000 expenses bill at Westminster after all he has hardly spent anytim,e at all there so why is it so high ?
29

walter,

05/04/2008 12:55:19
#27
Angus, good one.
30

Southern Belle,

Yeovil 05/04/2008 12:55:46
#27, Angus Ogg... Now THAT'S funny. Thanks for the laugh.
31

Buckpool Loon,

Cheshire 05/04/2008 13:15:58
Plenty of posts make the the relevent comment to this article. Perhps we should all e/mail the HMRC website-hmrc.gov.uk and report all our MP's for tax evasion!

All in all, this disgraceful practice is just another example of welfare for the wealthy.
32

Mike555,

05/04/2008 14:13:45
Respect for politicians must be at an all time low in this country.

I just wonder how much pigswill they get through in a year.
33

Union is Best,

05/04/2008 14:19:39
29. Boudica, great point! Salmond's constituency staff are on holiday and his constituency offices are shut when he is not at Westminster (OK, i just made that up, but it will flummox the Nats) so he should not claim salary and office expenses. Nailed it!

PS - word from the wise: given all the illegal donations and stuff, are you sure expenses is our best tack as Unionists at the moment?
34

Mike555,

05/04/2008 14:50:22
I remember in March 2004, one of the highest claims in that year was from Falkirk MP Eric Joyce, who racked up expenses totalling £140,000.00. Surely Pigswill does not cost that much!!
35

Sanny,

Glasgow 05/04/2008 19:11:17
28 Angus Ogg:
Angus you’ve got the germ of a good idea there. I would go further, lets have a political party the includes the abolition of this kind of rip off and insists on NORMAL business expense regime. This could include ALL staff being provided from the existing Civil Service. Everything else paid for by the MP out of their own pocket
36

Angus Ogg,

05/04/2008 19:29:22
#37 Sanny,

One good thing about the Scottish Parliament is that it has allowed the likes of Dr Jean Turner, and Margo MacDonald and the OAP Guy to stand as independents and they got in.

We'll maybe keep an eye on this and see about whether to spend some time and effort on this nearer to the next General Election and Scottish Parliamentary Election.

What do you reckon the new party should be called :@)
37

Angus Ogg,

05/04/2008 19:35:00
Who is going to pay for the MP's High Court bid to hide their expense claims ?
38

Sanny,

Glasgow 05/04/2008 21:24:27
38 Angus Ogg:
It wouldn’t need to be a new party, an existing party that made a ‘new deal’ on ‘expenses and transparency’ as an Inviolate Principle of their policy would suffice. Of course the existing Labour (snouts in the trough) Party would have to admit its previous corruption as would the Tory’s. The LD’s? They’ll say anything knowing their chance of being in a position to deliver is at best remote.

On reflection, perhaps as far as Westminster is concerned we would need a New Party! At least Holyrood still has the SNP and thus far very little mud is sticking to them. I’ve just remembered, was it not Teflon Tony who surged into power with the cry of “We shall be whiter than white”.
39

weeshooie1,

Wollongong 06/04/2008 02:47:10
Some good comments here but, let's face it, it will make no difference whatsoever. The 'Barstewards' should be made to live on their wages like everyone else. How can these allowances be justified? Do any of them, over a fiscal year, actually spend any of their own money? It looks like the public purse is only for the Members of the House :0(
40

weeshooie1,

Wollongong 06/04/2008 02:50:49
Correction to #41,

Last sentence should read: It looks like the public purse is only for the 'convenience' of the Members of the House :0(
41

Harry_GB,

England 06/04/2008 23:35:02
These types of expenses claimed for by MPs are obscene.

I agree with 2 Huntly loon, and wonder what HM Revenue & Customs would make of these claims if I tried to make similar obviously fraudulent claims.

Becoming an MP is no longer about improving the country, it's about acting for own greedy self interests.

There are too many fat UK and EU political pigs with their noses in the trough, and this abuse of taxpayers funds just has to STOP.

Time to make expenses claims for members of parliament as transparent as for everyone else claiming expenses in the rest of the country.

In the meantime, I hope you like the latest spoof slogan for the new Labour party: "We spend your money so you don't have to"
42

Harry_GB,

England 06/04/2008 23:46:17
Correction, I should have said 'snouts in the trough' and not 'noses in the trough', this being relevant to all political parties, and not limited to just the current bunch of legal thieving bast*rds commonly known as Members of Parliament for England, Scotland and Wales.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.