Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


The Steamie

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Muslims are also Scots, so treat us the same



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 December 2007
HALF of Scots see Muslims as a cultural threat, according to a report published by the Scottish Government this week.
The report also found that while 4 per cent of people would object to an Asian teacher, 21 per cent would do so if it was a Muslim teacher.

Today, in a revealing interview with The Scotsman, Osama Saeed, a member of the Muslim Council of Scotland, calls for better understanding between the majority of Scots and Muslims, who make up 0.8 per cent of the population.

Mr Saeed, 27, is one of the leading voices in Scotland speaking out on behalf of the Muslim community. Born in Glasgow and educated at Bishopbriggs High and Glasgow University, Mr Saeed became interested in politics after the 9/11 attacks. He admits bad feeling has got worse towards Muslims since 2001 with commentators speaking of a "clash of civilisations" between Muslims and the West and reports of extremism in Scotland.

He says the ongoing war in Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as recent legal cases in Scotland, has made many young Muslims angry. But, he says, it is just as much the responsibility of Muslims to engage in the democratic process and speak out against terrorism, as it is for others to try and better understand Islam.

Ultimately, he says, Muslims are no different from any other group in Scotland and deserve to be treated the same.

Q & A: A MUSLIM IN SCOTLAND

You are a well-known voice on Muslim issues in Scotland. How did this come about?

I was brought up a Muslim and had always been involved in youth groups and taken my faith seriously. But it was after 9/11, when I was 21, that the personal became political.

Suddenly Muslims were all over the news and I think in Scotland I was probably the first person other than the traditional community leaders who was able to speak out and it just snowballed. It was clear that a lot of work had to be done in public to clarify misconceptions about Islam.

How did you react when you saw the pictures of 9/11 on television?

People went to the mosque that evening and it was like: 'That is it. We are all finished. Time to sit in the corner quietly. Do not be seen or heard. We may even have to leave soon.' But I think they were wrong. Far from silence, what was required was for us to come out and explain ourselves, campaign for the things that are right, and I think that is what has been borne out by what has happened over the last few years.

Things do seem to have got worse. This week statistics showed an increased number of people see Muslims as a cultural threat, with half considering Scotland would lose its identity if an increased number of Muslims came to live here. Why do you think this is?

It is because of the international situation. (The Iraq and Afghanistan wars] and the terror attacks on London. But it was around before then. There has been this idea pedalled around over the last few years about a "clash of civilisations". Mistrust of Muslims is couched in this sort of inflammatory rhetoric.

There have been reports of extremism at mosques in Scotland. Does that make it worse?

People talk out of ignorance when it comes to Islam and some talk with a very mendacious attitude and want to smear by innuendo and just make stuff up. It does not help.

It makes it very difficult to try and get out the right message about Islam (as a peaceful religion].

What about the particular cases of Mohammed Siddique (who was convicted for having material related to al-Qaeda on his computer] and his lawyer Aamer Anwar (who now faces charges of contempt of court for speaking out against the conviction]?

I think there is a growing awareness of the powers that the Terrorism Act has given to the authorities. But there is a debate to be had about whether people who are not actually engaged in active plots can be prosecuted as terrorists.

On the one hand the government is giving out money to divert young people who are interested in extremism and on the other hand they are prosecuting people. The authorities have to say what is the dividing line, because people are very, very confused.

It is vital we champion the democratic process in the Muslim community but that is difficult because of the atmosphere.

Do you think it is making young Muslims frightened to speak out?

The reality is that parents are getting very jumpy about their kids getting involved in any kind of Muslim activity no matter how mundane for fear of them ending up on some watch, and that is dangerous, because when there is anger about foreign policy there needs to be an outlet, and that has effectively been shut down by the atmosphere and the approach to the Muslim community.

Young Muslims are feeling angry at what is going on in the world with the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. What is vital is that these people are channelled into the democratic process, where they can air their views and make change.

Is there a danger young Muslims could be driven underground?

Every time a Muslim speaks out against the war in Iraq they are labelled as an extremist even though they have the same views as their non-Muslim friends. Because they are Muslim it is considered more dangerous.

In the end if people are not coming together openly there is the internet and no-one knows what is going on there.

What can be done to encourage young Muslims to take part in the democratic process?

We have leadership training programmes for young Muslims and self-empowerment sessions teaching them that you can be a young Muslim rooted in your faith and be a good citizen. In fact one demonstrates the other, because to be a good Muslim you have to be a good citizen.

What about more established figures?

Against racism, society stood with blacks and Asians. There is a discomfort even amongst some at the higher echelons of society to do the same with Muslims. For this to happen, we need to break down barriers. Initiatives need to come forward telling not just that Muslim terrorism has no place within Islam, but many non-Muslims need to hear the true essence of the faith too.

Have stories like the recent furore over the teddy bear in Sudan given the wrong impression of Islam?

People lump Muslims into one basket when things like this happen whereas the reality is that Muslims in this country are campaigning for freedoms for other Muslims around the world.

We have to campaign for democracy, free speech and general advancement of these societies that starts with education but also includes political reform.

Do you think Muslims in this country could actually help to improve relations with Muslim countries?

There is this idea in many people's minds that Muslims in this country sympathise with regimes like Saudi Arabia or Libya, when in fact many people are here because they fled those regimes and are here because of the freedoms we enjoy.

Often it is Muslim society in this country that is uniquely placed to work with these societies (as in the Muslim peers helping to free the teacher in Sudan].

If there is going to be a bridge over the chasm between civilisations, then Muslims in this country are uniquely placed to cross it.

Most of the Muslim population in Scotland is from the Indian subcontinent and Pakistan. You are second-generation British. Are people of your generation moving away from the old traditions?

People have turned away from the cultural ways of a different country but are turning towards the original tenets of the faith.

The practice of the religion is going up and up.

Have you suffered any prejudice yourself?

I have had lots of verbal stuff, people calling me bin Laden or terrorist. People make predictable jokes about my name (Osama]. But I think it is worse for kids. I have known one child that had to change their name from Osama because it became so bad and it is difficult for girls who wear the hijab.

Do you think it is particularly difficult for Muslim women in Scotland?

I think the people who suffer the most are Muslim women who wear the headscarf. I think the issue of abuse that can take place in the family needs to be addressed in all communities. In general the picture is getting better. For example, forced marriage is being tackled and cultural practices are being replaced by the essence of what is taught in Islam.

There are around 42,600 Muslims in Scotland at the last census count. Is the population increasing?

Not really. The last influx came when there was a labour shortage and it is more eastern Europeans filling that gap today. The new Muslims are often asylum seekers. There is not a great deal of co-ordination to help this group and there should be more to help our fellow brethren.

What do you hope for your children as Muslims growing up in Scotland?

I have to believe relations will improve, otherwise you would go crazy. I think internationally things will calm down and with hard work we can make things work better here as well. We could be an example to the rest of the world.

How does Scotland compare with the rest of the UK in treatment of Muslims?

Scottish Muslims feel more affinity with Scotland than many indigenous people and I think the reason for that is that we have been given a space to do our own thing. In England there is more antagonism and Muslims are more defensive, but in Scotland we just get on with it.

How do Muslims contribute to Scottish life?

People expect special things from us and while I do think we have a unique set of ideas to contribute to Scotland, the reality is that most people in society just want to get on with their jobs, look after their families and volunteer in the community if they are particularly civic-minded. That is what Muslims are doing. We are just normal people like anybody else in Scotland.

The full article contains 1745 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 December 2007 11:42 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Gregor Addison,

Scotland 14/12/2007 00:25:21
The problem is that the only stories we get about Muslims tend to be negative and there is the notion that 'they' are all one group. It's that kind of totalizing language that becomes self-validating to some. The media have a role to play here in giving voice to those who dissent from fundamentalism.
2

Gregor Addison,

Scotland 14/12/2007 01:00:05
Sorry AM2, I didn't realise I was on trial here! For the record, I am not a Christian but an atheist and have no desire to live under any religious law. I've also mentioned elsewhere that I am not a member of the SNP. I have voted for them but I do not believe political parties are any less prone to believing they are absolutely right than many religious groups. My comments were not based on what Mr Saeed said but on an observation of the representation of Muslims in our media and society at large.
3

subrosa,

14/12/2007 01:15:56
A large part of the problem is the lack of integration of the Muslim community. Also I strongly object to any Muslim directing offensive remarks towards me personally regarding Westminster's foreign policy. If they were better informed they would know that the majority of people did not want wars with Iraq and Afghanistan and sympathise with them. Regarding integration there are several Muslim families in this small town and much has been done to encourage them to join with community activities. The result is always the same - a rebuke. In fact three families have lived here for some years and none of the elders speak English at all. Doesn't do a lot for tolerance here.
4

,

14/12/2007 01:38:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

Champion Haggis Slayer of Fife,

Dunfermline 14/12/2007 02:20:30
If these one eyed monstors decide to come and live in the greatest wee country in the world then they should live under our rules and our cultural systems. We have no need for these deviant religous freaks and thier archaic lifestyles. If they want to live under Islamic law then go live in an Islamic country.
No more pandering to these barbaric inhumane people. Extradite them all to the nearest islamic nation please!
6

somerferg,

Oz 14/12/2007 02:29:39

Quelle surprise ubernumpty AM2 links sharia law to Alex Salmond. Oh yes I can see it now - Alex Salmond and the SNP government were so influenced by someone who may or may not have worked for someone sometime that they plan to introduce Sharia law to Scotland immediately. Better watch out AM2 they may come after you for speaking against them and you know what happens to those who disagree with Sharia law. Keep taking the pills !
7

Champion Haggis Slayer of Fife,

Dunfermline 14/12/2007 02:39:08
#8
I agree, but could not be bothered engaging AM2, he is such a predictable bore.
8

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 14/12/2007 04:02:42
Hello All,

What can I say after reading the article above, but that the Scotsman has outdone itself in pursuing a totally one side propagandistic model of the Politically Correct/Rad Left.

AM2 has point out quite clearly (unfortunately none of the posters with opposing views, could muster the spine to address AM2 key point) that Mr. Saeed is for the re-constitution of the Islamic Khalifate AND replacing the Secular Rule of Law, with Islamic Sharia Law.

Why didn't the interviewer for the Scotsman address those two key questions?

How in the world, and in what world, can any honest journalist NOT address a key political figure concerning a Paradigm Shift in how people the police operate, how laws are made, what laws are made, how personal and private behaviour is viewed (what clothes a person wears, if jewelery is worn, if unmarried adults engage in intimate relations, etc.), how free speech would change, etc.

Does not the interviewer for the Scotsman believe that such issues are of key import?

Just how far down the Path of Destruction, are the PC Crowd willing to go?

Just as important a question, just how many Scots are willing to knowingly take that trip with the PC'rs down that road to destruction?

Folks, these issue ARE important!

The lives of your families and yourselves, are well and truly at stake. Just think of it: unless you are willing to convert to Islam (which is a Quranic Command from Allah), then you had better wake up and take notice.

Cheers from the Rockies
9

Jingling Geordie,

Sunshine on Leith 14/12/2007 05:12:46
If Muslims want to Scottish then at least meet half way and behave like they want to be.
Immigration without integration can only fail and I do not see the Muslim society behaving in a manner likely to embrace integration.
Scottish born Muslims are exactly that, Scottish, yet many parents actively encourage their children to dress in Muslim clothes on a scale that was not evident 15 years ago.
This is their culture now and they should at least try to embrace it.
I have no objection to the celebration of certain dates in the religious callender and with people dressing in a particular mode to celebrate.
I would not expect a Muslim to start drinking or become part of anything deemed to be unsavoury to him/her just to feel part of our culture, I would however expect to see an attempt at integration.
I've been to Pakistan on business and it's easy to see why so many want to emigrate from this seriously over-populated country with standards of living that would frighten most westerners.
Quite simply, to better themselves.
Immigrants are happy to accept our free medical services, free education and welfare but fly off the handle at out foreign policy, can't have it both ways.
I have Indian neighbours with six children, the kid's manners are immpecable, a lovely family who have gone to great lengths to integrate yet still attend their Temple and get on with their lives while making many friends, we need more of this.
10

Scythia,

Renfrewshire 14/12/2007 06:16:12
Islam is a serious cultural threat to this country. Honour killings, polygamy, suppression of free speech ,
low status of females, arranged marriages, intolerance of other faiths etc,etc. The demographics are eye opening too. 2001 census showed a muslim population of 42,500 and school roll of 4800 Pakistanis , by 2006 that population had increased by 183 % to an estimate of 80k pakistani's alone - It is almost doubling every 6 years and rising exponentially.. With their fertility rate of just under 5 , there will be well over 300,000 muslims here in 10 years. THere is no economic advantage either - 13% of muslim woman work and of men 53 %, and it makes no diffence whether new immigrant or "established" There is no prospect of integrating either, simply because it goes against everything their religious cult teaches them - submission. Every problem we have just now will be multipied as the muslim population reaches sufficient mass. There will 10 Islamic rage boys such as this extremist. This country is entering a dark stage in its historical development, a once wholy christian country is being taken over by a 7th religious cult that aims to impose a brutal sharia law, of which Saeeds Muslim brotherhood is at the forefront .Cities such as Dundee are even having foreign funded Islamic "education" centres. I urge people to read up on this dreadful cult, educate yourselves and reject it. No Sharia in Scotland, cut back on muslim immigration before it becomes too late.
11

Boy Wonder,

14/12/2007 06:17:32
I'm quite happy for Muslims to be part of our community in Scotland. The problem is that many of them refuse to integrate with us. It's all well and good declaring we're a multi-cultural society, but I suggest that if it became so completely, our Scottish identity as a nation would be submerged in a short time. No, anyone settling in this country, and I repeat they are welcome, must integrate into the Scottish way of life, so that their offspring will consider themselves Scots before anything else, despite being a different colour or religion (if we must have that!)
12

Maisie,

14/12/2007 06:22:28
I have no time for muslims and I don't fall for them doing interviews and pretending that Islam is a peaceful religion, just read the Koran and make up your own mind. The trouble is that Islam is a way of life, it dictates to it's cult members how they should live, wash, speak etc. So why on earth do they want to live in our culture if not to eventually take it over just as the Koran tells them it is their duty to do so. To us we are kaffirs, infedels, no more no less.
13

donald anderson it's me,

weegieland 14/12/2007 07:27:49
Well said Osama. Proud to call you a Scot.
14

Kate,

Zurich 14/12/2007 07:57:51
The article mentions that Mr. Saeed has called for better relations between Scots and Muslims...sorry, but these are two separate things. Scottish is a nationality referring to where a person comes from, while Muslim or Islam is a religion referring to a person's faith or beliefs. That implies (and should also actually mean) that we can have Muslim Scots, so why all the fuss.

Some of the people who have posted comments here should be ashamed to call themselves Scots as they are in no way showing the tolerance and openness so famous of the Scots. However, I also agree with some of the comments that people of other cultures, nationalities or creeds should not try to impose their ways on our country simply because they cannot be bothered to integrate properly into our ways.

15

Gregor Addison,

Scotland 14/12/2007 07:59:13
#3, AM2 and #11 Neandarthal75,

The Scotsman is to be commended on including this article. Surely you would agree that bridges must be built between communities which have different beliefs and, if we are serious about integration, that has to start with public dialogue. Perhaps that is Mr Salmond's view.

As for Neandarthal's views, I find your language loaded with prejudice. You seem guilty of what I was referring to in my firs post, using a 'totalizing language' that brands all Muslims as extremists who want to overthrow 'our' culture. Perhaps you'd like to make it clear for the record what you think 'we' should do in our awakened state?

Clearly, there are problems with integration. There are those - I'm sure - who want to hold to religious laws that are offensive and barbaric to others. I have no desire to live under anyone's religious rule, nor do I wish to believe that the only alternative is some form of religious isolationism. Open and public dialogue has to be the answer. Aren't you glad you've had the chance to take part?
16

Hugo of Garven,

Ayrshire 14/12/2007 08:07:12
I am dismayed at the anti-Muslim posts as they indicate a religious intolerance which I had hoped was disappearing in Scotland.

Yes, some of the first generation immigrants do not speak English even after being here for several years but that is the same situation as the English speakers who move to a foreign country.

Yes some of them are extremists but the vast majority are not. Oppression will breed more extremists.


17

Gregor Addison,

Scotland 14/12/2007 08:08:04
#6 Rules but not rulers,

you might be informed on first year philosophy but you make wild conclusions about genetics. I am Scottish. I was born here. My parents are Scottish. That doesn't mean I'm genetically different to people in Ireland or England or Europe. I would argue that being 'Scottish' is precisely being born here, living in our society, taking part in and contributing and adding to our culture, way of life, or whatever you wish to call it. Are you going to tell me next that if I marry my German girlfriend I'm polluting the gene pool?
18

Scot-free,

Thank God it's Friday 14/12/2007 08:09:20
Hello All and especially #11

I thought that Saaed sounded pretty conciliatory and displayed a level headedness which is much in need presently. Do you have any evidence of his desire for a Kaliphate or Sharia law? as this sounds very disturbing and is not exactly the policy of toleration, free speech or an example of much needed bridge building between cultures. I hope I am wrong but I see only danger in acquiescing to ]Islam's demands or requests for total religious freedom. What also worries me is the power that Islam weilds over its followers who are either too scared to speak up or are indeed intoxicated with the malevolence that submission to Islam grants most men. Do we have a choice in the matter or will we be expected to eventually submit? These are the quecstions that we should now be asking & if it is confrontational then so be it. If Islam has to be dragged kicking & screaming into the 21st century then we had better hurry up. Let's be honest about the treatment of gays non-believers, fallen women, honour killings & intolerance of all that is not Islam. It is not a question of weeding out the fanatics but more of encouraging the reformers. It will be a hard and brutal ideological battleground but that is the legacy of allowing Islam to wallow and fossilize in a 14th century fairy tale ideal of itself.
19

Media 1,

cape town 14/12/2007 08:25:45
This is a difficult topic because the issues are so complex..Problem is, Britain is at war with Muslim fundamentalists, and it is difficult to keep the peace at home.
During WW2 the dynamic was different, there wasnt 1 million Germans living in Scotland, because if there was, they would have been singled out and tormented byt the public at large. Todays war is more complex, because the enemy is a different colour, a different religion and cluture. Therefore, it is not merely viewed as a dislike based on the fact that two different peoples are at war (as it would have been during WW2 with Germans in Britain)it is viewed as racial and cultural dislike, which opens up an entirely different can of worms.
Truth is, Polish people also hang onto their cultural ways, but because there is only a very small difference in their culture and the British culture, it does not create that much of a problem! Whereas the Muslim world is COMPLETELY different in almost every aspect of British culture!
20

sam the god,

14/12/2007 08:32:35
I thought some of you might be interested in the following and if I'm now racist for telling the truth in my free country then thats OK with me.

1). If Christians in Saudi Arabia (THE HOME OF ISLAM) are even caught praying in their house, they are jailed, flogged and deported.

2). If you are driving on the motorway towards Mecca & Medina, there are huge motorway signs warning Non Muslims not to go any further. If you pass the final signpost and if you are stopped by the police, you will go to prison and possibly flogged and deported.

3). If my great grandfather went to work in Saudi Arabia100 years ago and my grand father, my father, me and my children were born there, we can still never ever get a passport. (IMAGINE LIVING IN A COUNTRY FOR 100 YEARS AND NEVER BEING ABLE TO GET A PASSPORT)

4). When I go to any Muslim country and I have been to most of them. If I spoke out against their governments and religion, minimum I would get is prison, flogged and deported, possibly even executed. (YET IN THE UK MANY BRITISH MUSLIMS WANT THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT AND TO FORCE US TO ACCEPT SHARIA LAW)

5). In another Muslim country, my wife friend worked in an English school. One day she was told to take a thick black marker pen and go through every bible and score out the words Israel, Zion and anything to do with Israel (SHE REFUSED and was Deported).

I could tell you countless things that I have seen with my own eyes but the readers would not believe me and I would be called a racist.

If Muslims want to come and stay in my country then thats fine with me, All I ask is that they mix with us, let our children marry their children and vice versa, don't try to force your beliefs and religion on us and most important don't try and kill the hand that feeds you. If this is not acceptable then go back to your Islamic paradise in Pakistan, Saudi Arabia or whatever country you came from!
21

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Home 14/12/2007 08:32:50
To be Scottish you must have considerable shares in the Britonic gene pool. To act/think/behave Scottish you must have a considerable share in the Scottish culture.

AS said already above, one is not a fish just because one was born at sea.

Also, Muslimism is just one of many faiths, not a nationality.

Thus a Scot can choose to be a Muslim, but a Muslim cannot just choose to be a Scot.

A loyal Muslim is honour bound by their holy book and sages to destroy all unbelievers and create a Muslimist state and world. I doubt we should welcome them here on that basis, despite their protestations.

Not all Muslims are suicide bombers, but all suicide bombers are Muslims.

WE should all ca' canny.
22

Gregor Addison,

Scotland 14/12/2007 08:59:58
#25 Rules but not rulers,

you really need to go back to Logic 101. I didn't say that Muslims were a nationalist grouping but to pick up on your point - one can have layered identities, Muslim, Scot, British, European, Pakistani. I find your views offensive. Anyone living in Scotland, whose parents and grandparents have lived here, must find it very odd that you wish to bracket them off as non-Scottish. What is your logical conclusion? Deportation? Have you got the guts to tell us what the logical practical conclusion of your argument would be?
23

Roballe,

Aberdeen 14/12/2007 09:15:17
Like it or not, Scots are people born in Scotland. No one race, religious or ethnic group holds rights to any piece of ground in perpetuity. The Scottish population is currently dominated by one particular tribe that may choose to categorise itself as Celtic. This doesn’t discount the fact that other Scottish tribes will become more influential at some stage in the future and that cultures and expectations will change. The country could be a very different place 50 years from now.
24

james 1st,

hamilton 14/12/2007 09:16:36
most things i dont mind but the burquha i find offensive. any person who goes to live in scotland should respect scottish culture. too many concessions are made to other peple and their culture, presumably those who settle in scotland do so for a better life,they should accept scottish culture as their own. that does not stop people celebrating their different religions
25

Number 6,

Germany 14/12/2007 09:26:38
He says they have programs to teach young muslims to be good citizens while rooted in the muslim faith. These are not compatable aspirations in a western society. Put these people on the spot, does he think it right that the Koran allows for muslims to lie and cheat as long as the victim is non muslim. Does he think it is right that his "Faith" calls for all muslims to convert the infidel at all costs ?.
Does he think it's fine for non believers to be labeled as dirty and of no conseqence, etc etc etc etc etc.

We need live tv debates to bring these points out in the open and make "True" muslims admit what they believe in terms of western society. Stop allowing them to portray themselves as victims.
26

Gregor Addison,

Scotland 14/12/2007 09:28:20
#28, AM2

It's also true is it not that Christians have used their faith to validate violence. The problem is the fundamentalist interpretation of a religious text and the view that anyone who does not share that view is sub-human and perhaps even worthy of death. This kind of fundamentalist view is still found amongst some Christians; it is clearly found amongst some Muslims; but not all Christians and not all Muslims hold these beliefs. If you choose to ratchet the debate up to the point where you argue that this is a key tenet of their faith which ALL Muslims must believe, then you leave little room for open dialogue. This extemism is not shared by a great many Muslims living in Britain. That some do hold these views is bad enough, let's not start forcing extremist beliefs on those who do not hold them.
27

Gregor Addison,

14/12/2007 09:30:48
#32, AM2

Maybe people are disoriented by this because we don't have open and frank discussion on this issue without it descending into labeling.
28

John S,

14/12/2007 09:40:13
#24 sam the god, nicely written.

How can Islam integrate when the Quran commands Muslims not to befriend anyone who is not a Muslim - again though, unless doing so can help protect the Muslim from harm:
Quran 5:51 - Believers, take neither Jews nor Christians for your friends. They are friends with one another. Whoever of you seeks their friendship shall become one of their number. Allah does not guide the wrong-doers.
Quran 9:23 - O ye who believe! Choose not your fathers nor your brethren for friends if they take pleasure in disbelief rather than faith. Who so of you taketh them for friends, such are wrong-doers.
Quran - 4:141, And never will Allah grant to the unbelievers a way (to triumphs) over the believers
Quran - 63:8 But honour, power and glory belong to Allâh, His Messenger and to the believers.

Power must belong to Muslims only (Koran 63:8), and they must exert power over non-Muslims (Koran 4:141). Is this a multicultural religion?

29

james 1st,

hamilton 14/12/2007 09:46:02
#31 dave from barra
most scots do not wear full highland regalia nor speak gaelic as part of their everyday life in scotland. i would have thought if you lived on barra that you would have known that.
you are allowed to disagree with my statment ,but dont make peurile stupid comments
30

Media 1,

cape town 14/12/2007 09:54:45
Of the three Abrahamic religions, Islam is by far the most extreme. Let us be honest here, the bible is also disgrace. Any person of sound mind cannot read through the book from start to finish without feeling total and utter contempt for the entity known as god. Off-course many do, I accept that. But in order for them to accept it they must invent excuses and metaphorical excuses to justify their position.
The Qaran though, well that is an entirely different book, but just as evil. Political to the core and evil in all aspects.......We can say the same about the Torah, the seven books of moses are unchallenged in their brutality....
But I think some of the posters have hit the nail on the head. The Qaran says Muslims cannot be friends with people outwith that faith, which means that no practicing Muslim in Scotland can be considered Scottish, unless they denounce their religion! But like most religions, people pick and choose what works for them, which is utterly primitive to be honest. A person of sound mind would be expected to take the bad parts and be so shocked by them, that they could not possibly even consider accepting the good points! But we live in a complex world and people are afraid of nothingness after life. Some people that is!
Muslims are as welcome in Scotland as Westerners are in Islam, I guess........
31

Gregor Addison,

Scotland 14/12/2007 09:55:03
#36, John S

Once again, I'm sure there are many who take the word of the Quran literally, as there are those who take the Bible literally; however, it is not the case that EVERY Muslim holds these beliefs and wishes to kill ALL non-Muslims. If you bracket ALL Muslims as being of the same mind set then you are not leaving much room for integration yourself. Perhaps, if you don't think integration is possible, you would enlighten us to your solution?
32

Logie Almond,

14/12/2007 09:58:43
Pity they did not ask him the basic question - does he agree that Muslims should be allowed to give up their religion if they so wish?
33

Dr. James Wilkie,

14/12/2007 10:03:30
The problem is that Muslims living in Scotland are either incomers or children of incomers. They can describe themselves as Scots for the sake of acceptance, but that does not make them Scots. The Scottish native culture in all its variations has evolved over 1,500 years, and those who do not adhere to it stick out like the proverbial sore thumb. I know what it is like to be a guest in someone else's country, and the recipe for success is not to flaunt your "right" to be different, but to acknowledge the right of your hosts to their own culture and way of life, and to ensure that you represent no threat to it.

34

Media 1,

cape town 14/12/2007 10:11:29
Dr James Wilkie #42

Excellent post!
35

Gregor Addison,

Scotland 14/12/2007 10:13:43
#42, Dr Wilkie

To argue that the 'Scottish native culture in all its variations has evolved over 1,500 years' is frankly nonsense. Scotland has seen successive waves of immigration that have contributed to and sometimes altered the way of life. The Scoti, the Vikings, Flemmish traders, Norman Knights, later waves of Irish immigrants, Poles, European Jews, all have come to Scotland and settled here. The culture has changed due to other reasons, industrialisation, extension fo the right to vote, etc. It has not been one clear line of descent or evolution over 1,500 years. Surely, the point is that it will continue 'in all its variations' to evolve? I agree that one must accept the law of the country you are in, whether an immigrant or not, and not seek to overthrow laws by violent means.
36

Media 1,

14/12/2007 10:16:33
#43 Dave From Barra
You are being pedantic..Dr Wilkie is absolutely spot on..
If a white person born in Nigeria was raised in a white home and he then looked to be accepted as an African Nigerian, he would be ridiculed and made to feel less Nigerian than he had ever felt....Because whilst he may be a Nigerian born person, he is still European in cultural terms and not Nigerian in the REAL sense.
You do not need to be a rocket scientist to understand Dr Wilkies post.
37

Vaquero,

Manila 14/12/2007 10:36:22
#13, A well written comment. Islam is however not just a Religion but also a political way of life. As I have said many times and you #13 are emphasising the point. "Read the Quran" everyone, and witness yourselves the problem of attempting to deal with a Muslim, even at the dinner table, you might find that they will not break bread with you (Metaphorically Speaking).

The issue raised about the article is that searching questions were not asked. As with #13 I have to ask why they were not asked.
38

John S,

14/12/2007 10:46:43
#13 Scythia, I agree and #38 Gregor Addison. I quoted the Koran where it commands Muslims not to befriend anyone who is not a Muslim so this doesn't allow for integration and this is taught to all followers of Islam, it is also taught that Muslims are superior to non Muslims. I quoted a reason why Islam cannot integrate because its followers by befriending a person of another religion could be influenced by those outside forces which goes against what is taught in the Koran. Maybe this is why Christians cannot worship openly say in Saudi Arabia ? Islam does not allow for integration, there is no half way meeting point otherwise Christians would be able to worship openly say in Saudi Arabia.

These url's make interesting reading - Muslims rule major Swedish city.
http://www.moriel.org/articles/discernment/islam/muslims_rule_sweden.htm
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/003131.php
39

Mcsnagpile,

14/12/2007 11:07:05
How about some axiomatic statements:

Islam is a religion based on Arabic culture, people, and language. The Koran is written in Arabic and only recognized in Arabic. The religion is not Pakistani or Iranian or Indonesian but Arabic. If I were an Iranian I would want my own Alphabet back.
The Zionists state that Jews are an ethnic people and a religion. The language and laws and culture of the Pentateuch and Talmud are Hebrew. However,all Jews are not Jewish, (Khazars etc). Many are converts; in fact whole countries were converts.
The thing about being a Jew is you can be a Christian, or an atheist, a revisionist, or a troublemaker and still be a Jew. The Pope cannae throw you out. A bit like being the descendant of a Papist in an Orange community.

If pork was not banned we could call it a bit of a pig’s ear

Christianity is an adaptation for the European market and has no bearing on Judaism at all. A Jew who believed in the covenant with JVH became a prophet for the Goyim???

At the end of the day we all grow old and die, we all go for a piss. It is time to find some common ground.
40

Dr. James Wilkie,

14/12/2007 11:33:24
#46 AM2. Logic is obviously not your strong point. However, #48 has given you an effective answer and there is no need to repeat it.

As to your "Dr" jibe, I have no need to prove anything to anyone, least of all to myself, but this is the form in which I have been known in the pages of The Scotsman since mid-1973, and for that reason alone I am reluctant to change it. If it is any relief to you, I don't use my Professor title, since I am no longer active in that particular field.

#47. You have just described what I meant by the evolution of Scottish culture over the millennia, fused into a whole from these disparate elements. Culture is definable as the totality of the way of life, and those of us who have been around the world a bit can still detect a distinctive Scottish way of life - a bit confused during the present transitional period, but still capable of revival. What Scotland needs is a long period of stability and consolidation rather than unending population upheavals, and a further increase in population is the last thing it needs.
41

Cauchy Riemann,

Wales 14/12/2007 11:41:32
Islam is a threat to the West.

Notice I said 'Islam', not Muslims. Many Muslims are decent people and we should be careful not to demonise all muslims because we are critical of Islam. However the ideology of mainstream Islam is incompatible with the West.

Mainstream Islam advocates punishment for those who leave Islam, or 'insult' Islam/Mohammed. This isn't some 'extreme' version of Islam, but mainstream teaching in the Hadith and in all the major schools of Islamic jurisprudence.

Osama Saeed wrote:
"People talk out of ignorance when it comes to Islam and some talk with a very mendacious attitude and want to smear by innuendo and just make stuff up. It does not help.

It makes it very difficult to try and get out the right message about Islam (as a peaceful religion]."

It is mendacious to try to present Islam as peaceful. It is peaceful if everyone accepts this ideology - but leave Islam or speak against it and Islam teaches violence towards that person. This is precisely what Mohammed did; it is part of the Hadith and a fact of Islamic jurisprudence.
42

Gregor Addison,

Glasgow 14/12/2007 14:02:53
#54, Dr James Wilkie

You misrepresent me. You talk of Scottish culture having "fused into a whole from these disparate elements. Culture is definable as the totality of the way of life..." The use of words like 'whole' and 'totality' suggest that you see modern day Scottish culture as the end result of a process. Don't you think Scotland will go on 'evolving'? It is hardly credible to argue that Scottish culture forms a whole anyway. The use of the word 'culture' frequently masks difference. I wonder if you'd indulge me and tell me what you think this whole culture is. Where can I find it?

I'm not sure what you think is being lost when you say 'capable of revival'and call for 'stability and consolidation rather than unending population upheavals'. The article suggests that Muslims make up only 0.8% of the Scottish population. Again, perhaps you can enlighten me.

Many vibrant cultures are made up of discontinuities, competing rationalities; if I have to think of what makes up Scottish culture, I'd have to say it is many things; different languages, different musics, differents literary traditions, as well as competing versions of history. It isn't a single unitary whole that is indivisible or cannot be added to. I think the difference between our positions is that you see Scottish culture as having reached the end point of its evolution, whilst I don't.
43

Gregor Addison,

Glasgow 14/12/2007 14:14:26
#42, AM2

I did not think you were labelling. You said 'some' Muslims, which I would suggest is right. However, I do think we need to hear Mr Saeed out and not leap to politically motivated accusations such as you made at #3 linking him, the SNP and Alex Salmond, as if to suggest that the SNP are in league with Muslim fundamentalists, which I do not accept as being the case. Perhaps this was not your intention. But I'm sure you'll see my point.
44

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Home 14/12/2007 14:21:50
#27 Finds my views offensive, but fails to say which or why.

A Scot can be a Muslim, but a Muslim cannot be a Scot unless s/he has a substantial share in the Britonic gene pool. A religion is not a nation. Not all Arabs are Muslims. Not all Muslims are Arabs. One is not a cabbage just because one is born in a cabbage patch. One is a cabbage if one's parents were cabbages.

None of these means anyone has to be repatriated, at least it doesn't for as long as the guests observe the house rules of the hosts.

Immigrants are welcome to absorb Scottish Culture (the bits we can be proud of, that is), but they have no right to demand we change our laws to suit them any more than we have the right to demand Pakistan changes its laws should we set up home there.

This is not an anti Muslim rant. Just substitute the terms for something more anodyne and the logic holds firm.

In deference to AM2 I grant his point that not all suicide bombers are Muslim. However, the facts are that the biggest terrorist threat to the Western democracies comes from a group of people, many of whom have chosen to come and live here. Grasp that fact and deal with its implications.
45

GP,

14/12/2007 14:36:08
Comment on 9/11 says it all. "But I think they were wrong. Far from silence, what was required was for us to come out and explain ourselves"

Us Scots had no explaining to do neither did Muslims terrorists did. He is effectively stating that he and all Muslims are terrorists by implication. Not a view shared by most Scots. But given his role and insight I bow to his superior knowledge on Mulsims and there role in 9/11
46

Hickory,

US 14/12/2007 14:56:13
If you have questions, read the Koran. All your answers are there.
47

Dougie - Edinburgh,

Edinburgh 14/12/2007 15:41:27
46 AM2, Glasgow
Although fascism is a difficult word to define, Dr Wilson’s comment is completely unrelated to any commonly accepted meaning of the word other than in the sense that it’s a generic word used to smear an opposing political viewpoint.
48

Dougie - Edinburgh,

Edinburgh 14/12/2007 15:42:04
18 Kate, Zurich
26 Dave from Barra
27 Gregor Addison
29 Roballe, Aberdeen

Scots, Indian, Pakistani or Swiss can have two meanings, they can be used to designate geographic origin or they can be used to designate an ethnic group. Historically little distinction was necessary but with recent immigration, it’s become so. Quite clearly, the vast majority of Muslims in Scotland are not ethnically Scots. Yet you object to the word Scots being used to describe the ethnic group of people previously known as the Scots. It’s a very dangerous situation because to undermine the use of this word as a description for an ethnic group robs this ethnic group of any way of describing themselves. In England this has even led to the idea that an ethnic group doesn’t exist (ie. the English). The inevitable result is to undermine the ethnic group’s culture, identity, cohesiveness, patriotism and self-worth. In England, it’s been a disaster, especially amongst the less educated in racially mixed areas. It contributes to the feeling of alienation amongst the ethnically English underclass. Please don’t backstab your own people in the same way. You talk about ethnically different Muslim immigrants being Scottish. It would be more accurate to describe them as British passport holding Muslims living in Scotland.
49

Dougie - Edinburgh,

Edinburgh 14/12/2007 15:46:00
60 AM2,Glasgow
Very good links, this man is a disingenuous hypocrite.

May I add one:

He claims the Muslim population in Scotland is not increasing. This is a blatant lie. The Muslim birth-rate is approximately three times higher than that of the native population and there’s ongoing immigration:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/08/05/nimm205.xml&page=3

Saeed’s claim that Islam is a peaceful religion fails to address the problem that Muslims are unable to live peacefully with non Muslims anywhere in the world and have oppressed non Muslims whenever they’ve had the opportunity.

Finally, Saeed talks about tolerance and integration but he’s campaigned for Muslim schools in Scotland, hardly likely to further the cause of integration. And he’s spokesman for an anti-integrationist lobby group. The journalist who interviewed him must be exceptionally gullible.
50

Pmonkey7,

14/12/2007 15:50:30
59

Muslim cannot be a Scot unless s/he has a substantial share in the Britonic gene pool.

What ratio do you suggest is appropriate? 1/2? 1/4, 1/8 ?

51

Scythia,

Glasgow 14/12/2007 16:06:35
The guy above is an extremist and should be in jail along with the other nut Anwar. Scotlands very own islamic rage boy caught on tape by a Dundee courier reporter urging extremist suspects and the wider muslim population in Dundee not to co-operate with special branch.

"Osama Saeed of the Muslim Association of Britain told a packed meeting at Dundee University last night that members of the Muslim community should not interact with officers from the SBCCU."
.

http://www.thecourier.co.uk/output/2006/11/07/newsstory8939138t0.asp

This guy also compared the treatment of Muslims in Britain to the nazi treatment of jews in WW11 Germany - I'm sorry Mr Islamic rage boy but the muslims are not the new jews and Britain is not nazi Germarny, and if it was you wouldn't be here.

Dundee has gained a reputation as a fertile breeding ground for Islamic fundamentalists. Last year it emerged that Norien Sajeel, a Scottish primary school teacher in her twenties, born and raised in the city, was also LEADER of Pakistan?s Sister Division, the womens branch of extremist group Al-Muhajiroun.

In the wake of the Bali bombing, which left more than 180 dead, one of the eight suspects was Shamsul Bahri Hussein, a graduate of Dundee University. Hussein confessed to his involvement.

This is what John Vine, chief constable of Tayside police and president of the Association of Chief Police Officers Scotland said two years ago"warned that despite the best efforts of police and security agencies, public safety could not be guaranteed."

Such is the heightened possibility of an atrocity on Scottish soil that a document — codenamed Operation Prism — is being drawn up by senior police officers.


"This is something I have been saying for a long time and most people just brush it off. Scotland has nothing to do with Islamic terrorism they say. When I point out the mosque in Edinburgh that preaches Wahabbism (bin Landen's brand of Islam) and it's connection to Dundee, they l
52

Sinnerman,

Another Planet 14/12/2007 16:08:11
I think intergation is something that we need to discuss with Moslems down the pub. Oh, and they can bring the wife along.
53

Ricardo,

methil 14/12/2007 16:09:41
If Osama is Scottish before he is a Muslim He's in with a chance of being accepted by me... Are Jews.. Scottish first or are the Jewish first... If they want to be part of Scotland ... Let them be Scottish first ... their religion or their beliefs should not take precede their Nationality.
54

Scythia,

Continued 14/12/2007 16:11:22
Here is another "Scottish" muslim , the sister of the "innocent" , "wanabee suicide bomber " from Alva.
Her name is Ayesh Siddique here BEBO entry.

On it she writes: "I want to die with my forehead on the ground, the sunnah in my heart, Allah on my mind, Koran on my tongue and tears in my eyes - Inshallah! [If Allah wills]"

She includes the picture of the cartoon figure carrying an automatic pistol in a folder marked "Pak.i and Proud". The figure is dressed in a hooded top in the colours of the Pakistan flag, and captioned "Pakistani soldier".
http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/ViewArticle.aspx?articleid=3589159


The Scots are going to have to make their mind up soon. Demographics and the exponential muslim population growth means that the muslims will start demanding sharia etc. Think about your grandchildren, do want them to become muslims, growing in a religious, political theology. Do you want to take a chance ? -

57 - Dave in Barra , You are using the classic PC brigate reposte. In doing so you try to diminish the essence of Nationality and ethnicity. Let me tell you what a Scot is as you are obviously struggling.

Firstly, Scots cannot be be defined as race , although they are generally, "Nordic" or "alpine".But as is currently and historically constituted the Scots have evolved a unique cultural fabric based on essentially Celtic societal/social foundations with manifestations as diverse as kinship-based social groupings, land tenure and management, house building techniques and of course, crucially, the unique linguistic, literary, mythological and musical configurations which migration has influenced but not irreversibly altered.




55

mina,

Glasgow 14/12/2007 17:17:13
We are constantly told that Scotland has many cultures, I would suggest to Mr. Saeed that we also have many religions, who take offence that you describe fellow Scots as non Muslims. Could you try not to offend others, simply by saying people of different faiths or beliefs?
Or is it easier for you to say, non muslim, for every one who does not worship allah?
56

Andrew Allan,

14/12/2007 18:21:40
Scots have, in the past, and I hope generally still do, believe in anti-elitism. Any judgements on others of varying beliefs such as in the Islamic religion have to be weighed up on an individual basis, in much the same way as people of various political beliefs.
57

Johnspain,

Alcobendas 14/12/2007 18:24:13
This man is a Muslim equivalent of the BNP, trying to put a decent face on a disgusting arguement
58

Media 1,

cape town 14/12/2007 18:30:14
#57 Dave From Barra

Dave, take a step back and listen to what I am saying.
Scotland is a very complex little country. Not that long ago there was a lot of Scottish protestants doing well for themselves. THEN! As if from nowhere, these Irish Catholics arrive escaping the failure and poverty in their own land. The two worlds collide and before you know it you have a very volatile secterian indifference between the indigenous protestants, and the foreign catholics! No matter that both are white and their cultures almost identical, THERE WAS NO WAY YOU COULD MARRY ACROSS THE DIVIDE! Well at least not for a while anyway. Even today the problem exists, we hear the songs,we know the score!
So how on Earth do you expect an ENTIRELY different culture, religious group and race to be welcomed in Scottish society when the catholics and protestants cant even get on?
59

Dr. James Wilkie,

14/12/2007 18:35:39
#56. The last thing I wanted was to misrepresent you, because on the whole I am actually in agreement with your views. No nation in the world is ethnically "pure" except perhaps some still undiscovered tribe in the backwoods of the Matto Grosso), nor is its culture and way of life (if you want to distinguish between them) uninfluenced by external forces.

What gives it its individual character is the predominant ethnic makeup, its historical development and the particular blend of cultural elements that marks it off from others. Of course Scottish culture is a wide mixture of elements, but that combination is unique on this planet, whether it be the arts like music and architecture, or our educational and legal traditions, and much else. Much of this has actually been exported, for instance the Scottish tradition of the sovereignty of the people that was lost to sight all through the British Episode although it was written into the US Constitution by Scots.

Scotland is a highly individual geographical, economic, legal, social and cultural entity that is going through a confused period of transition at the moment as an old order fades into the mists of history. A new era is opening, and when Scotland finally emerges into it I hope that will have a clearer vision of what it is and where it is going.

For the meantime, and in the light of the present discussion, I would assert that the maintenance of social cohesion is one of the top priorities. I have left the discussion of Islam to those who obviously know more about it than I do, but I am alarmed at the outlook for social cohesion, and all the consequences of a breakdown, if immigration is allowed to continue at its present level. And I will accept no criticism of fascism or other PC smear tactics in saying so.

60

Andrew Allan,

14/12/2007 18:43:19
#73.,Johnspain.

That is too much a simplistic response for individuals such as Mr Saeed, as when you read what he says he uses truth as a basis to manipulate on other issues.
In the case when he is asked, 'How did you react when you saw the pictures of 9/11 on television?' he side steps by not talking about himself directly but by others, and still shows a confrontational side in his answering.He then uses the truth on the questions such as 'Have you suffered any prejudice yourself?' and 'Is there a danger young Muslims could be driven underground?'
61

The Daleks,

14/12/2007 18:44:18
The Scots are the Scots.

We know exactly who we are, and no amount of PC propaganda will convince us otherwise.

Many of us have been too frightened to speak up for a long time, but it's pretty obvious that the tide is turning.

The emperor has no clothes.

Multiculturalism has been exposed as Balkanisation.
62

Media 1,

cape town 14/12/2007 18:48:00
Dr Wilkie

I must say, you posts are both elequent and informative.
I do however, believe you are wasting your time expressing your views on this forum. It appears that the majority of people who use this web service are unable to distinguish the difference between racism and realism! They are also unable to comprehend the importance of a persons right to hate, dislike or disagree. To them, EVERYONE must embrace everyone else, yet they themselves harbour normal human resentments against other people who happen to be protestant, catholic or English...
I guess you cannot explain what Scottish society is, because as you say, these micro mechanics change so rapidly from decade to decade now that the world is so much smaller, and the PC doors to all have been opened.
But you dont need to explain it, you are either Scottish or you are not, regardless of your religion! But that does not mean that your profile will always be historically, racially or religiously indigenous to Scotland...
63

armchairapocrypha,

Fife 14/12/2007 19:22:29
Scythis, here is Osama Saeed's response to the Courier articles from his own blog. There are loads of comments but they're well worth ploughing through. He comes across as a duplicitous and nasty piece of work. And he's an SNP candidate at the next general election Scary.
http://www.osamasaeed.org/osama/2006/11/helping_tayside.html#comments
64

Hugo of Garven,

14/12/2007 19:24:41
I am still dismayed at most of the anti-Muslim posts as they indicate a religious intolerance which I had hoped was disappearing in Scotland.
65

Media 1,

cape town 14/12/2007 19:28:37
Hugo of Garven

Religious intollerance in Scotland toward Muslims, is nowhere near as bad as the religious HATRED that exists in Islam toward all who are not of that faith.
One need only look at the landscape of Scotland by comparison to Iran or Afghanistan for example. How many mosques are in Scotland by comparison to churches or chapels in Iran or Afghanistan! You get what you give, end of story!
66

The Daleks,

zunyi 14/12/2007 19:48:27
Hugo of Garven.

It's deluded folk like you who are leading us all to the Caliphate, where liberal minded lemmings will be the first in line for a stoning.
67

Dougie - Edinburgh,

Edinburgh 14/12/2007 20:04:26
79 Hugo of Garven
You can't have religious tolerance in Scotland and Muslims in Scotland. They're mutually incompatible. The worst religious intolerance in Western Europe comes from Muslims. Throughout the world, Muslim religious intolerance causes violent conflict with Muslim and non-Muslim neighbours alike. The religion itself disallows tolerance to other religions. These aren't opinions, they're facts any reasonable person can verify.
68

Gregor Addison,

Glasgow 14/12/2007 22:17:47
#59, Rules but not rulers

You seem obsessed with cabbages. I've heard you repeat this line over and over until it sounds like a mantra. Don't you have any thoughts of your own? You say: "This is not an anti Muslim rant. Just substitute the terms for something more anodyne and the logic holds firm." Okay, let's go...

"a Muslim cannot be a Scot unless s/he has a substantial share in the Britonic gene pool."

What is this gene pool? What is Britonic? I thought it was Brythonic but there you go. Were the people you call Britons dropped perfected into the gene pool of Britain? Do you also mean that if someone has French or German blood in their lineage that they are not British? When you say they are not a Scot and then talk about 'Britonic gene pool', do you mean that Scots and English are genetically the same?

Then you go on about cabbages again:

"One is not a cabbage just because one is born in a cabbage patch. One is a cabbage if one's parents were cabbages."

Gregor Mendel cross bred peas. Are you saying peas are genetically mixed and therefore the pea gene pool is not pure? Do you know of no cabbage that is cross bred?

You say, #27 Finds my views offensive, but fails to say which or why.

Your logic seems to me to lead to racism. That's why I find your views to be offensive.
69

Gregor Addison,

Glasgow 14/12/2007 22:50:29
#75, Dr James Wilkie,

good for you! You won't accept any charges of racism. Or PC smear tactics. Well, all I'll say is that I support Scottish independence but I do so because I believe that decision making can be devolved to Scotland in such a way that it will make life better for those who live here. I don't support it because of any notion of purity of the gene pool (as we've seen in posts above). All countries are individual. And within those countries there are regions where there is a great deal of variety too. At the present rate of immigration, I don't see Scotland being threatened with a loss of identity. If you believe that it is losing its identity, perhaps you'll say why you think that.
70

busybee,

California 14/12/2007 23:20:42
I don't know how different Scotland is than the US in trying to be "tolerable" in regard to Muslims, but all I have ever seen are people going out of their way to not offend Muslims, instead of the other way around. Then again I'm sure there are instances of the other side of the fence, but honestly, not that I've ever seen.... And it's California... Land of the hippies and environmentally crazed...
71

Dr. James Wilkie,

15/12/2007 01:01:54
#84. This is not an issue of racism, but of statesmanship, of keeping control of the volume of immigration, ensuring that it can be assimilated over a given period without endangering social cohesion, risking the formation of ghettos and parallel societies, and provoking unrest by a volume of immigration that the indigenous population perceives as a threat.

It is obvious that many more western Europeans can be assimilated over a given period than can those coming from countries where there is a greater ethnic and cultural divide, and where assimilation may take several generations, if at all. There is only so much that any nation can absorb in the short term without losing its character. In the aftermath of the industrial era Scotland is already overpopulated in relation to its land and resources. A reduction in population is what is required, and tailor the economy to suit, not the reverse. About three and a half millions would be about right - the size at the time of Scotland's greatest achievements.

I have international experience, and I know what is waiting in the wings as regards world population developments. A lot of old values are going to go out of the window when the surplus population from the south and the east, faced with increasing water shortage and other dire problems, floods over Europe. It is happening already, and Scotland in its semi-isolation is totally unprepared for it.

72

Gregor Addison,

Glasgow 15/12/2007 01:14:12
#86, Dr James Wilkie,

don't be coy. Tell me, what is your international experience? And what is waiting in the wings?
73

james 1st,

hamilton 15/12/2007 01:27:59
#41 dave from barra

i made no attempt to define scottish culture nor in my first post did i make any reference to traditional clothing , stupid or otherwise. you in your post raised this subject
i think that you must be fairly thick

people who migrate should fit in with their hosts, not demand their right to carry the culture that they are fleeing with them

i believe anyone who settles in scotland with the intention of staying and bringing up their families to be good and law abiding citizens, who contribute to scotland, has the right to be regarded as scottish
many scots who migrate still regard themselves as scottish , but importantly their children become citizens of the new country, all my famlies children and grandchildren are kiwis ,not scots
74

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 15/12/2007 01:42:36
Hello Addison,

Re your 19.

Where should I start, considering that you seem to reject the whole concept of empirical evidence, as it relates to Islam, the Noble Quran, and the many polls done or reported in/by the Telegraph, Times, Guardian, etc?

I must ask you quite forthrightly, do you own a copy of the Noble Quran? Have you read or studied it? (I have for the last 6 years.) Have you researched the speeches/sermons by Brit Islamic clerics, in the Mosques of London, Edinburgh, or Glasgow? Have you done the same for the leading Clerics whom lead mosques in Stockholm, Paris, Berlin, Amsterdam, etc?

If you haven't (and considering the naivite' of your post, I gather you haven't so researched), allow me to inform you of a simple fact of Islamic Life: 'average' 'good and faithful' Muslims, get their spiritual 'food' as it were, from going to Mosque and hearing the Word of Allah, preached to them by their spiritual leaders.

The overwhelming majority of Muslims do not fit the Western European or American mold of 'secular Muslims' or 'liberal Muslims'. Christianity and Judaism both have what Western Societies call 'liberal believers'; people who 'pick and choose' which parts of the Bible/Torah they will believe, rejecting that which they do not.

Thus, you can have sects in Christianity, which call themselves 'christian' but actually deny the Deity of Christ, the Resurrection, Judgement, etc. Same for Judaism; Jews who believe only in the 'positive aspects' of their Faith, but reject others.

Christianity and Judaism both have a 'big tent' acceptance of these variants; they reject the validity of such sects/groups as actually being Christians or Jews, but also believe that it is a person's God given right to believe as they wish and accept the spiritual consequences.

Islam does not, in contrast, have a 'big tent' view of variant beliefs within Islam. You cannot for instance, be a 'good and faithful' Muslim, if you reject any aspect of the prophet Moha
75

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 15/12/2007 02:12:30
Addison answer to your 19 in my 89 Cont.

It cut the rest off without informing me.

....Mohammad's divine authority. One need but look to the Danish Cartoon debacle, to see just how seriously 95% of Muslims take this concept to heart.

Have you ever seen the horrific cartoons about Jews and Christians in Islamic newspapers across the globe? They depict us in all sorts of heinous and barbarous manner, but do Christians and Jews go on a worldwide riot, murdering people, burning buildings, calling for the murder of the cartoonists, the editors, the publishers, and ANY national of that country?

No! But WE are supposed to be the intolerant ones in this debate?

Mr. Saeed cannot hide the fact of severe and even deadly intolerance which is part and parcel of Islam. Reading the Noble Quran, we find that the goal of all 'good and faithful' Muslims is for the entire world to convert to Islam, either voluntarily or by force. Were this just about voluntary conversion, no problem: in Western thought and law, personal choice is paramount in such decisions.

The same cannot be said about Islam: if a Muslim converts to another religion, or decides to become an agnostic/atheist, he/she WILL be murdered (if found out) by that person's family, friends, neighbors, or ANY Muslim who knows of that person's conversion/agnosticism/atheism.

Why? Because the Noble Quran OBLIGATES ALL 'good and faithful' Muslims to execute such a person, for 'blasphemy against Allah'. There are no exceptions.

Do you find this a 'tolerant' point of faith?

Look at how many mosques have been built in the West. Try and build a church or a synagogue in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman, UAE, etc. Try and bring a Bible/Torah into any of the above countries. Try holding a Bible/Torah study in YOUR HOME in any of the above countries.

You've got a mistaken view that such instances are examples of extremists or a minority of Muslims. Addison, such intolerant beliefs are accepted and embraced by
76

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 15/12/2007 02:14:37
Addison....Completion of the last:


Addison, such intolerant beliefs are accepted and embraced by the MAJORITY of Muslims! Again, look at the polls of Muslims in Great Britain or on the Continent. Look at the behaviour of Islamic governments, city councils in Islamic countries, etc.

Intolerance is inherent within Islam, not because I or other non-Muslims say so, but because the Noble Quran says such is the case. Read it, study it, and you'll find that out for yourself.

Cheers from the Rockies.
77

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 15/12/2007 02:22:49
Hello Scott Free,

Re your 22,

The evidence is what Mr. Saeed left OUT of his statement and because the reporter for the Scotsman is a politically correct SP, obviously ignorant of what the Noble Quran commands Muslims, Mr. Saeed was able to get away with not explaining the real meaning of the issues discussed.

I take it Scot Free, that you've never studied the Noble Quran? You should. Were you to have, you'd not need me to explain to you that Islam is NOT a religion of either peace or tolerance.

All the proof you need is to be found in the polls of Muslims in Great Britain, the actions of ANY Islamic government concerning people of other Faiths, living within the national bounds of those countries.

For instance, you're not allowed to bring a bible into Saudia Arabia. You're NOT allowed to build a church in SA, you're NOT allowed to hold worship services, prayer services, bible studies, etc. Should you so do, you will find the Religious Police literally breaking down your door, beating you with canes, arresting you, hauling you off to jail, tried for crimes against Islam, and sent to PRISON.

This happens in EVERY Islamic nation on the planet, to one degree or another. Just Google for such instnaces, and you'll find them aplenty.

How about the intolerance of Islam against women? Honor murders, honor beatings, maimings, women who are raped are considered criminals and sent to prison or executed for their 'crimes'.

Just what level of empirical evidence do you demand, before you open your mind and your eyes, to just how insidious is Islam?

Did you know that it is NOT a sin for a Muslim to lie to a non-Muslim? It's true, just look it up in the Noble Quran.

Cheers from the Rockies
78

Gregor Addison,

Glasgow 15/12/2007 02:30:34
Neanderthal75,

My name is Gregor. Addison is my surname. Can I call you Neanderthal? You sound like a really bad tv evangelist. I don't deny that Christians get a rough time in other countries. But why should that become an excuse for giving Muslims a hard time in ours. The article above said Muslims are 0.8% of our community. We're hardly being 'swamped'. If Islam is not a religion of peace or tolerance then what do you propose we do about that?
79

Auckland Arab2,

15/12/2007 02:41:14
Can we all get a grip here. Stupidity and ignorance, combined with a lack of education, religious bigotry bordering on brainwashing, a complete and utter intolerance to other faiths, the treatment of women as de facto "slaves". Is any of this ringing a bell? Like it or not PC brigade, there are a lot more examples of these things in the Islamic world / community than elsewhere and we should be a lot firmer with protecting our liberties against these backward views wherever they are held. That in many ways is the tragedy of US and Western policies - we are not protecting liberty and freedom. Many Islamic countries are anything but free, libertarian, tolerant. So why do we do and say nothing? I personally don't care if people want to worship the sun or whatever this years deity is BUT do not try to impose your views on me or anyone else OR expect special rights and privileges. We have had to work hard over decades to erode the power of the church so I am definitely not in favour of handing some of these hard won liberties back to another power hungry group of zealots. Go to your mosques (or churches or whatever if you must), pray and then sh*t the f*ck up! If that is beyond you, then here is a one-way ticket - please use it.
80

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 15/12/2007 03:02:19
Hello Gregor,

Re your 93,

Unfortunately Gregor, you still don't understand. You're like an alcoholic who doesn't think he has a drinking problem; you'll have to hit bottom before you come to your senses.

This ISN'T about Christians, or Jews, or Buddhists, or Zoroastrians, or Shintos, it's about Islam and Muslims, and how that particular religion and its adherents, are INTOLERANT of other Faiths and adherents of those Faiths, but also that Islam and Muslims are INTOLERANT of Atheists, Agnostics, Homosexuals, et al.

The debate is about the FACT that Muslims such as Mr. Saeed are NOT being honest when questioned, as is clear when one compares his comments with what is written in the Noble Quran and what is preached in mosques throughout Great Britain and the rest of the world.

I note with no small sadness, that you couldn't bring yourself to address a single example of non-religious persons being targeted by Islamic countries and by Muslims; homosexuals, atheists, agnostics, secular persons.

You couldn't bring yourself to address the fact that Islam does NOT allow for personal choice in virtually any real world arena: dress, speech, literature, personal belief.

Why do you avoid such points Gregor? You hold a very PC attitude, and I've noted over the years, that those believing in Political Correctness usually REFUSE to answer specific points and questions, because if they were so to do, they'd undermine their own PC stances.

Open mindedness is not the hallmark of the Politically Correct, I would hope you were an exception.

I will answer your question, if you'll first address the specific points I've made about Islam and Muslims; this will tell me if you're honest about the debate, or if you're merely another PC adherent, doing his best to avoid reality and empiricism.

Cheers from the Rockies
81

John S,

15/12/2007 03:12:14
#92 Neanderthal75 - The word is Taqiya.
Taqiya is the art that Muslims of all flavors are taught since they are kids. It is ok to lie and commit any sin as long as it helps spread Islam and the cause of Islam. What makes these lies terribly destructive is that Muslims themselves repeat them so much that they end up believing them.

Imam Jafar Sadiq, the sixth Imam of Shi'a Islam states that Allah will dishonor anyone who tells the truth about certain elements of Islam: "One who exposes something from our religion is like one who intentionally kills us."
"You belong to a religion that whosoever conceals it, Allah will honor him and whosoever reveals it, Allah will disgrace him."

82

Very Rev Ian Paisley,

15/12/2007 09:24:41
A muslim is as much a Scot as any other Scot of any other denomination. Interesting however, that this particular demonination, has access to extremist material in 26 out of every 100 mosques.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2007/12/15/do1501.xml

"titles such as Women Who Deserve to Go to Hell (for answering their husbands back), virulent insults of Jews and homosexuals, puritanical attacks on moderate Muslims, calls for the complete rejection of Western society etc".

Respect is earned.

83

Gregor Addison,

Glasgow 15/12/2007 11:20:02
#95, Neandarthal75,

I understand the there are Muslims who are intolerant of others, who are intolerant of atheists, Christians, or any other group. I haven't disputed that at all. I do dispute the notion that this refers to ALL Muslims, or that Muslims are incapable of reforming their faith and coming to accept other faith and non-faith positions.

I have said several times on this thread that as an atheist I have no wish to live under any religious law. Muslims who accept Britian as a secular state are to be welcomed; those who do not, we clearly have problems with. I don't think there is anything PC in that. It is a practical position that draws a line in the sand over what our state will tolerate but does not go so far as to brand ALL Muslims fanatics and fundamentalists. There are a great many evangelising Christians who would have us all live under their law. If you are from the Rockies then you'll know what I'm talking about.

As to Mr Saeed's honesty, that is up to the public to judge. I welcomed the article by the Scotsman since it allows public discussion and allows us to make up our minds from a position of openness, rather than on the basis of innuendo and rumour and myth-making. That is not to say that he is not guilty of what you accuse him of but it is important, I think, to have the debate. You seem to have already prejudged the issue, or am I wrong in that?

Intolerance of homosexuals, dress codes, etc. is not just an issue for Muslims. A recent poll here in Scotland showed that 30% of those polled were still homophobic. I would wish that open discussion on forums such as these and through the press would allow us to deal with such issues. At the moment, the only views of Muslim we get are when there is bad news.

You said: "Open mindedness is not the hallmark of the Politically Correct, I would hope you were an exception." I'm sorry of I disappoint you but I would have thought one should begin from a point of view of open m
84

Gregor Addison,

Glasgow 15/12/2007 11:26:17
continues...

from a point of view of open mindedness, begin dialogue, gather information, then make a judgement. You seem to have moved straight to judgement and to have adjudged ALL Muslims guilty of intolerance. If that is the case, I repeat my question: What do you propose is done about it?
85

Shellfishfarmer,

Lochaber 15/12/2007 15:29:29
I have a very close friend who is a Pakistani and a Christian. He is proud to be a Pakistani, but he has no illusions about his status in that country. He is bottom of the heap. He doesn't have the freedoms of the Moslem majority.

So I say that if this is acceptable to Pakistanis or Saudis or whatever Islamic society, they have no right to rail against Western society. To use the excuse of the UK being at war with Iraq and Afghanistan is just pathetic. Where was the support from Saeed when NATO protected the Bosnian Moslems from the Serbs.

The reality is that Islam has been hijacked by Wahabbism amongst mostly young men who see it in romantic terms. What would they do about the Taleban who harboured Bin Laden?

Faced with this visceral hatred and the capacity and desire to target innocent people without any of the normal restraints about unintended victims, we have no choice but to go after them, despite the failings of our politicians. Unless Osama Saeed has a better way of removing the problem without the West caving in to the aspirations of the Caliphate, he should graciously shut up, as my friend has to do in Pakistan.
86

Gaius,

Paisley 16/12/2007 06:46:03
We cannot bully the Scots into accepting people who do not share their common values no matter how much political correctness we apply as persuasion.

Scots do not approve of treating women as second class citizens, nor do the majority of Scots approve of Islam's violent homophobia.

Until Muslims condemn violence everywhere and adjure the 'right' to indulge in undeclared jihad we should keep up our demands that they do so. In defence of our culture and our values we are entitled to ask what sort of society the Muslim wishes to see in Scotland.Then we must analyse this.

We must also bear in mind we may not be told the truth!

In Islam there is the concept of "taqqiyah", best translated as 'judicious dissimulation', ie the Muslim is advised not to confide his plans and intentions to the non-Muslim. How to divine then their real plans?

Islam seeks world dominion. Honest Muslims acknowledge this. We should be having a dialogue about these issues, not trading insults.

Above all we want a declaration from Muslim leaders of condemnation of all forms of violence and terrorism.

That would be a good start.

GAIUS
87

Gaius,

16/12/2007 07:41:11
Gregor Addison

Your eager, dull posts are typical of the ignorance that surrounds Islam and more relevantly here, Islamacism.

You attacked the insightful poster, AM2, who linked this contributing columnist with the SNP yet you blindly refuse to see the inherent political capital the situation creates.

I feel your debating tactic of spreading url's around like confetti is just a screen behind which you hide your confusion and lack of insight into the subtler aspects of this growing awareness of the potential negative power of Islam and Islamacism in the UK.

And we are part of the UK, and hopefully always will be.

The establishment of the Shar'ia legal system and the re-creation of the Caliphate are not items on an a la catre menu from which Muslims may pick and choose. The Koran enjoins the faithful to pursue these ends (q.v.). Perhaps you should read this book yourself. Then we might all learn something from you.

We need dialogue unconstrained by the false reasoning of popular political correctness when dealing with this issue. It is unproductive to stick your head in the sand and pretend these huge issues, cultural and philosophical don't exist.

You ask stupid questions of Neanderthal putting the burden of a solution on his shoulders rather than answer yourself. (This is an old disinformation technique, but easily spotted.)


GAIUS

88

Gregor Addison,

Glasgow 16/12/2007 09:11:31
Gaius,

I certainly have not spread url's around like confetti; if you look through any of my posts you'll see I never post url's or links to other sites, unlike your hero AM2. I questioned AM2s attempt to insinuate that Alex Salmond is somehow linked to Islamic fundamentalism rather than seeking to open dialogue. There is nothing politicaly correct about seeking dialogue with those who hold different views. I still have had no response from Neanderthal or Dr James Wilkie as to what the solution to this problem is; although the logical conclusion of their arguments seems to suggest to me that it would at least involve deportation. Perhaps you'd like to state clearly what you believe, then I won't have to ask you any 'stupid' questions.
89

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 17/12/2007 01:45:45
Hello Gregor,

Thanks for the reply, but I note that you still do NOT understand the basic premise of what I am saying, and the proof which I have offered.

You ARE Politically Correct Gregor, in that you shunt aside the clear statements I have made, and the evidence of citing Quranic doctrines, that I have studied the Noble Quran for 6 YEARS!!!! This is how I know what doctrines are to be found in the Noble Quran.

Despite having repeatedly stated this fact, you as a member of the Politically Correct Crowd, have repeatedly accused me of 'jumping to conclusions'.

Gregor, in what rational world do you define 6 YEARS of studying a given subject, Islam, as 'jumping to conclusions' and that I have 'prejudged the issue', inferring that I am writing mere personal opinions, without any factual basis?

Gregor, it is YOU who are doing thusly! You have not studied the Noble Quran, otherwise you wouldn't be making such statements. YOu would already know about Taqqiya, you would already know that any 'good and faithful' Muslim is FORBIDDEN from being in an honest, open, and solid friendship with ANY non-Muslim, you would know that Jews and Christians are defined as 'Apes' and 'Pigs', you would know that 'good and faithful' Muslims are commanded to kill Jews wherever they are found (IF the Muslim has the political/physical/military/ power so to do), you would know that every 'good and faithful' Muslim is commanded by Allah to convert the ENTIRE world to Islam-via FORCE if necessary, you would know these and many other Islamic doctrines, were you to free yourself of your Politically Correct shackles and actually study the subject of Islam, starting with the Noble Quran.

Gregor, again I tell you: my personally subjective opinion on factual matters is without merit/value/worth: but what I have stated above and in my earlier posts, relating to Islam and the Noble Quran, are NOT personal opinion: they are facts.

There are many other aspects of Islam which need to be
90

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 17/12/2007 01:47:23
Gregor...104 cont.

There are many other aspects of Islam which need to be understood by non-Muslims, but viewing these issues through the prism of Political Correctness, will NOT provide a single shred of understanding or constructive debate.
Take the first step AWAY from your PC stances Gregor, and ANSWER the specific points I and others have made: the Taqqiya, non-friendship commands, world wide forced conversion-beginning with the reconstitution of the Khaliphate, commands to murder Jews, commands to murder anyone not converting to Islam, etc.

Please don't sidestep addressing the issues by saying that Christianity also professes world wide conversion (as it obviously does), because NOWHERE in the New Testament will you find a single command to murder anyone not wanting to convert.

Further, don't bring up Christians wanting a world wide Christian governmental structure, because Christ Himself will do that, and we members of the Body of Christ have no power to bring that about-that is all in the hands of Christ Himself, and THAT is AFTER all secular rule has been abolished; in other words, we are talking about a completely SPIRITUAL TRANSFORMATION of the globe, not a man made action.

Politically Correct people don't address specific points in any positive manner, you just point out a negative from the PC point of view, and then quickly move on, NOT addressing the specific attributes of each point; again, you do this because if you exam each point (Khaliphate, 'Apes' and 'Pigs', commands to murder, non-friendship, etc.), you will literally be forced to admit that what you currently believe is NOT a tenable, real world, factual, position to hold.

Lastly, allow me to comment that PC'ers also don't really bother to investigate, exam, research, the opposing sides views. I must say that during my university training in History, I read more texts concerning Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, Dialectics, Hegelianism, than I ever did about Capitalism and Democracy.
91

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 17/12/2007 01:48:44
Gregor...105 cont.

Why did I read so many texts concerning a political paradigm which I did not like, and in which I did not believe? Because I wanted to truly understand what Marxists-Leninists-Maoists believed, and from there, I read about 'one rung down' Socialism in the Western sense, so that I could evaluate that system of belief.

I simply wanted to know which worked better/best in the real world: Marxism-Leninism (and its variant, Maoism), and thereafter, Socialism, or Capitalism/Open Market/Republican Democracy.

It was only after YEARS of reading hundreds of texts, doing thousands of hours of research, that I finally concluded that M-L-M/Socialism were bankrupt political/economic paradigms, and that the effective and positive paradigms were C/OM/RD.

I took the same approach with Islam; studying the Noble Quran has allowed me to better understand what Muslims do and why they do it.

Because you have not bothered to study the Noble Quran and research Islam, but have instead taken the easy path, reading media articles by PC reporters, listening to PC radio programmes, and visiting PC websites, you actually believe that it is a 'minority' of Muslims who believe the doctrines which I have outlined, INSTEAD of understanding that the MAJORITY of Muslims believe whole heartedly in such Quranic Doctrines, and it is the MINORITY which reject them.

We call the minority, 'moderate' or 'secular' Muslims. They are far and few between, because to openly declare yourself a 'moderate' Muslim or worse, a 'secular' Muslim, is to invite your own death.

How do I know this?; not because moderate and secular Muslims are saying so (when they feel there is no other way to protect themselves and their families, but to go public with the information), rather, I know such is the case, because I have READ IT IN THE NOBLE QURAN!!!!

All 'good and faithful' Muslims are COMMANDED by Allah, to murder ALL Muslims who convert to another religion, who reject parts of the N
92

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 17/12/2007 01:50:05
Gregor...106 cont.

All 'good and faithful' Muslims are COMMANDED by Allah, to murder ALL Muslims who convert to another religion, who reject parts of the Noble Quran, thus 'blaspheming' Allah and Islam.

I have noted this to you once before, but your Politically Correct thinking process makes you run away from addressing the issue fully, openly, and forthrightly.

You are NOT a bad person Gregor, in fact, considering your posts, I happen to believe you to be a fellow of very positive character and intent. However, you rule your life by the PC Paradigm, and this does not allow you to address real world issues in a real world manner.

Gregor, you are a Theorist.

I hope that you will take each point I and others have made about Muslim doctrine; 'non-friendship', 'apes and pigs', murdering 'apostate' Muslims, etc., and devote and entire post to just that one aspect.

It will help everyone interested in the debate, to get a better grasp of the issues and the real world affects understanding Islam has and will have, on ourselves, our families, our neighborhoods, our towns, our cities, and our nations.

Such are the stakes.

Cheers from the Rockies.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.