Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Stigma banished as majority of babies are born to unwed couples

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 March 2009
MORE than half the babies born in Scotland were born to unmarried parents last year, figures revealed yesterday.
It is the first time more children have been born out of wedlock than within a marriage.

Statistics on the number of births, deaths and marriages in 2008 showed the number of couples tying the knot reached its lowest level since Victorian times.

The provisional figures from the General Register Office for Scotland showed there were 60,041 babies born last year.

Of those 30,055 – 50.1 per cent of all live births – were to unmarried parents.

That compares with 24.5 per cent of babies being born to unmarried parents in 1988 and just 9.8 per cent in 1978.

Births in Scotland also rose for the sixth year in a row, bringing the total number of babies born to the highest figure since 1995.

The Registrar General for Scotland, Duncan Macniven, said: "There were 2,260 more births in 2008 than in 2007. The 60,041 total for the year was the highest since 1995. This is the sixth annual increase in a row."

He added: "The proportion of births to unmarried parents has been rising steadily for several years and in 2008 topped 50 per cent for the first time in a whole year.

"The proportion varies greatly across the country and in some areas has been above 50 per cent for several years."

The number of marriages that took place in Scotland fell to 28,903 in 2008 – down by almost 1,000 on the previous year's total of 29,866.

The number of couples getting married was also the lowest since the period 1891 to 1895.

The number of couples who divorced in 2008 also fell, going from 12,773 in 2007 to 9,333 last year – a drop of more than a quarter.

But Mr Macniven said that was because of a change in the law in 2006, which reduced the separation period for couples who are divorcing.

This led to an increase in the number of divorces in 2006, with the number dropping after then.

Mr Macniven said the average number of divorces over 2006 to 2008 was about 11,700 a year, which was "similar to the levels before the law was changed".

The number of deaths fell slightly, going from 55,986 in 2007 to 55,699 in 2008.

Mr Macniven said: "Cancer, which accounted for over a quarter of deaths, coronary heart disease, respiratory system diseases and strokes remain the biggest causes of death.

"The number of deaths from cancer fell slightly and coronary heart disease killed 532 fewer people – over 5 per cent down on 2007."

But he added that deaths from respiratory diseases and strokes had risen slightly.

The Conservatives voiced concern at the figures on marriage and childbirth.

Annabel Goldie, the Scottish Tory leader, said a strong family unit was key to fixing "our broken society", although that could take many forms.

"But it is the strength of the family which is common to all these forms," Ms Goldie said.

"My concern about these statistics is that research in the last decade indicated that unmarried couples are more likely to split up than married couples.

"Such figures do not augur well for that stability."



'Child is a greater sign of commitment than a wedding ring'

FOR photographer Susan Burrell, having a child was a greater sign of commitment to her partner than exchanging rings.

Susan, 34, gave birth to her son Archie 14 months ago and is planning a wedding with her partner Neil Wright, 37, in July.

"We had been trying for a baby for two and a half years so we were really pleased when we found out I was pregnant," she said.

"At the time it occurred to me that this was actually a much greater sign of our commitment to one another than getting married.

"You can easily get out of a marriage these days, but a child is something you both have a responsibility to for life."

Miss Burrell, from Edinburgh, added that she believes that the old stigma about having children out of wedlock is largely a thing of the past.

The greatest problem she had with her parents was that they had moved abroad a few months before she discovered she was pregnant and found themselves a long way from their daughter and first grandchild.

"Both sets of parents were delighted," she said. "Not least because for both sets it was their first grandchild. There was a little nervousness that we weren't married, but they accepted it.

"Times have changed, the old stigmas have mostly gone and although we are getting married now, it was not as important as having Archie."

Page 1 of 1

 
1

Tracker,

13/03/2009 00:16:56
I am disappointed that Annabel Goldie stigmatizes unmarried couples by stressing how they contribute to a "broken society". People who love each other and who want children should not be forced to marry. I hope that the innocent children will not suffer any ill consequences from her outburst.
2

Observer,,

Glasgow 13/03/2009 00:32:32
What stigma ?
3

EPS,

Edinburgh 13/03/2009 00:37:00
It is very commendable that, for Susan Burrell, having a child was a great sign of commitment to her partner. Would that all parents, wed and unwed, showed the same commitment to each other. Sadly, for many unwed couples the commitment to each other proves to be less than the commitment of the traditional married couple. For most married couples, marriage is an important token of mutual commitment that mere partnership often does not match.

May Susan, Neil and young Archie have a long and happy family life, regularised by their planned wedding.
4

thaijambo,

13/03/2009 02:35:54
It's single guys like me who are paying for all these kids, be they married or not.
5

W Smith,

Middle East 13/03/2009 05:12:14
Its not the stigma thats the problem its the Scottish redneck culture (just look at your average Weegie) of more booze, more drugs, more abortions and more single teenage girls getting pregnant so they can be comfortable on the dole.

Its the single mums who are producing the chip-on-the-shoulder Labour supporters for the future.

That could explain why The Scotsman is all for it.

So like dirt poor Cuba, the Scots are proud to have an usually high number of single mums then eh?

WHAT A MESS!

ANNABEL GOLDIE IS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT!

IF YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT A "BROKEN SOCIETY" LOOKS LIKE JUST VISIT GLASGOW (OR GO TO AN OLD FIRM GAME) THEN YOU'LL SEE SOCIALIST SCOTLAND IN ALL ITS GLORY!

BTW
Like all the other loony left politicians in Scotland Salmond claims to be fond of certain 'asians' and their culture and would have us believe these 'asians' are into having illegitimate children.

SHOWS YOU HOW MUCH OUR FIRST MINISTER UNDERSTANDS ABOUT ASIAN CULTURE.

Ms Goldie's views are more 'asian' than Salmonds on this matter.

Comments from the 'asian' Osama Saeed would be most welcome.

6

Angoos,

Baku, Azerbaijan 13/03/2009 07:11:00
#5 W. Smith

It's more likely that bitter and twisted individuals like yourself are responsible for the "Broken Society" in Scotland. You are nothing but an blinkered ignorant ER Sole.
7

Strict Ivan Jellicoe,

Renfrew 13/03/2009 08:27:48
This means that over half of Scotland are now underclass little baztards
8

,

13/03/2009 09:03:13
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

jdships,

Edinburgh 13/03/2009 09:12:12
5 W Smith,

How can you generalise re this young women?
Many teenage mothers have gone on to be very succsfull both in their careers and their eventual marriages.
This from personal family experience.
Many couples do not wish to marry but raise a family with no problems involved
Suggest you find out more about a subject before writing tripe .
10

drunken proffet,

Tassy 13/03/2009 09:20:54
It is a matter of priorities. In the old days folk got engaged, got married, it cost a fortune. Nowadays they tend to live together, raise kids and save up for the divorce. I am sure it makes sense, but I fear I am too old to suss it out.
11

Mcsnagpile,

13/03/2009 09:48:54
With pubs closing down everywhere, I do not think we need any more bar-stewards.
12

,

13/03/2009 09:51:05
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

Major General Puffin-Stuff,

13/03/2009 10:00:25
Where's old Flubby? Or is s/he really W Smith?
14

sam the god,

13/03/2009 10:35:23
well that is a new game that we can play as you walk through a town centre play spot the bast*rd you have a50-50 chance of being right
15

thinking,

Scotland 13/03/2009 12:12:22
Sadly, the problem is not stigma but a proven fact, statistically, that more children from single parent families do worse academically and in many other ways than those from two parent families.
16

FLUB,

a rocky outcrop in eastern central Scotland 13/03/2009 13:45:27
#13. Here I am and no, I'm not.


17

Major General Puffin-Stuff,

13/03/2009 14:01:45
Well hello Flubby old bean - how absolutely spiffing to seeing you popping up again!
18

Sandi,

San Diego 13/03/2009 15:17:57
I think some posters are assuming that "unmarried" also means "single" and that all births to unmarried women are to teenage girls. This is no longer the case. Unmarried couples can be just as devoted partners as married couples, and their children are brought up in two-parent, loving homes.
19

Duncan in Edinburgh,

13/03/2009 17:27:51
#15 Not thinking at all, are you? Not only have you got the wrong end of the stick here - unmarried parents doesn't mean the same as single parents - but you've gone and backed up your prejudice with the statement that it's a "proven fact, statistically". Dear oh dear.
20

Tartan Viking,

14/03/2009 11:32:09
#18 True. The only question I would ask is where do unmarried couples stand legally if they were to split up? Do unmarried fathers get legal rights for example?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.