Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 18th July 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Prince's visit to troops in Afghanistan dismissed as PR exercise



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 May 2008
IT WAS hailed as the conclusion to his training with the RAF, but British troops yesterday criticised Prince William's secret flying visit to Afghanistan as nothing more than an expensive public-relations exercise.
Soldiers, along with commentators and anti-war campaigners, suggested the trip was being used to generate good press coverage in the wake of controversy over his piloting military helicopters to visit his girlfriend, Kate Middleton.

He flew a C
hinook helicopter from RAF Odiham in Hampshire to Miss Middleton's family home 16 miles away in Bucklebury, Berkshire on 3 April.

Eight days later, he piloted a Chinook to London, picked up his brother Harry and then travelled to the Isle of Wight for a stag party.

Yesterday, Andrew Bergin, a spokesman for the Stop The War coalition, described the trip as a "shameful waste of public money" and accused the Ministry of Defence of using troops in Afghanistan to try to "cleanse" the prince's image.

He said: "The MoD and Buckingham Palace are manipulating the media to try to cleanse the prince's joyriding, tarnished image.

"It belittles the real problems soldiers face in Afghanistan. The resources devoted to this trip would have been better spent providing decent equipment for the troops and aftercare for injured soldiers. It is a shameful waste of public money."

The official purpose of the trip was for the prince to familiarise himself with RAF operations in a battle situation.

Prince William also flew back with the body of a soldier killed in action. Trooper Robert Pearson died earlier this month when his vehicle hit a mine.

Clarence House insisted Prince William was "honoured" to be a member of the aircrew that repatriated Trooper Pearson's body. He met the family of the soldier at RAF Lyneham.

Ken Wharfe, a former royal protection officer, said Prince William would have been in no real danger during his visit to Afghanistan.

He said: "There is an element of risk, but there would be no way security officials would allow it to happen … it would be pretty well sterile while he was there.

"I'm slightly sceptical about this. I think the cynics among us will say it's an attempt to cover up the Chinook jollies."

Max Clifford, the leading publicist, agreed, stating that the Afghanistan trip had been "a good public-relations exercise".

He said: "Certainly, this will get them some good headlines, I imagine."

The prince's trip received a mixed response on the British Army Rumour Service (Arrse), a popular military internet forum.

Many contributors praised Prince William, with one suggesting that he would not have wanted to be overshadowed by his brother Prince Harry's ten-week tour in Afghanistan.

But "Devil-Dog" thought the trip "smelt like a PR operation" and another user questioned the cost of the fleeting visit to Afghanistan.

"OldTimer" wrote: "He spent THREE HOURS there at a time when there is a shortage of kit. Just what did this little PR exercise cost the British taxpayer?"

Prince Charles and the Queen gave their consent to the trip.

During the exercise, Prince William flew a C-17 Globemaster military transport plane, which left RAF Brize Norton on Sunday, arriving in Afghanistan the next day.

He spent three hours chatting to personnel at Kandahar before flying on to Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar. The whole trip lasted about 30 hours.

A Clarence House spokesman described the trip as a success.

An RAF spokesman said: "The prince had travelled on a scheduled operational flight that was going to the area." He said that the trip had been in the pipeline for more than a year.

Last month, Prince William was presented with his pilot's "wings" by his father, the Prince of Wales.

WILLIAM WILL SEE SERVICE ON LAND, SEA AND AIR

FOR Prince William, known in the RAF as Flying Officer Wales, his current duties are part of the conclusion of a four-month attachment with the RAF.

The secondment was designed to teach him about the service's ethos, traditions and military role as he prepares to head the armed forces, even though he is highly unlikely to serve alongside his comrades.

He is spending time attached to all three armed services in order to get to grips with other areas of the military. This will give him a broader experience – a tactic similar to one used for his father.

The prince is following in the footsteps of his father, who completed his flying training course in August 1971 and graduated that year as a flight lieutenant.

Prince William's uncle, the Duke of York, also took to the air and served his country in a flying role, piloting Sea King helicopters during the Falklands War in 1982.

Prince Andrew used his aircraft as a decoy target, trying to divert deadly Exocet missiles, which sank a number of British ships, including the Atlantic Conveyor.

Next month William will undertake a number of official engagements, followed by some leave, before beginning an attachment with the Royal Navy at the beginning of June.





The full article contains 846 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 May 2008 10:06 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Prince William
 
1

Conan the Librarian™,

01/05/2008 01:17:12
Jugears and Liz gave "permission" for the trip.
So every parent now has the right to stop their children going to war?
2

Matt there,

somewhere 01/05/2008 02:02:15
Shock as anti-war campaigners, stamped their little sandal-clad feet, and ranted in a remarkably unpeaceful way. (Why IS it that self-styled 'peace campaigners' are all so very aggressive and always so damned ANGRY and rude?)
3

Guga II,

Rockall 01/05/2008 05:10:35
Of course this was a PR exercise, to try and whitewash the 12 week "pilot" using a RAF chopper for going to parties and to visit his girlfriend. We are now supposed to believe that his 12 weeks training qualified him to fly a C17 Globemaster. If he did real flying training, the only thing he would be allowed to fly is a lawnmower.

Next they are going to waste even more taxpayers money by giving this parasite Royal Navy "training". A couple of weeks should see him right for driving a nuclear submarine, no doubt.
4

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 01/05/2008 06:08:23
Can Craig Brown stoop any lower than he has with this article ! and just who is this numpty "Andrew Bergin"
Is he suggesting it was a waste of money to bring trooper Pearsons body back.
I happen to be against the war in Afghanistan and Iraq as well but I get very angry at imbeciles like Brown and Bergin who belittle people who go into war zones.
5

Grumpy,

01/05/2008 07:48:36
William was supposedly put through accelerate training to fly - so what takes a cmomercial pilot years to get a license (for just one type of plane, William gets one in months. When did he get the time to learn since he's out partying and flying pals to his girlfriends?

I'd hate to be the one whose house is under his flight path........
6

scottish person,

paisley 01/05/2008 08:33:00
PR, yes pure rubbish. Why does the hootsmon publish p**h about these royal bufoons.
Get rid of the lackeys
7

Freedom for Scotland,

01/05/2008 08:49:52
What a stroke of PR luck! William got to accompany the body of yet another victim of the Blair adventure in Afghanistan back to England.

I suppose he was at the "front" long enough to qualify for a medal.
Interesting isn't it that service personnel's fathers and grandmothers are now being asked if it is OK to send our youngsters to the war zones?

The second part of the piece is the most sycophantic P1sh I have seen in a long time.
8

AJ Fife,

01/05/2008 08:58:50
His Top Royal Sponger William, will be awarded the Victoria Cross for outstanding bravery in the face of extreme prawn and smoked salmon sandwiches.

Never before, in the history of human sponging, have so many, spent so much, on so few!
9

Geoff,

sa 01/05/2008 09:09:43
8 Aj-my favourite Republican! :)
10

shivago8,

livingston 01/05/2008 10:13:29
A flying visit to qualify for the medal
11

All Politicians are the same,

Scotland 01/05/2008 10:42:27
#10

You need 28 days in thaeatre to qualify fo thr Op Herrick medal. Only 2 questions to answer.
1. was the aircraft going anyway. yes.
2. did williams presence interfere with its mission. No

End of story.
12

Venachar,

01/05/2008 11:04:37
Just like all those guys at Grangemouth with a pension yer all just jealous!
13

MWM,

Argyll 01/05/2008 11:09:55
There is no way this parasite flew a C17 Globemaster. I think it more likely he got into the co-pilots seat whilst the plane was flying on auto-pilot. But yes, lets tell the peasants that he was flying the plane, they'll all believe it, my ar5e! Even Max Clifford wouldn't have come up with this one.

14

Englebert Humperdinck,

Here and there 01/05/2008 11:26:31
Did he do any harm?
15

AJ Fife,

01/05/2008 11:48:28
#14,

Publicising the fact that His Royal Thicko makes these trips might just help stimulate Taleban interest in C17s and surface to air missiles!

That could cause lots of harm!!! It's a hard enough job for the UK servicemen, without a Royal Dimwit increasing target values!!



16

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 01/05/2008 14:33:35
I'm sure William is sincere enough in his RAF role but is being cynically manipulated like wee brother. It's so transparent I don't know why the Royals and Nu Labour bother, but then they do rely on some percentage of their fiefdom to be populated by tumshies.
17

somerferg,

Perth 02/05/2008 01:37:18

#3 - you win the best comment award - spot on !!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.