Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Mirror sorry for Kate's picture

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 31 March 2007
THE Daily Mirror yesterday admitted it had "got it wrong" after publishing a picture of Kate Middleton taken in circumstances that she said amounted to harassment.
Lawyers for Prince William's longtime girlfriend contacted the Press Complaints Commission after using an image showing Ms Middleton glancing over her shoulder as she walked along the street.

It marked her first official complaint to the watchdog
.

Richard Wallace, the editor of the Daily Mirror, yesterday apologised. He said: "On Thursday we published an innocuous picture of Ms Middleton walking down the street with a cup of coffee.

"It was taken by a freelance photographer in circumstances where we were later told she felt harassed. We got it wrong and we sincerely regret that."

The close-up image showed Miss Middleton, wearing sunglasses, walking along clutching a takeaway cup and her car keys.

The Mirror picture is believed to be the first image used by a newspaper of Miss Middleton, 25, on her way to work since she encountered a media scrum outside her flat on her birthday in January.

Those scenes - reminiscent of the behaviour often witnessed around the Princess of Wales - provoked fresh calls for tabloids to show restraint.

Yesterday's apology appeared an acknowledgement of anxiety at Buckingham Palace that the princess's treatment at the hands of paparazzi photographers was being repeated.

The PCC said it was still examining the complaint.

A spokesman for the press watchdog added: "It's for the complainant to see how she feels about this response."

Prince William's girlfriend is said to feel she has endured "serious aggression" from some photographers in recent days.

The media group News International has already introduced a self-imposed ban on using paparazzi pictures of Miss Middleton, covering the Sun, News of the World, Times and Sunday Times.

Royal aides revealed that Prince William wanted "more than anything" for photographers to stop harassing Miss Middleton. His mother, Diana, Princess of Wales, was being pursued by paparazzi when she was killed in a car accident in Paris in 1997.



The full article contains 341 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 March 2007 9:24 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Privacy laws
 
1

I'm no really here,

31/03/2007 09:04:26

Their only sorry they got reported and that it wasn't a "juicier" picture.

2

somerferg,

Oz 31/03/2007 10:18:11

That's it boys tug on the forelock !

3

Scaramouche2,

31/03/2007 10:23:36

Why on earth are these papanazis tolerated?? If there ever something needed banning .... that is it!

LEAVE PEOPLE ALONE, you stupid shutterbugs!!!

4

Swilly Tisher,

Loch Maree 31/03/2007 12:12:33

The Mirror shouldn't have cracked under such ridiculous pressure.

5

The Daleks,

31/03/2007 14:31:06

Who's Kate Middleton??

6

Bran the Builder,

Beyond the Wall 31/03/2007 16:16:14

If she walks into the spot light she shouldn't be surprised at the attention.

7

Independent,

Chicago 31/03/2007 17:38:10

After Diana, I cannot understand why there isn't a law allowing only pictures that are agreed to. It's not as if these folks are unwilling to be photographed occasionally. The newspapers should simply stop buying photos from paparazzi.

Besides, Kate Middleton could not be made interesting from any angle.

8

Douglas,

Bathgate 31/03/2007 22:16:38

Mirror, sorry excuse for a newspaper.
#7: Having consulted my copy of "Interesting Positions for Toffs and Plebs" I respectfully disagree. :o)

9

GordC,

Toronto 01/04/2007 03:21:40

While Miss Middleton's angst about publicity is understood her suitability as a future regal consort is patently obtuse. Unless William abdicates his availability for the Crown his life is patently public. Where have we seen this before? The last media surly basher was William's own mother. Despite all the aura around the late vitriolic Diana, point one... she could not handle the media. Indeed she needlessly and tragically died fleeing such attention. Thus the future Prince must drop this woman from the list of potential wives. The Crown must have the media on its side, not be at odds with them.

10

Swilly Tisher,

Loch Maree 01/04/2007 16:24:34

Mirror, Mirror on the wall , who's the most subservient of them all ?


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.