Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


News of the World editor quits as journalist is jailed for 4 months over royal phone-tap

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
27 January 2007
THE editor of the News of the World, Andy Coulson, resigned last night after his royal editor, Clive Goodman, was jailed for four months for plotting to hack into royal aides' telephone messages.
Goodman was sentenced after the Old Bailey heard how he and private investigator Glenn Mulcaire conspired to tap into more than 600 messages, including some from Prince William. Both men had earlier pleaded guilty.

Coulson said he took "ultimate
responsibility" for the affair. Goodman's actions were "entirely wrong" and he "deeply regretted" what had happened.

Coulson formally resigned two weeks ago to executive chairman Les Hinton but delayed his departure until the completion of yesterday's court proceedings. He said: "I feel strongly that when the News of the World calls those in public life to account on behalf of its readers, it must have its own house in order."

News International, the News of the World's owner, said Colin Myler a former Daily Mirror editor, would replace him.

Earlier, the judge, Mr Justice Gross, told Goodman, 49: "This was low conduct, reprehensible in the extreme. This case is not about press freedom. It is about grave, inexcusable and illegal invasion of privacy."

He sentenced Mulcaire, 36, to six months in jail for his role.

David Perry, QC, prosecuting, said Mulcaire had signed a contract with the newspaper - worth £104,988 a year - for "research and information services". He was also paid £12,300 cash for stories relating to Prince Harry, his girlfriend, Chelsy Davy, and the Duchess of York.

"The defendants' motivation was profit and personal gain and their conduct amounted to gross invasion of privacy and the abuse of the public telephone system," Mr Perry said.

He said over eight months between November 2005 and June last year, the defendants gained access to voicemail messages on mobile phones of three members of the royal household. "The purpose was to gain confidential information with a view to it being published in the News of the World newspaper," he said.

Mr Perry said Mulcaire, who also pleaded guilty to five other charges involving well-known figures, accessed other voicemail messages between February and June last year.

The former footballer, admitted intercepting messages for the publicist Max Clifford; footballer Sol Campbell's agent, Skylet Andrew; the chairman of the Professional Footballers Association, Gordon Taylor; the MP Simon Hughes and supermodel Elle Macpherson.

Lawyers for both men apologised at a previous hearing to the Prince of Wales, Prince William, Prince Harry and their household for invasion of their privacy.

Voicemail messages were intercepted on the telephones of the Prince of Wales's aide, Helen Asprey; Jamie Lowther-Pinkerton, the ex-SAS officer who is private secretary to William and Harry; and Prince Charles's communications secretary, Paddy Harverson.

The court heard the defendants made 609 calls to the three aides' mobiles. Of those, 487 were made by Mr Goodman and 122 by Mr Mulcaire.

"The defendants, in the short calls, were fishing in the voicemail boxes to see whether there might be information of interest to them," he said.

They used a combination of mobile and landline phones, including in Mr Goodman's office at News International in Wapping, east London, and his home in Putney. Mulcaire sent Goodman text messages with the private PIN codes for the various phones "to enable Mr Goodman himself to gain access to the voicemail boxes".

John Kelsey-Fry, QC, defending Goodman, said his client had succumbed to pressure to come up with stories. "He was trying to protect his job

," he said.



Page 1 of 1

 
1

Ubi,

Edinburgh 27/01/2007 00:52:02

This may be a good thing if it forces tabloid "investigators" to behave more responsibly. For some time they have given every impression of being a law unto themselves.

2

Scullion,

Canada 27/01/2007 01:01:46

These cheap newshounds, pardon me, gossiphounds, make more money than all the budding Bernsteins and Woodwards put together. They are a blot on the fine profession of journalism.

3

Bonnie Laddie,

27/01/2007 01:44:35

Tap Tap Tap went the newshounds - bang bang bang went the gavel

Who cares!

4

Guga,

Rockall 27/01/2007 02:22:40

It is quite disturbing that this journalist gets sentenced to four months gaol for listening in to the so-called royals, yet, at the same time, they are not gaoling perverts, and allowing them to walk free to continue their predations on children.

They will probably continue to gaol people for not paying the iniquitous television tax, too.

There is something far wrong with the justice system. Like Reid, it is not fit for purpose.

5

www.scottwebb.co.uk,

27/01/2007 02:58:59

Comment@4 Guga..hi matey....Agreed :)

6

Mallory,

27/01/2007 07:39:18

With a very few notable exceptions Journalism is NOT an honourable profession. NOTW is, as always, filled with titivation, TV dross and vicarious apeing of 'celebs' antics.

The 'public interest' defence was not appropriate in this case.

7

Pocket Dictionary,

27/01/2007 07:46:47

Guga #4 Makes you proud to be British doesn't it? Knowing that when it comes to the British Royals the Establishment and the Judiciary still close ranks and come down hard on those 'criminals' who offend the Royals.
Maybe that's why they couldn't jail the two paedophiles, they knew they would need the jail beds for those two 'career criminals' once employed by the News of The World.
Never mind the countless damage the paedophiles could do to many kids over the next six and four months, we've got real 'gangsters' banged up for tapping into the phones of two Royals and their minions.
Commit a crime against against ordinary decent Joe public and you get a slap on the wrist, commit the same crime against a Royal and it's off to jail.

8

Scaramouche,

27/01/2007 09:12:24

HOORAY! Another two shot down! I hate the NotW and hope they get all they deserve coming to them.

At the same time, I agree with Guga and Scottweb and virtually everyone on this thread. The Media Industry really should gets house in order, before a judge with a conscience makes them .... after the justice system is sorted of course!

9

donald,

weegieland 27/01/2007 09:34:14

The News of the Screws and the Royal family both share disgaceful histories and ought to face Madam guillotine

10

Media 1,

cape town 27/01/2007 09:37:14

4 months for tapping a royal phone and 4 years for aggrivated assault which leads to death...

Some sysytem eh!

11

the_big_kev,

china 27/01/2007 11:11:39

serves them right........ i hate the royals as much as the next man but you can't have some #anker journo. invading their space just to sell their rag.

the full jail story just typifies modern britain..... just how difficult is it to build a place to hold scum bags..... forget about all the cushy stuff and just get the walls and roof up and big strong fence around it. give them oor school dinners (!) and u don't even need a kitchen! a loud radio playing out side for entertainment...dump all the murderers and lost causes in there - then ban the journo's from bringing it to anyones attention........what u don't know...

give me some real stories about kids putting in some real effort to get on, people doing unpaid, uncredited work in the society. I'm fed up hearing about Beckham, illegals, corrupt lawyers, the weak prison service, paedo's getting off with it, useless e'ffer being in charge and spending others money badly....

12

Gnasher,

27/01/2007 12:01:53

So everyone wants more cracking down on journalists, and the_big_kev, china #11 wants "real stories". Obviously we should emulate China, where press standards are rigorously maintained with a bullet in the back of the head.

My own view - the Royals are more on display than Big Brother, they are preposterously rich and powerful and perpetate their infamy daily, they could always say no and become private citizens.

They are parasites who deserve all they get in return. Free the NoTW Two!

13

Rod,

Edinburgh 27/01/2007 12:02:30

Surely an admission of working for the News of the World is sufficient in itself for a custodial sentence to be handed down?

14

the_big_kev,

china 27/01/2007 12:38:54

#12, like I always say, if you haven't been here, then your opinion of China means nothing. Your facts will have been culled from the press ....in your case likely the NoTW!
Try reading China Daily... plenty of stories of corruption, murder, rape and the rest.... Mao is dead too, btw.
Sorry but if your a jobbing engineer like me, it's better here than in GB!!

15

Cynic,

Dalkeith 27/01/2007 14:31:20

Is that all - 4 months. Couldn't have been all that serious an offence, after all. Let's hope his honour, integrity, standards, etc, are permanently wrecked. The rotten cretin.

16

Cynic,

Dalkeith 27/01/2007 14:36:20

Oh, and there was no complicity at the highest echelons of the paper. Had these stories been printed it would have been blatanty obvious that the information had been obtained surreptitiously.

17

Enjoy the football first,

27/01/2007 18:47:45

Cynical scum jailed for preying on pampered parasites to sell morality-free 'newspapers' to a sub-literate public who think that gossip about the inbred royal under-achievers qualifies as 'news'.

Not a pretty picture -- but a fairly accurate one.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.