Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Wednesday, 3rd December 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Only one in 14 reported rapes leads to trial



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 August 2008
ONLY one in 14 reported rapes in Scotland is taken to court, according to new figures that have triggered calls for a national inquiry into why so many cases collapse.
Statistics seen by The Scotsman reveal that 922 rapes were reported to police in 2006-7, but only 65 of the alleged crimes were prosecuted.

They also show huge regional variations in the proportion of cases that end up in court, from 19 per cent i
n Dumfries and Galloway to 1.7 per cent in Tayside.

Rape Crisis Scotland yesterday called for an "attrition study" by independent experts to find out why so many rape cases fall away at various stages in the criminal justice system.

Of the 65 cases that were prosecuted, 27 ended in a guilty plea or verdict – giving Scotland a 2.9 per cent conviction rate, one of the lowest in Europe.

The Crown Office has carried out a detailed review into rape prosecution, while the Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland undertook its own investigation.

Both produced a list of recommendations which are being implemented. For example, about 500 prosecutors and fiscal-service staff are undertaking specialist training to boost the chances of rapes being successfully prosecuted.

Sandy Brindley, Rape Crisis Scotland co-ordinator, said an independent inquiry was needed to ensure every aspect of the system – from the police to the courts – was no longer failing victims.

She said: "A prosecution figure of 7 per cent for rape is extremely low. What this means is the vast majority of rape cases never make it as far as court. No-one can suggest with any credibility that the vast majority of women reporting rape are lying.

"Rape is a crime which can take a lot of courage to report, and it can come as a shock for women to hear that their case is not being prosecuted."

She acknowledged the "many important steps" the Crown Office had taken to improve the prosecution of sexual offences cases, but added far better information about the stages in the justice system where cases were being dropped was needed.

"This includes looking at the initial response from the police right through to what happens in court, if the case gets this far. Rape Crisis Scotland is calling for a comprehensive and independent study into attrition in rape cases in Scotland. Until we know exactly what the problem is – why so many cases are falling down – it's hard to see how we can know what the solutions are likely to be," said Ms Brindley.

A spokeswoman for the Crown Office said Scottish police forces were working to national guidelines on the investigation of rape.

"There are a variety of reasons why rapes reported to the police do not result in a prosecution in Court – and these apply across the country."

She said fiscals were required to report all rape cases to senior experienced Crown Counsel, who took the decision on whether to proceed to trial. A decision to take no proceedings, or no further proceedings, could only be taken by the Lord Advocate or the Solicitor-General.

Some reported rapes also end in a conviction for other offences, such as indecent assault and attempted rape, she added.

A Crown Office report into rape cases found that about one-third of reported crimes passed from police to procurators-fiscal made it to court.

The Lord Advocate, Elish Angiolini, said: "There should be no doubt that we will gather all available evidence in the public interest and, where we have sufficient evidence to bring before a court, we will present a compelling prosecution case."

However, the independent MSP Margo MacDonald backed the call for an independent inquiry. "I'm supportive of an independent inquiry," she said. "Instances of rape, or at least allegations of rape, are too numerous for us to accept 7 per cent of cases ever being prosecuted. That doesn't make sense at all."





The full article contains 663 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Teofilio Cubillas,

26/08/2008 01:42:39
Comparing the Scottish conviction rate to other European countries is entirely misleading. If a drunk, uninjured 20-year-old who'd met a guy in a nightclub and gone back to his place willingly, walked into a police station in Naples, she'd be told that she'd asked for it. In Scotland, a full enquiry would kick into action. Unless the recording systems and definitions of what constitutes rape are identical, as well as the cultural norms, how can this comparison be made, unless to suit a particular agenda? Another issue that is raised in the article concerns the role of prosecutors deciding whether to proceed. Given that Rape is crime that must be tried in solemn proceedings, that is, before a jury, one of the prosecutor's concerns must be how the jury will view the matter. Whether people like Sandy Brindley like it or not, her view of what constitutes sufficient evidence to support a rape conviction is at odds with that of a large number of the public, both male and female. That is why the conviction rate for raping old ladies in their houses is significantly higher than that of the drunken 20 year old who can't remember what day it is.
2

Samcafe,

Glasgow 26/08/2008 07:49:21
51% of rape cases at court gain a conviction. Why would anyone choose to muddy the waters with statistics relating to allegations? Its not coming up for budget allocation time again is it for the plethora of 'wimmins' services that instead of doing key front line workl for vulnerable women divert the money instead to political campaigns and 'research'
3

,

26/08/2008 08:33:49
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 26/08/2008 12:19:33
"Only one in 14 reported rapes leads to trial"

So what? Maybe the other 13 are not, in fact, rape cases at all and would only be wasting the court's time (and our money) by sending them to trial.
5

JayDeeTee,

26/08/2008 12:59:16
#4. This story pops up again and again. Some people will not be happy until the 13 others you talk about are automatically brought to trial and found guilty.
6

Nic83,

26/08/2008 13:15:29
I agree that these statistics are often used as a handy crux for the media, keen for a story. As 4&5 point out, all 14 aren't necessarily rapes. Of course there are some despicable women who lie about it. However, even if you assume one in 10 women to be lying (and I seriously doubt it's that high) the conviction rate is still frighteningly low.

However, the reason these reasonable points are too often overlooked is that idiots like no.1 suggest drunk women are "asking for it" just for having the audacity to get drunk. That kind of ignorant and cruel comment sets the whole issue back a country mile.
7

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 26/08/2008 14:10:52
I wouldn't say that women who get drunk are asking for it.

However, you have to accept that their defences will probably be lower than normal and this makes them more susceptible.

At the end of the day, the individual plays a significant part in ensuring their own safety. Even if something (like rape) happens which involves someone else breaking the law, if you were drunk at the time, then you must by implication accept some responsibility for what happened---because had you not been off your face, you may not have put yourself in the position whereby you were vulnerable.
8

Brad,

Glasgow 26/08/2008 18:43:42
#7, going out in the dark makes you more vulnerable: if you were attacked at night, presumably you would accept some of the blame?

Being drunk may well make women more vulnerable but it does not shift any blame from their attackers. You are simply perpetuating the "asking for it" line.
9

Teofilio Cubillas,

27/08/2008 11:26:00
#6 Nic83

With the patience of a special needs teacher instructing a particularly dim and backward child, may I ask you to read my post before resorting to personal insults? Wher did I suggest that 'drunk women are asking for it?'. What I pointed out was the fact that a jury are unlikely to convict an accused for rape when the only witness to the crime was so drunk that she couldn't remember much of what actually happened. Idiot.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.