Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Richard Moore's Almanac: Sports gurus at Hampden in bid to uncover that winning formula

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 September 2008
HAMPDEN Park on Friday witnessed the first event organised by the re-branded Winning Scotland Foundation – formerly the Scottish Institute of Sport Foundation – and it provided a large audience, including Frank Hadden, John Collins, Tony Stanger and Lee McConnell, with a memorable introduction to the work of Professor Carol Dweck.
A diminutive, sharp-suited and permanently smiling 61-year-old, who speaks in a languid American drawl, Dweck explained her theories on mindsets. There are two types, she said: "fixed" and "growth". And it is pretty clear that, in a sporting context,
it is the growth mindset – which recognises the value of hard work over fixed, or natural, talent – that is best suited to success.

Dweck was introduced by the Foundation's executive director, Graham Watson, who used the occasion to announce that the 'Winning' game, developed by the Israeli guru Yehuda Shinar, is soon to be launched in Scottish schools. The game can teach children, said Watson, "how to behave like winners and think correctly under pressure".

Winning, as he explained, is what the Foundation is all about, and he criticised the FA for recently declaring their desire to make mini soccer less competitive. "Everybody loses if nobody wins," said Watson.

Then the stage was cleared for Dweck. She began with a Benjamin Barber quote: "I don't divide the world into the weak and the strong, or the successes and the failures; I divide the world into the learners and non-learners", before claiming that work, not talent, is the key. Consequently, she suggested that children could benefit from being praised for working hard rather than succeeding; for the process rather than the end result.

"It's not that everybody can be Michael Jordan," she said, "it's that Michael Jordan wasn't Michael Jordan until he put in years of dedicated effort." The notion of 'natural talent' is a myth, she suggested. "The thing that distinguishes geniuses or great successes is the amount of effort they've put in."

Of course, it is those with the "growth" mindset who are prepared to put in such effort, believing themselves to be a "work in progress," with infinite potential. It could also help explain why so many child prodigies do not scale the heights as seniors. Many of them are so unfamiliar with setbacks and failures that, when they come, they can't deal with them.

The burning question, of course, was, what about us? What is the Scottish mindset – typically, are we fixed or growth? Dweck smiled and refused to be drawn. "We have done studies in different countries," she said, "but not Scotland. In India, China, Japan there is much more emphasis on effort. India is very far over into a growth mindset. European countries do tend to be more fixed."

A PARTICULARLY interesting part of Professor Dweck's presentation was her claim regarding certain top sports people, and her singling out of some who might have "fixed" personalities. Good examples of "growth" personalities, she said, included Tiger Woods, who dismantled and re-built his game after becoming the youngest winner of the US Masters, and our own Chris Hoy, who re-invented himself as an Olympic match sprinter after his event, the kilo, was dropped. Both, said Dweck, are people who don't buy into the notion of "natural" or fixed limits. "The growth mindset," she said, "embraces setbacks and mistakes, and works hard to rectify them."

At the other end of the scale were Sergio Garcia, John McEnroe and another one of ours – Colin Montgomerie. "Monty is distracted by very minor incidents," noted Dweck, "as is McEnroe. If they don't win they deflect the blame away from themselves – McEnroe once blamed a defeat on the static coming from a TV speaker. Woods trains himself for such distractions, he'll have people running out from behind trees to frighten him."

What of the Scots athletes in the audience? Any "fixed" mindsets there? Well, Frank Hadden's body language was fascinating; so, perhaps, was the fact that he seemed to be the only member of the audience who didn't applaud Dweck's presentation.

DURING a question and answer session, chaired by John Beattie and with a panel of Dweck, Alistair Gray, Brian Whittle, Catriona Morrison and Tony Stanger, a particular group was subject to a withering attack from Gray, the founding chairman of the Scottish Institute of Sport, and Whittle. The group in question was Scotland's athletics coaches, or at least some of them.

"If they won't open their minds and take on new ideas then how can they improve?" asked Gray. "We had coaches (at the institute] who wouldn't tell you how fast their athlete was running, because they were 'protecting' their athlete."

Whittle echoed this. "We have lots of knowledge in Scotland but very little that's shared. Lots of coaches are very good at not telling other coaches what they're up to. Former athletes are not asked for their input, and so a lot of knowledge and experience is lost."

Beattie asked if the sub-text to Whittle's argument was that he hadn't been asked himself. "No, I haven't been asked," said Whittle, "but I'm the type of person who pushes my ideas out anyway."



The full article contains 872 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 September 2008 10:46 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Richard Moore
 
1

Deadpan,

London 22/09/2008 12:02:46
Interesting stuff. It's good to know that people are discussing such fundamentals but it is the incorporation of such ideas into schools and basic coaching that will be the true test.

Whenever I read of such forums I'm always reminded of the SFA's root and branch review under Rinus Michels (its name escapes me right now) which took three years and is now gathering dust in some vault somewhere. Or at least I think it is, such was the deafening silence on its completion.
2

Montford's Jaicket,

Hanging around 22/09/2008 13:09:07
When I saw the headline, I thought - hard work will beat natural ability, unless natural ability works hard. Having read the article, I see I was right. Should I be a sports psychologist?
As #1 says, it is okay to know the theory, it is another to put it into the schools, sports halls, and playing fields where it is needed. Good point about Chris Hoy; hopefully, if some more of our big name sports players see this result they will start to put some effort into the basics of their sports - too many footballers seem to be unable to pass or trap a ball to save themselves, but these simple skills can be learned and improved on! Sadly, it is more likely that some of them will only see this article when it is wrapped round a fish supper on their way home from the night club.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.