Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Cardinal joins fight to stop hotel 'ruining' cathedral

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 April 2009
THE leader of Scotland's Roman Catholics is trying to block plans to build a hotel in front of one of the nation's most important cathedrals.
Cardinal Keith O'Brien has personally intervened over the prospect of a modern development impeding the famous views of St Mary's Cathedral, in Edinburgh, from Leith Walk.

A roundabout in front of the cathedral would be replaced under plans to
redesign the area at Picardy Place to accommodate the new tram system.

Edinburgh City Council has agreed to sell off land it owns in front of the cathedral to the developer behind the £850 million revamp of the St James Centre.

Building firm Henderson's development would be constructed around a new public square, boasting new café-bars and restaurants. But church officials fear it will ruin views of St Mary's, which dates from 1814 and is the base of the Archdiocese of St Andrews and Edinburgh.

Cardinal O'Brien, who is also Archbishop of St Andrews and Edinburgh, has told the council the building of the hotels risks marring the 200th anniversary celebrations of the cathedral.

He and entrepreneur Sir Tom Farmer, who regularly worships in the cathedral, have gone public with concerns after negotiations over the plans dragged on for more than a year. However, a rethink is being resisted by the council on the grounds the site used to be occupied by tenements for about 100 years.

The roads between St Mary's Cathedral and the Omni Centre are due to be reorganised to accommodate a tram interchange in Picardy Place, thereby freeing a triangular parcel of land.

Richard Hamblett, secretary of fabric and planning for the archdiocese, said: "We obviously know the council is looking to sell the land in front of the cathedral once the area is designed for the tram. However, the current views of the cathedral would be completely blocked out."

Cardinal O'Brien added: "I will be meeting my planning and property advisers today to discuss how best we safeguard the important religious, social and geographical place the cathedral has in the life of the city.

"I hope the council can provide an assurance no structures will be built directly in front of the cathedral and that we will be able to celebrate its 200th anniversary in 2014 without any changes to its precincts."

A council report for the new-look area, published earlier this year, said the tram project had provided a huge opportunity to transform one of the key "gateways" into the city centre.

A spokeswoman said: "The advent of the tram network in Edinburgh and proposed redevelopment of the St James Quarter have given us an ideal opportunity to explore potential improvements to the area.

"Despite major environmental improvements carried out in the 1980s, Picardy Place remains an area dominated by traffic and difficult for pedestrians to use."

However, Sir Tom said: "This is a hugely valuable site, and I don't mean that in financial terms. The tram project gives the city a huge opportunity to create a new public piazza in this area."

A spokesman for Henderson said the developer was keen to find a "compromise" solution with the cathedral.



In-house magazine urges Kirk to lead on gay clergy issue

CRAIG BROWN

THE threat of a rift forming within the Church of Scotland over the appointment of an openly gay minister has increased after the Kirk's in-house magazine urged members to take a forward-looking stance.

In its editorial, Life & Work urged the Kirk to show strong leadership to other churches by taking a progressive stance and supporting the appointment of the openly gay Rev Scott Rennie to Queen's Cross Church by the Presbytery of Aberdeen.

The decision was challenged by a number of members, and following an appeal to the Commission of the General Assembly, was handed to the assembly for a final decision when it meets next month.

The magazine's editor, Muriel Armstrong, said that, having failed to deal with the issue of the role of gay people in the Kirk at the General Assembly two years ago, the forthcoming debate offered a fresh opportunity.

She said: "It has been suggested that if the Kirk stuck its neck out on this it would upset other churches that are still in a reflective no man's land on the issue. Isn't it time for leadership?" She also criticised the "selectivity" of those who used the Bible to justify their stance against homosexuality, choosing sections which support their position and ignoring others.

She said that those who did "presumably no longer accept biblical teaching on sexual matters such as polygamy and sex with slaves" but are happy to quote Leviticus 18:22 on homosexuality: "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 April 2009 12:59 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Roman Catholic church
 
1

Jock MacSprog,

22/04/2009 00:14:16
but he had no problem with being next to the ugliest building in Britain for 30+ years.
2

Buttress,

22/04/2009 00:31:53
I suspect Mammon will win, the council wants hotels and more hotels, so the people who come to admire the views can stay in the hotels which block the views.

I wish him luck though, it would be far better to leave the space open.
3

Reg, Perth WA,

22/04/2009 00:40:47
One man's view is another's eyesore.
Many years ago, it always amused me that the 'Deep Sea/Bandparts' triangle was opposite the steps to the Cathedral. On departing mass, the congregation was greeted by a Barber's?? shop with large letters advertising men's 'surgical appliances'.
4

Whopitt,

22/04/2009 07:09:56
There is no danger of this being stopped. The Council needs the revenue from the land sale, the "planning gain" and the Tram fees.
5

Buttress,

22/04/2009 07:20:04
Of course, but it's good that this is being said, as it's true - it would be far better left unbuilt.

The latest offering re hotels in the city is the deeply dreadful one by Allan Murray, and it's probable that he would be the architect of this also.
6

Whopitt,

22/04/2009 07:25:22
Any chance (hope) that Allan Murray might go the way of bunch who built the Holyrood eyesore. :-)
7

Kate,

Zurich 22/04/2009 07:25:44
Edinburgh does not need yet another hotel, Edinburgh needs green open spaces and the existing hotels to be improved and give better value for money!
8

albanman,

Edinburgh 22/04/2009 07:31:09
Good grief! Do the Edinburgh City Council members have any brains between them? BTW, I well remember that ugle triangle (thankfully gone) which used to change colours as the wind blew: it looked like a fallen pylon to me.
9

Whopitt,

22/04/2009 07:32:05
Send in the guerilla gardners (see other story). Or perhaps the gorilla gardners - that would be a sight worth seeing.
10

Brodric,

22/04/2009 07:53:05
Landscaping would be much better with flowers, bushes, and benches for weary shoppers and workers to rest and enjoy an open space.

Please don't let Edinburgh become so overbuilt that we can't see any space.
11

Angoos,

Baku, Azerbaijan 22/04/2009 07:56:44
Why didn't the Catholic Church and Sir Tom Farmer buy the land when the council put it up for sale ? Surely that would have solved the problem ?
12

sam the god,

22/04/2009 08:15:06
St Mary's Cathedral IMHO is an ugly building
13

john z,

edinburgh 22/04/2009 08:26:42
Can't they just bring back the fluroescent tubed sculpture in the roundabout. I remember that being built at great expense to the good folks of Edinburgh.

If I remember correctly the lights changed depending on the wind....

I also remember getting taken to see it specially, at night. But then I got taken to see the 'new lighting' on Princes' street too..
14

Antoine,

22/04/2009 08:38:08
Hello,

The cathedral was built in the 19th century at a time when Catholicism was just returning to Scotland, with bishops and a hierarchy.
Catholics were not popular, and the cathedral was deliberately designed to be inconspicuous. It was built next to a theatre and opposite a triangle of tenements. It was thus mostly hidden from view.
(It was in one of the tenements that Arthur Conan Doyle was born. Strange that there is no Sherlock Holmes trail in Edinburgh, given that Prof Black at Edinburgh University was the model for Holmes deductive powers.)
I digress.
The Cathedral is a black beetle of a building and a modern replacement with soaring spire would be more fitting for the site.
15

Seb,

22/04/2009 08:59:58
Picardy place is currently awful and would be greatly improved by the restoration of the triangular block. The Cathedral would still have a piazza in front of it, just one more appropriate to its size. Not sure I see the attratction of viewing the Omni and a tram interchange....
16

AJ Fife,

22/04/2009 09:30:50
What's going to happen to that massive foot in front of the cathedral?

Shouldn't it have been wearing a sandal anyway?
17

Daff,

Edinburgh 22/04/2009 10:13:18
Has anyone noticed the current clientele in front of St Marys. I dont think we want to have any more open space for them to congregate!
18

Calum Crubag,

22/04/2009 12:44:29
Funny how the cardinal resorts to the law of reason when it suits him. What happened to 'faith'? Surely if his 'God' is all powerful and him and his 'flock' are faithful then 'god' will stop the hotel?

Or is expecting god to actually do something being to unrealistic? Wonder why?
19

Calum Crubag,

22/04/2009 12:45:51
#17 - never mind what goes on in front of the church, i'm worried about what goes on behind the altar and in the dark recesses of the cathedral!
20

,

22/04/2009 14:53:52
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

Iain Mac,

22/04/2009 18:30:51
#20 - agree. Why do churches have so much influence and standing in the media and in government? Only 1 in 10 people regularly attend church. Apparently, that's the same proporion of the population who are gay.

Yeah, if we want a more peaceful, reasonable and sane world then we have to ditch religion and it's collection of incredible and sometimes nasty stories and maxims.
22

Kitti Kat,

Newtown Square 22/04/2009 19:04:00
as a frequent visitor to Edinburegh 9again next month) I have to agree with #8. What on earth is wrong with a bit of open spaces, flowers, ertc. rather than more ugly hotels, office buildings, etc. Edinburgh's buildings get uglier and uglier every year. can't the citizens who actually pay t axes t hat help to build these horrid buildings vote those in office who approve of this destruction out of office? What a shame to ruin a once beautiful city. Please stop the total ruinization of Edinburgh. PS my travel agency owner cousin and some of her competitors have said how they can't say how lovely Edinburgh is now with all those "modern" buildings. The council might get tourists, but with all the horrible stuff being built and taking away the historic buildings, etc. the visitors won't return. I have visited Edinburgh and spent many Hogmanays there but the charm is fading fast. Do something to stop the rape of the city. PLEASE!
23

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 22/04/2009 21:55:12
If we survive, Iain, will the next generation of kids be walking past these great cathedrals of our time called supermarkets and wonder what they signified, who built them?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.