Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


£37,000 a day: What RBS boss Hester could earn with controversial pay and bonus package

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 23 June 2009
SCOTLAND has a new record for pay in the public sector today: a package worth up to £12 million over three years for the new chief of the 70 per cent publicly owned Royal Bank of Scotland.
It is set to astound and inflame in equal measure.

The deal for chief executive Stephen Hester was agreed by the government agency UK Financial Investments (UKFI) and other leading institutional investors at the weekend.

Both in size and structure, it has prompted some to suggest that a massive opportunity has been missed to make a clean break with the past.

A leading figure in the financial community said: "What RBS needs is a totally new business model, not a chief executive paid to put back the failed business as if nothing has changed."

Mr Hester is now Scotland's highest-paid public sector employee. RBS and Lloyds Banking Group staff were officially included in the Scottish Government's measure of public sector employment released last week.

While the bonus element will not kick in unless certain criteria – including a recovery in RBS shares to 70p – are met, The Scotsman understands that the move has appalled many RBS staff and small investors.

Indeed, if Mr Hester meets his targets within the first 12 months he will be rewarded with the equivalent of £37,000 for every working day.

In February, Mr Hester told the Treasury committee: "I do think banking pay in some areas of the industry is way too high and needs to come down and I intend us to lead that process."

The risk he now takes is that a package of this magnitude will incite a new round of bonus demands within the bank.

Roger Lawson, of the RBS Shareholders Action Group, said: "It is outrageous the government does not use its power to bring the remuneration of bankers in these companies down to a reasonable level. Do they need to pay him this much to make him work harder?"

The planned package comes as RBS is laying off thousands of staff. Graham Goddard, deputy general secretary of the Unite union, said it would be met "with absolute disbelief by front line staff in the finance industry.

"Staff and customers are sick of seeing senior bankers earn such huge financial awards, when every week hundreds of hardworking and loyal staff are losing their jobs."

Sources close to RBS yesterday pointed out that the package was less than that for HSBC chief executive Michael Geoghegan, who is on a £1.1m basic salary and a long-term incentive bonus of £7.5m.

But then HSBC did not suffer a collapse on anything like the scale of RBS. And it is not in receipt of massive taxpayer funds.

Over at Lloyds Banking Group, chief executive Eric Daniels is paid a basic salary of £1m a year and is in line for a long-term incentive bonus equivalent to 200 per cent of salary, or £2m. But it is not immediately clear his workload in integrating two banks and sorting out the toxic corporate loan book of HBOS should be deemed only a third of Mr Hester's.

Under the package, the bonus fruit machine would only spew out the maximum payment if RBS shares hit 70p. With the government's stake bought at 50p, this would mean an £8 billion profit for the taxpayer.

But some analysts argue a recovery will probably owe more to the government, which has pushed a reflation package, and the Bank of England, which has slashed interest rates to a record low of 0.5 per cent and embarked on quantitative easing.

Private investors may also be dismayed that a recovery in the shares to 70p should occasion such a pay-out, given that so many of them loyally subscribed to the RBS rights issue at 200p a share barely a year ago.

The return to massive bonuses will be viewed as singularly inept timing and deeply disappointing for those who looked to Mr Hester to make a new start and change RBS culture.

That now looks all the more difficult given the signal that this deal sends throughout the group – here and overseas.

The pay package is likely to be nodded through by the full board now UKFI – an unelected body supposed to be at arm's length from management decisions – has given its blessing.

The non-executive directors now include Sir Sandy Crombie, chief executive of Standard Life. As a major institutional investor with £125 billion of other people's money under custody, Standard Life has a duty to act as a policeman on behalf of the millions of investors and policyholders it represents. But whistle-blowing hardly seems possible when its chief executive now sits on the RBS board.

Nor is the structure of the long-term bonus plan likely to earn plaudits for clarity and transparency.

The plan is said to rely "on a mix of targets, including relative total shareholder return and absolute share price performance". Such phraseology, reminiscent of previous obscure corporate remuneration reports, suggests an approach to accountability that has learnt nothing from the debacles of the past year.

WHAT HE COULD BUY WITH £12m

32.8m
RBS shares

16m
copies of The Scotsman on weekdays

7,295
duck houses – or 5,455 moats cleaned

102
average annual allowances for MPs in 2007-8 (£118,000)

632
ordinary RBS employees

35 years
of Sir Fred Goodwin's pension, after the former RBS chief executive took a £200,000 cut

15%
of Cristiano Ronaldo (£80m transfer from Manchester United to Real Madrid)

SALARY, BONUSES, SHARES: ANATOMY OF A DEAL

BASIC SALARY: £1.2m. As each year of the three-year long-term incentive plan goes by, Mr Hester's basic salary would be expected to remain at least at the same level. This would mean a basic payout over the three years of probably nearer £3.6m. However, for calculating the current package on offer, only this year's salary is included.

ANNUAL NON-CASH BONUS PAYMENTS: totalling £2m over three years. Paid in RBS bonds or loans (essentially corporate debt that Mr Hester can cash in). They can be clawed back if the performance on which the awards are made is found to have been faulty.

LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLANS: £6.4m. Paid in a mixture of free RBS shares (one-third) and share options (two-thirds) at the end of the three-year period. The potential profit from the share options depends on the difference between the price at which the option is granted and the market price of the shares when options are triggered. RBS won support from UK Financial Investments, which controls the government's more than 70 per cent stake, for Mr Hester's salary and long-term bonus arrangements at a meeting last week.

UKFI is thought to have backed the move because of links to the bank's share price. This would have to pass a 70p threshold for the long-term bonus to be paid in full, by which point the taxpayer would have made millions in profits.

Page 1 of 1

 
1

Jerry Springer,

22/06/2009 22:56:50
For Hester to earn his money, the RBS share price must get to 70 pence.

If it reaches that level, then the taxpayer makes billions of pounds worth of profit on the Government's original investment.

Sounds like a win win situation to me.
2

Fifi la Bonbon,

23/06/2009 00:31:23
I heard on the radio that Mr Hester only gets this remuneration of he achieves a profit for the bank of eight billion pounds. The remuneration would not be questioned if he was a professional footballer.

On the other hand, this guy would be paid in a day what I earn in a year. We are entitled to have a go, I think. Especially since I'm always getting annoying phone calls from the bank to try to persuade me to come into their offices and be sold financial services I don't want by a teenager in a suit.
3

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 23/06/2009 00:59:18

No-one is worth this grotesque amount of money no-matter what they do, or who they are!
Thee Years Wages for some, and Stephen Hester, will get this each day!, what is the Man going to do with all this Money?, He cant take it with Him, when 'judgement-day' calls!
I could not care less, if Stephen Hester was the 'Ruler' of the Universe, no-one is entitled to such a grotesque sum of money, and if it was me, I would feel guilty in earning soo much, and divert this money for good-causes, or our less fortunate, the needy in our lives, through no fault of their own!

4

Edward,

23/06/2009 01:00:23
Over the top headline and hysterics from this paper and certain elements in the BBC
The total Package COULD be £ 9.6 million, the BBC have prefered to round up, this paper seems to want to round up and add a bit!
The fact of the matter he will only earn £ 1.1 million, which for the position is par!
The rest of the package ONLY happens if certain targets are acheived. If they dont happen he doesnt get its as simple as that.
5

,

23/06/2009 01:10:10
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

sofiero,

luxembourg 23/06/2009 05:22:36
Plus ca change, plus c´est la meme chose....as a RBS customer, I am totally nonplussed by the greed and the cynicism...how can a semi-nationalised bank pay this ridiculous amount of money.. even as the Greedy Godwin debacle is still in close memory....and the Greed discussion ongoing. Time for a mass customer withdrawal....anybody recommend an honest bank to me??
7

Haggisette,

Wherever I am now 23/06/2009 05:25:56
This compensation just perpetuates the over the top money paid for a job that could have been filled competitively by others willing to work for less. No one even tries to fill the job for less.

An embarrassment.
8

Eddison,

Overseas 23/06/2009 05:38:03
I am pleased to see that at least some people have the sense to see the "could" aspect. I agree with Edward - hysterical reporting. This guy will hopefully turn this institution around and give more that adequate return on investment. By the way, most RBS staff have been screwed by their employer - but the little bonuses that have been given are structured in a similar way i.e. it is very unlikely that the bank will have to pay out - most staff will leave, especially overseas.
9

The Scot,

Singapore 23/06/2009 06:59:09
The shares trully couldn't be any lower at this point given the sanity check in the markets. The target pricing for the shares is too low and too easily achievable. While I agree with the pay and the bonuses I would like to see a higher target above GBP1.
10

JayJay,

Right here 23/06/2009 07:41:05
#11
You forgot:-

3. How did Mr Hester get on in his last role at British Land (clue - not very well judging by the last set of accounts).

Its back to same old, same old. The bonus trigger share price of £0.70 is risible in the contect of a bank which has been substantially de-risked. With hundreds of billions committed to support dodgy loans and further treasury guarantees made available, all Hester has to do is wield the knife over thousands of jobs and wait for the "Cameron bounce" post next election. This "target" will be achieved by next summer.

It seems that UKFI and the Treasury remains in thrawl to a group of city pin stripes. Would it have been too much to incentivise based on a reduction in the dodgy underwritten loans?
11

brianmca3,

auld reekie 23/06/2009 08:04:45
is it a trougher gov offering trougher wages?
if hes allowed to earn that,then im sure theres ones above him will be getting a lot more
12

Phil C,

23/06/2009 08:07:24
I thought we'd seen the end of these grotesque bonuses! What's wrong with "You'll be paid £1.2 million with a 1/60th pension and if it doesn't work you get the bullet. OK, we'll throw in a stuffed turkey as a Christmas bonus if you're very good!"

There's plenty good managers that would jump sat that.

If everyone offered similar we wouldn't hear about paying toffee-nosed fat-cat clowns like Goodwin over-inflated packages to compete. If corporations won't do it volutarily, set a cap on salary, bonuses & pension.

Oh, but then all the other also-ran directors would be getting too much. CUT THEIR PAY, "TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT"!!! Nobody could have done worse than them over the last ten years!
13

brianmca3,

auld reekie 23/06/2009 08:07:42
This made me laugh I hope it brightens everyone's day

Five surgeons are discussing who were the best patients to operate on.

The first surgeon says, 'I like to see Accountants on my operating table because when you open them up, everything inside is numbered.'

The second responds, 'Yeah, but you should try Electricians! Everything inside them is colour-coded.'

The third surgeon says, 'No, I really think Librarians are the best; everything inside them is in alphabetical order.'

The fourth surgeon chimes in, 'You know I like Construction Workers. Those guys always understand when you have a few parts left over at the end, and when the job takes longer than you said it would.'

But the fifth surgeon shut them all up when he observed, 'You're all wrong. Politicians are the easiest to operate on. There's no guts, no heart, no balls, no brains, and no spine, and there are only two moving parts - the mouth and the ars-ehole - and they are interchangeable'
14

Phil C,

23/06/2009 08:13:08
#14....Then we can tackle public sector workers and their jobs for life with gold-plated pensions. Nothing against the individuals you understand. It's those bloody unions!

We might create an affordable work market one day.
15

MikeN,

Edinburgh 23/06/2009 08:24:41
#3 - the solution to the annoying phone calls is simple. Next time you get one tell them very clearly that you don't wish to receive them and they will stop. I did that several years ago and haven't had one since.
16

puskas,

East kilbride 23/06/2009 08:27:39
An old retired couple that bide close to myself are disabled. The gentleman is being treated for possibly dementia.

Many years with the bank (30 appx.) Recently for the first time went over his overdraft limit by £32..

Bank charges £98 ..

Explaining all information was to no avail and bank charges still apply.

It seems taking advantage of disabled who are also dementia sufferers helps to pay the top money boys withing the money sector.

If ever an appeal should have been in favour of customers for many years this was one..

Anyway £98 robbed from this old couple will go to a good cause in balancing the books..

Anyone else out their on the internet have any tales similar.
17

brianmca3,

auld reekie 23/06/2009 08:34:38
years ago the RBS charged me £60 for being £8 overdrawn
i went to the branch and kicked up a fuss,result charges paid back to me,and a £100 overdraft
which in a week was upped to £500
thats how they get you by the short and curlies,give a high overdraft knowing you will spend it at some point ie emergency
then paying it back leaves the customer with next to zilch so they spend the £500 again,thus the circle goes on and on
18

ianpg,

Musselburgh 23/06/2009 08:43:40
When is this disgusting situation going to stop. Hester and his ilk - with the spineless acquiesence of the government - have reduced this country to a basket case. No organisation should be allowed to pay any of it's staff more than 25 times the lowest salary.

Lets be honest about it, a trained monkey could run a 'normal' bank. Without the interference of 'gamblers' and despots like Goodwin, RBS would still be making a profit.
19

,

23/06/2009 08:49:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
20

Pattester,

Galashiels 23/06/2009 09:11:23
This is obscene there is no one on this earth is worth that kind of money wither or not the bank is going to make big profits in the months to come have they not learned with the mistake they made with the last guy after he took them and US to the cleaners god What I would give to have that salary that he gets for one day for a whole year it would be magic.
21

Grumpy,

23/06/2009 09:25:08
They might have chosen someone with the initials FG so that they could have re-used the gold pens, headed paper (oops - sorry, vellum), and all the other monographed goods that Fred the Shred brought in to boost his ego.

Still think it's ridiculous to reward anyone this amount of money, when he could get 10 times that for playing football
22

Proghead,

Embra 23/06/2009 09:27:53
#18

I've a similar story. I've banked with HBOS for over 30 years. One day last week I went over my overdraft limit for 3 payments in the morning, but funds went in later to cover it. What did the semi-nationalised a**holes do ? Charged me for 3 unauthorised payments at 35 quid a pop. They want £165 off me for being overdrawn for about an hour, even though by end of business I was in the black. Considering I own about half that bank, they can jolly well f*** off
23

Scotfree,

Erskine 23/06/2009 09:29:07
Well this is a surprise who could have predicted it?

http://news.scotsman.com/latestnews/RBS-axes--9000-jobs.5151185.jp

Gordon Brown, North British hammer of Scots workers will be pleased with this. With a major labour party donor running the bank he can rid it of Scottish management, particularly those who are off message and rid it of all the expensive Scots workers and bring a nice fat fee to other labour party (remember Hindudja a la Lord Mandelson) donors by sending the work to India. Keep the front office staff, as they are low paid anyway. A nice profit in a few years for labour cronies and Scotland kept in it’s place with its face in the gutter under a British boot. Criminal yes, but the labour party can only be understood as an essentially criminal organisation.

The theft of Scotland’s oil is to be made to pay for the theft of Scotland’s Banks.

Scottish executive talent is to be culled or made to cow to their English masters.

Major labour party donors, such as Stephen Hester, are to amply rewarded by being given vast banking assets at massive discount after a state driven campaign, supported by the State broadcaster, to drive the company into the ground. After a short period it will be found that confidence is restored in the assets and a massive reward is available to the City and labor donors, with Scotland’s wealth again defrauded.

Our liberation from this menace cannot come quickly enough.
24

Proghead,

Embra 23/06/2009 09:35:18
I'll probably be administrated for my post on #24, but hey ho
25

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 23/06/2009 09:44:22
Ludicrous charges? Just threaten to close your account and point out that there was no intentional wrongdoing and that the punitive rate of interest they are charging on the usually small amount overdrawn is xxxx% Usually does it for me.
26

Proghead,

Embra 23/06/2009 09:47:09
#27

Good call, Mr Angry. I'll try that one
27

ianpg,

Musselburgh 23/06/2009 10:15:42
#25.

You're forgetting that Fred Goodwin is Scottish and it's him that got RBS into the mess.
Since time began, Scottish 'heroes' have managed to 'sell out' their fellow countrymen and it's naive to think that lurking somewhere in the ranks of the SNP, there aren't turncoats who would sell their granny for a few pounds!

28

Class On Grass,

Troughing fwits 23/06/2009 10:49:45


Is the fees office now in charge of setting commensurate rates for part-nationalised bank quangos?
29

Chief King Bonga,

23/06/2009 10:53:14
Scotfree,

"Our liberation from this menace cannot come quickly enough".

Just promise us that when you eventually find the courage to vote for independence you will take all the Scottish piggies who have had their snouts in the English trough with you!
30

Class On Grass,

Feed the fat 23/06/2009 10:56:57

If you replace the cat's 'a' with a 'un', then you have another fat cat.

But I'm not angry. Or maybe I am. Getting personal? The guy could do with losing a few pounds both ways, that's all.
31

Class On Grass,

at the RBS piggery 23/06/2009 11:06:48
CK Bonga, no problem, but what will be left in the English trough?
The Scottish trough has to feed 5 million, the English one 55 million. It would be interesting to see comparative farming outputs per head of population, dont you think?
Even I could run a country like Scotland, but I'd probably make a pigs ear of England.
Dont worry though; we'll be glad to help out, as we dont want to leave our Neebs in the lurch.
32

union member,

Glasgow 23/06/2009 11:39:30
Dare we hope that Bill Jamieson will now wake up to the fact that the Private Sector pays hugely inflated wages cf the Public Sector? (the CE of our largest council gets around £160,000 pa). After all, to call Heston a public sector employee is stretching it - unless it is the plan to nationalise the whole of the banking sector, which haven't heard from anyone - despite its attractions.
33

John1,

Stirling 23/06/2009 11:40:41
As usual, we have Independence given as a solution to all our problems. Rubbish! Let's stick to the subject, shall we?
Integrity and the Financial Sector seem to be incompatible. We have the same old people doing the same old things to keep themselves in a manner they want to be kept in. I notice small businesses in particular are looking at alternative ways of funding (issuing shares rather than borrowing from the banks). Perhaps we are at the start of a completely new system which will see the banks fade from sight. When this happens the captains will be the last to abandon the sinking ships. Invest your money elsewhere and keep your ready cash under the bed in a shoebox. Anyone got a better idea?
34

Class On Grass,

Put your money in tin 23/06/2009 11:48:54

John1, biscuit tins are more sturdy and not susceptible to rats. Of course, shoe boxes are better at warding off the rats than banks are.
Companies should now be made to have the option to pay us in readies, no bankers required.
35

Tris,

23/06/2009 12:19:53
It seems to me that, while we live in a country where people go hungry and freeze to death in the winter, where patients die for the lack of drugs or a bed in a hospital, no one, not Ronaldo, not Madonna, not Prince Charlie, not the Speaker, not Andy Murray nor Jenson Button and not even the chairman of a bank should be worth that kind of money.
36

Strict Ivan Jellicoe,

Renfrew 23/06/2009 12:37:02
Is he going to spend all his wages or will he take some of it home?
37

Iain Mac,

23/06/2009 12:41:41
Bankers. Footballers. Pigs and troughs.
38

John1,

Stirling 23/06/2009 12:47:59
36 Class On Grass
Thanks for the tip. There are no bankers, sorry - rats, in my house but a tin box might be best, I agree.
Do we not still have a law where people have to be paid in 'coin of the realm'- the 'Truckers act', I believe? This was brought in in the 19th century to prevent companies paying their workers in tokens which could only be spent in the company store - which sold inferior goods at inflated prices. If memory serves me right it was modified in the 20th century to allow direct payments to a bank account if the employee preferred. That was in the days when banks were trusted. Perhaps it is time it look at it again.
39

wellieboot,

Edinburgh 23/06/2009 13:02:40
OK guys,

Something to put into the pot. How much does Ronaldo get paid for turning up for a few hours a week to kick a ball about a field?

This guy's work to turn around RBS is pretty crucial to Scotland's economy and Alex S's plan for a strong independent Scotland.
40

Class On Grass,

Boot the bankers 23/06/2009 13:38:33


Right enuff welly, so shouldnt he look at being prudent by cutting wages? Two grey's and all that about footballers though. They have not been bailed out with taxpayers money. Ronaldo is deemed to be worth that crust by those who decided to pay him.
Is this guy amazingly talented, or could the job be done just as well by some individual willing to take on the task for (say) 300K pa, with no further expenses. I would. And I would never have bought Abn Ambro... or give loans without adequate security, but that's just me.


41

Class On Grass,

Tied into banks 23/06/2009 13:41:56

John1 I just requested payment from now on in cash, but was told payroll can and will only pay to bank accounts...
42

A Crofter,

Western Arce 23/06/2009 13:54:58
A glimmer of a green shoot, Darling congratulates city slickers on their avarice and promises more "light-touch regulation" and it's back to troughing as usual at your friendly bank.

Worse still, one or two posters apparently believe this is all acceptable behaviour.
43

georgia, chloe's mommy,

somewhere outside chicago 23/06/2009 14:23:13
There'll be no shortage of ready company, I'll wager, once he's recognized. Wonder if he has a local pub - it would be worth it to spend a few days there to get to know the chunky monkey....
44

georgia, chloe's mommy,

somewhere outside chicago 23/06/2009 14:24:16
erm.....the noble banker....
45

Kenny A,

23/06/2009 14:28:16
At a conservative estimate, time to get confused here,this man should be eating 2466 kilo of lobster a day, working on £15 per kilo. Is this man realy worth this amount of money while others are grafting and risking their lives. I tried to work it out for crab but the figure sounded more like a supertanker than anything else. My next project is to figure how many midges make up 2466 kilo.

Probably take up the whole internet to post that one. Anyone got a cray super duper comptuer handy for this mind boggling waste of time.
46

Kenny A,

23/06/2009 14:42:42
Holy donkeys, thats between 5 and 6 Thousand lobsters a day on average, or 30 plus members of Strathclyde police band in their finest. Which is just plain greedy.

It also works out at 47 of my analysists.

She has recomended radical therepy involving pipe music.

47

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 23/06/2009 14:49:24
His pay deal is about on a par with Jonathan Ross and David Beckham then !

I see no problem with big pay for people who can do a good job. I also think if you get the big job and you turn out to be a numpty you have to give you pay pack to the taxpayer _ he could take out an RBS loan do do so if he wanted !
48

Kenny A,

23/06/2009 14:58:21
49 Very good post.
49

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 23/06/2009 15:00:18
It seems that Gordon and his Darling have little or no control over these banks.

Time for a clear-out and to replace them with someone with a scintilla of competence and honesty.
50

Keith Mac,

Edinburgh 23/06/2009 15:24:40
And to pay this robbing person the RBS continue to steal money from us, vis a vis, illegal charges. Yes they do, and they do it in such a sneaky way. Like many I bank on-line, so, consequently hardly ever look at my paper statements. I don't have any need to. However, the RBS continues to send me "paper" statements of when charges are to come off INSTEAD OF PUTTING THIS INFORMATION ON-LINE WHERE I WILL SEE IT . Then they apply the charge JUST WHEN I AM AT MY OVERDRAFT LIMIT/AGREEMENT, so triggering another charge!!!! It is legalised theft - nothing else - absolute financial skulduggery, and no amount of intervention, by Grdon Brown or any other idiot politican, will stop it happening! Financial Services Authority!??? Don't make me laugh. What we need is a revolution in this country - of the "big bang" - variety, and we need it soon!
51

BroEli,

Florida 23/06/2009 15:35:10
Do what I did a short time ago. SELL THE STOCK. Hester must have read one of the American CEO's books on how to get exorbitant compensation for little results. Sad!
52

St Andrews Jock,

ST ANDREWS 23/06/2009 16:37:02
I do hope that at the very least this one is a qualified banker; though still too much money.
53

Ewan Oosami,

23/06/2009 18:00:55
I don't know why you're all moaning - if you're with the RBS just draw your money out and close your account. He can't take what isn't there!
54

cabrach loon,

inverness 23/06/2009 20:27:07
So where is the change to transparency, accountability and the end of the greed and grub culture. No banker is worth that / he only risks depositors and shareholders money and we know what happened to that / he should only get a 13th month bonus as used to be on the continent and be glad of a salary without perks or a golden handshake for doing his job / just like everyone else who is normal and decent. It is wholly unjustifiable since if he dropped dead tomorrow the bank would carry on probably just as well if not better!
55

John162,

Edinburgh 23/06/2009 21:17:31
I would rather pay Hester if it means we get the bank profits back and repay the Billions of our money. Better value than the BBC paying £6M of our money to that waste of space Jonathan Ross.
56

Russell M,

Stirling 23/06/2009 21:17:34
Is it reform without change or change without reform?
57

thesmallerhalf,

Edinburgh 23/06/2009 21:29:41
In the current climate this hardly rates as a public relations coup. What interests me more than what Hester can get if he makes good, is how generous is the exit package that he will have negotiated. Jobs like this always have a fat juicy exit package if it goes pear shaped.
58

S.M.D.,

Edinburgh 24/06/2009 00:05:48
Have they REALLY not learned anything?????
Those kind of high wages deals should be illegal!
Should the taxpayer not have a say here?Considering, they own 70% of RBS!
It's a disgrace, just shouldn't be allowed!
59

Scottyt,

Saint Paul, Usa 24/06/2009 00:25:15
Stephen certainly has a short and a not too good memory if he's forgotten what he said all of FOUR months ago??
.
No doubt he'll be a "sir" in no time at all.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.