Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Wednesday, 3rd December 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Banks now 'bulletproof' and must start lending – Sants



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 16 October 2008
BRITISH banks are now "bulletproof" following the government's £31.5 billion emergency refinancing deal, the UK's chief financial regulator claimed yesterday.
Hector Sants, the chief executive of the Financial Services Authority, said the part-nationalisation had left Royal Bank of Scotland, HBOS and LLoyds TSB "extremely well capitalised"

And Sants urged the banks to use the extra money they will be getting from the government to increase lending to business and help the flagging UK economy.

Asked about the position of the banks after the government's move, Sants told an audience in Edinburgh: "They have been recapitalised to withstand shocks we don't expect to occur, to make them bulletproof – the intention being to generate confidence in the system.

"They are extremely well capitalised. Therefore it would be appropriate to for them to utilise that capital for commercial purposes and make a return to minimise a potential downturn."

Sants defended the role of the FSA which has been criticised for failing to act to prevent the current financial crisis, admitting that the regulator had made mistakes but saying "we have learnt our lessons".

He apologised for failings in the FSA that led to the nationalisation of Northern Rock.

Sants said the FSA, which is responsible for regulating the UK's banking sector, now had the right framework to address further banking crises, where previously it had failed to "follow through" on its approach.

He said the regulator's "principles and outcome-based" approach to regulation was "the right way forward".

Sants continued: "The (banks'] management were not thinking 'do I have a durable business model?' and 'what are the consequences of what my actions, what is the risks I am running?' The regulator was not challenging and testing with those questions."

Sants was speaking as a guest of Scottish Financial Enterprise and Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce. He cited a report released earlier this year that clearly apportioned at some blame to failings of the regulator's monitoring of banks including Northern Rock.

The FSA will next year publish a paper on reforming the global regulatory framework to help governments address financial and accounting regulation.

Sants, who had been invited to speak to the Edinburgh audience nearly a year ago, said he had changed his speech to address the recent "extraordinary events".

"I am sure you realise these unprecedented market developments have required these unprecedented set of interventions by the authorities," he said.

"But I do believe they are the right set of interventions and the necessary set of interventions and we are now on the road to restoring financial stability and market confidence not just in the UK but also worldwide."

The full article contains 447 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Plodjfriss, Hammer of the Numpties,

Edinburgh 16/10/2008 02:13:46
They may be bulletproof, but are they bombproof?
2

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 16/10/2008 04:52:03
So Hector since you are guilty of failing to "follow through" and "not challenging and testing" the banks to make sure they " have a durable business model?" and making them ask "'what are the consequences of what my actions, what is the risks I am running?" When can we expect for letter of Resignation?
3

Evan Owen,

Snowdonia 16/10/2008 07:20:06
Oh deary me,that is the kiss of death for sure, the FSA says something is hunky dory and a short time later it falls over. As #1 says, are they bombproof? Nothing is, is it? All those fancy financial instruments have yet to unwind, couterparties have vanished...

The bandy men at the FSA couldn't catch a pig in a poke. Regulation is bust, not fit for pupose.

Does anybody else find it rather odd that John Tiner, formerly at Arthur Andersen of Enron fame, is silent during all this? He was once the most poweful regulator on the planet, now that his inaction (or action) has laid waste to the financial system he is going round with his collection box to fund another 'Zombie' company to mop up the flotsam and jetsam. Good innit! Heads they win, tails they win. While the rest of us pick up the pieces. GRRRRRR
4

Liz,

Edinburgh 16/10/2008 09:25:13
Do they not realise that it is 'lending' that got these banks into their respective messes in the first place?
Where have the FSA been for the past 10 years if they think that the lending stragies of Northern Rock and Bradford and Bingley (and the rest of them) were at all sustainable!?


5

Auld Twa,

Edinburgh 16/10/2008 10:17:29
Once again "lessons will be learned" is trotted out by all and sundry.
Is it not the case that regulators and bank executives (who were paid enormous amounts) were at least supposed to be able to avoid the most simple pitfalls ? Such as not checking what it was that they were buying from the sub-prime lenders in the US.
Can Hector Sants explain that ? Maybe it has something to do with Gordon Brown's repeated preference for risk taking and light touch regulation, after all if you want to keep your job it is better to listen to what the boss says.
6

Dijit,

Glasgow 16/10/2008 11:05:04
#3 Spot on.

"He apologised for failings in the FSA that led to the nationalisation of Northern Rock. "

Think they've got rather a lot more to apologise for that NR.
Completely asleep at the wheel, woke up with a start, over corrected with a crazy demand to hike Tier One Capital Ratios, banking vehicle crashes through the barriers where Armco Alistair is waiting.

Gordon can't stop smiling, joking even, thinks he's going to show everyone the solution. Heard he's bought a blue, red and yellow vest with matching shorts.

Anyway he now has a conflict of interest as the UK's head banker, so will he give an assurance to the house that he won't follow his ex-neighbour into a paid banking job for a period of five years (like his pref shares) after he 'retires' from being PM?

Besides what use is a £4,000,000 a year job to a man who thinks he thinks in billions and trillions?

As he was rumoured to say recently to both Alistair Darling and George Bush, "When I want your opinion I'll give it to you."
7

RAS Putin,

Auchterarder 16/10/2008 11:10:03
Oh dear, as Evan Owen (07:20) says; it's the kiss of death. Just wait for the next bank to fail!
8

My dad calls another man Sonny,

Edinburgh 16/10/2008 11:41:17
First time poster, so very nervous.
Has it been suggested the way we have been doing things doesn't work and perhaps a planned economy run for the benefit of all would be better?
9

Active Sassenach,

Luton, England 16/10/2008 11:44:55
I'm just a shambling, well-meaning old Hector in the best traditions of British amateurism aren't I Zebedee?

Hector on banks:

"They have been recapitalised to withstand shocks we don't expect to occur, to make them bulletproof – the intention being to generate confidence in the system."

On what stochastic analysis of equity prices, inflation, economic growth/recession, public borrowing, trade deficit and interest rates is that statement based? You did this for Standard Life when the FTSE 100 was about 4,300, at which point you panicked. Is that what you have done here? The FTSE closed yesterday at 4080 rounded. At 11h30 on 16.10.08 it is 3955 rounded. Do you have any further comment on Standard Life's ability to meet its obligations?

Active Sassenach on the exam questions for Chief Executive of the FSA

Devise a stochastic model by reference to which you can monitor bank capitalisation and liquidity showing which is the most important stress factor to test.

"Bank failure is a function of relying on information given to regulators by inherently greedy people who conceal the truth until it is too late." Discuss and say how regulation might be reformed in the "open public" as opposed to the "narrow private" interest.
10

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

16/10/2008 13:30:58
House prices aren't a quarter of the way down yet. The banks will lose reserves all the way down. I doubt this is the last recapitalisation.
11

Mcsnagpile,

16/10/2008 16:53:13
One has to remember that it was lending that got everybody into this mess in the first place. We need to go back to the land of honest men and bank managers with faces. Real security is in a well kennt face and a warm smile.
12

Wab,

Edinburgh 16/10/2008 18:10:24
This is the same organisation that gave a clear bill of health to NR just prior to the demise of that company. It may not be common knowledge but the FSA has the highest ratio of employees earning in excess of 100k per annum of any company in the UK. The FSA is as toothless as it is useless, no matter how Mr Sants may choose to try and absolve himself or the FSA from blame the harsh reality is that they are not fit for purpose.

Unlike companies in the real world of business or finance they cannot run out of money as they are funded by the government. Everyone is quick to call for the heads of the bankers / finance people who have made lots of money in the last few years but what about the buffoons at the FSA who despite being in possession of all the salient information failed to understand the implications of the lending policies of the self same institutions they are paid hansomely to oversee.

The people of this country have a right to expect that those who are tasked to ensure no financial irregularities occur are accountable for their actions and as such a public enquiry should be held immediately to determine who was at fault and strip them of the pensions and index linked benefits they do not deserve.
13

SkeptikScot,

17/10/2008 00:29:21
"Bulletproof"?! Hardly. Several hundred trillion dollars of credit swaps anyone?

What he means is "We've paid your debts - now we own you. Loan or else!".

Time to sell all you banking shares (if you haven't already).
14

Charles MN,

17/10/2008 01:03:14
At what rate does Sants suggest the banks lend at? As the Governments preferential shares require a 12% pa return it is unlikely to be cheap.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Should banks be paying for staff Christmas parties as their customers suffer?
Yes, staff deserve to be rewarded for their year’s hard work
It’s okay making a contribution, but not £1 million
No, staff should have to pay for their own parties

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.