Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Wednesday, 3rd December 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

RBS denies boardroom reshuffle rumour



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 October 2008
Royal Bank of Scotland today denied a report that its chief executive and chairman are to step down in the wake of the Government's bail-out package.
It was reported today that Sir Fred Goodwin and his chairman Sir Tom McKillop are leaving, with replacements already lined up.

Asked if the pair were going to step down, a spokeswoman for the bank said: "No."

The bank, whose share price fell nearly 40% yesterday, added in a statement: "We have been uniquely focussed on working with government and the other banks to bring stability to the system. Management changes have not been a feature of these discussions."

Sir Fred, who earned more than £4 million last year, welcomed the rescue package announcement.

Under its terms, NatWest owner RBS is one of eight banks and building societies able to obtain up to £25 billion of capital support. Banks must also cap executive pay and shareholder dividends as part of the plan.

Sir Fred, 50, said: "We welcome this comprehensive package of measures in response to unprecedented conditions in the financial system. The Government has increased support in a number of important areas."

"The proposals will enable us to strengthen our position and to support our customers across the economy."

Both his and Sir Tom's positions have been under scrutiny since the group was forced to raise £12 billion from investors earlier this year.

RBS has also written off nearly £6 billion from credit crunch-linked investments this year, making it one of the worst UK banks to be affected by the sub-prime loans crisis.

RBS, the UK's second biggest bank, declined to comment on how much extra capital it might need from the Government as part of the recapitalisation scheme.

The group announced its first loss in 40 years as it unveiled first-half figures in August, but assured investors that its fundraising efforts had sufficiently strengthened its finances.

The £691 million pre-tax deficit compared with £5 billion of profits the bank made during the same period last year.

A large chunk of the financial hit came from recently-acquired Dutch bank ABN, bought for nearly £50 billion as part of a consortium of banks led by RBS. Not only has ABN contributed to the bank's write-downs, but the cost of the deal knocked RBS's balance sheet.

The takeover was agreed at the height of the market just before the credit crunch struck, with the price now looking excessive given the share falls since in the banking sector.

One of its partners in the ABN takeover – Belgium bank Fortis – has since had to be part-nationalised and broken up, largely after it ran into trouble with costs associated with the deal.

RBS is also thought to be facing difficulties integrating its portion of ABN without having to make more big write-offs.

Meanwhile the bank is reportedly struggling to find buyers for its Churchill Insurance and Direct Line businesses, put up for sale in April.

Earlier this week the group's troubles were compounded further when credit ratings agency Standard & Poor's cut its rating on the firm amid fears over its future earnings and write-downs.

The move effectively means that RBS is now deemed a less safe institution to lend money to, which is set to make it even more difficult for the bank to secure funds at a time when interbank lending has all but frozen.

The full article contains 573 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Mike S,

08/10/2008 09:12:10
If they do go I hope they don't get golden parachutes and are paid off in RBS Shares
2

Fidelio,

Edinburgh 08/10/2008 09:19:31
There is only one reason that RBS is in this situation: GREED.

At least I won't have to suffer the blight of their adverts all over the land anymore and maybe they will take that big badge off the bridge at Gogarburn that makes me boke everytime I pass under it.

I also assume the profit sharing bonuses for RBS leeches will be considerably less this year than in previous years.

Shame - welcome to the real world chaps!

Sack the board.

3

,

08/10/2008 09:49:03
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

Plodjfriss, Hammer of the Numpties,

Edinburgh 08/10/2008 13:55:03
Reason?
5

Joe Smith.,

Moscow 08/10/2008 14:16:15

Yesterday's RBS denial turned out to be false.

I'd guess that Fred and Tom are going to be pushed from a very great height in the near future.
6

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 08/10/2008 17:07:07
The rumor is that Fred Goodwin and Tom McKilliop are are to be replaced by Stephen Hester, formerly of the Abbey, and Sir Philip Hampton, chairman of Sainsbury's.

After the fantastic job by Andy "ASDA" Hornby in destroying any remaining value in HBOS, Gordon Brown has decided that the banks are best run by grocers.

In fact plans are a foot to turn them all into subsidiarys of the Grocery Chains.

We will soon have:

The Royal Bank of Sainsbury's

The Halifax Bank of ASDA

Lloyds Morrisons

Barclays Safeway

You won't be able to withdraw your money, but you will be given club points instead that you can redeem for groceries.
7

harvey05,

driving the getaway car 08/10/2008 19:38:44
My instructions are very clear. Get Fred and his pal out the back door quickly. But don't mention the money!!!!!
8

Scotty dog,

09/10/2008 02:53:50
RBS denies boardroom reshuffle rumour

2 days before - RBS denies requesting capital support from government rumour



9

Pedro2007,

Edinburgh 09/10/2008 12:48:52
I agree that greed is at the root of all this but just as people who complain about our tabloid press need to remember that they only do it because it sells papers, they also need to remember that Banks didn't force people to take the money! People were crying out for more & more cash & didn't care how much debt they got themselves into. There is plenty of blame to go round - the Banks, the Govt and the public - and those pointing fingers might find some fingers pointing back at them.
10

Here Today HBOS Tomorrow,

10/10/2008 22:21:20
Pedro2007, I agree blame has to be shared but the largest chunk of it must pass to the banks. When you ask for a loan etc you apply, the term "application" being key, they are under no obligation to accept it. Much like if you apply for a job, no employer has to take you. I wish they did as I would have been much better paid by now! The banks I would say are 80% responsible for this mess, the remaining 20% is taken up by the Government and the public, the latter being responsible for the smaller part. The Government could have placed more reasonable limits on the money the banks could borrow on the markets, closed down the off-balance sheet vehicles concept (as used by NR) and perhaps have placed legal deposit limits for any loan or mortgage request. The latter may have proven hard but the first two were perfectly possible. NR for example had borrowed around 30-40 times their capital from the wholesale markets, this was their fault but also shows a shocking lack of control from central government. It's worth keeping in mind the last crash was also caused by excess credit, followed by high interest rates and a credit crunch. So you would think we would have learned, but too many bonuses and Porches seem to have distracted the Govt from their job.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Should banks be paying for staff Christmas parties as their customers suffer?
Yes, staff deserve to be rewarded for their year’s hard work
It’s okay making a contribution, but not £1 million
No, staff should have to pay for their own parties

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.