Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Wednesday, 3rd December 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Sir Fred's numbed … but still in a job



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 August 2008
WHAT does a bank chief have to do to lose his job? Yesterday Royal Bank of Scotland chief executive Sir Fred Goodwin unveiled a half yearly loss of £692 million – the largest loss suffered in its history.
It follows a £5.9 billion write-down against US subprime loans and related assets.

It follows the £71 billion RBS-led takeover of Dutch bank giant ABN Amro – at the wrong time and the wrong price.

It follows a dramatic slide in the bank's shares which collapsed by as much as 70 per cent this year compared with the level a year ago.

It follows a mammoth £12 billion rights issue – the biggest ever cash call on the shareholders of a UK company, sprung just two months after the market had been led to understand no capital raising was needed.

And it follows bumper pay and bonuses paid to the chief executive running into millions of pounds a year over this period.

So what is the magic alchemy that keeps Sir Fred in his job? And what has the chairman, Sir Tom McKillop, done to protect shareholder interests?

Asked yesterday on his reaction to unveiling the massive loss, Sir Fred said he had gone through "a range of emotions … I'm very disappointed. I'm numbed by it." He had talked earlier in the day of it being a "chastening experience".

As well he might munch a slice of this humble pie.

But there is, of course, another side to the drama at Gogarburn.

Yesterday's results were much better than feared. Bank analysts had been expecting losses ranging up to £1.7 billion. The actual result is less than half that.

Shares in Royal Bank closed 3.2 per cent up at 240.5p, continuing a rally that has lifted the shares 96p since the low of 144.2p hit on July 16.

Profits from UK retail and business banking are up, UK mortgage lending is up, personal lending is up and, strange but true, bad debt provisions against these actually fell 8 per cent in the first half. Its non-performing loans are growing at a lower rate than those at rival Barclays.

The fact is, the underlying business at RBS has held up remarkably well through the credit crunch – so far. And it is also squeezing £1.6 billion of integration benefits from the ABN Amro takeover, where savings are running at double the level estimated at this stage.

The strongest argument for keeping Sir Fred Goodwin in place is that he is a maestro at integration as the NatWest take-over showed – with big benefits and dividends for shareholders.

He has also, through the ABN acquisition, diversified the bank's business, both geographically and by activity. It is not just about making RBS "big and global". That he has certainly done. But by far the best antidote to future credit crunch disasters is diversification of earnings.

Of course, investors feel angry about the share performance. But almost all banks have suffered as the credit crunch spread into a global phenomenon. RBS has deleveraged, raised capital to improve its capital ratios and done everything to cauterise the subprime horrors.

And if a 3 per cent fall in underlying profits is the cause for a beheading, there is barely a chief executive in the FTSE 100 Index who would be safe today.

RBS is transformed from the bank he took command of a decade ago. Had he not grown the bank in the way he did, it would have fallen victim to a predator.

Institutional investors are reluctant to change the captain in the middle of a storm – and this is by far the worst storm in the financial sector in decades . The test is whether he is now steering the right course, and that looks to be the case. Its UK mortgage book is sounder than most – with an average loan to value of 66 per cent on new business and 49 per cent on the entire book. Other UK banks envy this.

Neither Sir Fred nor his chairman Sir Tom McKillop qualify for summary execution on these figures. They will be judged on their ability to handle the darkening storm ahead as the UK, the US and Europe goes into recession. If the first half was tough, wait till you see the second.

There is no quick-fix solution. Next year will also be a struggle . "The difficult conditions in financial markets", Sir Fred warned, "look set to be compounded by a deteriorating economic outlook, with consensus forecasts pointing to slowing growth in many countries." Note the absence of any statements about "turning the corner" and "over the worst".

"Chastened and determined" is the new mood. Few shareholders would wish it otherwise.

Bad news, good news and regrets

THE BAD NEWS


A £5.9 billion write-down against US subprime-related debt may not be the end of the problems, as US house prices continue to fall and defaults rise.

Basic earnings per share have slumped from 22.8p to a loss of 4.7p. Provision against exposure to monolines has been raised from £1.8 billion to £2.1 billion.

Charge for "impairments" (bad and doubtful debt provisions) has risen to £1.7bn (£871 million.).

Effective tax rate has risen from 24.9 to 43.8 per cent.

Second-half trading will be tougher as recession bites and arrears and defaults on business and personal loans rise sharply.

The expert analysts are forecasting: net profit before tax overall to fall from £7.1 billion to £3.9 billion.

THE GOOD NEWS

Group income overall down just 1 per cent at £16.8 billion and underlying profits only 3 per cent down at £5.1 billion.

Ahead of schedule in realising benefits from ABN Amro acquisition.

Capital position strengthened: Core Tier 1 ratio at 5.7 per cent and on course to top 6 per cent by year-end.

UK retail and business bank profits up 8 per cent.

UK mortgage lending up 9.4 per cent; personal lending up 7.2 per cent; credit card lending up 7 per cent; savings balances up 12 per cent.

UK mortgage portfolio has average loan to value ratio on new business of 66 per cent and LTV of 49 per cent. Impairments just 0.04 per cent of UK mortgage balances.

The search is on to find new non-executive directors to beef up the board.

SIR FRED GOODWIN'S STATEMENT:

"It has been a chastening experience and reporting a pre-tax loss of £691 million is something I and my colleagues regret very much.

"This loss is a consequence of previously signalled write-downs on credit market exposures amounting to £5.9 billion.

"In response to these new market conditions we moved decisively to strengthen our capital position materially.

"In so doing we are acutely aware that we drew heavily on our shareholders for financial support and we recognise that we must now deliver a level of performance that meets their expectations for the company and restores value to our shares.

"We are determined to do so, and this is our focus."

FACT BOX

THE RBS losses of £691 million represent only half-a-year's trading, but they nevertheless represent a significant point in the history of banking losses.

The biggest global banking loss was recorded by Société Générale of France which declared losses of about $7.2 billion (£3.7 billion) earlier this year after huge losses run up by a single rogue trader Jérôme Kerviel.

Barings Bank suffered from a similar problem in 1995 after the activities of trader Nick Leeson, based in the Far East, which led first to the loss of £827 million for the bank and then to the collapse of the bank itself.

The biggest annual loss by a British high street bank was the £715 million lost by Lloyds TSB in 1989 which came after huge losses in South American markets.

IN NUMBERS

£691 million
RBS pre-tax loss for the latest six months

£5.1 billion
The profits made by RBS during the same period last year

170,000
Total number of RBS employees worldwide

1727
Year Royal Bank of Scotland was founded

£6 billion
Amount written-off for bad debts in the past year

£4.2 million
Amount earned last year by Sir Fred Goodwin, RBS chief executive, including bonuses

15 million
Number of RBS British customers

50
Per cent drop in RBS share price over the past year

£48 billion
Amount paid by RBS for ABN Amro

£12 billion
Amount RBS had to raise in a share issue to boost finances

16,400
Number of RBS employees in Scotland

2,276
Number of UK RBS branches

6,800
Number of RBS free ATM machines in the UK

50
Number of countries where RBS operates

The full article contains 1483 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 August 2008 9:31 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Royal Bank of Scotland
 
1

Conan the Librarian™,

09/08/2008 00:37:27
6
He has very poor taste in ties.

http://tinyurl.com/6pb2wq
2

Conan the Librarian™,

09/08/2008 00:52:35
9
You been phished again?
3

Conan the Librarian™,

09/08/2008 01:06:40
12
What's the words I'm looking for here...

"Life", "get", "a" and "f u d".

Found them. Although technically "a" is a letter not a word.
4

Conan the Librarian™,

09/08/2008 01:15:55
15
Fair comment, my grammar is sitting in the corner drooling.

Like you, over photies of sphincters.
5

Conan the Librarian™,

09/08/2008 01:17:39
16
No. No idea what you are talking about.

17
Quickly.
6

Conan the Librarian™,

09/08/2008 01:24:53
You really are a breast, aren't you?
7

Conan the Librarian™,

09/08/2008 01:35:12
Abreast of the Scotsman, if not the Times.
8

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 09/08/2008 02:16:18

Another 'Fiasco' in the year MMVIII old Fred wont care a 'Hoot' why should he,?

Long time dead and all that!

Within a week, this will be history, people will get on with it although scarred and life will go on.

News it is! but no-need the fuss! no-one will care a 'hoot'! at end of the Day, least of all, Freddy Boy!
9

W Smith,

Middle East 09/08/2008 04:14:28
"What does a bank cheif have to do to lose his job?"

- says this Labour Party supporting newspaper.

The shame of it.

Our Fred is being lectured by Labour supporters on financial competance!

THIS IS NOT THE NATIONS FIRST CREDIT CRISIS IS IT BILL?

Forgotten the seventies already?

Here is a wee remninder:

1) James Callaghan was effectively running the entire nation on credit - that's money from the Imternational Monetary Fund.

2) The IMF told the the Chancellor Dennis Healy to get his house in order as GOVERNMENT SPENDING CONTINUED TO SPIRAL OUT OF CONTROL.

3) Labour were giving into the Trade Unions and giving public sector pay rises from money borrowed from the IMF!

4) Margaret Thatcher had to clear up the financial mess left by Dennis Healy and the rest is, as they say, history!

5) By 1997 the Tories were running the country on a surplus not a deficit. Gordon Brown has reversed this, even after the boom years, and it looks like the Tories will once again have to come in and clear up the mess.

By comparison, Fred Godwin is more financially competent than Gordon Brown and Dennis Healy.

BTW
Fred Godwin made RBS what it is today and sacking him is a wee bit like sacking Alex Ferguson - NOT EASY TO REPLACE.

Unless you have a replacement in mind Bill Jamieson I think you should be quiet.
10

MNS,

Scotland 09/08/2008 06:03:06
Financial Blood on your hands. Your actions led to the demise of a 50+ year old business. Your actions are NOT FORGOTTEN
11

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 09/08/2008 07:02:20
Sir Fred should resign or be sacked. Surely the buck stops with him?
12

Mallory,

Edinburgh 09/08/2008 08:02:50
RBS is always closer to small accounts
see: http://www.martinfrost.ws/htmlfiles/robs1.html
13

david team,

edinburgh 09/08/2008 08:03:51
surely all of the non executive directors should have resigned or been sacked
14

MacGillicuddy,

09/08/2008 08:16:43
The one person who will NOT lose out on this is Goodwin. I wonder what size his bonus will be this year for this "performance"? And of course his pension will be unaffected.
15

MacGillicuddy,

09/08/2008 08:51:29
RBS should rename itself "Edinburgh Rock".
Garishly packaged, sweetie-sweetie, and liable to crumble!
16

Pilrig.,

Livingston 09/08/2008 09:30:25
Did anyone seriously expect him to resign. What do we expect of men of power these days ? Morale fibre ? decency ?

To hell with usurers !

"Neither a borrower not a lender be"

W Shakespeare - "Hamlet"
17

Pilrig.,

Livingston 09/08/2008 09:31:30
67 - 'nor a lender be'

oops.
18

Bikefast,

Edinburgh 09/08/2008 09:36:33
I have to answer these comments about the very poor customer service and the non-replies to phone calls made to the Royal Bank. My experience is completely the opposite. At least one is able to phone one's own branch and speak to a real person who has a name. And "NO" I am NOT an employee of RBS.
19

Phil1,

Edinburgh 09/08/2008 09:48:09
69 Bikefast,Edinburgh 09/08/2008 09:36:33

But what about family membership of RBS - you forgot to mention that connection didn't you.

Poor customer service is racking up billions of £ in losses in US at the same time getting bonuses for a good job. Poor customer services is over paying for another company (as all the pundits said at the time) whilst claiming that time would show RBS had underpaid - and collecting more bonuses. Poor customer service is one week saying the bank has no capital problems so you can keep all the bonuses paid then next week asking for 12 billion and getting paid more for raising the money. Poor customer service is racking up the biggest losses in RBS banking history and still keeping your job and all those bonuses. Poor customer service is now arranging share bonuses to ensure when the market picks up in a year or two all the useless managers get well rewarded in extra shares for sitting on their fat bottoms.

At least people will stop claiming RBS is a shining example of how Scotland Business can be well run.It can now be used across the world in management and business studies courses to demonstrate the failures of capitalism and how the buck only stops with the Chairman and Chief Executive when success beckons. When failure arrives it is 'our' problem which 'we' must solve together.
20

pwd,

Borders 09/08/2008 11:07:16
It won't be long now before the great lie is exposed, that we can let industry go and financial services will lead us into the land of plenty.
21

Alberto.,

09/08/2008 11:47:29
#2.

"I'm a bank risk manager."


What Risk?

Is it the same as the 'Risk' Sir Fred has - which seems to be non-existent und RBS saleary policy where their 'clever boys' are concerned!

Nice 'fat whacking bonuses' for their 'efforts' when a profit looms - but, apparently, and with their great blessing 'Nae Bother if you don't!!!!!!' -or so it seems!

I wonder how many who were 'given' massive bonuses last year for 'their great success' will have the courage - dare I say 'decency', to hand it back - or is that just not done at their level of greatness???
22

JoeMcT,

BlairsFantasyIsland 09/08/2008 12:01:21
Fred's level of greed, stupidity and incompetence is beyond measure.

Fred the dead head.
23

Vaccav,

Edinburgh and Sydney 09/08/2008 13:15:20
I hope Fred stays in place. He has done a good job building up RBS over the years. The institutional shareholders are sophisticated investors who are satisfied with him. They are good judges of CEO's.

I wish the Scotsman could filter this site to prevent children posting to it. The nonsense posted above belongs in the playground.

24

Jacqueline Hyde ,

On the shelf 09/08/2008 13:26:30
Why do journalists continue to bang on about the US subprime market?

The UK banks have unique problems caused by their huge borrowings in the euro market when the euro was cheap against sterling and lending those funds in pounds. Now with the euro rising so much against sterling, they are paying 50-60% greater interest and principal than budgeted. Most UK businesses with a substantial euro commitment were able to see the dangers and keep inter-currency issues to a minimum. The banks' shareholders are paying the price of short-termist board-room greed. Unfortunately, unlike other badly run and grossly mismanaged companies, the banks don't just disappear - they use their position in the country's economy to foist their grief and their losses on to everyone else's shoulder.

For too long, bankers have scoffed at the criminal and civil laws of the country while successive governments have let them get away with it. Now they are finding that the basic laws of economics are not so forgiving.
25

Salem,

09/08/2008 13:27:12
# 2 Mr. Bank Risk Manager

As a bank risk manager you will know that many large banks and corporations etc choose not to use risk management techniques and take the hits as they arise. Such companies are usually well run organizations. They are solid financially and have adequate provisions for such events as fraud etc.

You also will know some companies have their own in house risk management systems, others contract the service out to organizations who specialize in risk management.

Risk management is a highly sophisticated subject utilizing complex software and is not yet in widespread use.

Please enlighten us on the risk management systems that are in place at RBS? Are they in house or external? Or has RBS been flying by the seat of their pants.

Either way what has happened at RBS is a monumental disaster characterized by incompetence and arrogance at the top.

Sir Fred is clearly a very bright fellow if somewhat too big for his boots. He has the appearance of a gambler and reckless risk taker driven by ambition and a lust for power.

Despite his brilliance, judgment is always an issue with such talented individuals, particularly in those of mixed heritage.

He said he has been numbed by the experience; the larger question is has he learned from the experience.

Firing Fred will not solve RBS’s problems. If he has a shred of honor he should work for no salary until the problem is fixed.

I say give him a second chance!
26

Salem,

09/08/2008 13:50:02
# 79 Jacqueline Hyde

You absolutely correct in your analysis.

It is perfectly natural to play the blame game especially when it is a question of survival.

High fliers like Fred are often blind to reality and the consequences of their actions. When faced with a disaster that was their making they immediately look for a scapegoat.

America is the current scapegoat of choice.
27

Paula,

09/08/2008 14:18:47
Incompetence - he's doing it right.

None of these top dogs ever fall on their sword. When was the last time any of them decided to do the honourable thing? I'll wait for you all to go check the history books.
28

Dr Mike,

Edinburgh 09/08/2008 17:54:57
"But for losing £5.9 billion, we would have made a profit of £5.1 billion." That's got to be the most banal financial report of all time. It's time The Stocks were re-introduced at these events.

Well, the next financial statement will report profits of at least £5 billion then, as the business is fundamentally sound and has no more skeletons in the cupboard.

Any takers on that hedge?
29

Dr Mike,

Edinburgh 09/08/2008 17:59:40
16,400 employees in Scotland, 153,600 elsewhere.
30

Derek Williams,

Edinburgh 10/08/2008 13:34:53
Privatising profits, ok, well let's hope we poor and humble taxpayers aren't yet again called upon to pay for nationalising losses - à la Northern Rock et al.

No bonuses whatsoever should be paid to any executive who presides over poor performance, a practice both counter-intuitive and scandalous. Indeed, bonuses so inappropriately disbursed at this time should be confiscated. It's no incentive to anyone to do their best if when doing his worst, the big chief still gets his candy bar. It's also a stinging slap in the face to the low paid and the unemployed who are continually asked to tighten their belts whilst the rich get richer, and richer, and richer.
31

The Spook in Leith,

10/08/2008 15:47:28
#82 bring them on

Still posting pis# is see, remember Rangers were kicked out of Europe before any RBS employer has got the boot, food for thought.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Should banks be paying for staff Christmas parties as their customers suffer?
Yes, staff deserve to be rewarded for their year’s hard work
It’s okay making a contribution, but not £1 million
No, staff should have to pay for their own parties

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.