Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Russia seeks to outlaw denial of Soviet Union's victory over Nazis

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 March 2009
FEARS that Russia is protecting and propagating a Soviet version of history have been heightened after a government minister warned that foreign leaders could be punished under a planned law that would make the denial of the Soviet Union's victory over Nazi Germany in the Second World War a crime.
Sergei Shoigu, the emergency situations minister and a member of Vladimir Putin's dominant United Russia party, this week called for a law that would make it a criminal offence to question the USSR's role in the defeat of Hitler's forces, in which ab
out 27 million civilians and soldiers died.

While he added that it would be based on the Holocaust denial laws seen in some western European countries, Mr Shoigu also issued a veiled threat to leaders in eastern and central Europe. Most of them regard the advance of Soviet forces into German- occupied Europe as a second occupation, and Estonia sparked outrage in Russia a few years ago when it relocated a statue of a Soviet soldier from the centre of the capital, Tallinn, an event not lost on Mr Shoigu.

"Our parliament should pass a law that would envisage liability for the denial of the Soviet victory in the Great Patriotic War (the Second World War]," the minister said.

"The presidents of several countries who deny this would not be able to come to our country and remain unpunished, and the mayors of several towns would think twice before they dismantle monuments to Soviet warriors."

Mr Shoigu's suggestion, which has popular support in the Russian parliament, has added to concerns that Russia is promoting a version of history that has changed little since it emerged from the Stalinist propaganda machine as a means of bolstering support for Mr Putin and his government.

Critics of Mr Putin, the former president and now prime minister, have often accused him of trying to return the country to autocracy, and fostering a culture that tends to glorify Russia's dictatorial past and castigate any deviation from the official line.

Earlier this month, acclaimed British historian Orlando Figes claimed political reasons lay behind his Russian publisher's decision to postpone the release of his book The Whispers, which examines the private lives of Soviet citizens in Stalinist Russia.

Although the publishers attribute their decision to the economic crisis, writing on his website Mr Figes, a professor of history at Birkbeck College, University of London, said: "The Kremlin has been actively campaigning for the rehabilitation of Stalin. Its aim is not to deny Stalin's crimes but to emphasise his achievements in building the 'glorious Soviet past'."

As further evidence of this, Mr Figes referred to a Russian history textbook covering 1945 to 2006. He said that one of its authors, Pavel Danilin, argued the aim of the book was to present Russian history as "not a depressing sequence of misfortunes and mistakes but one to instil pride in one's country".

A growing adherence to one particular line of historical thought could well breed further frustration in many of Russia's border states.

Poland, for one, has long been irritated with Russia's refusal to hand over, or even grant access to, all the documents concerning the massacre of more than 20,000 Polish officers and civilians by Soviet forces in the Katyn forest in 1940.

Continual Russian obstruction into Polish investigations has led many Poles to believe Moscow is seemingly unable to accept the fact that the Soviet Union committed war crimes and crimes against humanity.



Producers accused over Zhukov documentary

THE extent of resistance in Russia to any revisionist version of Second World War history can be gauged by the reaction to a recent documentary highlighting the failures of a campaign in 1942-43 by the famed Marshal Georgy Zhukov.

Aired last month on Russia's NTV channel, the producers showed re-enactments of the fighting and spoke to German survivors from the Rzhev Battles, a number of offensives launched against German forces near Moscow, which became known as known as the "Rzhev meat grinder", with Soviet losses estimated at between 500,000 and 1,000,000 men.

Instead of being praised for their research, the producers were branded part of the "Jewish conspiracy" by some sections of the media, while a former general accused the makers of smearing the "heroic deeds of the Soviet people".

Some Russian politicians have even advocated making it a crime to question Soviet military tactics in the conflict, in addition to the proposed measures.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 March 2009 12:49 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Russia
 
1

Renny,

07/03/2009 00:05:10
Attacking Russia was probably the turning point in the war. That was a big mistake. The Germans got seriously pinned down by the Russians and the terrible weather conditions that prevailed.
2

redcliffe62,

07/03/2009 00:53:49
most governments deny they have lost a battle or war even when they have. vietnam was not a loss according to amercicans, it was a strategic withdrawal. russia does not want people to realise they lost some battles as well, as ego matters in military circles.
3

,

07/03/2009 01:19:27
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

lulach mac gille coemgain,

07/03/2009 01:31:30
Enemy at the gates!
5

Giustino,

Estonia 07/03/2009 05:56:09
Poor Shoigu, nobody is denying the Soviets won the war. Unfortunately, in those countries where the Nazis were defeated by the Soviets, though, the Red Army is known more for raping and looting than heroics. That's just how it is.

Plus, those governments have a basis for not seeing Soviet arrival as liberation. Did the Polish government in exile return to Warsaw from London after the war? No. The Estonian government could hardly return: almost all of its members were executed by the NKVD after the country was occupied and annexed by the Soviets in 1940 -- at a time when Stalin and Hitler had a non-aggression pact.

The Poles and Estonians are just telling their stories, just like the Russians should, warts and all.
6

,

07/03/2009 06:32:23
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

drunken proffet,

Tassy 07/03/2009 08:35:04
I cannot think of anyone belonging to the generation that fought the war that would forget the tremendous effort by the Russian people and it's Allies to bring World War Two to a close. We can also remember the massacre of Polish Officers by Russia, and the dropping of two Atomic bombs on Japan. Maybe time to live in the twenty first century and discourage some folk from "strutting their stuff".
8

Newton_Invented_Gravity,

07/03/2009 08:45:28
The Second world war was a bogus war.
britain went to war to stop Poland being conquered by the NAZIs. Five years and 60 million dead later, Britain helped Stalin take over Poland.
9

From Russia with love,

07/03/2009 09:27:16
Giustino from Estonia says:
The Poles and Estonians are just telling their stories, just like the Russians should, warts and all.

I've never heard of Estonians telling the story of making their country Judenfrei (clean of Jews). A lot of your people, Giustino, sided with Nazis and your country was first to report itself as Judenfrei. Now in the 21th century Estonian authorities (with popular support) have removed the monument commemorating the soldiers that stopped those mad Übermenschen from making the whole Europe clean of jews and enslaving and murdering slavic nations.
Having said that, I want to add that some Estonians fought Nazis together with Soviet Army and the soldier who was a prototype for the monument was Estonian.
10

VAR,

Zavelstein 07/03/2009 12:04:17
The Soviet Union undoubtedly bore the brunt of the Fascist onslaught. They suffered the most casualties of any nation during the war, roughly half of all the 50-60 million dead were Soviet. Partially this was through Stalin's and his generals' incompetence or lack of military acumen. Stalin was indeed a monster who through his own policies killed approximately 50 million of his own people. Agree with Giustino, truth should be told, warts and all.
11

Giustino,

Estonia 07/03/2009 14:33:13
To Russia with Love,

Estonia was "judenfrei" even before the Wannsee Conference in 1942 because there were less than 1,000 Jews left in Estonia when the Nazis arrived in the summer of 1941. The pre-war population of Jews was less than 5,000. Most were either deported by the Soviets to Siberia in June 1941 or fled with the Soviet retreat in August 1941.

So, killing Estonia's remaining Jewish population took the Nazi German killing squads a limited amount of time. Local police battalions: made up of Estonians, Russians, Germans, and others, were ordered to take part in that crime. That is without a doubt.

Estonia was similar to Norway in this experience. Norway had ~2,000 Jews prior to the war. During the Nazi occupation almost all were murdered or deported with some local assistance. It's a terrible legacy, but I wouldn't say that the Norwegians are collectively guilty for it.

Look, there is no way to keep facts undercover forever. That's my main point. Laws like Shoigu's will inevitably fail because you can't suppress history. It's probably good for Russia to examine that past, especially because I have read the armed forces are in a similar state of neglect. Maybe they could learn something from it.
12

ebbi,

spain 07/03/2009 15:21:46
do these idiots really think that by outlawing something the public will just forget it??? why is it that the most intellectual and reasonable people totally lose it when they are elected to office ?????? why do we all have little hitlers inside us ????
13

Paul Schultz,

Bowmanville, Ontario, Canada 07/03/2009 15:57:01
What many people in the West often forget is that fully 80% of German fatalities in WWII occurred on the Eastern Front (vs. the Soviets). That figure is staggering, to say the least. It (of course) takes nothing away from the courage and sacrifice of the British, American, Canadian, and other servicemen and women who struggled to defeat the Nazis, but it reminds us of where it was that Hitler truly lost the War. Having said that, exploring the numerous, colossal military blunders made by Stalin and some of his commanders is a necessary part of the story and should not be discouraged. To conclude, the entire "debate" over whether or not the Soviet Union "won" the War is asinine. Do the Nazis still run Germany? Did the Red Army not put that flag atop the Reichstag in Berlin in 1945? Was there not a Communist country called East Germany that existed for nearly fifty years?

WWII buffs might want to check out my new novel, The Fuhrer Virus. It is a fictional WWWII spy/conspiracy/thriller for adolescent/adult readers that takes place (in part) on the Eastern Front in 1941. It can be found at www.eloquentbooks.com/TheFuhrerVirus.html, www.amazon.com, www.amazon.co.uk, and www.barnesandnoble.com.

Thanks!

Paul Schultz
14

Tom in Belmont,

Belmont 07/03/2009 16:52:12
What is it about free speech that terrifies so many Europeans? While I can marginally understand German laws against Holocaust denial as a tool to keep neo-nazi groups in line, it still give governments a fearsome power and set a bad precedent. Sweden (and Canada) protect homosexuality from criticism and now some Euro-Muslims want the Koran off-limits. The Russians are at least transparent: their law is about protecting the State's right to "guard" the nation's history. What's with the rest of you (save the British)?
15

,

07/03/2009 18:22:58
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

,

08/03/2009 15:17:51
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

Conan,

Moffat 09/03/2009 07:08:03
Poor Russians, they simply can't help themselves.
18

Dave Crassman,

17/07/2009 13:48:20
The Russians were almost solely responsible for the Germans losing the war after their attack on Russia.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.