Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Lucky escape for crew after space descent danger

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 23 April 2008
THE crew of the Soyuz space capsule that landed in Kazakhstan at the weekend after an unexpectedly severe descent was in serious danger.
The Russian news agency Interfax quoted an unnamed space official as saying that the capsule entered the atmosphere improperly, with the hatch first, instead of with its heat shields leading the way. As a result, the hatch suffered significant damage
.

The official also says the TMA-11 capsule's antenna burned up during the descent, and as a result the crew couldn't communicate properly with Russian mission control.

"The fact that the entire crew ended up whole and undamaged is a great success. Everything could have turned out much worse," the official was quoted by Interfax as saying. "You could say the situation was on a razor's edge."

Alexander Vorobyev, a spokesman for the Russian space agency, confirmed that the descent had problems, saying the Soyuz hatch and the antenna did suffer partial burn damage, but he said that was a common occurrence when the capsules re-enter the Earth's atmosphere.

Mr Vorobyev said investigators looking into Saturday's landing had classified it as a "3" on the five-point scale of seriousness, where "5" would be a critical level. Russian officials were still investigating what went wrong, he said.

The crew, which included South Korea's first astronaut, was returning from the international space station and endured severe gravitational forces because it took a steeper-than-usual re-entry, called a "ballistic trajectory".

The capsule carrying the South Korean bioengineer Yi So-yeon, a US astronaut, Peggy Whitson, and Russian flight engineer Yuri Malenchenko, ended up landing some 260 miles off-target and 20 minutes late.

On Monday, Ms Yi told a news conference at the Star City cosmonaut training centre outside Moscow that she was frightened by the descent.

"At first I was really scared because it looked really, really hot and I thought we could burn," she told reporters.

The incident was the second time in a row – and the third since 2003 – that a Soyuz landing had gone awry.

Despite the mishaps, the Russian space programme has long had a reputation for reliability.

The single-use Soyuz and Progress vehicles have long been the workhorses of the space station programme, regularly shuttling people and cargo to the orbiting outpost.

They assumed a greater importance following the grounding of the US space shuttle fleet in the wake of the Columbia disaster in 2003.





The full article contains 414 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 April 2008 9:35 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Space science
 
1

Scullion,

Canada 23/04/2008 01:35:41
I've said it before and I'll say it again, these people are the bravest of the brave.
2

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 23/04/2008 21:40:38
#1 Scullion: Technically, they're not. Space shuttle crew have approximately a 2% chance of dying, and the Soyuz TM crews considerably less. Compare that with WW1 Royal Flying Corps pilots (also volunteers), or many other servicemen, including those in Iraq and Afghanistan, and members of resistance forces such as those who resisted Nazi occupation in WW2. I also believe competitive aerobatic pilots have a significantly greater chance of death.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.