Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 6th September 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Vanishing zooplankton spells disaster for fishing



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

THE Scottish fishing industry could be facing disaster as a result of a dramatic collapse in zooplankton – the tiny organisms at the bottom of the marine food chain – according to a conservation charity.
Zooplankton numbers have plunged in recent years, according to researchers who put together Defra's marine programme plan for 2008 to 2009. They found the rate of decline in zooplankton levels in Scottish waters has accelerated, and the numbers have
dropped by three-quarters since 1960.

The charity Buglife said it could lead to a collapse in the marine food chain, as zooplankton are fed on by larger fish.

It believes climate change, leading to a warming of the oceans, is to blame.

Matt Shardlow, the director of Buglife, said the collapse in zooplankton was "a biodiversity disaster of enormous proportions".

Craig Macadam, the Scottish conservation officer with Buglife, said the decline is increasing, with a 50 per cent loss between 1960 and 1990 and then another 50 per cent loss in the next 16 years.

He said: "The implications for marine productivity and fisheries are mindboggling.

"The biomass of the seas is, or was, enormous, so this statistic must represent a very significant reduction in the number and weight of living organisms in the seas around Scotland.

"The implications for the Scottish fishing industry are deeply worrying.

"Big fish feed on little fish, so when there is a big decline in the bedrock of the marine food chain it spells trouble all down it."



The full article contains 253 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 July 2008 10:40 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

,

11/07/2008 05:16:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Unimpressed one,

11/07/2008 09:58:37
Strange that, who'd have thought something as obscure as 'climate change' would get the blame for this sort of problem. Notice like Jesus arising from the dead, the guy 'believes' climate change to be responsible. This is religion not science.
3

Nomada,

11/07/2008 10:19:05
#2 - Religious belief is based on no evidence (or frequently in defiance of evidence).

Scientific belief is based on evidence.

There is a mass of empirical evidence on the warming of the seas, and on the effects of temperature on plankton. You will not read the evidence in the Scotsman, but find a decent library, or do a bit of Googling, and you will have plenty reading for the rest of your unimpressed life.
4

Saoghal Beag,

11/07/2008 12:05:20
zooplankton are not at the bottom of the food chain.

there's the plankton they feed on and then there could be a few labour mps, below them, and possibly a few unionistas on which they feed.
5

Unimpressed one,

11/07/2008 12:44:16
#3 So warming is caused by humans? There's no evidence for this claim - none whatsoever. You really should try to grasp the principle of the scientific method. Then again as a denier of natural climate change, you might not be impressed.
6

Jay Kay,

11/07/2008 13:01:30
oh-oh, the reduction in this micro organism can have a massive effect on the fish stocks, their prime source of food.

Yikes.
7

Nomada,

11/07/2008 14:08:36
#5 - You are a lot more than simply unimpressed: un-all-sorts-of-other-things too, it seems.

The article and my comment make no reference to 'man-made climate change'.

As for the scientific method, I grasped that a long time ago, and could certainly teach you a thing or two about it.

I don't know where you get the idea that I am 'a denier of natural climate change'. You confuse me with someone else.

It does not matter what the origin of climate change is (though human activities are most certainly not helping) when the consequences for human societies (not just zooplankton) are so severe.

Unimpressed, uninformed, unscientific, unworthy of being taken seriously ...
8

Neil,

Glasgow 11/07/2008 14:34:38
I do not believe this.

A 75% reduction in any part of the food chain would not go unnoticed either on land or sea, as even a little thought should prove.

This reads very much like a press release from Buglife (a conservation organisation for those who "feel passionately about bugs" according to its website) which has not been checked against any more widely respected scientific source.
9

Nomada,

11/07/2008 14:51:00
Neil #8. Whatever Buglife put out in their press release, the research is from 'Defra's marine programme'. Buglife is commenting on the results.

You write: 'A 75% reduction in any part of the food chain would not go unnoticed either on land or sea, as even a little thought should prove'.

It has not gone unnoticed, not in the DEFRA study, nor in lots of other studies.
You can see the details at http://www.defra.gov.uk/marine/pdf/mpp08-09.pdf

You obviously come out of the same box as 'Unimpressed'.
10

Unimpressed one,

11/07/2008 16:26:19
#7, By the sounds of your rant you're probably as scientifically educated as the average Janet and John reader. If you can't hold the thread of a coherent post don't bother to comment in the first place.
11

Nomada,

11/07/2008 18:52:13
You are not just Unimpressed, #10, but that comment is also decidedly unimpressive, unright, unrelevant and verging on the unhinged.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.