Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


'Risk-averse' parents fail their children, warns head

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 July 2009
CHILDREN must be exposed to risk or they will grow into adults unable to cope with work or grown-up life, a leading headteacher has said.
Rod Grant, headmaster of Clifton Hall independent school in Edinburgh, says parents have become hugely "risk averse".

He said it was wrong to remove trees from playgrounds or diving boards from swimming pools in a misguided attempt to protect youn
gsters.

He said: "Today, we live in a world that is fearful. Parents have become hugely risk averse, so their children are exposed to a back garden – under supervision, of course – at best.

"My plea is that each of us is, in some way, responsible for modifying these deep-rooted fears that we all share.

"We should not place children at unnecessary risk but we must expose them to some risk.

"Otherwise, we risk their future health and safety and that is something none of us want."

He suggests youngsters should not be cocooned from danger, but allowed to explore the world.

Mr Grant said: "Childhood has never been risk-free. But if we succumb to our fears, our children may end up ill-equipped to live successfully in adulthood.

"Protecting children from the risks of trees, diving boards, escalators, uncomfortable social situations and incomplete homework assignments is almost certain to produce adults with deficits."

A culture of legal action, imported from the US, has seen a rise in unusual measures taken to protect youngsters. An Aberdeenshire primary created a special "snowball zone" last winter, so those wishing to avoid icy bombardment could avoid "danger". A Carlisle headteacher in 2004 insisted pupils wore safety goggles to play conkers, saying: "It's just being sensible. We live in a litigious society."

In the same year, Menstrie Primary in Clackmannanshire banned conkers after experts said the pastime threatened the lives of pupils who suffered severe reactions to nuts.

Abbeyfield Secondary School in Chippenham, Wiltshire, banned children playing with balls larger than a tennis ball on health and safety advice. Teachers feared the school was open to legal action from parents after a number of children suffered minor injuries caused by playtime games.

Other councils have threatened to remove roadside horse chestnut trees on the grounds that children might run into the path of traffic while collecting the chestnuts.

Suffolk County Council banned hanging baskets in case they fell on passers-by.

Mr Grant's comments were backed by child-development expert Sue Palmer who said youngsters risked becoming either bullies or bullied themselves, if not exposed to playground rough and tumble.

She said: "It's not just the workplace they won't be able to cope with as adults, it is social interaction. If they are not out there with the other kids, learning how to get along with people and make up after arguments, and take responsibility for their own actions, there's the likelihood that later on they will either become bullies or victims."

She said children needed their independence. She added: "Not only will that child grow up into an adult not able to cope. But there will be a social cost from creating people who simply don't have the resilience to bounce back from adversity."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 July 2009 9:49 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

danbob,

06/07/2009 00:12:09
Seems to me that it's teachers who ban things not parents. As for the parents who look for gold over every silly accident, simple. If they lose they pay all the costs.
2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 06/07/2009 00:28:43

Will throwing of our Children into the 'Lions-Den' be a good starting place to teach our Children the 'Risk-Factor'?

3

,

06/07/2009 02:18:53
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

Jock's Away,

Africa 06/07/2009 05:40:40
The head master is spot on. The consequences of the cotton wool society, has made its people less robust, less able to recover unscathed from lifes knocks. Less able to take responsibilty for their own lives. Scotland the brave rings hollow with the crys of litigation, holyrood nannying, and H&S job security ploys. It is not to late to do right by the children today.
5

Trams shams,

06/07/2009 08:27:12
Spot on #1... Any one who thinks they can get a quick buck for a papercut because they did not handle it correctly should be made to pay...
6

catgut,

pomona 06/07/2009 09:05:25
Wish there were more heads like this rather than the army of business managers and box tickers we have in school. You should not have published the guys name the HSE taliban will be all over his school to check on parent consent forms, figures for this and that, support cords for hanging baskets. If the taliban dont find anything the inspectors will be in next.
I want my kids to go on school trips, many teachers rightly dont want to be bothered with the three days of paper work involved to take pupils down the street.
In Orkney they want to risk assess your home to see if it is suitable for an exchange student!
I don’t think it’s the parents who are avoiding risk just the system we have allowed to develope.
7

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 06/07/2009 09:35:21
At last someone apart from me has realised that all this risk-averse nannying is actually having a negative, damaging effect.
8

Plodjfriss, Hammer of the Numpties,

Edinburgh 06/07/2009 09:53:01
How about letting them walk to school and elsewhere instead of being transported everywhere in motor cars?
9

Chris,

Edinburgh 06/07/2009 10:11:56
#3 Sorry Suzanne: Please expand. Your brief comment does not establish what your argument is.
10

Vlad Tepes,

Snagov 06/07/2009 11:03:32
He might be stating the obvious, but this Head is dead right. Play is about preparing for life; keep them in a sterile, cosseted environment without climbing, exploring & mischief and they grow up fearful of new experience and unprepared for life. Authorities have to meet parents half-way though- no point in throwing kids onto today's busy streets to play football..
11

drunken proffet,

Tassy 06/07/2009 11:16:59
It is an excellent idea, however before you carry it out I would suggest that someone in the government gets a good grip on on the legal profession's short and curlies, or whatever. Forty years ago, you were responsible for your own stupidity, now a days you can find someone else to take the responsibility, and pay through the nose for the privilege. The American way of life, is there any better?
12

plord,

edinburgh 06/07/2009 11:23:32
#6 I'm sure that there are in the private sector, which Clifton Hall is.
We have a slim to no chance of changing the mindset of educationalists that have been spoon fed tripe since the 1960's. Our kids are being brought up in a society that does not punish bad behavior in case the kids are damaged! Worse bad kids get more help and attention to the detriment of the good kids.
13

soapy1,

Rainworth 06/07/2009 11:30:15
Experience is the greatest teacher of all, A child at play learns many things, social skills, risk assessment, they expend energy keeping themselves healthy. these are all benefits, not only for the child but for society as a whole, by allowing a degree of experimentation you get healthy inquisitive well adjusted children who will grow into healthy inquisitive well adjusted adults.

All that is required from adults is a little supervision and advice for when things get heated, this is where they learn tolerence, courtesy ect and reinforces their social skills.

Most animals provide that, their offspring learn how to survive in their environment, through experience combined with play,the humble houshold cat demonstrates this and human beings are no different.
14

james 1st,

hamilton nz 06/07/2009 11:40:46
i nearly choked someone involved in teaching that has finally said something sensible , i didnt think it possible, maybe at last there is some hope
15

drunken proffet,

Tassy 06/07/2009 12:26:46
Well James 1st, I certainly agree with you. In the late seventies Mr James Callaghan decided that the government should dictate your child's education. In 2009 they eventually realised that it was the teachers that were more important than the politicians. OK it took them thirty years but they accepted that they were wrong and thats all it takes to join the 21st century.
16

Brodric,

06/07/2009 13:17:40
No 10 Vlad - ce mai faci, nu am auzit despre tine pentru ani de zile
17

Brodric,

06/07/2009 13:20:11
I agree with all the excellent comments about this Head being right.

What has happened in Britain that we want to wrap our children up in cotton wool and search for a risk-free environment for ourselves? Some of the best experiences I have had in my life have not been the most positive ones at the outset. We can't expect a society to provide absolute safety.
18

Possil,

Glasgow 06/07/2009 13:25:48
catgut,pomona 06/07/2009 09:05:25

the HSE taliban will be all over his school to check on parent consent forms.

Just for your info catgut, the HSE are constantly having to explode these myths as you'll see should you visit their website. The crazy action by teachers and councils are from people who cannot apply common sense. Just a thought, if a council finds hanging baskets a drain on their resources, who better to blame for not putting them up than .....You've guessed it, the HSE!
19

El Franko,

06/07/2009 15:41:31
Some have already grown up and joined the HSE. I discount their apologies. They were first set up to protect companies from an imagined flood of claims, but they have contributed to the creation of laws and mindsets which will continue to damage us all. Shut them down is my suggestion.
20

Calum Crubag,

06/07/2009 22:21:11
The man talks sense. Children are far too molly-coddled - in schools its usually because of councils and headteachers reacting to scare headlines in newspapers.
21

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 06/07/2009 23:29:58
I really feel sorry for kids these days .... if you just went back in time about 50 years kids were much happier, more balanced, less prone to carry weapons about. But there were bumps and scrapes and the occasional broken bone, there was the belt or cane, there was boxing in schools and kids knew exactly where they stood.

Now there is no discipline at school (at least none that is anything approaching worthwhile), there is hardly any 'contact' sports to get pent up teenage aggression out in a controlled fashion. Over the last 20 years in particular the kids are basically in charge of their schools and they know it ... it is a little bit like putting the lunatics in-charge of the asylum then wondering why the system is broken !

Kids NEED to get rid of aggression, they need a cuff round the lug when they misbehave and most importantly of all they need strong individuals to look up to not weak do-gooders who mollycoddle them.
22

Calum Crubag,

07/07/2009 09:29:04
#21^- do you have any evidence for the lack of discipline in school? How do you know that current methods of behaviour control do not work with most kids? I was at school 30 years ago when we got belted regularly and i cant see any decline in behavioural standards, unless of course you have the stats to prove me wrong.
23

criochan,

Lochailort 13/07/2009 17:59:55
At last a really sensible comment from the University of the Bleedin' Obvious !

Make the man the Education Minister, the Social Services Minister, the Home Secretary ...

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.